作者中心
专家审稿
责编办公
编辑办公
Credible Inference of Near-field Sparse Array Synthesis for Three-dimensional Millimeter-wave Imagery
-
摘要: 考虑到主动式电扫描毫米波成像系统在实际应用中成像场景要求大，分辨率要求高，但毫米波的波长短，继而造成满足奈奎斯特采样定理的均匀阵列规模及馈电网络复杂度过高，面临着成像精度、成像速度和系统成本之间的矛盾。针对以上问题，该文提出了可信推断近场稀疏综合阵列算法(CBI-SAS)，在全贝叶斯学习框架下，该算法基于贝叶斯推断对复激励权值进行稀疏优化，得到复激励权值的完全统计后验概率密度函数，从而利用其高阶统计信息得到复激励权值的最优值及其置信区间和置信度。在贝叶斯推断中，为了实现较少数量的阵元合成期望波束方向图，可通过对复值激励权值引入重尾的拉普拉斯稀疏先验。然而，由于先验概率模型与参考方向图数据模型非共轭，因此需对先验模型进行分层贝叶斯建模，从而保证得到的复激励权值完全后验分布具有闭合解析解。为了避免求解完全后验分布的高维积分，采用变分贝叶斯期望最大化方法计算复激励权值后验概率密度函数，实现复激励权值的可信推断。仿真模拟实验结果显示，相较于传统稀疏阵列合成方法，所提方法阵元稀疏度更低、归一化均方误差更小、匹配方向图精度更好。此外，基于设计的稀疏阵列采集近场一维电扫和二维平面全电扫实测回波数据后，利用改进三维时域算法进行三维重建，验证了所提CBI-SAS算法在保证成像结果的同时降低了系统复杂性的优势。Abstract: Due to the short wavelength of millimeter-wave, active electrical scanning millimeter-wave imaging system requires large imaging scenarios and high resolutions in practical applications. These requirements lead to a large uniform array size and high complexity of the feed network that satisfies the Nyquist sampling theorem. Accordingly, the system faces contradictions among imaging accuracy, imaging speed, and system cost. To this end, a novel, Credible Bayesian Inference of near-field Sparse Array Synthesis (CBI-SAS) algorithm is proposed under the framework of sparse Bayesian learning. The algorithm optimizes the complex-valued excitation weights based on Bayesian inference in a sparse manner. Therefore, it obtains the full statistical posterior Probability Density Function (PDF) of these weights. This enables the algorithm to utilize higher-order statistical information to obtain the optimal values, confidence intervals, and confidence levels of the excitation weights. In Bayesian inference, to achieve a small number of array elements to synthesize the desired beam orientation pattern, a heavy-tailed Laplace sparse prior is introduced to the excitation weights. However, considering that the prior probability model is not conjugated with the reference pattern data probability, the prior model is encoded in a hierarchical Bayesian manner so that the full posterior distribution can be represented in closed-form solutions. To avoid the high-dimensional integral in the full posterior distribution, a variational Bayesian expectation maximization method is employed to calculate the posterior PDF of the excitation weights, enabling reliable Bayesian inference. Simulation results show that compared with conventional sparse array synthesis algorithms, the proposed algorithm achieves lower element sparsity, a smaller normalized mean square error, and higher accuracy for matching the desired directional pattern. In addition, based on the measured raw data from near-field 1D electrical scanning and 2D plane electrical scanning, an improved 3D time domain algorithm is applied for 3D image reconstruction. Results verify that the proposed CBI-SAS algorithm can guarantee imaging results and reduce the complexity of the system.
