极化SAR目标散射旋转域解译理论与应用

陈思伟; 李永祯; 王雪松; 肖顺平

doi:10.12000/JR17033

极化SAR目标散射旋转域解译理论与应用

DOI: 10.12000/JR17033

国防科技大学电子科学与工程学院电子信息系统复杂电磁环境效应国家重点实验室长沙 410073

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(41301490, 61490690, 61490692)

详细信息

作者简介:
陈思伟(1984–)，男，四川人，博士，国防科技大学电子科学与工程学院讲师，主要研究方向包括雷达极化信息处理、成像雷达信息处理、目标散射建模与解译、微波遥感大数据、环境遥感与灾害遥感等。E-mail: chenswnudt@163.com

李永祯(1977–)，男，内蒙古人，博士，国防科技大学电子科学与工程学院研究员，电子信息系统复杂电磁环境效应国家重点实验室副主任，主要研究方向为新体制雷达与电子对抗。E-mail: e0061@sina.com

王雪松(1972–)，男，内蒙古人，博士，国防科技大学理学院院长，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为雷达极化信息处理、雷达目标识别、新体制雷达技术

肖顺平(1964–)，男，江西人，博士，国防科技大学电子科学与工程学院教授，博士生导师，电子信息系统复杂电磁环境效应国家重点实验室主任，主要研究方向包括雷达极化信息处理、电子信息系统仿真评估技术、雷达目标识别等

通讯作者:
陈思伟 chenswnudt@163.com

中图分类号: TN957.52
计量
- 文章访问数: 4974
- HTML全文浏览量: 1009
- PDF下载量: 733
- 被引次数: 31
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-03-28
- 修回日期: 2017-06-28
- 网络出版日期: 2017-10-28

Polarimetric SAR Target Scattering Interpretation in Rotation Domain: Theory and Application

The State Key Laboratory of Complex Electromagnetic Environment Effects on Electronics and Information System, School of Electronics Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301490, 61490690, 61490692)

摘要

摘要: 雷达目标的后向散射敏感于目标姿态与雷达视线的相对几何关系。雷达目标的这种散射多样性给以极化合成孔径雷达(SAR)为代表的成像雷达信息处理与应用造成诸多不便，是当前目标散射机理精细解译和定量应用面临的主要技术瓶颈之一。该文回顾并介绍一种在绕雷达视线旋转域解译目标散射机理的新思路，主要包括新近提出的统一的极化矩阵旋转理论和极化相干特征旋转域可视化解译理论。目标散射旋转域解译方法的核心思想是将特定几何关系下获得的目标信息拓展到绕雷达视线的旋转域，为目标散射信息深度挖掘和利用奠定基础。该文详细分析上述方法导出的一系列新的极化特征参数集，并开展应用验证。对比研究证实了旋转域解译方法在地物辨识与分类等领域的应用潜力。
- 极化合成孔径雷达 /
- 散射机理 /
- 旋转域 /
- 极化目标分解 /
- 图像解译
Abstract: Backscattering of radar targets is sensitive to the relative geometry between target orientations and the radar line of sight. This scattering diversity makes imaging radar represented by polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) information processing and applications very difficult. This situation has become one of the main bottlenecks in the interpretation of the target scattering mechanism and quantitative applications. In this work, we review and introduce a new interpretation of the target scattering mechanism in the rotation domain along the radar line of sight. This concept includes the recently established uniform polarimetric matrix rotation theory and polarimetric coherence pattern visualization and interpretation in the rotation domain. The core idea of target scattering interpretation in the rotation domain is to extend the amount of target information acquired at a given geometry to the rotation domain, which then provides fundamentals for the deep mining and utilization of target scattering information. This work mainly focuses on the investigation of derived new polarimetric feature sets and application demonstrations. Comparison study results validate the promising potential for the application of the established interpretation framework in the rotation domain with respect to target discrimination and classification.
- Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) /
- Scattering mechanism /
- Rotation domain /
- Polarimetric target decomposition /
- Image interpretation

HTML全文

图 1 研究区域荷兰Flevoland

Figure 1. Study area of Flevoland, the Netherlands

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 导出的极化角参数

Figure 2. Derived polarimetric angle parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 旋转域极化相干特征的可视化图示例

