Processing math: 100%
Volume 14 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Measurement Method for Sea Clutter with Shore-based Radar
3. Experiment Radar, Sites, and Data Acquisition
4. Typical Data Presentation and Analysis
5. Conclusions
Appendix
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2025  >  14(1): 204-228
LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, WANG Guoqing, et al. Sea-detecting X-band radar and data acquisition program[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(5): 656–667. doi: 10.12000/JR19089
Citation: ZHENG Xuezhao, DING Wen, HUANG Yuan, et al. A review of UWB radar detection of respiration and heartbeat signals in different scenarios[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(1): 204–228. doi: 10.12000/JR24154
shu

A Review of UWB Radar Detection of Respiration and Heartbeat Signals in Different Scenarios

DOI: 10.12000/JR24154 CSTR: 32380.14.JR24154
  • 1.

    College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China

  • 2.

    Xi’an Research Center of National Mine Rescue, Xi’an 710054, China

  • 3.

    Shaanxi Xikuang Zhitong Technology Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710086, China

Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (52174197), The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3010905), Shaanxi Provincial Association for Science and Technology Young Talent Support Program (20240205)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: DING Wen, 2695900258@qq.com; HUANG Yuan, hy_xust@163.com
  • Received Date: 2024-08-07
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-09-17
    • Available Online: 2024-09-25
  • Publish Date: 2024-10-12
    Abstract
  • Due to their many advantages, such as simple structure, low transmission power, strong penetration capability, high resolution, and high transmission speed, UWB (Ultra-WideBand) radars have been widely used for detecting life information in various scenarios. To effectively detect life information, the key is to use radar echo information-processing technology to extract the breathing and heartbeat signals of the involved person from UWB radar echoes. This technology is crucial for determining life information in different scenarios, such as obtaining location information, monitoring and preventing diseases, and ensuring personnel safety. Therefore, this paper introduces a UWB radar and its classification, electromagnetic scattering mechanisms, and detection principles. It also analyzes the current state of radar echo model construction for breathing and heartbeat signals. The paper then reviews existing methods for extracting breathing and heartbeat signals, including time domain, frequency domain, and time-frequency domain analysis methods. Finally, it summarizes research progress in breathing and heartbeat signal extraction in various scenarios, such as mine rescue, earthquake rescue, medical health, and through-wall detection, as well as the main problems in current research and focus areas for future research.

     

    • FullText(HTML)

  • When detecting military and civil targets, such as ships, skimming aircraft, fairway buoys, fishing vessels, small-scale yachts, and floating ice in a complex marine environment, sea-detecting radars are inevitably influenced by surface scattering echo, i.e., sea clutter. Particularly under high-resolution radar and high sea conditions, spike phenomenon, which occurs frequently in sea clutter and has strong overall energy, is extremely similar to target echo in time domain. However, the radar shows a greater spectral width in frequency domain, which easily results in false alarm and seriously influences sea target detection. Thus, studying the characteristics of sea clutter based on actual application scenario and real data, developing sea clutter suppression and target detection, and improving sea-detecting radar capacity have become bottlenecks with strong exploration and difficulty and crucial issues in current research[1–3].

    The research methods for sea clutter characteristics can be classified into two types. One is research on the formation mechanism of sea clutter and scattering calculation based on geometrical model of sea surface and electromagnetic scattering theory. The other is acquiring real data on surface scattering echo and modifying existing theory or developing a new theory from an experimental perspective. The research method from an experimental view is widely used and closely resembles the real environment, thereby mutually supplementing and demonstrating the research method from the perspective of theoretical calculation. The characteristics of real experimental data are closely related to radar equipment. As a result, the research method based on real measurement of experiment can combine universal research results of theoretical calculation with specific application scenarios of special equipment to a certain extent. Besides, this research method implements optimization and improvement, advances the application of characteristic research results of sea clutter, and strongly supports research on target detection and clutter suppression such as MTI/MTD, transform domain disposal, tracking before detection, and constant false alarm rate[4,5]. Called “information fully recorded sea clutter measurement data,” real experimental data include not only sea clutter data and target echo data but also marine environment data (e.g., wave height, wave direction, wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity), real-time location of target (e.g., size or RCS, longitude and latitude or range orientation, velocity, direction of real-time motion state, and motion track), radar operating parameters (e.g., radar location, height, frequency band, pulse repetition frequency, and distance/orientation resolution). Such information normalizes detailed records and correlates to radar data to repeat the experimental scenario corresponding to data and ensure high application values of such data.

    According to the literature, various sea clutter measurement experiments with radar have been made at China and abroad to support the development of sea-detecting radar equipment and improve the capacity of sea target detection[6]. Typical foreign experiments include four-frequency (P, L, C, X) sea clutter measurement with airborne radar made by the United States Navy Research Laboratory[7], “Peak Program” of the US Navy and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency[8], sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band IPIX radar conducted by McMaster University in Canada[9,10], sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band Fynmeet radar conducted by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)[11,12], sea clutter measurement experiment with Ka-band radar on the South Coast of Spain[13], and L-band multichannel sea clutter experiment conducted by the Defense Science and Technology Organization[14-16]. In China, several radar-related scientific research institutions have also conducted sea clutter measurement experiments under different conditions[6,17–30], acquired massive data under various radar platforms, and developed many studies on characteristic analysis and modeling and multi-domain feature extraction[31–41]. However, because of military and technical confidentiality, most sea clutter datasets measured with radar have not been disclosed, and only the datasets acquired from the sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band IPIX radar conducted by McMaster University and with X-band Fynmeet radar of South Africa’s CSIR are available.

    The IPIX radar dataset is well known in the research field of sea target detection, being typical radar data under small grazing angles of shore-based platform. Under the leadership of Prof. Simon Haykin of McMaster University, a research team[9,10] conducted sea clutter measurement and small-sea floating target detection experiments in Dartmouth, south of Nova Scotia, and in Grimsby, Ontario in 1993 and 1998, respectively. The Fynmeet radar dataset was acquired by CSIR to support a small sea-target monitoring system. CSIR conducted sea clutter and echo data measurement experiments twice for target vessels over 19 days on the southwest coastline of South Africa in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Such a database is complete in a variety of parameters and records[11,12]. These two publicly available datasets focus on specific targets and sea areas for experiments, thereby having certain limitations. These datasets can be used to evaluate the performance of clutter suppression and target detection methods, but may be inaccurate in performance evaluation for the Chinese sea area and specific target detection. Furthermore, because of indefinite reasons, CSIR datasets can no longer be downloaded from the official website.

    Considering research demands for sea clutter characteristics and sea target detection technology, and learning from successful experiences in data acquisition and records of McMaster University for the IPIX radar datasets and of South Africa’s CSIR for the Fynmeet radar dataset, the research group working on sea target detection at Naval Aeronautical University have proposed a “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program.” This program aims to develop a sea-detection experiment with X-band full solid-phase coherent radar in stages and batches, acquire real radar data and experimental supplementary data under different conditions, as well as build and form datasets used to support recognition for sea clutter characteristics, sea clutter suppression, sea target detection, tracking, and classification. These datasets are disclosed and shared in batches to contribute toward advancing the quality sea-detecting radar equipment and improving detection performance.

    Using shore-based X-band full solid-phase coherent radar, this experiment acquires surface electromagnetic scattering echo and measure surface scattering coefficient[42–45], which are used to study rules of sea clutter change with resolution, incidence direction and scattering direction, and environmental characteristics of sea surface. This experiment also investigates statistical features and spectral characteristics of sea clutter. Note that the radar’s observation objects include not only sea surface (sea clutter) but also sea-surface targets such as channel buoys and ships. In other words, acquired real radar data include pure sea clutter data and sea clutter as well as target echo data.

