基于Transformer的转移范围优化检测前跟踪方法

张顺生 刘晓凯 陈垣光

张顺生, 刘晓凯, 陈垣光. 基于Transformer的转移范围优化检测前跟踪方法[J]. 雷达学报(中英文), 待出版. doi: 10.12000/JR26038
引用本文: 张顺生, 刘晓凯, 陈垣光. 基于Transformer的转移范围优化检测前跟踪方法[J]. 雷达学报(中英文), 待出版. doi: 10.12000/JR26038
ZHANG Shunsheng, LIU Xiaokai, and CHEN Yuanguang. Track-Before-Detect method with transformer-based transition range optimization[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26038
Citation: ZHANG Shunsheng, LIU Xiaokai, and CHEN Yuanguang. Track-Before-Detect method with transformer-based transition range optimization[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26038

基于Transformer的转移范围优化检测前跟踪方法

DOI: 10.12000/JR26038 CSTR: 32380.14.JR26038
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张顺生,研究员,主要研究方向为新体制雷达探测与成像、人工智能技术在雷达、电子战中的应用等

    刘晓凯,硕士生,主要研究方向为基于深度学习的雷达目标检测,检测前跟踪

    陈垣光,硕士生,主要研究方向为基于深度学习的雷达目标检测

    通讯作者:

    张顺生 zhangss@uestc.edu.cn

    责任主编:周共健 Corresponding Editor: ZHOU Gongjian

  • 中图分类号: TN953

Track-Before-Detect Method with Transformer-Based Transition Range Optimization

More Information
  • 摘要: 现有基于深度学习的检测前跟踪(TBD)方法主要依赖历史状态序列进行运动建模与前向预测,对原始量测平面中目标能量分布及时空一致性信息的显式利用不足,在复杂机动场景下易产生累积误差和轨迹偏移。针对此问题,该文提出一种基于Transformer架构的量测引导转移门控网络(MG-TGN),以数据驱动方式生成自适应状态转移范围。MG-TGN从历史轨迹与量测序列中提取时空特征,预测先验位移概率矩阵,同时利用当前帧量测平面提取局部观测响应以估计观测似然概率,并通过可学习门控系数对二者进行动态融合,确定候选转移集合,从而约束动态规划递推的状态搜索空间。该方法将深度特征融合策略嵌入TBD框架,在保留全局路径搜索优势的同时,提升低信噪比下机动目标的能量累积一致性与轨迹稳定性。实验结果表明,相较于既有深度学习TBD方法,本文方法在信噪比为8 dB时,弱机动场景下目标检测概率提升约5%,强机动场景下提升约28%。

     

  • 图  1  基于Transformer状态转移范围优化的检测前跟踪方法推理流程

    Figure  1.  Inference pipeline for Transformer-based TBD with optimized state transition range

    图  2  MG-TGN整体网络架构

    Figure  2.  The overall architecture of the MG-TGN network

    图  3  位移估计模块

    Figure  3.  Architecture of the displacement-estimation module

    图  4  量测引导模块

    Figure  4.  Architecture of the measurement-guided module

    图  5  门控校正模块

    Figure  5.  Architecture of the gated correction module

    图  6  后向搜索的转移范围示例

    Figure  6.  Illustration of transition range

    图  7  输入数据:不同信噪比下的原始量测平面

    Figure  7.  The raw measurement planes in different SNR conditions

    图  8  不同机动条件下的目标运动轨迹示意图

    Figure  8.  Target trajectories under different maneuvering conditions

    图  9  MG-TGN位移概率矩阵

    Figure  9.  Distribution of displacement estimation

    图  10  MG-TGN位移估计结果

    Figure  10.  Results of displacement estimation

    图  11  轨迹回溯结果对比

    Figure  11.  Visualization of trajectory backtracking result

    图  12  不同机动场景下的目标检测概率曲线

    Figure  12.  curves of $ {P}_{d} $ under different maneuvering scenarios

    图  13  不同机动场景下的轨迹检测概率曲线

    Figure  13.  curves of $ {P}_{d-\text{track}} $ under different maneuvering scenarios

