基于多径模型的建筑区SAR三维成像中非视距目标重定位方法

林雨青; 仇晓兰; 彭凌霄; 李杭; 丁赤飚

doi:10.12000/JR24057

基于多径模型的建筑区SAR三维成像中非视距目标重定位方法

doi: 10.12000/JR24057

林雨青^{1, 2, 3},
仇晓兰^{1, 2, 4, 5, ,},
彭凌霄^{4, 5},
李杭^{4, 5},
丁赤飚^{1, 2}

1.
中国科学院空天信息创新研究院北京 100190
2.
微波成像全国重点实验室北京 100190
3.
中国科学院大学电子电气与通信工程学院北京 100094
4.
苏州空天信息研究院苏州 215123
5.
苏州市微波成像处理与应用技术重点实验室苏州 215123

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重大项目(61991421, 61991424, 61991420)

详细信息

作者简介:
林雨青，博士生，主要研究方向为SAR三维成像处理、多径利用雷达等

仇晓兰，研究员，博士生导师，主要研究方向为SAR成像处理、SAR图像理解

彭凌霄，助理研究员，主要研究方向为SAR图像信息处理和应用、SAR仿真技术

李　杭，副研究员，主要研究方向为阵列干涉SAR成像处理

丁赤飚，研究员，博士生导师，中国科学院院士，主要研究方向为合成孔径雷达、遥感信息处理和应用系统等

通讯作者:
仇晓兰 qiuxl@aircas.ac.cn

责任主编：罗迎 Corresponding Editor: LUO Ying
中图分类号: TN957.52
计量
- 文章访问数: 145
- HTML全文浏览量: 48
- PDF下载量: 30
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-01
- 修回日期: 2024-05-06
- 网络出版日期: 2024-06-12

Non-Line-of-Sight Target Relocation by Multipath Model in SAR 3D Urban Area Imaging

LIN Yuqing^{1, 2, 3},
QIU Xiaolan^{1, 2, 4, 5
, ,},
PENG Lingxiao^{4, 5},
LI Hang^{4, 5},
DING Chibiao^{1, 2}

1.
Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2.
China National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3.
School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
4.
Suzhou Aerospace Information Research Institute, Suzhou 215123, China
5.
Suzhou Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging, Processing and Application Technology, Suzhou 215123, China

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61991421, 61991424, 61991420)

More Information

Corresponding author: QIU Xiaolan, qiuxl@aircas.ac.cn

摘要

摘要: 随着合成孔径雷达(SAR)系统小型化技术、SAR三维成像技术的发展，当前已可利用无人机载小型化阵列干涉SAR实现城区三维成像，在城市测绘、复杂环境重建等领域具有重要应用前景。然而，SAR进行城市场景三维成像时，回波中存在多径信号，会导致成像结果解译困难，却也给非视距区域隐蔽目标的发现提供了重要手段。为此，该文针对低空无人机载阵列干涉SAR建筑区三维成像中的非视距目标进行了研究，建立了非视距目标在低空阵列干涉三维成像下的多径模型，给出了城市峡谷区域利用多径扩大可视范围的计算方法，并基于建筑平面拟合提出了非视距目标重定位方法。无人机载阵列干涉SAR的仿真和实际数据处理验证表明，所提出的方法可以对城市峡谷非视距目标进行有效的三维成像和重定位，重定位误差小于0.5 m，实现了对非视距区域信息的获取。
- 阵列干涉SAR /
- 三维成像 /
- 非视距 /
- 多径 /
- 无人机载SAR
Abstract: The advancement in the miniaturization technology of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) systems and SAR three-dimensional (3D) imaging has enabled the 3D imaging of urban areas through Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne array Interferometric SAR (array-InSAR), offering significant utility in urban cartography, complex environment reconstruction, and related domains. Despite the challenges posed by multipath signals in urban scene imaging, these signals serve as a crucial asset for imaging hidden targets in Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) areas. Hence, this paper studies NLOS targets in UAV-borne array-InSAR 3D imaging at low altitudes and establishes a multipath model for 3D imaging at low altitudes. Then, a calculation method is proposed for obtaining the multipath reachable range in urban canyon areas based on building plane fitting. Finally, a relocation method for NLOS targets is presented. The simulation and real data experiments of UAV-borne array InSAR show that the proposed method can effectively obtain 3D images and relocate NLOS targets in urban canyon areas, with errors typically below 0.5 m, which realizes the acquisition of hidden NLOS region information.
- Array-InSAR /
- 3D imaging /
- Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) /
- Multipath /
- UAV-borne SAR

HTML全文

图 1 城市场景下非视距场景示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the NLOS scene in an urban scenario