Figure 3. Illustration of polarimetric coherence pattern example

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 极化相干特征旋转域优化前后对比图

Figure 4. Comparison of polarimetric coherence without and with optimization in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 极化相干特征旋转域优化前后的统计分布图

Figure 5. Histograms of polarimetric coherence for full scene AIRSAR data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

AIRSAR数据中7种已知地物的旋转域极化相干特征的可视化图。(a1)–(a4) 茎豆，(b1)–(b4) 油菜，(c1)–(c4)豌豆，(d1)–(d4)土豆，(e1)–(e4)紫苜蓿，(f1)–(f4)小麦，(g1)–(g4)甜菜。其中，1–4分别代表 $\left| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} + {\rm{VV}}} \right) - \left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right)}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ , $\left| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right) - \left( {{\rm{HV}}} \right)}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ , $\left| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ 和 $\left| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{HV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$

Polarimetric coherence patterns of the seven crop types from AIRSAR data. (a1)–(a4)stembeans, (b1)–(b4)rapeseed, (c1)–(c4)peas, (d1)–(d4)potatoes, (e1)–(e4)lucerne, (f1)–(f4)wheat and (g1)–(g4)beet. The numbers 1–4 indicate $\left| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} + {\rm{VV}}} \right) - \left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right)}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ , $\left| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right) - \left( {{\rm{HV}}} \right)}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ , $\left| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ and $\left| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{HV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right|$ , respectively

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 旋转域极化相干特征典型值对比图

Figure 7. Errorbar plots of typical polarimetric coherence parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 旋转域极化相干度对比图

Figure 8. Errorbar plots for polarimetric coherence degree in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 旋转域极化相干起伏度对比图

Figure 9. Errorbar plots of polarimetric coherence fluctuation in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 旋转域极化相干对比度对比图

Figure 10. Errorbar plots of polarimetric coherence contrast in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 旋转域极化相干宽度对比图

Errorbar plots of polarimetric coherence beamwidth ${\rm{B}}{{\rm{W}}_{0.95}}$ in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 旋转域极化相干特征最大化角对比图

Errorbar plots of maximum rotation angles ${\theta _{\gamma {\rm{ - }}\max }}$ (in deg) which produce maximized coherence in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 旋转域极化相干特征最小化角对比图

Errorbar plots of minimum rotation angles ${\theta _{\gamma {\rm{ - }}\min }}$ (in deg) which produce minimized coherence in rotation domain

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 基于极化特征组合的农作物辨识结果

Figure 14. Crops discrimination results based on combinations of derived polarimetric parameters

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 旋转域极化相干矩阵的振荡参数集^[40]

Table 1. Oscillation parameter set of polarimetric coherence matrix in rotation domain

元素项	$A = \sqrt \cdot$	B	$\omega$	${\theta _0} = \displaystyle \frac{1}{\omega }{\rm{Angle}}\left\{ \cdot \right\}$
${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}\left( \theta \right)} \right]$	${{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$	0	2	${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}} \right] + j{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}} \right]$
${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}\left( \theta \right)} \right]$	${{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$	0	2	$- {\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + j{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$
${\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}\left( \theta \right)} \right]$	${{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + {{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$	0	2	${\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}} \right] + j{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}} \right]$
${\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}\left( \theta \right)} \right]$	${{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + {{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$	0	2	$- {\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}} \right] + j{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{13}}} \right]$
${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{23}}\left( \theta \right)} \right]$	$\frac{1}{4}{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)^2} + {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]$	0	4	$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right) + j{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]$
${T_{22}}\left( \theta \right)$	$\frac{1}{4}{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)^2} + {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]$	$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{22}} + {T_{33}}} \right)$	4	${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{23}}} \right] + j\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{22}} - {T_{33}}} \right)$
${T_{33}}\left( \theta \right)$	$\frac{1}{4}{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)^2} + {{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]$	$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{22}} + {T_{33}}} \right)$	4	$- {\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{23}}} \right] + j\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)$
${\left\| {{T_{12}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|^2}$	${{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}T_{13}^ * } \right] + \frac{1}{4}{\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2} - {{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)^2}$	$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2} + {{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)$	4	${\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}T_{13}^ * } \right] + j\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2} - {{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)$
${\left\| {{T_{13}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|^2}$	${{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{12}}T_{13}^ * } \right] + \frac{1}{4}{\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2} - {{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)^2}$	$\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2} + {{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)$	4	$- {\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{12}}T_{13}^ * } \right] + j\frac{1}{2}\left( {{{\left\| {{T_{13}}} \right\|}^2} - {{\left\| {{T_{12}}} \right\|}^2}} \right)$
${\left\| {{T_{23}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|^2}$	$\frac{1}{4}{\left\{ {\frac{1}{4}{{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)}^2} + {{{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} }^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]} \right\}^2}$	$\begin{array}{l}\frac{1}{2}\left\{ {\frac{1}{4}{{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)}^2} + {{{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} }^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]} \right\}\\\quad + {{\mathop{\rm Im}\nolimits} ^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right]\end{array}$	8	$\begin{array}{l}\frac{1}{2}\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right){\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} \left[ {{T_{23}}} \right] \\\quad+ j\frac{1}{2}\left[ {{{{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits} }^2}\left[ {{T_{23}}} \right] - \frac{1}{4}{{\left( {{T_{33}} - {T_{22}}} \right)}^2}} \right]\end{array}$

