高分辨率星载SAR成像与图像质量提升方法综述

李春升; 于泽; 陈杰

doi:10.12000/JR19085

高分辨率星载SAR成像与图像质量提升方法综述

DOI: 10.12000/JR19085

北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院北京 100191

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61861136008)

详细信息

作者简介:
李春升(1963–)，男，天津人，北京航空航天大学，教授，博士生导师，主要从事星载SAR系统总体与仿真、多源遥感图像信息融合、信息获取与处理等方面的研究工作。E-mail: lichunsheng@buaa.edu.cn

于　泽(1979–)，男，博士，副教授，现任职于北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院。分别于2002年、2007年在北京航空航天大学获得学士学位和博士学位。目前主要研究方向包括天基雷达系统体制设计、高分辨SAR成像处理、稀疏目标特征重建等。E-mail: yz613@buaa.edu.cn

陈　杰(1973–)，教授、博士生导师，长期从事高分辨率微波遥感信息系统理论与方法研究。2005年获得北京市高等教育成果二等奖，2006年入选教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”，2008年获霍英东教育基金会第十一届高等院校青年教师奖三等奖。承担国家自然科学基金、“973”计划、“863”计划、国家重大专项等多项课题。已发表论文100余篇，其中SCI(E)检索15篇，EI检索80余篇。申请国家发明专利20余项，合作编写教材4部，合作出版译著1部。E-mail: chenjie@buaa.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李春升 lichunsheng@buaa.edu.cn

于泽 yz613@buaa.edu.cn

中图分类号: TN958
计量
- 文章访问数: 8535
- HTML全文浏览量: 3184
- PDF下载量: 930
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-09-21
- 修回日期: 2019-11-30
- 网络出版日期: 2019-12-01

Overview of Techniques for Improving High-resolution Spaceborne SAR Imaging and Image Quality

School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beihang university, Beijing 100191, China

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61861136008)

More Information

Corresponding author: LI Chunsheng, lichunsheng@buaa.edu.cn; YU Ze, yz613@buaa.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 作为一种重要的空间遥感信息获取工具，星载合成孔径雷达(SAR)具备高分辨率宽测绘、多方位信息获取、高时相对地观测、3维地形测绘等多种工作体制和模式。对于任何星载SAR系统，获取高质量的图像始终是提升SAR应用效能的前提。该文基于“观测在天，成像在地”的理念，分析了卫星轨道、平台姿态、有效载荷、地面处理等环节中星载SAR成像和图像质量的影响因素；阐释了中央电子设备幅相补偿与动态调整、天线方向图预估等高精度数据获取技术；给出了基于改进运动模型的星载SAR成像补偿和对流层传播效应补偿方法，能够实现优于0.3 m分辨率的成像；总结和对比了相干斑噪声抑制、方位模糊抑制和旁瓣抑制等SAR图像处理技术，可以使得等效视数优于25、方位模糊和旁瓣抑制优于20 dB。
- 星载合成孔径雷达 /
- 成像处理 /
- 图像处理 /
- 星地一体化
Abstract: As an important tool for acquiring remote sensing information, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) has various modes, including high-resolution wide-swath, multi-angle information acquisition, high temporal observation, and three-dimensional topographic mapping. For any spaceborne SAR system, obtaining high-quality images is a prerequisite for improving the performance of SAR applications. In this paper, we analyze the factors affecting spaceborne SAR imaging and image quality with respect to orbit, platform, payload, and signal processing. We describe high-precision data acquisition techniques, including amplitude-phase compensation, the dynamic adjustment of the central electronic equipment, and antenna pattern estimation. We then present imaging compensation methods based on the improved motion model and tropospheric delay correction, which can achieve resolutions better than 0.3 m. Lastly, we summarize and compare SAR image processing techniques such as speckle noise suppression, azimuth ambiguity suppression, and sidelobe suppression, whereby the equivalent number of looks can be increased to more than 25 and the azimuth ambiguity and sidelobes can both be suppressed by 20 dB.
- Spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar /
- Imaging processing /
- Image processing /
- Satellite-terrestrial system integration

