Volume 6 Issue 3
Jun.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2017  >  6(3): 300-308
Jiang Tie-zhen, Xiao Wen-shu, Li Da-sheng, Liao Tong-qing. Feasibility Study on Passive-radar Detection of Space Targets Using Spaceborne Illuminators of Opportunity[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(6): 711-719. doi: 10.12000/JR14080
Citation: Xiong Dingding, Cui Guolong, Kong Lingjiang, Yang Xiaobo. Micro-motion Parameter Estimation in Non-Gaussian Noise via Mutual Correntropy[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(3): 300-308. doi: 10.12000/JR17007
shu

Micro-motion Parameter Estimation in Non-Gaussian Noise via Mutual Correntropy

DOI: 10.12000/JR17007

  • School of Electronics Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology, Chengdu 611731, China

Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61501083, 61301266)
  • Received Date: 2017-01-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-03-09
    • Available Online: 2017-04-17
  • Publish Date: 2017-06-28
    Abstract
  • This study considered parameter estimations for micro-motion targets embedded in non-Gaussian noise with a Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) radar. A novel estimation algorithm based on mutual correntropy was presented and used to derive the micro-perturbation parameters by exploiting the second and higher-order knowledge of the return signals among multiple channels. Compared with a conventional Fourier Transform (FT) method, the method proposed herein had a much higher Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) gain. In addition, the location was derived by employing the Phase-Comparison Monopulse (PCM) technique. Finally, several numerical results were provided and discussed.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    Tahmoush Dave. Review of micro-Doppler signatures[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2015, 9(9): 1140–1146.
    [2]
    Li Yan-bing, Du Lan, and Liu Hong-wei. Hierarchical classification of moving vehicles based on empirical mode decomposition of micro-Doppler signatures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(5): 3001–3013. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2216885
    [3]
    Chen V C. The Micro-Doppler Effect in Radar[M]. London: Artech House, 2001: 157–159.
    [4]
    Chen V C, Li Fa-yin, Ho Shen-shyang, et al.. Micro-Doppler effect in radar: Phenomenon, model, and simulation study[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2006, 42(1): 2–21. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2006.1603402
    [5]
    胡程, 廖鑫, 向寅, 等. 一种生命探测雷达微多普勒测量灵敏度分析新方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(5): 455–461. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract380.shtml

    Hu Cheng, Liao Xin, Xiang Yin, et al.. Novel analytic method for determining micro-Doppler measurement sensitivity in life-detection radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 455–461. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract380.shtml
    [6]
    Zhang Wen-peng, Li Kang-le, and Jiang Wei-dong. Parameter estimation of radar targets with macro-motion and micro-motion based on circular correlation coefficients[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2015, 22(5): 633–637. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2014.2365547
    [7]
    Liu Jin, Ai Xiao-feng, Zhao Feng, et al.. Motion estimation of micro-motion targets with translational motion[C]. IET International Radar Conference, Hangzhou, China, 2015: 1–5.
    [8]
    Jia Yong, Kong Ling-jiang, Yang Xiao-bo, et al.. A novel method for detection of micro-motion target in image domain[C]. 2011 IEEE Radar Conference, Chengdu, China, 2011: 99–102.
    [9]
    Kong Ling-jiang and Principe Jose C. Life detection based on correntropy spectral density[C]. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing, China, 2011: 168–171.
    [10]
    Mahafza B, Elsherbeni A, 朱国富, 黄晓涛, 黎向阳, 等. 雷达系统设计MATLAB仿真[M]. 第1版, 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2009: 297–299.