-
图 1 毫米波圆周扫描成像系统几何模型
Figure 1. Geometric model of millimeter-wave electric scanning circumferential 3D imaging system
图 2 任意方位下近场线阵聚焦模型
Figure 2. Focusing model of near-field linear array in Cartesian coordinate system with arbitrary orientation
图 5 第1阶段的第u个子孔径的局部极坐标网格
Figure 5. The first stage of the u subaperture of the local polar grid
图 7 不同算法下的近场天线方向图
Figure 7. The direction pattern of near-field antenna and the position and amplitude of near-field array under different algorithms
图 8 不同算法下的近场阵元位置及其幅度
Figure 8. The position and amplitude of near-field array under different algorithms
图 9 不同聚集线位置下不同算法匹配参考方向图的均方误差对比图
Figure 9. Different algorithms match the mean square error comparison graph of reference direction graph under different aggregation line positions
图 10 近场阵元位置及幅度的置信区间
Figure 10. Confidence interval for the position and amplitude of near-field elements
图 11 相同稀疏度下不同方法设计的圆周线性稀疏阵列获得的成像结果对比
Figure 11. Comparison of imaging results obtained by circular linear sparse arrays designed by different methods under the same sparsity
图 12 相同稀疏度下不同方法设计的全电扫平面稀疏阵列获得的成像结果对比
Figure 12. Comparison of imaging reaults obtained by full scanned planar sparse arrays designed by different methods under the same sparsity
图 13 方位15°时不同方法设计的圆周线性稀疏阵列侧面成像结果对比
Figure 13. Comparison of side imaging results of circular linear sparse array designed by different methods at 15° orientation
图 15 不同稀疏阵列综合算法成像结果边缘点的剖面图
Figure 15. Profile of edge points of imaging results of different sparse array synthesis algorithms
表 1 不同稀疏阵列合成算法下的性能对比
Table 1. Performance comparison of different sparse array synthesis algorithms
方法 峰值旁瓣电平(dB) 阵元个数 稀疏度(%) 均方误差 本文所提方法 –15.81 273 71.28 1.89×10–4 ℓ1范数 –15.76 339 88.51 3.50×10–3 FOCUSS法 –15.68 321 83.81 3.08×10–4 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 毫米波电扫描圆周成像系统相关参数
Table 2. Parameters of milli-meter wave electrical scanning circumferential imaging system
参数 数值 系统工作带宽 6.5 GHz 工作频率 27 GHz 目标距离 0.4～0.8 m 方位/俯仰角 55°/55° 采样点数 64 阵元间距 0.0052 m旋转次数 314 单次旋转角度 0.2867 °旋转半径 0.628 m
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同稀疏阵列综合方法成像结果边缘点的剖面图定量分析
Table 3. Quantitative analysis of profile of edge points of imaging results by different sparse array synthesis methods
边缘点的成像结果 高度向峰值旁瓣比(dB) 3 dB宽度时高度
向分辨率(mm)方位向峰值旁瓣比(dB) 3 dB宽度时方位
向分辨率(mm)均匀阵列成像 –24.69 7.76 –8.01 4.2 本文所提算法稀疏阵列成像 –22.15 7.76 –8.01 4.2 基于FOCUSS算法稀疏阵列成像 –20.18 7.79 –8.01 4.2 基于凸优化CVX求解的ℓ1范数稀疏阵列成像 –17.98 7.82 –8.01 4.2
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 马宇欣, 海宇, 李中余, 等. 稀疏轨迹毫米波雷达三维高分辨成像算法[J]. 雷达学报, 2023, 12(5): 1000–1013. doi: 10.12000/JR23001.MA Yuxin, HAI Yu, LI Zhongyu, et al. 3D high-resolution imaging algorithm with sparse trajectory for millimeter-wave radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(5): 1000–1013. doi: 10.12000/JR23001. [2] MA Zhaohui, WANG Jingyang, JING Handan, et al. Millimeter wave security imaging based on single-channel MIMO radar[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2020, 39(6): 709–717. doi: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2020.06.008. [3] 刘可, 朱泽政, 于军, 等. 基于互质阵列孔洞分析的稀疏阵列设计方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(1): 372–379. doi: 10.11999/JEIT201024.LIU Ke, ZHU Zezheng, YU Jun, et al. Sparse array design methods based on hole analysis of the coprime array[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(1): 372–379. doi: 10.11999/JEIT201024. [4] KARIMKASHI S and KISHK A A. Focused microstrip array antenna using a Dolph-Chebyshev near-field design[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2009, 57(12): 3813–3820. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2009.2033435. [5] 赵磊, 黄昆, 郝鑫, 等. 近场雷达成像非均匀稀疏阵设计[J]. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报, 2017, 15(5): 707–710. doi: 10.11805/TKYDA201705.0707.ZHAO Lei, HUANG Kun, HAO Xin, et al. Non-uniform sparse array design in near field radar imaging[J]. Journal of Terahertz Science and Electronic Information Technology, 2017, 15(5): 707–710. doi: 10.11805/TKYDA201705.0707. [6] ZHAO Dongdong, LIU Xuesong, CHEN Wenyuan, et al. Optimized design for sparse cross arrays in both near-field and far-field[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2019, 44(3): 783–795. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2018.2837458. [7] LEMAITRE-AUGER P, ABIELMONA S, and CALOZ C. Generation of Bessel beams by two-dimensional antenna arrays using sub-sampled distributions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2013, 61(4): 1838–1849. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2232263. [8] LI Pengfa, QU Shiwei, YANG Shiwen, et al. Focused array antenna based on subarrays[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2017, 16: 888–891. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2016.2613887. [9] RUDOLPH D L and BAROTT W C. Reduction of near-field grating lobes in sparse linear phased arrays[C]. 2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Memphis, USA, 2014: 1155–1156. doi: 10.1109/APS.2014.6904904. [10] OLIVERI G and MASSA A. Bayesian compressive sampling for pattern synthesis with maximally sparse non-uniform linear arrays[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2011, 59(2): 467–481. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2010.2096400. [11] OLIVERI G, CARLIN M, and MASSA A. Complex-weight sparse linear array synthesis by Bayesian compressive sampling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2012, 60(5): 2309–2326. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2012.2189742. [12] 杨磊, 陈英杰, 王腾腾, 等. 旅客人身时频调和型毫米波三维重建[J]. 红外与毫米波学报, 2023, 42(3): 327–338. doi: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2023.03.006.YANG Lei, CHEN Yingjie, WANG Tengteng, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm for passengers based on time-frequency coordination[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2023, 42(3): 327–338. doi: 10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2023.03.006. [13] 陈秀琴, 李跃华, 孔令雄. 毫米波近场成像及图像增强算法研究[J]. 微波学报, 2023, 39(S1): 324–327.CHEN Xiuqin, LI Yuehua, and KONG Lingxiong. Research on millimeter wave near field imaging and image enhancement algorithms[J]. Journal of Microwaves, 2023, 39(S1): 324–327. [14] 谢朋飞, 张磊, 吴振华. 融合ω-K和BP算法的圆柱扫描毫米波三维成像算法[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7(3): 387–394. doi: 10.12000/JR17112.XIE Pengfei, ZHANG Lei, and WU Zhenhua. A three-dimensional imaging algorithm fusion with ω-K and BP algorithm for millimeter-wave cylindrical scanning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(3): 387–394. doi: 10.12000/JR17112. [15] LIN Zhenwei, CHEN Yaowu, LIU Xuesong, et al. Optimized design for sparse arrays in 3-D imaging sonar systems based on perturbed Bayesian compressive sensing[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(10): 5554–5565. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2971568. [16] 宋嘉奇, 陶海红. 一种稀布阵列天线的近场波束综合算法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 45(6): 14–18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2018.06.003.SONG Jiaqi and TAO Haihong. Near-field beam synthesis algorithm for sparse array antennas[J]. Journal of Xidian University: Natural Science, 2018, 45(6): 14–18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2018.06.003. [17] HUANG Zixuan and CHENG Yujian. Near-field pattern synthesis for sparse focusing antenna arrays based on Bayesian compressive sensing and convex optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2018, 66(10): 5249–5257. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2018.2860044. [18] KIM S, DONG H J, YU J W, et al. Phased array calibration system with high accuracy and low complexity[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 69: 759–770. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.02.026. [19] 祁峥东, 卢阳沂, 孔玥, 等. 基于多凸优化的稀疏线性阵列综合方法[J]. 雷达与对抗, 2019, 39(4): 21–24, 49. doi: 10.19341/j.cnki.issn.1009-0401.2019.04.006.QI Zhengdong, LU Yangyi, KONG Yue, et al. Synthesis of sparse linear arrays based on multi-convex optimization[J]. Radar & ECM, 2019, 39(4): 21–24, 49. doi: 10.19341/j.cnki.issn.1009-0401.2019.04.006. [20] BABACAN S D, MOLINA R, and KATSAGGELOS A K. Bayesian compressive sensing using Laplace priors[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2010, 19(1): 53–63. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2032894. [21] LIU Ying, ZHANG Zongyu, ZHOU Chengwei, et al. Robust variational Bayesian inference for direction-of-arrival estimation with sparse array[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71(8): 8591–8602. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3173418. [22] ZHAO Xiaowen, YANG Qingshan, and ZHANG Yunhua. A hybrid method for the optimal synthesis of 3-D patterns of sparse concentric ring arrays[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2016, 64(2): 515–524. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2015.2504377. [23] 李浩林, 陈露露, 张磊, 等. 快速分解后向投影SAR成像的自聚焦算法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36(4): 938–945. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.00011.LI Haolin, CHEN Lulu, ZHANG Lei, et al. Study of autofocus method for SAR imagery created by fast factorized backprojection[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2014, 36(4): 938–945. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.00011. [24] MA Chengzheng, YEO T S, LIU Zhoufeng, et al. Target imaging based on ℓ1ℓ0 norms homotopy sparse signal recovery and distributed MIMO antennas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2015, 51(4): 3399–3414. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2015.140939. [25] 杨鹏, 闫飞, 张胜辉, 等. 基于FOCUSS算法的稀疏阵列综合[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2014, 43(2): 203–206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2014.02.008.YANG Peng, YAN Fei, ZHANG Shenghui, et al. Sparse array synthesis based on FOCUSS algorithm[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2014, 43(2): 203–206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2014.02.008. [26] 邢孟道, 马鹏辉, 楼屹杉, 等. 合成孔径雷达快速后向投影算法综述[J]. 雷达学报, 2024, 13(1): 1–22. doi: 10.12000/JR23183.XING Mengdao, MA Penghui, LOU Yishan, et al. Review of fast back projection algorithmsin synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(1): 1–22. doi: 10.12000/JR23183. 期刊类型引用(23)
1. 肖敏睿，王巍，尤明懿，陈新. 存在时频统误差条件下的联合时频差定位与观测站航迹优化方法. 信号处理. 2025(01): 150-160 . 