    By measuring and recording echo power on the sea surface, we can build a corresponding relationship between the radar scattering coefficient of the measured sea surface and the voltage value of the radar video based on calibration. Such a relationship can be used in real measurements to determine the radar scattering coefficient of the measured sea surface from video voltage value. As a result, the data of this experiment can be compared with other experimental data. The external calibration method is mainly used in this experiment, i.e., to provide a calibration level with a calibration object under a given radar cross section. The calibration method is expressed as follows[42]:

    σ0=σA=PrPr0⋅(RrR0)4⋅σ0A=VrVr0⋅(RrR0)4⋅σ0A (1)

    where σ0 refers to the radar cross section of the measured sea surface (unit: dBm2/m2); σ refers to the radar cross section shown when the radar antenna beam irradiates the sea surface (unit: m2); A refers to the irradiation area on the sea surface made from the radar antenna beam (unit: m2); Pr refers to the echo power of measured sea surface (unit: W); Pr0 refers to echo power of calibration object (unit: W); Rr refers to the distance from the measured sea surface to antenna (unit: m); R0 refers to the distance between the calibration object and antenna (unit: m); σ0 is the radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); Vr refers to the echo voltage of measured sea surface (unit: V); and Vr0 refers to the echo voltage of the calibration object (unit: V).

    The calibration accuracy mainly depends on the radar cross section of the calibration object and relative size of the surface scattering cross section. The calibration error can be expressed as follows:

    σm−σ0σm=σbσ0±2√σbσ0 (2)

    where σm refers to the measured radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); σ0 refers to the real radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); and σb refers to the radar cross section of the measured sea surface (unit: m2). When error is limited within ±20% (equivalent to ±1 dB), σb/σ0≤10−2 (equivalent to –20 dB) is controlled.

    In the calibration process, a rectangle panel, a corner reflector, a Luneburg lens reflector, and a metal ball are typically used as calibration objects. The scattering cross sections of these standard objects can be obtained through theoretical calculation (Ref. [42] provides details). This experiment proposes to use a metal ball as a calibration object (see Fig. 1). The calibration object is placed at sea surface and higher than sea level to a certain extent as a whole. Besides, the object is not submerged. The position of the calibration object is accurately calculated based on erection location of the radar and orientation of the wave beam. Stable calibration results can be obtained by averaging measurements acquired multiple times.

    Figure  1.  Stainless steel ball calibration body
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    In fact, for research demands of real sea clutter, such as characteristics of statistical distribution, correlation characteristics, Doppler spectrum characteristics, clutter suppression, and target detection, we pay close attention to the relative amplitude of radar echo. If differences exist in surface scattering coefficient and different bands and radars, then the radar will be calibrated.

    3.1 Experiment radar

    The X-band solid power amplifier surveillance/navigation radar used in this experiment is mainly applicable to scenarios such as shipping navigation and shore surveillance. Characterized by high-range resolution, high reliability, and small distance from dead zone of detection, the radar clearly distinguishes various targets under different ranges (see Fig. 2). Such a radar utilizes a solid power-amplifier combined impulse transmission mechanism (see Fig. 3) to improve range resolution, decline dead zones of range, and increase radiation power. The launch time is 40 ns to 100 µs. The target distance is calculated based on the difference of time between receiving signals and launching signals. Furthermore, the radar scans completely through 360° on a horizontal plane (see Tab. 1 for technical parameters of the radar).

    Table  1.  X-band experimental radar parameters
    Parameters Technical indexes
    Operating frequency X
    Scope of operating frequency 9.3-9.5 GHz
    Range 0.0625-96 nm
    Scanning bandwidth 25 MHz
    Range resolution 6 m
    Pulse repetition frequency 1.6 K, 3 K, 5 K & 10 K
    Emission peak power 50 W
    Revolving speed of antenna 2rpm, 12 rpm, 24 rpm, 48 rpm
    Length of antenna 1.8 m
    Operating mode of antenna Gazing & circular scanning
    Polarization mode of antenna HH
    Width of horizontal beam of antenna 1.2°
    Width of vertical beam of antenna 22°
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  X-band solid-state power amplifier surveillance/ navigation radar
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Figure  3.  Three modes of combined pulse emission
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    1.  Summary table of sea-detecting radar data (the 1st phase)
    No. Grade of sea conditions Data size Working mode of radar antenna Transmission pulse mode Regional AIS data Meteorological and
    hydrological data     		Grazing angle (°)
    1 Grade 1 and below >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    2 Grade 2 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    3 Grade 3 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    4 Grade 4 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    5 Grade 5 >5 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 No Yes 0.3–15
    Notes: ① Daily AIS data will be generated into a table format, which provides MMSI of ships, time, longitude and latitude, and others. ② Daily meteorological and hydrological data will be generated into an NC-format file, which indicates wind speed, wind direction, wave height, and cycle. ③ The number of pulses contained in a group of data under staring mode will not be less than 105, while a group of data under scanning mode contains a complete scanning cycle. ④ Under transmission pulse mode 2, radars of each corresponding repetition cycle will transmit a single-carrier frequency pulse and an LFM pulse.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2 Experiment sites

    The “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program” proposes a series of sea-detecting experiments, including shore-based and airborne platform experiments, which are carried out within one to two years.

    The sea target detection site located in the coastal zone of Yantai, Shandong Province is selected as the shore-based experiment site. Three experiment sites with different altitudes are covered because of geographical conditions for observing the same sea area, various features, and mutual complementation.

    Experiment site 1: Located on Yangma Island in Yantai, the experiment site is approximately 50 m far from the seaside, at an altitude approximately 30 m, and approximately 180° sea-detecting range of radar. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles is approximately 0.3° to 15°. Various sea targets exist, which are mainly small and medium-sized ships (see Fig. 4 for details).

    Figure  4.  Aerial view of experiment site 1 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Experiment site 2: Located on the seaward side of a small mountain in Muping district, Yantai, the experiment side is approximately 500 m far from the seaside, has an altitude of 60–120 m, and has approximately 180° sea-detecting range of radar. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles shown in significant sea clutter data is approximately 0.3°–6°. Offshore small fishing boats are mainly sea targets and a few other sea targets exist at a remote distance. Thus, this site is feasible for conducting the target experiment (see Fig. 5 for details).

    Figure  5.  Aerial view of experiment site 2 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Experiment site 3: Located on Daiwang mountain in the Zhibu district of Yantai, this experiment site is approximately 2200 m far from the seaside and at an altitude approximately 400 m and sea-detecting range of radar larger than 180°. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles shown in the significant sea clutter data is approximately 1.2° to 7°. Various sea targets are mainly large, small, and medium-sized ships, which show a wide horizon (see Fig. 6 for details).

    Figure  6.  Aerial view of experiment site 3 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The four-fin Bell 407GXi helicopter (see Fig. 7), which carries the experiment radar and is allowed to fly over the Yantai airspace, is mainly used in airborne platform experiment. For the sea target detection experiment, the helicopter is designed with a flight height from 500 m to 4000 m, loading capacity of up to 300 kg, single flight time of less than 2 h, maximum range of 675 km, and maximum cruising speed of 250 km/h.

    Figure  7.  Helicopter experimental platform
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Phase 1 experiment was conducted at seaside experiment site 1 from September to October 2019 to collect radar echo data, including sea clutter data and target echo data of ships, under different conditions. Phases 2 and 3 experiments will consider experiment sites 2 and 3 and an airborne experiment platform with high altitude. As the shore-based/shipborne radar used in the phase 1 experiment cannot be installed in an airborne platform, the airborne experiment has not been carried out in phase 1, but will be conducted later.

    3.3 Radar data acquisition

    Model HD-LD-CJ-10 portable radar acquisition equipment developed by the research group has been used for data acquisition (see Fig. 8). The equipment is constituted by a 2U portable reinforced IPC, acquisition board card, and upper computer software. Designed with 105 MSPS peak sampling capacity and 80 MB/S continuous storage capacity, and designed with 3-way TTL level signal, 2-receiving and 2-sending RS232 signals, and 4-receiving RS422 signal ports, the acquisition board will perform 3-way quantification and can be used to access data of auxiliary equipment. The upper computer software can realize user-defined port gate sampling, automatically separate binary data files based on the size of the preset file, and record automatic identification system (AIS), radar output point/flight path, and other data through serial and network interfaces.

    Figure  8.  HD-LD-CJ-10 portable acquisition equipment
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    When radar signals are collected, port gate sampling will be conducted based on triggering signals. The designation format for the data acquisition file is 20191008085830_staring/scanning (y/m/d/h/min/s/antenna working mode) and the working mode of the antenna includes staring (at a certain direction) and scanning (in a circular manner). Fig. 9 presents the basic format of collected data. Each data file is constituted by multiple pulse combined echo data ranked in order. Different working modes of radar correspond to different pulse combinations, and each pulse combination includes one to three transmission pulses. The echo data of each pulse combination is constituted by “data head plus echo data.” The data head includes zone bit, length of information head, data version, pulse repetition period, frequency and counting, sampling frequency, data source and triggering mode, orientation code, sign of data loss, start time and corresponding sampling depth of port gate, UTC time, radar position, true north angle of radar, working mode of radar and data check bit, and others. The length of echo data can be calculated based on the size of the port gate and sampling depth. Besides, the sampling number of each pulse echo in one pulse combination is defined (see Appendix for details of the real data).