    Mahafza B, Elsherbeni A, Zhu Guo-fu, Huang Xiao-tao, Li Xiang-yang, et al.. MATLAB Simulations for Radar Systems Design[M]. First edition, Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2009: 297–299.
    [11]
    Liu Wei-feng, Pokharel P P, and Principe Jose C. Correntropy: Properties and applications in non-Gaussian signal precessing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, 55(11): 5286–5298. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.896065
    [12]
    Santamaria I, Pokharel P P, and Principe Jose C. Generalized correlation function: Definition, properties, and application to blind equalization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(6): 2187–2197. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2006.872524
    [13]
    Yamaguchi K, Saito M, Akiyama T, et al.. A 24 GHz band FM-CW radar system for detecting closed multiple targets with small displacement[C]. 2015 International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks, Sapporo, Japan, 2015: 268–273.
    [14]
    Narumi K and Takayama J. Material discrimination and propagation time estimation for buried object based on cross correlation processing using microwave radar[C]. Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), Tsukuba, Japan, 2016: 1287–1292.
    [15]
    Molchanov Pavlo, Gupta Shalini, Kim Kihwan, et al.. Short-range FMCW monopulse radar for hand-gesture sensing[C]. 2015 IEEE Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2015: 1491–1496.
    [16]
    李青华, 孔令讲, 杨晓波. 基于SIRP法的相关韦布尔分布雷达杂波仿真[J]. 雷达科学与技术, 2011, 9(3): 253–258. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDKJ201103012.htm

