全极化探地雷达多极化数据融合分析研究

薛策文; 冯晅; 李晓天; 梁文婧; 周皓秋; 王颖

doi:10.12000/JR20104

全极化探地雷达多极化数据融合分析研究

DOI: 10.12000/JR20104

薛策文^{1, 3,},
冯晅^{1, 2, 3, 4, ,},
李晓天^{1, 3,},
梁文婧^{1, 3},
周皓秋^{1, 3},
王颖^{1, 3}

1.
吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院长春 130026
2.
地球信息探测仪器教育部重点实验室(吉林大学) 长春 130026
3.
近地面探测技术重点实验室无锡 214035
4.
吉林大学国家发展与安全研究所长春 130012

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1503705)，近地面探测技术重点实验室(6142414180911)，中央高校基础研究基金(20130061110061)，吉林省科技发展项目(20180101091JC)

详细信息

作者简介:
薛策文(1996–)，男，吉林人，吉林大学硕士生，研究方向为全极化探地雷达数据融合，探地雷达数据处理。E-mail: xuecw18@mails.jlu.edu.cn

冯　晅(1973–)，男，博士，教授，博士生导师，吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院副院长。2002年获吉林大学博士学位；日本東北大学(Tohoku University)博士后、研究助手(2003–2006)；美国麻省理工学院(MIT)访问学者(2014–2016); IEEE Senior Member。教育部新世纪优秀人才，国土资源部国土资源杰出青年科技人才。主要研究方向为全极化探地雷达地下探测理论和技术、非线性弹性地震学。E-mail: fengxuan@jlu.edu.cn

李晓天(1995–)，男，河南人，吉林大学硕士生，研究方向全极化探地雷达系统、探地雷达数据处理。E-mail: lixt@mails.jlu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
冯晅 fengxuan@jlu.edu.cn

责任主编：雷文太 Corresponding Editor: LEI Wentai
中图分类号: P631
计量
- 文章访问数: 2635
- HTML全文浏览量: 1069
- PDF下载量: 299
- 被引次数: 16
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-21
- 修回日期: 2020-09-27
- 网络出版日期: 2021-02-25

Multi-polarization Data Fusion Analysis of Full-Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar

XUE Cewen^{1, 3
,},
FENG Xuan^{1, 2, 3, 4
, ,},
LI Xiaotian^{1, 3
,},
LIANG Wenjing^{1, 3},
ZHOU Haoqiu^{1, 3},
WANG Ying^{1, 3}

1.
College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Geophysical Exploration Equipment, Ministry of Education (Jilin University), Changchun 130026, China
3.
Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory, Wuxi 214035, China
4.
Institute of National Development and Security Studies, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Funds: The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1503705), The Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory (6142414180911), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20130061110061), The Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (20180101091JC)