    Figure  9.  Format of radar acquisition data
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Regarding the process of sea-detecting radar experiment and data acquisition, the radar is erected at a predetermined experiment side. Before each experiment, the preliminary level of sea state and staring angle at the antenna are determined based on the wind speed, wind direction, wave height, wave direction, weather forecast, and real-time information. The radar starts up and works under antenna parking mode and circular scanning mode, respectively. Furthermore, the data acquisition unit will be enabled to record data and synchronize data of AIS equipment. The data acquisition lasts over 2 min under parking mode and over 5 min under circular scanning mode. When the requirements are satisfied, the data acquisition is stopped, and the list of records for data acquisition and record information are prepared, as indicated in the experiment process. This process is repeated over five times to ensure the acquisition of 10 groups of real data from each experiment. These data are validated by being replayed and analyzed onsite by acquisition equipment.

    MAT data format in Matlab is used for data disclosed in the phase 1 experiment of the “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program.” The data head information and echo data can be loaded directly for future reference. In subsequent experiments, as the data type and size increase, international general data format (e.g., NetCDF, HDF5, and others) will be used to improve compatibility with various types of radar data. Furthermore, special radar data management and analysis software will be provided to ensure standard management for radar data.

    3.4 Auxiliary data of experiment

    One of the important elements of the sea clutter experiment with the radar is synchronous record of marine environmental data. On the one hand, generating the “information fully recorded sea clutter measurement data” will include basic information on the marine environment during the time that the radar data are replayed. On the other hand, this process will advance the refinement of technical research on characteristics of sea clutter, sea clutter suppression, and target detection. The range of spatial scale is relatively small because of the limited scope of the sea area for shore-based observation with the radar. Meanwhile, through marine meteorological station and satellite remote sensing, the marine environmental data (e.g., wave height and direction) will be predicted or modified in real time within a large spatial scale. For the definite sea area observed with the radar, corresponding marine environmental data will be provided generally through modeling and reanalysis. As a result, certain errors may occur. Of course, marine environmental data can also be measured through information buoy and such measurements will be more accurate. However, the buoy will only measure a certain point in the sea area observed with the radar, which cannot reflect the conditions of other zones of the entire sea area. Therefore, this experiment combines both of them (i.e. the reanalysis data and the measured data), while marine environmental data in the field of view of the radar will be provided mainly through reanalyzed marine environmental data. Furthermore, marine information buoys will be placed in certain points and time within the radar observation area to modify the marine environmental data. A combination of both will provide more accurate results to support the sea-detecting radar experiment.

    The marine environment information on wind and wave will be mainly recorded in the sea-detecting radar experiment. The wind elements mainly include wind scale, wind speed, and wind direction, while the wave elements mainly include wave height, wave direction, wave velocity, wave period, and temperature. In addition, the weather phenomena, temperature, and relative humidity during the experiment will also be recorded.

    With the background field of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), the data source of wind elements utilizes the scale mode in weather research and forecasting, and 3DVAR (3D VARiational) data assimilation technology to assimilate various conventional and non-conventional meteorological observation data for land, ocean, and upper air as well as ensure dynamic integration between various observation and reanalysis data. On this basis, data on the historical optimal path of typhoons sourced from the National Meteorological Center and weak-constraint variational method have been used to adjust dynamically integrated reanalysis wind field and further improve data accuracy. The reanalysis dataset of the sea surface wind field can cover the northwest Pacific Ocean (10°S–50°N, 95°E–150°E). The data of the sea area observed with the radar will be randomly selected based on the experiment position and longitude and latitude in each experiment to support the experiment data analysis. For the data of wind elements, the spatial resolution is 0.1° (longitude and latitude), the time resolution is not less than 1 h, and the wind speed error at grid point of longitude and latitude is within ±1.5 m/s.

    With the driving field of CFSR, the data source of wave elements, based on the third-generation numerical mode SWAN of the offshore wave optimized by the National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center and the optimal interpolation assimilation technology, has assimilated effective wave height data of satellite altimeter along sea waves. The data source also used the nesting method to build a wave reanalysis system and form a high-resolution wave reanalysis dataset covering the northwest Pacific Ocean (0°–50°N, 100°E–160°E). Similar to the data acquisition method for wind elements, the data of the radar observed sea area will be randomly selected based on the longitude and latitude of the experiment site in each experiment to support the experiment data analysis. For the data of wave elements, the special resolution is 0.1° (longitude and latitude), time resolution is not less than 1 h, and wave height error at the grid point of longitude and latitude is within 0.3 m (see Fig. 10(a)—Fig. 10(d) for samples). In Fig. 10(a) and Fig. 10(c), “BUOY WS/BUOY SWH” refers to one-site experiment data of wind speed/effective wave height acquired through sea-surface buoy, and “MODEL WS/MODEL SWH” refers to the reanalysis data of wind speed/effective wave height acquired through data at the grid point of longitude and latitude and data modeling.

    Figure  10.  Meteorological and hydrological data of experimental sea area
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Based on the above data acquisition, the buoy for marine meteorology and hydrological information will also be used to modify the reanalysis data of wind and wave at specific positions during the experiment. The real-time observation for onsite wave and tide can be realized at a fixed position through such a buoy because of its high accuracy in measurement and simple erection and maintenance (see Fig. 11). The measurement parameters include wave height, wave period, wave direction, wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, air pressure, and position coordinates of the buoy.

    Figure  11.  Marine meteorological and hydrological information buoy
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    In addition to obtaining the aforementioned marine environmental information, the sea-detecting radar experiment will also synchronize real motion tracks of the sea targets. For large and medium-sized ships, the position, motion state, and dimensional information of targets can be acquired through message data of AIS. For small-sized ships, coordination experiments (additionally installing AIS equipment or GPS/Beidou positioning system) will be conducted to acquire real motion tracks. Furthermore, non-coordinated targets (e.g., small-sized fishing ships and yachts) at sea surface will be roughly marked (for position and time) through observations of radar display terminal and manual records. These targets, however, cannot provide accurate position information as real values.

    To describe data validity, in this section, a group of typical sea-surface measurement data will be selected to provide time domain and frequency domain processing results. The data file name is 20191008085830_staring.mat and data acquisition was conducted from 8:58:30 a.m. on October 8, 2019. When the data acquisition began, the radar antenna stared at a certain direction of the sea surface. The pulse transmission mode is Mode 2 shown in Fig. 3, i.e., each trigger of radar successively transmits two different pulses. The first pulse is a single-carrier frequency signal with pulse width of 40 ns, while the second pulse is an LFM signal with bandwidth 25 MHz, pulse repetition frequency of 3 kHz, and sampling rate at a distance direction of 60 MHz. This group of data will be used to measure sea clutter. No coordinated target occurs at sea surface and the effective wave height of the sea surface is 1.8–2.0 m, which is Grade 4 sea condition according to the Table of Grade of Sea Conditions[1,46]. Fig. 12(a) and Fig. 12(b) show 2D plane graphs of the time domain for single-carrier frequency pulse echo and LFM pulse echo. This group of data contains a total of 4,096 pulses and the data duration is approximately 1.36 s. The echo sampling number at distance direction is 1,436 for the first pulse and 6,678 for the second pulse. Fig. 12(a) and Fig. 12(b) only shows the data of the area with strong clutter instead of the data in all distance units. Fig. 12(c) and Fig. 12(d) present oscillograms of the echo sequence of three distance units. We can observe that clutter energy gradually declines as the distance increases. Fig. 12(e) and Fig. 12(f) show a 2D planar graph of distance and frequency for the single-carrier frequency pulse echo and LFM pulse echo, respectively. Fig. 12(g) and Fig. 12(h) respectively show the Doppler spectra of multiple distance units. We can observe positive values at the center of the Doppler spectrum, indicating the movement of sea waves toward the gazing direction of the radar. According to a 2D diagram of distance frequency for the single-carrier frequency pulse echo, the amplitude of the Doppler spectrum for clutter at certain sampling points is weak, which is related to the fluctuation of sea waves and also the single-carrier frequency pulse echo without distance dimension matched filtering after digital demodulation. If distance dimension matched filtering is conducted, then the Doppler spectrum inevitably widens at the distance dimension to cover all distance units. As a result, results become similar to a 2D diagram of the distance frequency for the LFM pulse echo.