    图  14  不同机动场景下的RMSE曲线

    Figure  14.  curves of $ \text{RMSE} $ under different maneuvering scenario

    1  MG-TGN辅助的DP-TBD推理流程

    1.   Inference Pipeline of DP-TBD Using MG-TGN

     1. 初始化值函数,利用宽门控DP递推和纯量测引导的MG-
      TGN实现首个窗口初始化,得到轨迹序列$ {\hat{\bar{\mathbf{X}}}}_{1\colon K} $;
     2. while $ t+K-1\leq T $do
     3.  窗口$ {W}_{t}\leftarrow [t,t+K-1] $
     4.  在窗口内执行DP递推:
     5.   基于$ {W}_{t-1} $轨迹先验和量测信息及$ {\mathbf{z}}_{t} $
     6.   MG-TGN输出$ {\pi }_{\text{upd}} $,构造候选转移集合$ {\mathcal{S}}_{k} $;
     7.   根据公式(30),针对$ \Delta \in {\mathcal{S}}_{k} $更新值函数;
     8.   记录轨迹回溯指针;
     9.  阈值判决,轨迹回溯;
     10. 下一滑窗迭代;
     11. end while
     12. 返回:整条轨迹序列$ {\hat{\bar{\mathbf{X}}}}_{1\colon N} $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  1  不同机动条件下的目标运动参数

    Table  1.   Target motion parameters under different maneuvering conditions

    参数 弱机动 强机动
    速度约束$ ||{v}_{\max }|| $ $ 100\;\text{m/s} $ $ 400\;\text{m/s} $
    加速度$ ||{a}_{\max }|| $ $ 5\;{\text{m/s}}^{2} $ $ 40\;{\text{m/s}}^{2} $
    转弯率$ ||{\omega }_{\max }|| $ $ 0.05\pi $ $ 0.3\pi $
    切换概率$ {p}_{\text{turn}} $ 0.01 0.25
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  MG-TGN关键网络参数

    Table  2.   The key parameters of MG-TGN

    参数数值
    序列长度8
    轨迹编码器层数4
    量测编码器层数4
    解码器层数4
    特征维度192
    多头注意力头数8
    前馈神经网络维度512
    Dropout0.1
    位移预测头MLP层数3
    位移预测头隐藏维度256
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  模型训练参数

    Table  3.   Model training parameters

    参数数值
    优化器AdamW
    初始学习率$ 5\times {10}^{-4} $
    学习率策略余弦退火
    权重衰减$ 1\times {10}^{-4} $
    Batchsize32
    辅助损失权重0.25
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  平均运行时间对比

    Table  4.   Comparison of average execution times

    方法平均运行时间(ms)
    KBC-TBD759.1
    MD-TBD595.5
    LSTM-TBD383.4
    Trans-TBD407.5
    MG-TGN-TBD342.3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  消融实验结果

    Table  5.   Results of ablation experiment

    模型变体位移估计量测引导$ {P}_{d} $
    完整MG-TGN0.837
    w/o 位移估计×0.743
    w/o量测引导×0.512
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] JALIL A, YOUSAF H, and BAIG M I. Analysis of CFAR techniques[C]. The 13th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan, 2016: 654–659. doi: 10.1109/IBCAST.2016.7429949.
    [2] BARNIV Y. Dynamic programming solution for detecting dim moving targets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1985, AES-21(1): 144–156. doi: 10.1109/TAES.1985.310548.
    [3] BOCQUEL M, DRIESSEN H, and BAGCHI A. Multitarget particle filter addressing ambiguous radar data in TBD[C]. 2012 IEEE Radar Conference, Atlanta, USA, 2012: 575–580. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2012.6212206.
    [4] GARCIA F J I, MANDAL P K, BOCQUEL M, et al. Riemann–Langevin particle filtering in track-before-detect[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2018, 25(7): 1039–1043.
    [5] LI Yuefeng, ZHANG Xiangyu, WANG Guohong, et al. A novel HT-TBD detection approach for near-space target[C]. The 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), Chengdu, China, 2017: 1720–1724. doi: 10.1109/CompComm.2017.8322834.
    [6] YI Wei, KONG Lingjiang, YANG Jianyu, et al. A modified dynamic programming approach for dim target detection and tracking[C]. The 2nd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Tianjin, China, 2009: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/CISP.2009.5300953.
    [7] 易伟. 基于检测前跟踪技术的多目标跟踪算法研究[D]. [博士论文], 电子科技大学, 2012.

    YI Wei. Research on track-before-detect algorithms for multiple-target detection and tracking[D]. [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2012.
    [8] YI Wei, MORELANDE M R, KONG Lingjiang, et al. An efficient multi-frame track-before-detect algorithm for multi-target tracking[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2013, 7(3): 421–434. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2013.2256415.
    [9] 方梓成. 多帧联合检测与跟踪技术研究[D]. [硕士论文], 电子科技大学, 2017.

    FANG Zicheng. Research on multi-frame detection and tracking technique[D]. [Master dissertation], University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2017.
    [10] 陆晓莹. 基于动态规划的雷达弱目标检测前跟踪算法研究[D]. [博士论文], 电子科技大学, 2023. doi: 10.27005/d.cnki.gdzku.2023.005491.