More Information

Corresponding author: FENG Xuan, fengxuan@jlu.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 对于相同地下目标体，相比大部分传统单极化探地雷达，全极化探地雷达(FP-GPR)可以测得更全面的极化数据，称为VV, HH, VH。为了对地下目标体进行更全面精细的成像和识别, 数据融合技术被应用于FP-GPR将3种不同极化模式的极化信息结合起来。然而，目前全极化探地雷达数据融合常用的加权平均融合方法，它会掩盖全极化的优点，同时也无法同时适应不同的散射机制。因此，该文提出了基于主成分分析(PCA)，拉普拉斯金字塔(LP)以及多尺度小波变换(WT)的3种FP-GPR数据融合方法。为了检验几种数据融合方法的可靠性，该文在实验室分别测量了代表3种不同基本散射机制目标体的FP-GPR数据进行分析, 引入瞬时振幅为主、梯度为辅的方法将加权平均融合方法与3种方法进行比较。结果表明该研究所应用的3种数据融合方法效果均优于加权平均融合，并且3种方法可以分别适应不同散射机制的目标体，主成分分析融合可以更好的应用于未知散射机制目标体。最后，将主成分分析融合应用于实际冰裂缝数据成像，得到很好的融合效果，且优于加权平均融合方法。
- 全极化探地雷达 /
- 数据融合 /
- 主成分分析 /
- 拉普拉斯金字塔 /
- 小波变换 /
- 目标体成像
Abstract: Full-Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar (FP-GPR), compared to traditional single-polarimetric GPR, can obtain more comprehensive polarization data (such as VV, HH, and VH) for the same target. To ensure a more comprehensive targets’ image identification, data fusion technology is applied to FP-GPR so as to combine the polarization information of three different polarization modes. However, weighted average fusion is usually employed in FP-GPR data fusion, since it masks the advantages of full polarization and is unable to simultaneously adapt to different target scattering mechanisms. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Laplacian Pyramid (LP), and multi-scale Wavelet Transform (WT), this research proposes three FP-GPR data fusion methods. To check the reliability of several data fusion methods, we obtained FP-GPR data representing three different target scattering mechanisms in the laboratory and, then, compared the weighted average fusion method with the other three methods using instantaneous amplitude and gradient. The result shows that the three methods were better than the weighted average fusion and that they can be adapted to different target scattering mechanisms. However, PCA was used to fuse the unknown target scattering mechanisms. Finally, PCA fusion is applied to actual ice fracture data imaging, as it produces a better fusion effect than that of weighted average fusion.
- Full-Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar (FP-GPR) /
- Data fusion /
- Principal Component Analysis (PCA) /
- Laplacian Pyramid (LP) /
- Wavelet Transform (WT) /
- Target imaging

HTML全文

图 1 全极化探地雷达系统中的天线配置

Figure 1. Antenna configurations used in a FP-GPR system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 金属目标体

Figure 2. Metallic targets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 FP-GPR系统

Figure 3. FP-GPR system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 板的FP-GPR图像

Figure 4. FP-GPR image of plate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 二面角的FP-GPR图像

Figure 5. FP-GPR image of dihedral

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 多分支散射体的FP-GPR图像

Figure 6. FP-GPR image of multi-branch scatterer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 板偏移后融合图像

Figure 7. Fusion images of plate after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 板偏移后融合瞬时振幅图

Figure 8. Fusion instantaneous amplitude images of plate after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 板偏移后融合梯度图

Figure 9. Fusion gradient images of plate after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 二面角偏移后融合图像

Figure 10. Fusion images of dihedral after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 二面角偏移后融合瞬时振幅图

Figure 11. Fusion instantaneous amplitude images of dihedral after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 二面角偏移后融合梯度图

Figure 12. Fusion gradient images of dihedral after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 多分支散射体偏移后融合图像

Figure 13. Fusion images of multi-branch scatterer after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 多分支散射体偏移后融合瞬时振幅图

Figure 14. Fusion instantaneous amplitude images of multi-branch scatterer after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 多分支散射体偏移后融合梯度图

Figure 15. Fusion gradient images of multi-branch scatterer after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 冰裂缝实验

Figure 16. Ice crack experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 冰裂缝FP-GPR数据图像

Figure 17. FP-GPR image of ice crack

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 冰裂缝偏移后融合图像

Figure 18. Fusion images of ice crack after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 冰裂缝偏移后融合瞬时振幅图

Figure 19. Fusion instantaneous amplitude images of ice crack after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 冰裂缝偏移后融合梯度图

Figure 20. Fusion gradient images of ice crack after migration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 瞬时振幅最大值

Table 1. Max of instantaneous amplitude

目标体	加权平均	PCA	LP	WT
板	0.0066	0.0150	0.0134	0.0183
二面角	0.0031	0.0119	0.0094	0.0100
多分支散射体	3.0135×10^–4	8.707×10^-4	8.6279×10^–4	8.7215×10^–4