HTML全文

图 1 星载SAR对地观测示意图

Figure 1. Observation geometry of spaceborne SAR

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 星载SAR有效载荷基本结构示意图

Figure 2. Diagram of the basic structure of the spaceborne SAR payload

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 MGC反演前后的成像结果

Figure 3. Imaging results before and after MGC inversion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 星载SAR天线系统优化和方向图预估技术示意图

Figure 4. Diagram of optimization and pattern estimation technology for spaceborne SAR antenna system

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 停走误差补偿前后成像结果对比图

Figure 5. Comparison of imaging results before and after the compensation of stop-go phase error

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 原始SAR图像和斑点噪声抑制后的结果

Figure 6. Results of speckle suppression

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 方位模糊抑制效果

Figure 7. Azimuth ambiguity suppression result

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 SVA处理结果

Figure 8. SVA result

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 SAR图像质量提升方法总结

Figure 9. Summary of SAR image quality improvement methods

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实时定轨和事后定轨比较

Table 1. Comparison between real-time and precise orbit determination

	输入数据类型	数据时效性	定轨精度
实时定轨	广播星历+双频伪距载波观测数据	实时	米级
事后定轨	IGS最终产品+双频伪距载波观测数据	12–18天	厘米级

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 通道误差补偿前后脉冲压缩性能

Table 2. Performance of pulse compression before and after compensating for channel error

幅相误差	分辨率(m)	展宽系数	峰值旁瓣比(dB)	积分旁瓣比(dB)
无补偿	0.2392	1.0800	–6.41	–5.85
补偿	0.2232	1.0077	–13.25	–9.97

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 仿真参数

Table 3. Simulation parameters

参数	数值	参数	数值
轨道倾角	98.06°	波束宽度(方位向)	0.305°
轨道高度	680 km	斜视角	±6.21°
偏心率	0.001	信号带宽	1.0 GHz
观测视角	35°	脉冲宽度	40 μs
波长	0.03 m	脉冲重复频率	4000 Hz

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 停走误差补偿前后成像质量评估结果

Table 4. Imaging quality evaluation of point target before and after compensating for stop-go error

		分辨率(m)	峰值旁瓣比(dB)	积分旁瓣比(dB)
距离向	补偿前	0.1444	–15.42	–12.51
距离向	补偿后	0.1342	–13.13	–9.80
方位向	补偿前	0.2420	–11.98	–9.79
方位向	补偿后	0.2170	–13.32	–10.41

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 不同视角下目标对流层延迟补偿前后对比

Table 5. Evaluation results before and after tropospheric delay compensation with different looking angles

视角(°)	对流层延迟补偿前方位向性能			对流层延迟补偿后方位向性能
视角(°)	分辨率(m)	PSLR(dB)	ISLR(dB)	分辨率(m)	PSLR(dB)	ISLR(dB)
15	0.272	–12.448	–9.213	0.270	–13.246	–10.150
35	0.272	–12.033	–8.938	0.269	–13.223	–10.319
55	0.294	–8.579	–5.860	0.275	–13.240	–10.069

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 斑点噪声抑制指标

Table 6. Speckle noise suppression performance

图像	ENL1	ENL2	EPI
图6(a)	0.9996	0.9682	–
图6(b)	36.3338	26.3064	0.9484
图6(c)	1.0420	1.0051	–
图6(d)	67.2727	36.5582	0.9480

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(42)