    Figure  12.  Results of typical measurements
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    According to an analysis of multiple groups of data, at the radar erection height of approximately 80 m and under levels 3–4 marine conditions, the range of the significant sea clutter is measured at not less than 3 km when the radar transmits a single-carrier frequency pulse and not less than 8 km when the radar transmits an LFM pulse. Such a range declines under low sea conditions but increase under high sea conditions.

    Real radar data are required to support the development of sea target detection technology with radar. Owing to military and technical confidentiality, most sea clutter datasets measured with radar have not been disclosed. The earlier disclosed sea-detecting radar data, however, is difficult to acquire. Thus, this paper has proposed a “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program” that aims to conduct sea-detection experiments with X-band solid full-coherent radar and other types of radars; acquire targets and sea clutter data under different grades of sea conditions, resolutions, and grazing angles; synchronously acquire real marine meteorological and hydrological data, target positions, and tracks; and achieve standard management for real radar data. As a result, dataset sharing will be advanced to provide data support for tackling critical problems in the research field of sea-detecting radars.

    The real sea-detecting X-band radar data will be disclosed and shared depending on the official website of the Journal of Radars. Experiment data will be uploaded to the “Data/Sea-Detecting Radar Data” page (see Appendix Fig. 1). Please visit http://radars.ie.ac.cn/web/data/getData?dataType=DatasetofRadarDetectingSea for details. Furthermore, data will be regularly updated after the sea-detection experiment.

    1.  Release address of sea-detecting radar data
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The phase 1 experiment primarily focuses on collecting sea clutter data and then detecting the data of sea-surface targets (non-coordinated targets). Owing to large data size, each data file is not described in this paper. An overview of each data type will be provided based on grade of sea conditions for future reference and selection by researchers.

    Each pulse echo in every group of data includes data head, which includes zone bit, length of information head, data version, pulse repetition period, frequency and counting, sampling frequency, data source and triggering mode, orientation code, sign of data loss, start time and corresponding sampling depth of port gate, UTC time, radar position, true north angle of radar, working mode of radar and data check bit, and others. When the data are loaded, each data point contained in the data head and corresponding meaning will be presented for future reference.

    • References(102)
  • [1]
    刘新, 阎焜, 杨光耀, 等. UWB-MIMO穿墙雷达三维成像与运动补偿算法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2020, 42(9): 2253–2260. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190356.

    LIU Xin, YAN Kun, YANG Guangyao, et al. Study on 3D imaging and motion compensation algorithm for UWB-MIMO through-wall radar[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2020, 42(9): 2253–2260. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190356.
    [2]
    罗朋, 胡振峰, 田世伟, 等. UWB雷达芯片的研究现状与发展[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(4): 1176–1192. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211082.

    LUO Peng, HU Zhenfeng, TIAN Shiwei, et al. The status and trends of UWB radar integrated circuit[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(4): 1176–1192. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211082.
    [3]
    郑学召, 丁文, 蔡国斌, 等. 面向钻孔救援的UWB雷达回波信息处理关键问题研究进展[J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(10): 219–225. doi: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.10.030.

    ZHENG Xuezhao, DING Wen, CAI Guobin, et al. Research progress on key issues of UWB radar echo information processing for borehole rescue[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(10): 219–225. doi: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.10.030.
    [4]
    肖明国, 张彪, 康玉国, 等. 面向钻孔救援的UWB雷达探测技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭技术, 2024, 43(6): 174–177. doi: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2024.06.036.

    XIAO Mingguo, ZHANG Biao, KANG Yuguo, et al. Research progress of UWB radar detection technology for drilling rescue[J]. Coal Technology, 2024, 43(6): 174–177. doi: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2024.06.036.
    [5]
    文虎, 刘盛铠, 郑学召, 等. 基于钻孔救援的UWB雷达波传输衰减研究及展望[J]. 工矿自动化, 2023, 49(4): 42–49. doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18053.

    WEN Hu, LIU Shengkai, ZHENG Xuezhao, et al. Research and prospect of UWB radar wave transmission attenuation based on borehole rescue[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(4): 42–49. doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18053.
    [6]
    敬芳菲. 基于超宽带雷达的生命体征提取技术研究[D]. [硕士论文], 电子科技大学, 2022. doi: 10.27005/d.cnki.gdzku.2022.002229.

    JING Fangfei. Vital signs extraction technology based on UWB radar[D]. [Master dissertation], University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2022. doi: 10.27005/d.cnki.gdzku.2022.002229.
    [7]
    QU Xiaodong, GAO Weicheng, MENG Haoyu, et al. Indoor human behavior recognition method based on wavelet scattering network and conditional random field model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5104815. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3276023.
    [8]
    屈乐乐, 刘淑杰, 杨天虹, 等. 基于多通道的调频连续波雷达生命信号提取[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(4): 1318–1326. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211073.

    QU Lele, LIU Shujie, YANG Tianhong, et al. Life signal extraction based on multi-channel frequency modulated continuous wave radar[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(4): 1318–1326. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211073.
    [9]
    马铖. 面向低信噪杂比环境的随机信号雷达生命探测方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 太原理工大学, 2022. doi: 10.27352/d.cnki.gylgu.2022.000168.

    MA Cheng. Research on life detection method of random signal radar in low signal to noise and clutter ratio environment[D]. [Master dissertation], Taiyuan University of Technology, 2022. doi: 10.27352/d.cnki.gylgu.2022.000168.
    [10]
    CHUNG S W, SHIH C C, and HUANG C C. Freehand three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of carotid artery using motion tracking technology[J]. Ultrasonics, 2017, 74: 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.09.020.
    [11]
    TSANG T K K and EL-GAMAL M N. Ultra-wideband (UWB) communications systems: An overview[C]. The 3rd International IEEE-NEWCAS Conference, Quebec, Canada, 2005: 381–386. doi: 10.1109/NEWCAS.2005.1496688.
    [12]
    赵尤信, 姚海飞, 李佳慧, 等. 超宽带雷达生命探测技术研究[J]. 工矿自动化, 2023, 49(9): 178–186. doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18111.

    ZHAO Youxin, YAO Haifei, LI Jiahui, et al. Research on ultra wideband radar life detection technology[J]. Journal of Mine Automation, 2023, 49(9): 178–186. doi: 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.18111.
    [13]
    CHEN Xiaomin and KIAEI S. Monocycle shapes for ultra wideband system[C]. 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Phoenix-Scottsdale, USA, 2002: 1. doi: 10.1109/ISCAS.2002.1009911.
    [14]
    LOPES A, OSÓRIO D F N, SILVA H, et al. Equivalent pipeline processing for IR-UWB and FMCW radar comparison in vital signs monitoring applications[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2022, 22(12): 12028–12035. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2022.3173218.
    [15]
    邢孟道, 谢意远, 高悦欣, 等. 电磁散射特征提取与成像识别算法综述[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(6): 921–942. doi: 10.12000/JR22232.

    XING Mengdao, XIE Yiyuan, GAO Yuexin, et al. Electromagnetic scattering characteristic extraction and imaging recognition algorithm: A review[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(6): 921–942. doi: 10.12000/JR22232.
    [16]
    HUANG Peng, HAI Yu, LI Zhongyu, et al. UWB-radar target scattering characteristic estimation method using joint Low-Rank and sparse characteristic[C]. IGARSS 2023–2023 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Pasadena, USA, 2023: 6037–6040. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS52108.2023.10282414.
    [17]
    RICHARDS M A. Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing[M]. 2nd ed. Chicago: McGraw-Hill Education, 2014: 71–75.
    [18]
    GAO Xiaomeng, JIANG Xiaonan, BI Songjie, et al. Measurement of the complex human Atrial-Ventricular motions using Contact-Based Doppler radar[C]. 2019 IEEE 20th Wireless and Microwave Technology Conference (WAMICON), Cocoa Beach, USA, 2019: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/WAMICON.2019.8765441.
    [19]
    丁鹭飞, 耿富录. 雷达原理[M]. 3版. 西安: 西安电子科技大学出版社, 2019: 235–239.

