基于差分特征的间歇采样转发干扰辨识与抑制方法

盖季妤; 姜维; 张凯翔; 梁振楠; 陈新亮; 刘泉华

doi:10.12000/JR22058

基于差分特征的间歇采样转发干扰辨识与抑制方法

DOI: 10.12000/JR22058

盖季妤^{1, 2},
姜维³,
张凯翔¹,
梁振楠¹,
陈新亮^{1, 2, 4, ,},
刘泉华^{1, 2}

1.
卫星导航电子信息技术教育部重点实验室(北京理工大学) 北京 100081
2.
北京理工大学重庆创新中心重庆 401120
3.
电子信息控制重点实验室成都 610036
4.
北京理工大学长三角研究院(嘉兴) 嘉兴 314019

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61771050)，电子信息控制重点实验室开放基金(6142105190313)，重庆市自然科学基金(2020ZX3100039)

详细信息

作者简介:
盖季妤，硕士生，主要研究方向为干扰辨识与抑制、自适应阵列信号处理、扩展目标检测

姜　维，博士，高级工程师，主要研究方向为阵列信号处理、雷达信号处理

张凯翔，博士生，主要研究方向为分布式阵列雷达抗干扰

梁振楠，博士，主要研究方向为数字阵列雷达系统和宽带雷达信号处理

陈新亮，博士，硕士生导师，主要研究方向为自适应阵列信号处理、双/多基地合成孔径雷达成像

刘泉华，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为高分辨雷达、分布式雷达系统及信号处理

通讯作者:
陈新亮 chenxinliang@bit.edu.cn

责任主编：全英汇 Corresponding Editor: QUAN Yinghui
中图分类号: TN974
计量
- 文章访问数: 1992
- HTML全文浏览量: 1016
- PDF下载量: 250
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-02
- 修回日期: 2022-05-24
- 网络出版日期: 2022-06-21
- 刊出日期: 2023-02-28

A Method for Interrupted-Sampling Repeater Jamming Identification and Suppression Based on Differential Features

GAI Jiyu^{1, 2},
JIANG Wei³,
ZHANG Kaixiang¹,
LIANG Zhennan¹,
CHEN Xinliang^{1, 2, 4
, ,},
LIU Quanhua^{1, 2}

1.
Key Laboratory of Electronic and Information Technology in Satellite Navigation (Beijing Institute of Technology), Ministry of Education, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing 401120, China
3.
Science and Technology on Electronic Information Control Laboratory, Chengdu 610036, China
4.
Yangtze Delta Region Academy of Beijing Institute of Technology, Jiaxing 314019, China

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61771050), Science and Technology on Electronic Information Control Laboratory (6142105190313), The Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (2020ZX3100039)

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Xinliang, chenxinliang@bit.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 间歇采样转发式干扰机通过对其接收到的雷达发射信号进行采样、存储、处理和多次转发，在雷达接收端形成逼真的假目标干扰效果。为提升上述干扰场景下的雷达探测性能，该文提出了一种新的信号差分特征提取方法，在此基础上，利用目标回波和干扰信号在差分特征空间的差异设计判决准则，从而在有效辨识并抑制干扰的同时实现目标检测。仿真结果表明：该方法干扰抑制效果显著，相比于3种典型的时频域滤波算法等效信噪比改善4.2 dB以上。
- 间歇采样转发干扰 /
- 差分特征 /
- 干扰辨识 /
- 干扰抑制 /
- 目标检测
Abstract: The interrupted-sampling repeater jammer can sample, store, process and transmit part of the radar transmitter signal multiple times and the fake targets will form on the radar receiver. To improve the radar performance in the aforementioned jamming scenario, in this study, a new signal differential feature extraction method is proposed, and a judgment criterion is formulated based on the difference between the target echo and the Interrupted-Sampling Repeater Jamming (ISRJ) in the differential feature space to effectively identify and suppress the ISRJ while achieving target detection. Simulation results show that the proposed method has a remarkable ISRJ suppression performance. The equivalent signal-to-noise ratio is improved by at least 4.2 dB compared with three typical time-frequency domain filtering algorithms.
- Interrupted-Sampling Repeater Jamming (ISRJ) /
- Differential features /
- Jamming identification /
- Jamming suppression /
- Target detection

HTML全文

图 1 间歇采样转发干扰示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of ISRJ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 目标与间歇采样转发干扰差分特征对比