    LU Xiaoying. Research on track-before-detect algorithm based on dynamic programming for weak target with radar[D]. [Ph.D. dissertation], University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2023. doi: 10.27005/d.cnki.gdzku.2023.005491.
    [11] CAI Jiong, WANG Rui, LI Muyang, et al. An efficient threshold determination algorithm for DP-TBD based on structural analogy and saddle-point approximation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(6): 8263–8281. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3301458.
    [12] LI Wujun, YI Wei, TEH K C, et al. Radar multiframe detection in a complicated multitarget environment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5107516. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3298040.
    [13] LI X R and JILKOV V P, Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part I. Dynamic models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2003, 39(4): 1333–1364. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2003.1261132.
    [14] LI Xinzhe, WANG Shouyong, and ZHENG Daikun. A DP-TBD algorithm with adaptive state transition set for maneuvering targets[C]. 2016 CIE International Conference on Radar (RADAR), Guangzhou, China, 2016: 1–4. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2016.8059476.
    [15] FANG Zicheng, YI Wei, KONG Lingjiang, et al. A multi-frame track-before-detect algorithm for maneuvering targets in radar system[C]. 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), Philadelphia, USA, 2016: 1–6.
    [16] GROSSI E, LOPS M, and VENTURINO L. A novel dynamic programming algorithm for track-before-detect in radar systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2013, 61(10): 2608–2619. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2251338.
    [17] GROSSI E, LOPS M, and VENTURINO L. Track-before-detect for multiframe detection with censored observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2014, 50(3): 2032–2046. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.130148.
    [18] YI Wei, FANG Zicheng, LI Wujun, et al. Multi-frame track-before-detect algorithm for maneuvering target tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(4): 4104–4118. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.2976095.
    [19] ZHENG Daikun, WANG Shouyong, and MENG Qingwen. Dynamic programming track-before-detect algorithm for radar target detection based on polynomial time series prediction[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2016, 10(8): 1327–1336.
    [20] ZHENG Daikun, XU Hong, and ZHOU Chang. Maneuvering target joint detection and tracking using multi-frame integration[C]. 2019 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences, Chengdu, China, 2019: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS46528.2019.9074565.
    [21] XIONG Yan, PENG Jiaxiong, DING Mingyue, et al. An extended track-before-detect algorithm for infrared target detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1997, 33(3): 1087–1092. doi: 10.1109/7.599339.
    [22] WANG Yizhou, JIANG Zhongyu, LI Yudong, et al. RODNet: A real-time radar object detection network cross-supervised by camera-radar fused object 3D localization[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2021, 15(4): 954–967. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2021.3058895.
    [23] DECOURT C, VANRULLEN R, SALLE D, et al. DAROD: A deep automotive radar object detector on range-Doppler maps[C]. 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Aachen, Germany, 2022: 112–118. doi: 10.1109/IV51971.2022.9827281.
    [24] WU Yuanhang, ZHANG Chenyu, LIN Yiru, et al. CV-SAGAN: Complex-valued self-attention GAN on radar clutter suppression and target detection[C]. 2023 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf23), San Antonio, USA, 2023: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RadarConf2351548.2023.10149701.
    [25] YATAKA R, CARDACE A, WANG Pu, et al. RETR: Multi-view radar detection transformer for indoor perception[C]. The 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 2024: 625.
    [26] DECOURT C, VANRULLEN R, SALLE D, et al. A recurrent CNN for online object detection on raw radar frames[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(10): 13432–13441. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3404076.
    [27] ZHU Chuan, DENG Jie, LONG Xingyue, et al. DBU-Net based robust target detection for multi-frame track-before-detect method[C]. The 11th International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2022: 412–418. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS56082.2022.9990429.
    [28] SONG Fei, LI Yong, CHENG Wei, et al. An improved dynamic programming tracking-before-detection algorithm based on LSTM network[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2023, 2023(1): 57. doi: 10.1186/s13634-023-01020-3.
    [29] MOU Pan, MIAO Qing, ZHU Chuan, et al. Transformer architecture based multi-frame TBD algorithms for maneuvering targets[C]. The 12th International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2023: 224–229. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS59597.2023.10382246.
    [30] LEI Meng, WANG Yipeng, and ZHANG Ying. Highly maneuverable target recognition via contrastive-based time-frequency domain dynamic fusion[C]. IGARSS 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece, 2024: 9222–9226. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10640849.
  • 加载中
图(14) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量: 
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-02-02

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回