    DING Lufei and GENG Fulu. Principle of Radar[M]. 3rd ed. Xi’an: Xidian University Press, 2019: 235–239.
    [20]
    漆晶, 汪正东, 谢广智. 基于胸腔信号样本的FMCW雷达身份验证[J]. 雷达科学与技术, 2023, 21(5): 539–546, 554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2023.05.010.

    QI Jing, WANG Zhengdong, and XIE Guangzhi. FMCW radar authentication based on chest cavity signal samples[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2023, 21(5): 539–546, 554. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2023.05.010.
    [21]
    LI Zhi, JIN Tian, DAI Yongpeng, et al. Through-wall multi-subject localization and vital signs monitoring using UWB MIMO imaging radar[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(15): 2905. doi: 10.3390/rs13152905.
    [22]
    LIU Fan, ZHANG Tingting, and CAO Pan. Asynchronous integration of communication and localization systems using IR-UWB signals[C]. 2021 IEEE Military Communications Conference, San Diego, USA, 2021: 521–527. doi: 10.1109/MILCOM52596.2021.9652951.
    [23]
    张崇超, 张长春, 张群英. EEMD在超宽带雷达生命信号提取中的应用[J]. 电子测量技术, 2012, 35(4): 76–80, 101. doi: 10.19651/j.cnki.emt.2012.04.019.

    ZHANG Chongchao, ZHANG Changchun, and ZHANG Qunying. Applications of EEMD in vital signal detection for UWB radar[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2012, 35(4): 76–80, 101. doi: 10.19651/j.cnki.emt.2012.04.019.
    [24]
    WANG Jun, ZHU He, LEI Peng, et al. CNN based classification of rigid targets in space using radar micro-Doppler signatures[J]. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 2019, 28(4): 856–862. doi: 10.1049/cje.2018.08.003.
    [25]
    刘翼群. 生命探测雷达信号处理算法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2019.

    LIU Yiqun. Research on signal processing algorithm of life detection radar[D]. [Master dissertation], Xidian University, 2019.
    [26]
    PATERNIANI G, SGRECCIA D, DAVOLI A, et al. Radar-based monitoring of vital signs: A tutorial overview[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2023, 111(3): 277–317. doi: 10.1109/jproc.2023.3244362.
    [27]
    LI Zongwei, PEI Yanbin, WANG Yuqi, et al. An enhanced respiratory mechanics model based on double-exponential and fractional calculus[J]. Frontiers in Physiology, 2023, 14: 1273645. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1273645.
    [28]
    高晓阳. 生命探测雷达目标辨识算法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2021.

    GAO Xiaoyang. Research on target recognition algorithm of life detection radar[D]. [Master dissertation], Xidian University, 2021.
    [29]
    LAZARO A, GIRBAU D, and VILLARINO R. Analysis of vital signs monitoring using an IR-UWB radar[J]. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2010, 100: 265–284. doi: 10.2528/pier09120302.
    [30]
    SHYU K K, CHIU L J, LEE P L, et al. Detection of breathing and heart rates in UWB radar sensor data using FVPIEF-based two-layer EEMD[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2019, 19(2): 774–784. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2018.2878607.
    [31]
    吴佳茜, 梁步阁, 杨德贵, 等. 引入时距信息的IR-UWB雷达多域特征融合呼吸模式识别方法[J]. 信号处理, 2024, 40(2): 236–249. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2024.02.002.

    WU Jiaxi, LIANG Buge, YANG Degui, et al. IR-UWB radar multi-domain feature fusion respiratory pattern recognition method with time-distance information[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2024, 40(2): 236–249. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2024.02.002.
    [32]
    郭继坤, 王保生, 郝维来, 等. 基于超宽带信号的矿井塌方体下生命特征的检测方法[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报, 2017, 27(1): 73–76, 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7262.2017.01.016.

    GUO Jikun, WANG Baosheng, HAO Weilai, et al. Research on detection method of life under mine based on ultra-wideband signal[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang University of Science & Technology, 2017, 27(1): 73–76, 96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-7262.2017.01.016.
    [33]
    HUO Ze, ZHANG Zhaoxia, YIN Yonggen, et al. Research on multitarget vital sign detection using IR-UWB radar in occlusion scenarios[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24(9): 15327–15336. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2024.3380831.
    [34]
    HUANG Ling, WANG Zhao, TIAN Ming, et al. Influence of Parameters on Radar Localization of Human Target under Complex Shielding Environment[M]. KIM K J and KIM H Y. Information Science and Applications. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 3–9. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1465-4_1.
    [35]
    YANG Degui, ZHU Zhengliang, ZHANG Junchao, et al. The overview of human localization and vital sign signal measurement using handheld IR-UWB through-wall radar[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(2): 402. doi: 10.3390/s21020402.
    [36]
    SHYU K K, CHIU L J, LEE P L, et al. UWB simultaneous breathing and heart rate detections in driving scenario using multi-feature alignment two-layer EEMD method[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(17): 10251–10266. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2020.2992687.
    [37]
    杨国成, 余慧敏. 基于N次峰值捕捉的超宽带雷达生命体征检测[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2020, 34(11): 204–210. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.B2003126.

    YANG Guocheng and YU Huimin. Vital sign detection of ultra-wideband radar based on N peaks capture[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2020, 34(11): 204–210. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.B2003126.
    [38]
    JING Fangfei, LIANG Jing, WANG Yizhu, et al. Harmonics and intermodulation products-based fuzzy logic (HIPBFL) algorithm for vital sign frequency estimation using a UWB radar[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 228: 120294. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120294.
    [39]
    YAN Meihui, LUO Zhongtao, HE Zishu, et al. The five-domain-six-map method for signal analysis in over-the-horizon radar[C]. 2021 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf21), Atlanta, USA, 2021: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RadarConf2147009.2021.9455249.
    [40]
    PAN Tianze, GUO Yuanyue, GUO Weiwei, et al. Detection of vital sign based on UWB radar by a time domain coherent accumulation method[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2023, 23(15): 17054–17063. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2023.3283552.
    [41]
    ZHAO Dawei, WANG Jun, CHEN Gang, et al. Clutter cancellation based on frequency domain analysis in passive bistatic radar[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 43956–43964. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2977961.
    [42]
    薛帅康, 王小月, 许致火, 等. 面向人体呼吸心跳同时监测的雷达信号处理方法综述[J]. 电讯技术, 2023, 63(12): 1995–2002. doi: 10.20079/j.issn.1001-893x.220904002.

    XUE Shuaikang, WANG Xiaoyue, XU Zhihuo, et al. A review of radar signal processing for simultaneous monitoring of human vital signs[J]. Telecommunication Engineering, 2023, 63(12): 1995–2002. doi: 10.20079/j.issn.1001-893x.220904002.
    [43]
    TURLEY M. Impulsive noise rejection in HF radar using a linear prediction technique[C]. The International Conference on Radar (IEEE Cat. No.03EX695), Adelaide, Australia, 2003: 358–362. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2003.1278767.
    [44]
    LU Lian, REN Weixin, and WANG Shidong. Fractional Fourier transform: Time-frequency representation and structural instantaneous frequency identification[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 178: 109305. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109305.
    [45]
    LI Tingpeng, WANG Zelong, and LIU Jiying. Evaluating effect of blanket jamming on radar via robust time-frequency analysis and peak to average power ratio[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 214504–214519. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3040514.
    [46]
    SUN Kewen, JIN Tian, and YANG Dongkai. An improved time-frequency analysis method in interference detection for GNSS receivers[J]. Sensors, 2015, 15(4): 9404–9426. doi: 10.3390/s150409404.
    [47]
    LAO Guochao, YIN Canbin, YE Wei, et al. A frequency domain extraction based adaptive joint time frequency decomposition method of the maneuvering target radar echo[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 266. doi: 10.3390/rs10020266.
    [48]
    LIU Meiru, XIA Hong, SUN Lin, et al. Vibration signal analysis of main coolant pump flywheel based on Hilbert-Huang transform[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2015, 47(2): 219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2014.12.010.
    [49]
    朱少民, 夏虹, 尹文哲, 等. 基于变分模态分解和希尔伯特变换的转子非平稳信号故障特征识别[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2024, 45(5): 825–832. doi: 10.11990/jheu.202205050.