[1]	WANG Pengbo, LIU Wei, CHEN Jie, et al. A high-order imaging algorithm for high-resolution spaceborne sar based on a modified equivalent squint range model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(3): 1225–1235. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2336241
[2]	CHEN Jie, KUANG Hui, YANG Wei, et al. A novel imaging algorithm for focusing high-resolution spaceborne SAR data in squinted sliding-spotlight mode[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, 13(10): 1577–1581. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2598066
[3]	赵团, 邓云凯, 王宇, 等. 基于扇贝效应校正的改进滑动Mosaic全孔径成像算法[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(5): 548–557. doi: 10.12000/JR16014 ZHAO Tuan, DENG Yunkai, WANG Yu, et al. Processing sliding mosaic mode data with modified full-aperture imaging algorithm integrating scalloping correction[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 548–557. doi: 10.12000/JR16014
[4]	TOWNSEND W. An initial assessment of the performance achieved by the Seasat-1 radar altimeter[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 1980, 5(2): 80–92. doi: 10.1109/JOE.1980.1145459
[5]	李春升, 王伟杰, 王鹏波, 等. 星载SAR技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(1): 229–240. LI Chunsheng, WANG Weijie, WANG Pengbo, et al. Current situation and development trends of spaceborne SAR technology[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2016, 38(1): 229–240.
[6]	PITZ W and MILLER D. The TerraSAR-X satellite[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(2): 615–622. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2037432
[7]	DE ZAN F and GUARNIERI A M. TOPSAR: Terrain observation by progressive scans[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(9): 2352–2360. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.873853
[8]	魏钟铨. 合成孔径雷达卫星[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001. WEI Zhongquan. Synthetic Aperture Radar Satellite[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
[9]	CURLANDER J C and MCDONOUGH R N. Synthetic Aperture Radar: Systems and Signal Processing[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
[10]	PRATS-IRAOLA P, SCHEIBER R, RODRIGUEZ-CASSOLA M, et al. On the processing of very high resolution spaceborne SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(10): 6003–6016. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2294353
[11]	万丽华, 魏立龙, 王磊. 基于全球台站的GNSS卫星精密定轨策略分析[J]. 测绘地理信息, 2019, 44(4): 53–58. doi: 10.14188/j.2095-6045.2017331 WAN Lihua, WEI Lilong, and WANG Lei. On the strategies of precise orbit determination of GNSS from global stations[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 2019, 44(4): 53–58. doi: 10.14188/j.2095-6045.2017331
[12]	丁赤飚, 刘佳音, 雷斌, 等. 高分三号SAR卫星系统级几何定位精度初探[J]. 雷达学报, 2017, 6(1): 11–16. doi: 10.12000/JR17024 DING Chibiao, LIU Jiayin, LEI Bin, et al. Preliminary exploration of systematic geolocation accuracy of GF-3 SAR satellite system[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(1): 11–16. doi: 10.12000/JR17024
[13]	秦显平. 星载GPS低轨卫星定轨理论及方法研究[D]. [博士论文], 解放军信息工程大学, 2009. QIN Xianping. Research on precision orbit determination theory and method of low earth orbiter based on GPS technique[D]. [Ph.D. dissertation], PLA Information Engineering University, 2009.
[14]	崔仁洁. 卫星姿态控制一体化仿真系统设计与研究[D]. [硕士论文], 浙江大学, 2017. CUI Renjie. Design and research of the integrated simulation platform for satellites attitude control system[D].[Master dissertation], Zhejiang University, 2017.
[15]	LI Zhou, LI Chunsheng, YU Ze, et al. Effects of receiver saturation on image formation[C]. 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, 2011: 535–538. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6049183.
[16]	SMITH A M. A new approach to range-Doppler SAR processing[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1991, 12(2): 235–251. doi: 10.1080/01431169108929650
[17]	JIN M Y, CHENG F, and CHEN Ming. Chirp scaling algorithms for SAR processing[C]. 1993 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, 1993: 1169–1172. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.1993.322129.
[18]	LIU Yan, XING Mengdao, SUN Guangcai, et al. Echo model analyses and imaging algorithm for high-resolution SAR on high-speed platform[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(3): 933–950. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2011.2162243
[19]	WU Yuan, SUN Guangcai, YANG Chun, et al. Processing of very high resolution spaceborne sliding spotlight SAR data using velocity scaling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(3): 1505–1518. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2481923
[20]	YU Ze, WANG Shusen, and LI Zhou. An imaging compensation algorithm for spaceborne high-resolution SAR based on a continuous tangent motion model[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(3): 223. doi: 10.3390/rs8030223
[21]	胡程, 董锡超, 李元昊. 大气层效应对地球同步轨道SAR系统性能影响研究[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7(4): 412–424. doi: 10.12000/JR18032 HU Cheng, DONG Xichao, and LI Yuanhao. Atmospheric effects on the performance of geosynchronous orbit SAR systems[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(4): 412–424. doi: 10.12000/JR18032