    Li Qing-hua, Kong Ling-jiang, and Yang Xiao-bo. Simulation of correlated Weibull distribution radar clutter based on SIRP method[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2011, 9(3): 253–258. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LDKJ201103012.htm
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]YIN Junjun, LUO Jiahao, LI Xiang, DAI Xiaokang, YANG Jian. Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric SAR Gradient and Complex Wishart Classifier[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(2): 396-410. doi: 10.12000/JR23198
    [2]WANG Ruichuan, WANG Yanfei. Terrain Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Using Semi-supervised Spatial-channel Selective Kernel Network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(4): 516-530. doi: 10.12000/JR21080
    [3]LIU Tao, YANG Ziyuan, JIANG Yanni, GAO Gui. Review of Ship Detection in Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Imagery （in English）[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 1-19. doi: 10.12000/JR20155
    [4]ZHU Qingtao, YIN Junjun, ZENG Liang, YANG Jian. Polarimetric SAR Image Affine Registration Based on Neighborhood Consensus[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 49-60. doi: 10.12000/JR20120
    [5]PANG Lei, ZHANG Fengli, WANG Guojun, LIU Na, SHAO Yun, ZHANG Jiameng, ZHAO Yuchuan, PANG Lei. Imaging Simulation and Damage Assessment Feature Analysis of Ku Band Polarized SAR of Buildings[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(3): 578-587. doi: 10.12000/JR20061
    [6]QIN Xianxiang, YU Wangsheng, WANG Peng, CHEN Tianping, ZOU Huanxin. Weakly Supervised Classification of PolSAR Images Based on Sample Refinement with Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(3): 525-538. doi: 10.12000/JR20062
    [7]HUA Wenqiang, WANG Shuang, GUO Yanhe, XIE Wen. Semi-supervised PolSAR Image Classification Based on the Neighborhood Minimum Spanning Tree[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(4): 458-470. doi: 10.12000/JR18104
    [8]ZHANG Lamei, ZHANG Siyu, DONG Hongwei, ZHU Sha. Robust Classification of PolSAR Images Based on Pinball loss Support Vector Machine[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(4): 448-457. doi: 10.12000/JR19055
    [9]ZHANG Xiangrong, YU Xinyuan, TANG Xu, HOU Biao, JIAO Licheng. PolSAR Image Classification Method Based on Markov Discriminant Spectral Clustering[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(4): 425-435. doi: 10.12000/JR19059
    [10]HU Tao, LI Weihua, QIN Xianxiang, WANG Peng, YU Wangsheng, LI Jun. Terrain Classification of Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Based on Deep Learning and Conditional Random Field Model[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(4): 471-478. doi: 10.12000/JR18065
    [11]Tao Chensong, Chen Siwei, Li Yongzhen, Xiao Shunping. Polarimetric SAR Terrain Classification Using Polarimetric Features Derived from Rotation Domain[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 524-532. doi: 10.12000/JR16131
    [12]She Xiaoqiang, Qiu Xiaolan, Lei Bin, Zhang Wei, Lu Xiaojun. A Classification Method Based on Polarimetric Entropy and GEV Mixture Model for Intertidal Area of PolSAR Image[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 554-563. doi: 10.12000/JR16149
    [13]Zhong Neng, Yang Wen, Yang Xiangli, Guo Wei. Unsupervised Classification for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Based on Wishart Mixture Models[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 533-540. doi: 10.12000/JR16133
    [14]Yang Wen, Zhong Neng, Yan Tianheng, Yang Xiangli. Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on the Riemannian Manifold[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 433-441. doi: 10.12000/JR17031
    [15]Ji Kefeng, Wang Haibo, Leng Xiangguang, Xing Xiangwei, Kang Lihong. Spaceborne Compact Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar for Ship Detection[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 607-619. doi: 10.12000/JR16083
    [16]Zhang Jie, Zhang Xi, Fan Chenqing, Meng Junmin. Discussion on Application of Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar in Marine Surveillance[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 596-606. doi: 10.12000/JR16124
    [17]Hong Wen. Hybrid-polarity Architecture Based Polarimetric SAR: Principles and Applications (in English)[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 559-595. doi: 10.12000/JR16074
    [18]Sun Xun, Huang Pingping, Tu Shangtan, Yang Xiangli. Polarimetric SAR Image Classification Using Multiple-feature Fusion and Ensemble Learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 692-700. doi: 10.12000/JR15132
    [19]Xing Yanxiao, Zhang Yi, Li Ning, Wang Yu, Hu Guixiang. Polarimetric SAR Image Supervised Classification Method Integrating Eigenvalues[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 217-227. doi: 10.12000/JR16019
    [20]Hua Wen-qiang, Wang Shuang, Hou Biao. Semi-supervised Learning for Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on SVM-Wishart[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(1): 93-98. doi: 10.12000/JR14138
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 20.1 %FULLTEXT: 20.1 %META: 71.8 %META: 71.8 %PDF: 8.1 %PDF: 8.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.9 %其他: 11.9 %其他: 0.7 %其他: 0.7 %Canada: 0.1 %Canada: 0.1 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %India: 0.2 %India: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.0 %Netherlands: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.0 %XX: 0.1 %XX: 0.1 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %上海市: 0.0 %上海市: 0.0 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东营: 0.0 %东营: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 15.1 %北京: 15.1 %北京市: 0.0 %北京市: 0.0 %北海: 0.1 %北海: 0.1 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南通: 0.0 %南通: 0.0 %印度: 0.5 %印度: 0.5 %古吉拉特: 0.2 %古吉拉特: 0.2 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %宁波: 0.0 %宁波: 0.0 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.2 %宿迁: 0.2 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广元: 0.1 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %开封: 0.1 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口: 2.4 %张家口市: 0.1 %张家口市: 0.1 %徐州: 0.0 %徐州: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.1 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %日照: 0.0 %日照: 0.0 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %梅州: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %永州: 0.1 %永州: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %河池: 0.1 %河池: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %泰安: 0.1 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %淮安: 0.1 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %渭南: 0.2 %渭南: 0.2 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄市: 0.1 %石家庄市: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 17.1 %芒廷维尤: 17.1 %芝加哥: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.2 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %荷兰北布拉班特省: 0.1 %荷兰北布拉班特省: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 35.8 %西宁: 35.8 %西安: 1.0 %西安: 1.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %贵港: 0.1 %贵港: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %车士活: 0.0 %车士活: 0.0 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %鞍山: 0.0 %鞍山: 0.0 %韶关: 0.0 %韶关: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %其他其他CanadaChinaIndiaNetherlandsTaiwan, ChinaXX[]上海上海市东莞东营丹东伊利诺伊州佛山保定兰辛凤凰城包头北京北京市北海南京南宁南通印度古吉拉特台州合肥呼和浩特咸宁哈尔滨哥伦布大庆大连天津宁波安康宿迁常州常德广元广州库比蒂诺开封张家口张家口市徐州德黑兰成都扬州新乡无锡日照昆明杭州梅州武汉永州沈阳河池泰安济南淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭漯河潍坊烟台玉林盐城石家庄石家庄市纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荷兰北布拉班特省莫斯科葫芦岛衡阳襄阳西宁西安西雅图贵港贵阳车士活运城连云港郑州重庆铁岭长春长沙长治阳泉青岛鞍山韶关香港特别行政区

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(2640) PDF downloads(728) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return