    ZHU Shaomin, XIA Hong, YIN Wenzhe, et al. Fault feature identification for rotor non-stationary signals based on VMD-HT[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(5): 825–832. doi: 10.11990/jheu.202205050.
    [50]
    TOMA R N, KIM C H, and KIM J M. Bearing fault classification using ensemble empirical mode decomposition and convolutional neural network[J]. Electronics, 2021, 10(11): 1248. doi: 10.3390/electronics10111248.
    [51]
    CHENG Yao, WANG Zhiwei, CHEN Bingyan, et al. An improved complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise and its application to rolling element bearing fault diagnosis[J]. ISA Transactions, 2019, 91: 218–234. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.01.038.
    [52]
    PENG Kecheng, CAO Xiaoqun, LIU Bainian, et al. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise with convolution based gated recurrent neural network: A new deep learning model for South Asian high intensity forecasting[J]. Symmetry, 2021, 13(6): 931. doi: 10.3390/sym13060931.
    [53]
    CHUI K T, GUPTA B B, LIU R W, et al. Handling data heterogeneity in electricity load disaggregation via optimized complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition and wavelet packet transform[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(9): 3133. doi: 10.3390/s21093133.
    [54]
    WU Shiyou, TAN Kai, XIA Zhenghuan, et al. Improved human respiration detection method via ultra-wideband radar in through-wall or other similar conditions[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2016, 10(3): 468–476. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0159.
    [55]
    LIANG Xiaolin, ZHANG Hao, YE Shengbo, et al. Improved denoising method for through-wall vital sign detection using UWB impulse radar[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2018, 74: 72–93. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2017.12.004.
    [56]
    高磊. 非接触人体体征信号提取及分离方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 南京理工大学, 2017.

    GAO Lei. Research on non-contact human body signal extraction and separation methods[D]. [Master dissertation], Nanjing University of science and Technology, 2017.
    [57]
    SUN Li, HUANG Shuaiming, LI Yusheng, et al. Remote measurement of human vital signs based on joint-range adaptive EEMD[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 68514–68524. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2985286.
    [58]
    弭晴, 马永涛, 黄祉同. 基于多序列WOA-VMD算法的超宽带雷达心率检测[J]. 传感技术学报, 2024, 37(7): 1144–1153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2024.07.006.

    MI Qing, MA Yongtao, and HUANG Zhitong. Heart rate detection based on multi-sequence WOA-VMD algorithm using UWB radar[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2024, 37(7): 1144–1153. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2024.07.006.
    [59]
    NAISHADHAM K, PIOU J E, REN Lingyun, et al. Estimation of cardiopulmonary parameters from ultra wideband radar measurements using the state space method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2016, 10(6): 1037–1046. doi: 10.1109/tbcas.2015.2510652.
    [60]
    REN Lingyun, WANG Haofei, NAISHADHAM K, et al. Phase-based methods for heart rate detection using UWB impulse Doppler radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2016, 64(10): 3319–3331. doi: 10.1109/tmtt.2016.2597824.
    [61]
    LI Meiyu and LIN J. Wavelet-transform-based data-length-variation technique for fast heart rate detection using 5.8-GHz CW Doppler radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2018, 66(1): 568–576. doi: 10.1109/tmtt.2017.2730182.
    [62]
    YANG Guocheng and YU Huimin. Vital signs detection based on UWB radar using trajectory capture and peak capture[C]. 2020 3rd International Conference on Electron Device and Mechanical Engineering (ICEDME), Suzhou, China, 2020: 657–661. doi: 10.1109/ICEDME50972.2020.00155.
    [63]
    WANG Yong, WANG Wen, ZHOU Mu, et al. Remote monitoring of human vital signs based on 77-GHz mm-wave FMCW radar[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(10): 2999. doi: 10.3390/s20102999.
    [64]
    QIAO Lihong, LI Xin, XIAO Bin, et al. Learning-refined integral null space pursuit algorithm for noncontact multisubjects vital signs measurements using SFCW-UWB and IR-UWB radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 8506013. doi: 10.1109/tim.2022.3218031.
    [65]
    何密, 平钦文, 戴然. 深度学习融合超宽带雷达图谱的跌倒检测研究[J]. 雷达学报, 2023, 12(2): 343–355. doi: 10.12000/JR22169.

    HE Mi, PING Qinwen, and DAI Ran. Fall detection based on deep learning fusing ultrawideband radar spectrograms[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(2): 343–355. doi: 10.12000/JR22169.
    [66]
    MALEŠEVIĆ N, PETROVIĆ V, BELIĆ M, et al. Contactless real-time heartbeat detection via 24 GHz continuous-wave Doppler radar using artificial neural networks[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(8): 2351. doi: 10.3390/s20082351.
    [67]
    周金海, 吴耿俊, 雷雯, 等. 基于呼吸样本空间的超宽带雷达身份识别[J]. 电子测量与仪器学报, 2022, 36(1): 118–125. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.B2104217.

    ZHOU Jinhai, WU Gengjun, LEI Wen, et al. UWB radar identification based on breathing sample space[J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrumentation, 2022, 36(1): 118–125. doi: 10.13382/j.jemi.B2104217.
    [68]
    HE Mi, NIAN Yongjian, XU Luping, et al. Adaptive separation of respiratory and heartbeat signals among multiple people based on empirical wavelet transform using UWB radar[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(17): 4913. doi: 10.3390/s20174913.
    [69]
    ZHAO Heng, HONG Hong, MIAO Dongyu, et al. A noncontact breathing disorder recognition system using 2.4-GHz digital-IF Doppler radar[J]. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2019, 23(1): 208–217. doi: 10.1109/jbhi.2018.2817258.
    [70]
    侯敏. 基于深度学习的人体微动特性分析与步态识别[D]. [硕士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2021. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2021.001623.

    HOU Min. Analysis of human micro-motion characteristics and gait recognition based on deep learning[D]. [Master dissertation], Xidian University, 2021. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2021.001623.
    [71]
    郑学召, 孙梓峪, 郭军, 等. 矿山钻孔救援多源信息探测技术研究与应用[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(11): 94–102. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.05.0421.

    ZHENG Xuezhao, SUN Zhiyu, GUO Jun, et al. Research and application of multi-source information detection technology for drilling rescue of mine[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(11): 94–102. doi: 10.12363/issn.1001-1986.22.05.0421.
    [72]
    王保生. 超宽带信号穿透塌方体衰减特性及生命特征检测方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 黑龙江科技大学, 2017.

    WANG Baosheng. Study on attenuation characteristics and life characteristics detection method of ultra wide band signal through landslide[D]. [Master dissertation], Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, 2017.
    [73]
    李欣欣. 遮蔽环境下基于超宽带雷达的生命探测技术研究[D]. [硕士论文], 兰州理工大学, 2023. doi: 10.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2023.000714.

    LI Xinxin. Research on life detection technology based on Ultra-Wide-Band radar in sheltered environment[D]. [Master dissertation], Lanzhou University of Technology, 2023. doi: 10.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2023.000714.
    [74]
    潘俊, 叶盛波, 史城, 等. 基于先验信噪比估计的超宽带穿墙雷达呼吸信号检测算法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(4): 1241–1248. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211042.

    PAN Jun, YE Shengbo, SHI Cheng, et al. Study on respiration signal detection algorithm of Ultra-WideBand through-wall radar based on a priori signal-to-noise ratio estimation[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(4): 1241–1248. doi: 10.11999/JEIT211042.
    [75]
    LI Jing, LIU Lanbo, ZENG Zhaofa, et al. Advanced signal processing for vital sign extraction with applications in UWB radar detection of trapped victims in complex environments[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(3): 783–791. doi: 10.1109/jstars.2013.2259801.
    [76]
    MAO Kai, ZHU Qiuming, YE Xijuan, et al. UWB channel modeling and simulation with continuous frequency response[J]. China Communications, 2022, 19(11): 88–98. doi: 10.23919/jcc.2022.11.007.
    [77]
    CAI Jiajia, ZHOU Hao, HUANG Weimin, et al. Ship detection and direction finding based on time-frequency analysis for compact HF radar[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2021, 18(1): 72–76. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2020.2967387.
    [78]
    瑞泽, 熊明耀, 梁步阁. 穿墙雷达呼吸信号提取算法研究[J]. 电子技术, 2021, 50(7): 106–108.