Figure 2. Comparison of the differential features between target and ISRJ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 基于差分特征的间歇采样转发干扰辨识与抑制流程图

Figure 3. Flow chart of the ISRJ identification and suppression based on differential features

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同干噪比、信噪比下，干扰、目标处差分特征能量比值的概率分布

Figure 4. The probability distribution of differential features energy ratio under different jamming-to-noise ratio and signal-to-noise ratio for ISRJ and target

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 由最小错误概率准则确定辨识门限$\epsilon $

Figure 5. The determination of identification threshold $\epsilon $ by minimizing the probability of error

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 仿真数据间歇采样转发干扰辨识与抑制结果

Figure 6. ISRJ identification and suppression results for simulation data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 目标检测概率

Figure 7. Target detection probability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 4种方法检测性能对比(仿真数据)

Figure 8. The detection performance comparison of the four methods (simulation data)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 实测数据间歇采样转发干扰辨识与抑制结果

Figure 9. ISRJ identification and suppression results for measured data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 时频图

Figure 10. Time-Frequency distribution

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 归一化差分序列

Table 1. Normalized differential sequence

M	各项系数$ {c_M}(m),m = 0,1, \cdots ,M - 1 $
1	1
2	$ 1/\sqrt{2},-1/\sqrt{2} $
3	$ 1/\sqrt{6},-2/\sqrt{6},1/\sqrt{6} $
4	$ 1/2\sqrt{5},-3/2\sqrt{5},3/2\sqrt{5},-1/2\sqrt{5} $
5	$ 1/\sqrt{70},-4/\sqrt{70},6/\sqrt{70},-4/\sqrt{70},1/\sqrt{70} $

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 仿真数据信源参数

Table 2. Source parameters for simulation data

信源	波形参数	脉压后信(干)噪比
目标	脉宽100 μs，带宽5 MHz	10~50 dB，间隔1 dB
干扰1	切片宽度16.67 μs，切片1次重复转发5次	10~50 dB，间隔1 dB
干扰2	切片宽度10 μs，切片1次立即重复转发2次，共切片3次	10~50 dB，间隔1 dB

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 仿真参数

Table 3. Simulation parameters

参数	数值
常规检测门限	13.82
最高差分阶数	6
辨识门限	1.79

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同干噪比下，检测概率为95%时所需的信噪比

Table 4. When the detection probability is 95%, the required signal-to-noise ratios under different jamming-to-noise ratios

干噪比(dB)	所需信噪比(dB)
无干扰	15.5
10	17.9
20	17.4
30	21.4
40	29.5
50	38.5

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 实测数据信源参数

Table 5. Source parameters for measured data

目标参数	数值	干扰参数	数值
脉宽(μs)	20	脉宽(μs)	10
带宽(MHz)	2	带宽(MHz)	1
脉压后信噪比(dB)	33	脉压后信噪比(dB)	45