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 梯度最大值

Table 2. Max of gradient

目标体	加权平均	PCA	LP	WT
板	8.8737×10^–9	2.0838×10^–8	1.9288×10^–9	9.5532×10^–8
二面角	9.0147×10^–9	1.6597×10^–8	3.5484×10^–8	6.0511×10^–8
多分支散射体	9.0209×10^–10	2.3254×10^–9	2.4932×10^–9	3.8864×10^–9

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	KANG M S, KIM N, IM S B, et al. 3D GPR image-based UcNet for enhancing underground cavity detectability[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(21): 2545. doi: 10.3390/rs11212545
[2]	GABALLAH M, GRASMUECK M, and SATO M. Characterizing subsurface archaeological structures with full resolution 3D GPR at the early dynastic foundations of Saqqara Necropolis, Egypt[J]. Sensing and Imaging, 2018, 19(1): 23. doi: 10.1007/s11220-018-0209-8
[3]	SATO M and LU Q. Ground water migration monitoring by GPR[C]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 2002: 345–347. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1025035.
[4]	FENG Xuan and SATO M. Pre-stack migration applied to GPR for landmine detection[J]. Inverse Problems, 2004, 20(6): S99–S115. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/6/S07
[5]	CHENG Siyuan, LIU Sixin, GUO Jingxue, et al. Data processing and interpretation of antarctic ice-penetrating radar based on variational mode decomposition[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(10): 1253. doi: 10.3390/rs11101253
[6]	HU Bin, WANG Deli, ZHANG Ling, et al. Rock location and quantitative analysis of regolith at the Chang’e 3 landing site based on local similarity constraint[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5): 530. doi: 10.3390/rs11050530
[7]	FENG Xuan, YU Yue, LIU Cai, et al. Subsurface polarimetric migration imaging for full polarimetric ground-penetrating radar[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2015, 202(2): 1324–1338. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggv208
[8]	FENG Xuan, YU Yue, LIU Cai, et al. Combination of H-alpha decomposition and migration for enhancing subsurface target classification of GPR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9): 4852–4861. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2411572
[9]	FENG Xuan, LIANG Wenjing, LIU Cai, et al. Application of freeman decomposition to full polarimetric GPR for improving subsurface target classification[J]. Signal Processing, 2017, 132: 284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.07.030
[10]	李玲玲. 像素级图像融合方法与应用[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2006. LI Lingling. Pixel-Level Image Fusion Method and Application[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu People’s Publishing House, 2006.
[11]	DAILY M I, FARR T, ELACHI C, et al. Geologic interpretation from composited radar and Landsat imagery[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1979, 45(8): 1109–1116.
[12]	ABIDI M A and GONZALEZ R C. Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence[M]. Boston: Academic Press, 1992: 1–546.
[13]	HILL D, EDWARDS P, and HAWKES D. Fusing medical images[J]. Image Processing, 1994, 6(2): 22–24.
[14]	POHL C and VAN GENDEREN J L. Review article Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: Concepts, methods and applications[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, 19(5): 823–854. doi: 10.1080/014311698215748
[15]	DING Ji, LIU Qiang, BAI Mingxuan, et al. A multisensor data fusion method based on gaussian process model for precision measurement of complex surfaces[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(1): 278. doi: 10.3390/s20010278
[16]	WAN Tao, ZHU Chenchen, and QIN Zengchang. Multifocus image fusion based on robust principal component analysis[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2013, 34(9): 1001–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.03.003
[17]	JOSE C. A fast, on-line algorithm for PCA and its convergence characteristics[J]. IEEE, Transactions on Neural Network, 2000, 4(2): 299–307.
[18]	PEARSON K. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space[J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1901, 2(11): 559–572. doi: 10.1080/14786440109462720
[19]	SAFAYANI M, MANZURI SHALMANI M T, and KHADEMI M. Extended two-dimensional PCA for efficient face representation and recognition[C]. 2008 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, Cluj-Napoca, 2008: 295–298. doi: 10.1109/ICCP.2008.4648390.
[20]	HADRI A, CHOUGDALI K, and TOUAHNI R. Intrusion detection system using PCA and Fuzzy PCA techniques[C]. 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems and Information Security, Marrakesh, Morocco, 2016: 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ACOSIS.2016.7843930.
[21]	QIU Changzhen, REN Hao, ZOU Huanxin, et al. Performance comparison of target classification in SAR images based on PCA and 2D-PCA features[C]. 2009 2nd Asian-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Xi’an, China, 2009: 868–871. doi: 10.1109/APSAR.2009.5374193.
[22]	ADELSON E H, ADELSON C H, BERGEN J R, et al. Pyramid methods in image processing[J]. RCA Engineer, 1984, 29(6): 33–41.
[23]	BURT P and ADELSON E. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1983, 31(4): 532–540. doi: 10.1109/TCOM.1983.1095851
[24]	MAO Run, FU Xiansong, NIU Pingjuan, et al. Multi-directional laplacian pyramid image fusion algorithm[C]. 2018 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering, Huhhot, China, 2018: 568–572. doi: 10.1109/ICMCCE.2018.00125.
[25]	LIANG Pei, XIE Zhiwei, and DAI Jiguang. Joint edge detector based on Laplacian pyramid[C]. 2010 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Yantai, China, 2010: 978–982. doi: 10.1109/CISP.2010.5646931.
[26]	MALLAT S G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1989, 11(7): 674–693. doi: 10.1109/34.192463
[27]	KUMAR K, MUSTAFA N, LI Jianping, et al. Image edge detection scheme using wavelet transform[C]. 2014 11th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Actiev Media Technology and Information Processing, Chengdu, China, 2014: 261–265. doi: 10.1109/ICCWAMTIP.2014.7073404.
[28]	LIU Qingliang, YANG Shuguo, LIU Jing, et al. A discrete wavelet transform and singular value decomposition-based digital video watermark method[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 85: 273–293. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.04.015
[29]	TAŞMAZ H. Dual tree complex wavelet transform based speech enhancement[C]. 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, Malatya, Turkey, 2015: 823–826. doi: 10.1109/SIU.2015.7129955.
[30]	梁文婧, 冯晅, 刘财, 等. 多输入多输出极化步进频率探地雷达硬件系统开发[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2018, 48(2): 483–490. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170254 LIANG Wenjing, FENG Xuan, LIU Cai, et al. Development of multiple-input and multiple-output polarimetric stepped-frequency ground penetrating radar system[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2018, 48(2): 483–490. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170254