    RUI Ze, XIONG Mingyao, and LIANG Buge. Study on algorithm of breathing signal extraction for through wall radar[J]. Electronic Technology, 2021, 50(7): 106–108.
    [79]
    WANG Kun, ZENG Zhaofa, and SUN Jiguang. Through-wall detection of the moving paths and vital signs of human beings[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019, 16(5): 717–721. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2018.2881311.
    [80]
    NEZIROVIC A, YAROVOY A G, and LIGTHART L P. Signal processing for improved detection of trapped victims using UWB radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(4): 2005–2014. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2009.2036840.
    [81]
    ALAM M J, O’SHAUGHNESSY D D, and SELOUANI S A. Speech enhancement based on novel two-step a priori SNR estimators[C]. 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane, Australia, 2008: 565–568.
    [82]
    ZHANG Jingwen, QI Qingjie, CHENG Huifeng, et al. A multi-target localization and vital sign detection method using ultra-wide band radar[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(13): 5779. doi: 10.3390/s23135779.
    [83]
    樊哲宁, 朱嘉健, 王立新, 等. 基于超宽带雷达及支持向量机的灾后人体呼吸信号识别方法与试验研究[J]. 震灾防御技术, 2021, 16(3): 597–604. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210320.

    FAN Zhening, ZHU Jiajian, WANG Lixin, et al. An approach and experiments for human respiratory signal recognition based on UWB radar and support vector machine[J]. Technology for Earthquake Disaster Prevention, 2021, 16(3): 597–604. doi: 10.11899/zzfy20210320.
    [84]
    PAN Jun, YE Shengbo, NI Zhikang, et al. Enhancement of vital signals based on low-rank, sparse representation for UWB through-wall radar[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2022, 13(1): 98–106. doi: 10.1080/2150704x.2021.1995069.
    [85]
    LIANG Xiao, PAN Jun, ZHENG Zhijie, et al. Enhancement of vital signals for UWB through-wall radar using nonconvex regularization[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 14(4): 392–401. doi: 10.1080/2150704x.2023.2204197.
    [86]
    LIANG Xiao, YE Shengbo, SONG Chenyang, et al. Enhancement of vital signals for UWB through-wall radar using low-rank and block-sparse matrix decomposition[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(4): 620. doi: 10.3390/rs16040620.
    [87]
    ISLAM S M M, BORIĆ-LUBECKE O, and LUBECKE V M. Identity authentication in two-subject environments using microwave Doppler radar and machine learning classifiers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2022, 70(11): 5063–5076. doi: 10.1109/tmtt.2022.3197413.
    [88]
    PURNOMO A T, LIN Dingbing, ADIPRABOWO T, et al. Non-contact monitoring and classification of breathing pattern for the supervision of people infected by COVID-19[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(9): 3172. doi: 10.3390/s21093172.
    [89]
    胡锡坤, 金添. 基于自适应小波尺度选择的生物雷达呼吸与心跳分离方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(5): 462–469. doi: 10.12000/JR16103.

    HU Xikun and JIN Tian. Adaptive wavelet scale selection-based method for separating respiration and heartbeat in bio-radars[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 462–469. doi: 10.12000/JR16103.
    [90]
    YE Chen, GUI Guan, and OHTSUKI T. Deep clustering with LSTM for vital signs separation in contact-free heart rate estimation[C]. ICC 2020–2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Dublin, Ireland, 2020: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149328.
    [91]
    QIAO Lihong, WANG Zehua, XIAO Bin, et al. Spectral unmixing successive variational mode decomposition for robust vital signs detection using UWB radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 8502813. doi: 10.1109/tim.2023.3274171.
    [92]
    KANG Sun, KIM D K, LEE Y, et al. Non-contact diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea using impulse-radio ultra-wideband radar[J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1): 5261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62061-4.
    [93]
    ZHENG Tianyue, CHEN Zhe, ZHANG Shujie, et al. MoRe-Fi: Motion-robust and fine-grained respiration monitoring via deep-learning UWB radar[C]. The 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Coimbra, Portugal, 2021: 111–124. doi: 10.1145/3485730.3485932.
    [94]
    徐向阳. 基于UWB生物雷达的心跳呼吸提取技术实现[D]. [硕士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2018.

    XU Xiangyang. Realization on extracting technology of heartbeat and respiration based on UWB bioradar[D]. [Master dissertation], Xidian University, 2018.
    [95]
    陶启明. 基于超宽带雷达的生命特征信息提取技术研究[D]. [硕士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2022. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2022.003124.

    TAO Qiming. Vital sign monitoring using ultra wide band radar[D]. [Master dissertation], Xidian University, 2022. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2022.003124.
    [96]
    YUAN Zhonghang, LU Shuaibing, HE Yi, et al. Nmr-VSM: Non-touch motion-robust vital sign monitoring via UWB radar based on deep learning[J]. Micromachines, 2023, 14(7): 1479. doi: 10.3390/mi14071479.
    [97]
    AHMED S, LEE Y, LIM Y H, et al. Noncontact assessment for fatigue based on heart rate variability using IR-UWB radar[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 14211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18498-w.
    [98]
    乔嘉豪. 基于生物雷达的心跳分离与特征提取方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 西安工业大学, 2023. doi: 10.27391/d.cnki.gxagu.2023.000594.