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 阵列干涉SAR三维成像非视距目标重定位流程框图

Figure 2. Flowchart of NLOS target relocation in array-InSAR 3D imaging

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 城市场景阵列干涉SAR成像模型

Figure 3. Array-InSAR imaging model for urban scene

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 城市场景下非视距范围示意图

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the NLOS range in urban scenarios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 非视距多径可达区域计算流程图

Figure 5. Flowchart for calculating the NLOS multipath reachable area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 仿真及实际实验参数示意图

Figure 6. Schematic of simulation and real data experiment parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 建筑物仿真实验三维点云

Figure 7. 3D point cloud of the urban canyon in simulation experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 单NLOS目标仿真实验三维点云对比图

Figure 8. Comparison of 3D point cloud for single NLOS target simulation experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 多NLOS目标仿真实验三维点云对比图

Figure 9. Comparison of 3D point cloud for multiple NLOS target simulation experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 MV3DSAR系统和实验场景说明

Figure 10. Illustration of the MV3DSAR system and experimental scenarios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 天津临港商务大楼SAR成像结果

Figure 11. SAR imaging results of Lingang Business Building

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 天津实验SAR三维成像点云对比

Figure 12. Comparison of the SAR 3D imaging point clouds in Tianjin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 天津实验SAR三维成像点云俯视图对比

Figure 13. Comparison of the top view of the SAR 3D imaging point clouds in Tianjin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 苏州东西飞角反放置图以及实验现场图

Figure 14. Placement of multipath reflectors and experimental scene of the east-west flight in Suzhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 苏州实验图和二维结果对应图

Figure 15. Optical image of Suzhou experiment and the corresponding 2D results

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 苏州园区东西飞行多径示意图

Figure 16. Multipath diagram of east-west flight in Suzhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 苏州东西飞行SAR三维成像结果

Figure 17. SAR 3D imaging results of east-west flights in Suzhou

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 MV3DSAR实验参数(Ku波段)

Table 1. Parameters of the MV3DSAR experiment (Ku-band)

参数	指标
中心频率	15.2 GHz
信号形式	调频连续波(FMCW)
极化方式	全极化
信号带宽	1200 MHz
天线尺寸(单通道)	0.05 m(俯仰)×0.32 m(方位)
分辨率	优于0.2 m×0.2 m
中心视角	45°

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 平面拟合和成像位置误差分析

Table 2. Plane fitting and imaging position error analysis

分析对象	ME (m)	RMSE (m)
楼面拟合	5.87e–13	0.6982
峡谷长度拟合	0.3328	/
非视距角反1	0.43	0.4201
非视距角反2	0.41	0.4201

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(29)