[22]	YU Ze, LI Zhou, and WANG Shusen. An imaging compensation algorithm for correcting the impact of tropospheric delay on spaceborne high-resolution SAR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9): 4825–4836. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2015.2411261
[23]	郭小洋, 李洋, 林赟, 等. 基于CSAR成像的相干斑统计模型研究[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(6): 708–714. doi: 10.12000/JR15039 GUO Xiaoyang, LI Yang, LIN Yun, et al. Statistical models of speckle for circular SAR imaging[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(6): 708–714. doi: 10.12000/JR15039
[24]	KUAN D T, SAWCHUK A A, STRAND T C, et al. Adaptive noise smoothing filter for images with signal-dependent noise[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1985, PAMI-7(2): 165–177. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1985.4767641
[25]	ARGENTI F and ALPARONE L. Speckle removal from SAR images in the undecimated wavelet domain[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(11): 2363–2374. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2002.805083
[26]	YU Yongjian and ACTON S T. Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2002, 11(11): 1260–1270. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2002.804276
[27]	DELEDALLE C A, DENIS L, and TUPIN F. Iterative weighted maximum likelihood denoising with probabilistic patch-based weights[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009, 18(12): 2661–2672. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2009.2029593
[28]	PARRILLI S, PODERICO M, ANGELINO C V, et al. A nonlocal SAR image denoising algorithm based on LLMMSE wavelet shrinkage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(2): 606–616. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2011.2161586
[29]	WANG Puyang, ZHANG He, and PATEL V M. SAR image despeckling using a convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2017, 24(12): 1763–1767. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2017.2758203
[30]	ZHANG Qian, YUAN Qiangqiang, LI Jie, et al. Learning a dilated residual network for SAR image despeckling[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(2): 196. doi: 10.3390/rs10020196
[31]	WANG Puyang, ZHANG He, and VISHAL M P. Generative adversarial network-based restoration of speckled SAR images[C]. 2017 IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing, Curacao, Netherlands, 2017: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/CAMSAP.2017.8313133.
[32]	YU Ze, WANG Wenqi, LI Chunsheng, et al. Speckle noise suppression in SAR images using a three-step algorithm[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(11): 3643. doi: 10.3390/s18113643
[33]	肖鹏, 吴有明, 于泽, 等. 一种基于压缩感知恢复算法的SAR图像方位模糊抑制方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(1): 35–41. doi: 10.12000/JR16004 XIAO Peng, WU Youming, YU Ze, et al. Azimuth ambiguity suppression in SAR images based on compressive sensing recovery algorithm[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(1): 35–41. doi: 10.12000/JR16004
[34]	MOREIRA A. Suppressing the azimuth ambiguities in synthetic aperture radar images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1993, 31(4): 885–895. doi: 10.1109/36.239912
[35]	CHEN Jie, IQBAL M, YANG Wei, et al. Mitigation of azimuth ambiguities in spaceborne stripmap SAR images using selective restoration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(7): 4038–4045. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2279109
[36]	GUARNIERI A M. Adaptive removal of azimuth ambiguities in SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(3): 625–633. doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2004.842476
[37]	WU Youming, YU Ze, XIAO Peng, et al. Suppression of azimuth ambiguities in spaceborne SAR images using spectral selection and extrapolation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(10): 6134–6147. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2832193
[38]	陶一凡. SAR图像旁瓣抑制和目标识别方法的研究及实现[D]. [硕士论文], 浙江工业大学, 2017. TAO Yifan. Research and implement on methods of SAR image sidelobe suppression and target recognition[D]. [Master dissertation], Zhejiang University of Technology, 2017.
[39]	ZHU Xiaoxiang, HE Feng, YE Fan, et al. Sidelobe suppression with resolution maintenance for SAR images via sparse representation[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(5): 1589. doi: 10.3390/s18051589
[40]	VARSHNEY L R and THOMAS D. Sidelobe reduction for matched filter range processing[C]. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Radar Conference, Huntsville, USA, 2003: 446–451. doi: 10.1109/NRC.2003.1203439.
[41]	JIN Guodong, DENG Yunkai, WANG R, et al. An advanced nonlinear frequency modulation waveform for radar imaging with low sidelobe[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(8): 6155–6168. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2904627
[42]	SMITH B H. Generalization of spatially variant apodization to noninteger Nyquist sampling rates[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000, 9(6): 1088–1093. doi: 10.1109/83.846250