    QIAO Jiahao. Research on the method of heartbeat separation and feature extraction based on bio-radar[D]. [Master dissertation], Xi’an Technological University, 2023. doi: 10.27391/d.cnki.gxagu.2023.000594.
    [99]
    LIANG Xiaolin and JIANG Yongling. Detection of breathing rates in through-wall UWB radar utilizing JTFA[J]. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS), 2019, 13(11): 5527–5545. doi: 10.3837/tiis.2019.11.014.
    [100]
    JIN Yanghao, CHEN Jianlai, LIANG Buge, et al. First demonstration of using signal processing approach to suppress signal ringing in impulse UWB through-wall radar[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2022, 19: 3505505. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2021.3070407.
    [101]
    ZHENG Tianyue, CHEN Zhe, CAI Chao, et al. V2iFi: In-vehicle vital sign monitoring via compact RF sensing[J]. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 2020, 4(2): 70. doi: 10.1145/3397321.
    [102]
    SCHIRES E, GEORGIOU P, and LANDE T S. Vital sign monitoring through the back using an UWB impulse radar with body coupled antennas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 2018, 12(2): 292–302. doi: 10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2799322.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Yaping, SHI Longfei, WANG Dong, TANG Jianglan, CHEN Junxian, MA Jiazhi, LIU Jialei. Research Progress on Dual Function Radar and Communication Signal Design and its Application in Typical Detection Scenarios[J]. Journal of Radars. doi: 10.12000/JR24213
    [2]ZHAO Xiang, WANG Wei, LI Chenyang, GUAN Jian, LI Gang. Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome Using Fusion of Micro-motion Signals from Millimeter-wave Radar and Pulse Wave Data[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(1): 102-116. doi: 10.12000/JR24107
    [3]YANG Xuan, WANG Ziying, ZHANG Li, ZHAO Heng, HONG Hong. Noncontact Multiperson Respiratory Detection Method Based on Blind Source Separation[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(1): 117-134. doi: 10.12000/JR24115
    [4]JIN Tian, SONG Yongkun, DAI Yongpeng, HU Xikun, SONG Yongping, ZHOU Xiaolong, QIU Zhifeng. UWB-HA4D-1.0: An Ultra-wideband Radar Human Activity 4D Imaging Dataset[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(1): 27-39. doi: 10.12000/JR22008
    [5]JIN Biao, LI Cong, ZHANG Zhenkai. Group Target Track Initiation Method Aided by Echo Amplitude Information[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 723-729. doi: 10.12000/JR19088
    [6]XING Mengdao, LIN Hao, CHEN Jianlai, SUN Guangcai, YAN Bangbang. A Review of Imaging Algorithms in Multi-platform-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(6): 732-757. doi: 10.12000/JR19102
    [7]Lei Wentai, Liang Qiong, Tan Qianying. A New Ground Penetrating Radar Signal Denoising Algorithm Based on Automatic Reversed-phase Correction and Kurtosis Value Comparison[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(3): 294-302. doi: 10.12000/JR17113
    [8]Yang Haifeng, Xie Wenchong, Wang Yongliang. Modeling and Analysis of Multiple AEWs Coordinated Detection Radar System with Different Transmit Waveform[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(3): 267-274. doi: 10.12000/JR16142
    [9]Rao Yunhua, Ming Yanzhen, Lin Jing, Zhu Fengyuan, Wan Xianrong, Gong Ziping. Reference Signal Reconstruction and Its Impact on Detection Performance of WiFi-based Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(3): 284-292. doi: 10.12000/JR15108
    [10]Chen Fuming, Li Sheng, An Qiang, Zhang Ziqi, Wang Jianqi. Advancements in Bio-radar Speech Signal Detection Technology[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 477-486. doi: 10.12000/JR16099
    [11]Zhao Chunlei, Wang Yaliang, Yang Yunlong, Mao Xingpeng, Yu Changjun. Review of Radar Polarization Information Acquisition and Polarimetric Signal Processing Techniques[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 620-638. doi: 10.12000/JR16092
    [12]Hu Xikun, Jin Tian. Adaptive Wavelet Scale Selection-based Method for Separating Respiration and Heartbeat in Bio-radars[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 462-469. doi: 10.12000/JR16103
    [13]Zhang Zhe, Zhang Bingchen, Hong Wen, Wu Yirong. Accelerated Sparse Microwave Imaging Phase Error Compensation Algorithm Based on Combination of SAR Raw Data Simulator and Map-drift Autofocus Algorithm[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(1): 25-34. doi: 10.12000/JR15055
    [14]Xia Zheng-huan, Zhang Qun-ying, Ye Sheng-bo, Wu Shi-you, Tan Kai, Fang Guang-you, Yin He-jun. Design of a Handheld Pseudo Random Coded UWB Radar for Human Sensing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(5): 527-537. doi: 10.12000/JR15027
    [15]Zou Ning, Xu Zheng-guang, Ran Jian-hua, Li Chao-yang. Performance of Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Sub-Nyquist Bandpass Sampling in the Pulse Position Modulation-Ultra Wide Band System[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(2): 185-191. doi: 10.12000/JR14103
    [16]Liang Fu-lai, Li Zhao, An Qiang, Liu Miao, Wang Jian-qi. Suppression of Time-domain Jitter of Impulse Radio Ultra-wide Band Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(4): 439-444. doi: 10.12000/JR14115
    [17]Ning Chao, Geng Xu-pu, Wang Chao, Huang Pei-kang. Wideband Radar Echo Frequency-domain Simulation and Analysis for High Speed Moving Targets[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(2): 142-149. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2014.14021
    [18]Du Qiang, Song Yao-liang, Cao Xiao-jian. Research on UWB Beamforming Using Direct Time Delay Compensation Based on Hermite Interpolation Filter[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(3): 278-283. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13028
    [19]Gong Bin, Wang Zhuang, Cheng Zhu. Wideband Array Signal Detection Algorithm Based on Power Focusing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(3): 253-261. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20049
    [20]Zhu Ying, Zhang Gong, Zhang Jin-dong. Signal Model and Parameters Estimation of Statistical MIMO Radar Based on Distributed Compressed Sensing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(2): 143-148. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20016
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-03050100150200250300
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.8 %FULLTEXT: 18.8 %META: 56.1 %META: 56.1 %PDF: 25.2 %PDF: 25.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 10.3 %其他: 10.3 %其他: 0.5 %其他: 0.5 %Central District: 0.2 %Central District: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %Russian Federation: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %San Mateo: 0.1 %San Mateo: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.1 %Taichung: 0.1 %Taichung: 0.1 %上海: 3.4 %上海: 3.4 %东京: 0.2 %东京: 0.2 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %中卫: 0.7 %中卫: 0.7 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %丹东: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %九江: 0.2 %九江: 0.2 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %北京: 14.9 %北京: 14.9 %南京: 1.9 %南京: 1.9 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %卧龙岗: 0.1 %卧龙岗: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %厦门: 0.1 %台北: 0.2 %台北: 0.2 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %合肥: 0.8 %合肥: 0.8 %吕梁: 0.1 %吕梁: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.6 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %唐山: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %天水围: 0.1 %天水围: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %孝感: 0.1 %安康: 0.6 %安康: 0.6 %宜宾: 0.3 %宜宾: 0.3 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.8 %宣城: 0.8 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广州: 1.3 %广州: 1.3 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %开封: 0.3 %开封: 0.3 %张家口: 2.1 %张家口: 2.1 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %徐州: 1.2 %徐州: 1.2 %惠州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %成都: 1.1 %成都: 1.1 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %抚顺: 0.1 %抚顺: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新北: 0.1 %新北: 0.1 %新泽西: 0.1 %新泽西: 0.1 %新西伯利亚: 0.1 %新西伯利亚: 0.1 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %桂林: 1.0 %桂林: 1.0 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %比勒费尔德: 0.1 %比勒费尔德: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %洛杉矶: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %淄博: 0.3 %淄博: 0.3 %深圳: 3.3 %深圳: 3.3 %清远: 0.3 %清远: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湘潭: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.4 %滨州: 0.2 %滨州: 0.2 %漯河: 2.4 %漯河: 2.4 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %烟台: 0.4 %烟台: 0.4 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %纽约: 9.8 %纽约: 9.8 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 6.9 %芒廷维尤: 6.9 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 1.3 %西宁: 1.3 %西安: 2.4 %西安: 2.4 %许昌: 0.2 %许昌: 0.2 %诺沃克: 2.0 %诺沃克: 2.0 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 4.0 %郑州: 4.0 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.1 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %锦州: 0.1 %长沙: 2.6 %长沙: 2.6 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港: 0.2 %香港: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %鹤壁: 0.1 %鹤壁: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaKao-sungOsakaRussian FederationSan JoseSan MateoSeattleTaichung上海东京东莞中卫临汾丹东乌鲁木齐九江伦敦佛山保定六安兰州内江北京南京南宁南昌南通卧龙岗厦门台北台州合肥吕梁呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布唐山嘉兴圣地亚哥大同大连天水围天津太原威海娄底孝感安康宜宾宜昌宝鸡宣城宿州常州常德广元广州库比蒂诺开封张家口张家界徐州惠州成都扬州抚顺新加坡新北新泽西新西伯利亚昆明朝阳杭州柳州桂林武汉比勒费尔德汕头沈阳泰州洛杉矶洛阳济南济宁淄博深圳清远温州湖州湘潭滨州漯河潍坊潮州烟台珠海石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科葫芦岛蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安许昌诺沃克赣州达州运城邯郸郑州重庆金华银川锡林郭勒盟锦州长沙青岛韶关香港马鞍山鹤壁

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(22)  / Tables(8)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(878) PDF downloads(393) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    • Table  1.  X-band experimental radar parameters
      Parameters Technical indexes
      Operating frequency X
      Scope of operating frequency 9.3-9.5 GHz
      Range 0.0625-96 nm
      Scanning bandwidth 25 MHz
      Range resolution 6 m
      Pulse repetition frequency 1.6 K, 3 K, 5 K & 10 K
      Emission peak power 50 W
      Revolving speed of antenna 2rpm, 12 rpm, 24 rpm, 48 rpm
      Length of antenna 1.8 m
      Operating mode of antenna Gazing & circular scanning
      Polarization mode of antenna HH
      Width of horizontal beam of antenna 1.2°
      Width of vertical beam of antenna 22°
       | Show Table
      DownLoad: CSV
    • 1.  Summary table of sea-detecting radar data (the 1st phase)
      No. Grade of sea conditions Data size Working mode of radar antenna Transmission pulse mode Regional AIS data Meteorological and
      hydrological data       		Grazing angle (°)
      1 Grade 1 and below >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      2 Grade 2 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      3 Grade 3 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      4 Grade 4 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      5 Grade 5 >5 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 No Yes 0.3–15
      Notes: ① Daily AIS data will be generated into a table format, which provides MMSI of ships, time, longitude and latitude, and others. ② Daily meteorological and hydrological data will be generated into an NC-format file, which indicates wind speed, wind direction, wave height, and cycle. ③ The number of pulses contained in a group of data under staring mode will not be less than 105, while a group of data under scanning mode contains a complete scanning cycle. ④ Under transmission pulse mode 2, radars of each corresponding repetition cycle will transmit a single-carrier frequency pulse and an LFM pulse.
       | Show Table
      DownLoad: CSV