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	王雪松, 刘建成, 张文明,等. 间歇采样转发干扰的数学原理[J]. 中国科学E辑, 2006, 36(8): 891–901. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7259.2006.08.007 WANG Xuesong, LIU Jiancheng, ZHANG Wenming, et al. Mathematic principles of interrupted-sampling repeater jamming (ISRJ)[J]. Science in China Series E:Information Sciences, 2006, 36(8): 891–901. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7259.2006.08.007
[2]	刘忠, 王雪松, 刘建成, 等. 基于数字射频存储器的间歇采样重复转发干扰[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(4): 405–410. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.04.005 LIU Zhong, WANG Xuesong, LIU Jiancheng, et al. Jamming technique of interrupted-sampling and periodic repeater based on digital radio frequency memory[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(4): 405–410. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.04.005
[3]	GRECO M, GINI F, and FARINA A. Radar detection and classification of jamming signals belonging to a cone class[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(5): 1984–1993. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.909326
[4]	李宏, 郑光勇, 杨英科, 等. 部分截取雷达信号多假目标干扰性能分析[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2010, 25(3): 39–44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2010.03.010 LI Hong, ZHENG Guangyong, YANG Yingke, et al. The performance analysis of multi-false targets jamming of part copying radar pulse[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2010, 25(3): 39–44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2010.03.010
[5]	ZHANG Jindong, ZHU Daiyin, and ZHANG Gong. New antivelocity deception jamming technique using pulses with adaptive initial phases[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2013, 49(2): 1290–1300. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.6494414
[6]	李宏, 牟能文, 郭雷. 相参干扰的压制距离[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2015, 30(4): 33–36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2015.04.008 LI Hong, MOU Nengwen, and GUO Lei. Depressing distance of coherent jamming[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2015, 30(4): 33–36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2015.04.008
[7]	施富强, 周超, 刘泉华. 间歇采样重复转发式干扰特性分析[J]. 信号处理, 2017, 33(12): 1616–1624. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2017.12.013 SHI Fuqiang, ZHOU Chao, and LIU Quanhua. Characteristics analysis of interrupted-sampling repeater jamming[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2017, 33(12): 1616–1624. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2017.12.013
[8]	FENG Dejun, XU Letao, PAN Xiaoyi, et al. Jamming wideband radar using interrupted-sampling repeater[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2017, 53(3): 1341–1354. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2017.2670958
[9]	CHEN Fengbo, LI Rongfeng, DING Liming, et al. A method against DRFM dense false target jamming based on jamming recognization[C]. IET International Radar Conference 2015, Hangzhou, China, 2015: 1–4.
[10]	陈静, 李晗, 张洪纲, 等. 分布式雷达主瓣间歇采样转发干扰抑制方法[J]. 信号处理, 2018, 34(11): 1368–1376. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2018.11.013 CHEN Jing, LI Han, ZHANG Honggang, et al. Main-lobe interrupted sampling repeater jamming suppression method in distributed radar[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2018, 34(11): 1368–1376. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2018.11.013
[11]	周畅, 汤子跃, 余方利, 等. 基于脉内正交的抗间歇采样转发干扰方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 269–276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.02.06 ZHOU Chang, TANG Ziyue, YU Fangli, et al. Anti intermittent sampling repeater jamming method based on intrapulse orthogonality[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(2): 269–276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.02.06
[12]	ZHANG Jiaxiang and ZHOU Chao. Interrupted sampling repeater jamming suppression method based on hybrid modulated radar signal[C]. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Signal, Information and Data Processing (ICSIDP), Chongqing, China, 2019: 1–4.
[13]	周畅, 汤子跃, 朱振波, 等. 抗间歇采样转发干扰的波形设计方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2018, 40(9): 2198–2205. doi: 10.11999/JEIT171236 ZHOU Chang, TANG Ziyue, ZHU Zhenbo, et al. Anti-interrupted sampling repeater jamming waveform design method[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2018, 40(9): 2198–2205. doi: 10.11999/JEIT171236
[14]	ZHANG Yang, WEI Yinsheng, and YU Lei. Interrupted sampling repeater jamming recognition and suppression based on phase-coded signal processing[J]. Signal Processing, 2022, 198: 108596. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108596
[15]	ZHOU Kai, LI Dexin, SU Yi, et al. Joint design of transmit waveform and mismatch filter in the presence of interrupted sampling repeater jamming[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2020, 27: 1610–1614. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2020.3021667
[16]	TIAN Dezhi, REN Wei, ZHANG Lu, et al. An adaptive scheme for chopping and interleaving jamming suppression based on the mismatched filter[C]. 2021 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Xi’an, China, 2021: 78–83.
[17]	ZHOU Kai, LI Dexin, QUAN Sinong, et al. SAR Waveform and mismatched filter design for countering interrupted-sampling repeater jamming[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5214514. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3107328
[18]	ZHOU Chao, LIU Quanhua, and CHEN Xinliang. Parameter estimation and suppression for DRFM-based interrupted sampling repeater jammer[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2018, 12(1): 56–63. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0114
[19]	GONG Shixian, WEI Xizhang, and LI Xiang. ECCM scheme against interrupted sampling repeater jammer based on time-frequency analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 25(6): 996–1003. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2014.00114
[20]	CHEN Jian, WU Wenzhen, XU Shiyou, et al. Band pass filter design against interrupted-sampling repeater jamming based on time-frequency analysis[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2019, 13(10): 1646–1654. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2018.5658
[21]	周超, 刘泉华, 胡程. 间歇采样转发式干扰的时频域辨识与抑制[J]. 雷达学报, 2019, 8(1): 100–106. doi: 10.12000/JR18080 ZHOU Chao, LIU Quanhua, and HU Cheng. Time-frequency analysis techniques for recognition and suppression of interrupted sampling repeater jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(1): 100–106. doi: 10.12000/JR18080
[22]	KAY S M. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory Volume II[M]. Englewood: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998: 77–79.