百度学术2. Xin Yang，Hongming Liu，Xiaoke Wang，Wen Yu，Jingqiu Liu，Sipei Zhang. A Fusion Localization Method Based on Target Measurement Error Feature Complementarity and Its Application. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2024(01): 75-88 . 必应学术3. 任洋，姚金杰，赵昶淳，邹宇，薛晓东. 卫星导航多干扰源直接定位方法. 计算机测量与控制. 2024(04): 159-165+173 . 百度学术4. 罗军，张顺生. 联合自适应LASSO与块稀疏贝叶斯直接定位方法. 雷达科学与技术. 2024(03): 265-274 . 百度学术5. 万鹏武，李文杰，彭康. 混合信道下基于到达时间的快速直接定位算法. 西安邮电大学学报. 2024(02): 20-26 . 百度学术6. Dandan Li，Deyi Wang，Hao Huan. LFM Radar Source Passive Localization Algorithm Based on Range Migration. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2024(02): 130-140 . 必应学术7. 李俊霞，王欣，黄高见，徐勇军，郝万明，朱政宇，李兴旺. 无源定位技术发展及其展望. 无线电工程. 2024(08): 1825-1846 . 百度学术8. 陈梁栋，黄知涛，王翔，吴癸周. 基于角速度信息先验的固定无源单站直接定位方法. 电子学报. 2024(07): 2190-2200 . 百度学术9. 任洋，姚金杰，赵昶淳. 一种自适应网格细化的卫星干扰源定位方法. 火力与指挥控制. 2024(08): 152-158+165 . 百度学术10. 张炜，杨秋，李昊. 一种分布式一体化传感器异步纯方位跟踪管理方法. 指挥控制与仿真. 2024(06): 43-48 . 百度学术11. 王雨琦，吴楠，张旭，刘丹，王海强，韩笑冬，仲小清，王宁远. 多星分布式无源相干定位方法. 中国空间科学技术. 2023(01): 63-68 . 百度学术12. 陈志坤，翁一鸣，彭冬亮，吴美婵. 基于VEPPSO-EXTRA混合算法的分布式直接定位技术. 电子与信息学报. 2023(02): 664-671 . 百度学术13. 罗迪，尹灿斌，李智. 双星对地面未知辐射源直接定位方法研究. 指挥控制与仿真. 2023(01): 136-143 . 百度学术14. 刘云天，史鑫磊. 多基站非圆信号直接定位：降维PM与泰勒补偿. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2023(06): 725-733 . 百度学术15. 夏楠，高丹阳，邢宝辉，王亚宁. 基于外辐射源的空中目标直接定位算法. 通信学报. 2023(06): 117-124 . 百度学术16. 唐元春，陈端云，夏炳森. 基于传播算子的卫星导航系统干扰源直接定位方法. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2023(08): 985-991 . 百度学术17. 张怡霄，王怀习，姚云龙，常超，康凯. 基于聚类与霍夫变换的同型雷达多目标定位算法. 电讯技术. 2023(12): 1885-1893 . 百度学术18. 刘清，谢坚，王伶，王秋红，张兆林. 卫星导航欺骗式干扰源高精度直接定位方法. 电子学报. 2022(05): 1117-1122 . 百度学术19. 韦卓. 基于单站干涉仪测向法的未知辐射源定位技术. 舰船电子工程. 2022(07): 159-161 . 百度学术20. 王裕旗，孙光才，邢孟道，张子敬. 合成孔径无源定位性能分析与参数设计. 电子与信息学报. 2022(09): 3155-3162 . 百度学术21. 刘振，苏晓龙，刘天鹏，彭勃，陈鑫，刘永祥. 基于矩阵差分的远场和近场混合源定位方法. 雷达学报. 2021(03): 432-442 . 
本站查看22. 金峥嵘，王洁，陈丹彤，赵翼，朱秋明，段洪涛. 基于频谱测绘的辐射源定位. 通信技术. 2021(12): 2644-2649 . 百度学术23. 张国鑫，易伟，孔令讲. 基于1比特量化的大规模MIMO雷达系统直接定位算法. 雷达学报. 2021(06): 970-981 . 本站查看其他类型引用(22)
-
百度学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 441
- HTML全文浏览量: 261
- PDF下载量: 227
- 被引次数: 45