[1]	丁赤飚, 仇晓兰, 徐丰, 等. 合成孔径雷达三维成像——从层析、阵列到微波视觉[J]. 雷达学报, 2019, 8(6): 693–709. doi: 10.12000/JR19090. DING Chibiao, QIU Xiaolan, XU Feng, et al. Synthetic aperture radar three-dimensional imaging—from TomoSAR and array InSAR to microwave vision[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(6): 693–709. doi: 10.12000/JR19090.
[2]	仇晓兰, 焦泽坤, 杨振礼, 等. 微波视觉三维SAR关键技术及实验系统初步进展[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(1): 1–19. doi: 10.12000/JR22027. QIU Xiaolan, JIAO Zekun, YANG Zhenli, et al. Key technology and preliminary progress of microwave vision 3D SAR experimental system[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(1): 1–19. doi: 10.12000/JR22027.
[3]	孔令讲, 郭世盛, 陈家辉, 等. 多径利用雷达目标探测技术综述与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2024, 13(1): 23–45. doi: 10.12000/JR23134. KONG Lingjiang, GUO Shisheng, CHEN Jiahui, et al. Overview and prospects of multipath exploitation radar target detection technology[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(1): 23–45. doi: 10.12000/JR23134.
[4]	LI Zhixing, JIANG Fan, WYMEERSCH H, et al. An iterative 5G positioning and synchronization algorithm in NLOS environments with multi-bounce paths[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2023, 12(5): 804–808. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2023.3244575.
[5]	PRICE R and GREEN P. A communication technique for multipath channels[J]. Proceedings of the IRE, 1958, 46(3): 555–570. doi: 10.1109/JRPROC.1958.286870.
[6]	SILVA C F, FERLIN S, ALAY O, et al. IoT traffic offloading with multiPath TCP[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2021, 59(4): 51–57. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.2000915.
[7]	SAYEED A M and SIVANADYAN T. Wireless Communication and Sensing in Multipath Environments Using Multiantenna Transceivers[M]. HAYKIN S and LIU K J R. Handbook on Array Processing and Sensor Networks. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. doi: 10.1002/9780470487068.ch5.
[8]	SCHEINER N, KRAUS F, WEI Fangyin, et al. Seeing around street corners: Non-line-of-sight detection and tracking in-the-wild using doppler radar[C]. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA, 2020: 2065–2074. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00214.
[9]	SOUBIELLE J, FIJALKOW I, DUVAUT P, et al. GPS positioning in a multipath environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2002, 50(1): 141–150. doi: 10.1109/78.972490.
[10]	HAN Ke, TANG Canyang, and DENG Zhongliang. A new method for multipath filtering in GPS static high-precision positioning[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(12): 2704. doi: 10.3390/s19122704.
[11]	ZHANG Yueting, DING Chibiao, CHEN Hongzhen, et al. Special phenomena of the shadow region in the high resolution synthetic aperture radar image due to synthetic aperture[J]. Journal of Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 2012, 33(10): 1052–1070. doi: 10.1007/s10762-012-9924-8.
[12]	AUER S, HINZ S, and BAMLER R. Ray-tracing simulation techniques for understanding high-resolution SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(3): 1445–1456. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2029339.
[13]	SETLUR P, NEGISHI T, DEVROYE N, et al. Multipath exploitation in Non-LOS urban synthetic aperture radar[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2014, 8(1): 137–152. doi: 10.1109/jstsp.2013.2287185.
[14]	CHEN Jiahui, GUO Shisheng, CUI Guolong, et al. Building layout reconstruction with transmissive and reflective signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5116612. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3199270.
[15]	CHEN Jiahui, ZHANG Yang, GUO Shisheng, et al. Joint estimation of NLOS building layout and targets via sparsity-driven approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5114513. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3182429.
[16]	LI Nian, CHEN Jiahui, GUO Shisheng, et al. Building layout tomographic imaging with improved delay estimation algorithm[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2023, 22(5): 1079–1083. doi: 10.1109/lawp.2022.3232769.
[17]	ZHANG Fubo, LIANG Xingdong, CHENG Ruichang, et al. Building corner reflection in MIMO SAR tomography and compressive sensing-based corner reflection suppression[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(3): 446–450. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2019.2926301.
[18]	LINNEHAN R and SCHINDLER J. Multistatic scattering from moving targets in multipath environments[C]. 2009 IEEE Radar Conference, Pasadena, USA, 2009: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2009.4977062.
[19]	LINNEHAN R, DEMING R and SCHINDLER J. Multipath analysis of dismount radar responses[C]. 2011 IEEE RadarCon, Kansas City, USA, 2011: 474–479. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2011.5960583.
[20]	NOUVEL J F, VAIZAN B, DU PLESSIS O R, et al. Ka band measurements over urban area, a study of NLOS back-scattering[C]. 2012 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany, 2012: 3615–3618. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2012.6350634.
[21]	NOUVEL J F, DUPUIS X, and LESTURGIE M. Non line of sight signal analysis: Investigation of interferometry modes over urban area[C]. 2016 CIE International Conference on Radar, Guangzhou, China, 2016: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2016.8059175.
[22]	COLIN-KOENIGUER E, SAR N, THIRION-LEFEVRE L, et al. Preliminary studies on the detection of a NLOS Target in a 2D urban canyon using PolInSAR data[C]. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Science and Applications of SAR Polarimetry and Polarimetric Interferometry, Frascati, Italy, 2011.
[23]	MOKADEM A, THIRION-LEFEVRE L, COLIN-KOENIGUER E, et al. Determination ofmechanisms that can occur in NLOS urban canyon[C]. The 9th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Nuremberg, Germany, 2012: 99–102.
[24]	YAN Qiancheng, JIAO Zekun, QIU Xiaolan, et al. Comparison between different TomoSAR imaging models for airborne platform flying at low altitude[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(21): 5452. doi: 10.3390/rs14215452.
[25]	ZHU Xiaoxiang. Spectral estimation for synthetic aperture radar tomography[D]. [Master dissertation], Technische Universität München, 2008.
[26]	LI Hao, YIN Jie, JIN Shuang, et al. Synthetic aperture radar tomography in urban area based on compressive MUSIC[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 2005: 012055. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2005/1/012055.
[27]	ZHU Xiaoxiang and BAMLER R. Tomographic SAR inversion by L₁ -norm regularization—the compressive sensing approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(10): 3839–3846. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2048117.
[28]	ZHU Xiaoxiang and BAMLER R. Very high resolution spaceborne SAR tomography in urban environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(12): 4296–4308. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2010.2050487.
[29]	TORR P H S and ZISSERMAN A. MLESAC: A new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry[J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2000, 78(1): 138–156. doi: 10.1006/cviu.1999.0832.