施引文献

期刊类型引用(7)

1.	庞岳，岳富占，夏正欢，张闯，王洪强，高文宁，张瑶. 基于改进型PCA全极化雷达回波信号融合的动目标检测方法. 现代雷达. 2025(02): 126-133 . 百度学术
2.	尹达，辛国亮，孙学超，张友源，张其道. 实时三维探地雷达关键技术的设计与实现. 物探与化探. 2024(01): 194-200 . 百度学术
3.	冯温雅，程丹丹，王成浩，程星. 基于探地雷达等效采样的时变零偏实时校正方法. 物探与化探. 2023(02): 372-376 . 百度学术
4.	董泽君，冯晅，周皓秋. 不同测量角度下渗流微裂隙的全极化探地雷达响应特征研究. 现代雷达. 2023(12): 15-23 . 百度学术
5.	于虹，李昊，周帅，沈锋. 非均质土壤中直埋式电缆的精确定位技术研究. 哈尔滨理工大学学报. 2023(05): 34-41 . 百度学术
6.	杨军，王筱宇. GF-2和Sentinel-2全色多光谱影像融合方法比较研究. 测绘科学. 2022(01): 112-120 . 百度学术
7.	余昆，朱洁，杜卫峰，仝润北. 基于GprMax的道路空洞全极化数据融合研究. 交通运输研究. 2022(01): 99-106 . 百度学术