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 AIRSAR数据极化相干特征旋转域优化前后对比结果

Table 2. Comparison of polarimetric coherence without and with optimization in rotation domain for AIRSAR data

极化相干特征	原始值均值	最优值均值	增强百分比(%)
$\left\| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} + {\rm{VV}}} \right) - \left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right)}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|$	0.30	0.33	10.00
$\left\| {{\gamma _{\left( {{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}} \right) - {\rm{HV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|$	0.11	0.48	336.36
$\left\| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{VV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|$	0.35	0.64	82.86
$\left\| {{\gamma _{{\rm{HH}} - {\rm{HV}}}}\left( \theta \right)} \right\|$	0.13	0.45	246.15

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(49)

[1]	Lee J S and Pottier E. Polarimetric Radar Imaging: From Basics to Applications[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2009.
[2]	Cloude S R. Polarisation Application in Remote Sensing[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[3]	金亚秋, 徐丰. 极化散射与SAR遥感信息理论与方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008. Jin Ya-qiu and Xu Feng. Theory and Approach for Polarimetric Scattering and Information Retrieval of SAR Remote Sensing[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
[4]	张红, 王超, 刘萌, 等. 极化SAR理论、方法与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015. Zhang Hong, Wang Chao, Liu Meng, et al.. Theory, Approach and Application of Polarimetric SAR[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[5]	Dell’Acqua F and Gamba P. Remote sensing and earthquake damage assessment: Experiences, limits, and perspectives[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(10): 2876–2890. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2196404
[6]	Sato M, Chen S W, and Satake M. Polarimetric SAR analysis of Tsunami damage following the March 11, 2011 East Japan Earthquake[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(10): 2861–2875. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2012.2200649
[7]	Chen S W and Sato M. Tsunami damage investigation of built-up areas using multitemporal spaceborne full polarimetric SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(4): 1985–1997. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2210050
[8]	Chen S W, Wang X S, and Sato M. Urban damage level mapping based on scattering mechanism investigation using fully polarimetric SAR data for the 3.11 East Japan earthquake[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(12): 6919–6929. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2588325
[9]	吴一戎. 多维度合成孔径雷达成像概念[J]. 雷达学报, 2013, 2(2): 135–142. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract93.shtml Wu Yi-rong. Concept of multidimensional space joint-observation SAR[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(2): 135–142. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract93.shtml
[10]	洪文. 圆迹SAR成像技术研究进展[J]. 雷达学报, 2012, 1(2): 124–135. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract29.shtml Hong Wen. Progress in circular SAR imaging technique[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(2): 124–135. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract29.shtml
[11]	张杰, 张晰, 范陈清, 等. 极化SAR在海洋探测中的应用与探讨[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(6): 596–606. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract390.shtml Zhang Jie, Zhang Xi, Fan Chen-qing, et al.. Discussion on application of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar in marine surveillance[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 596–606. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract390.shtml
[12]	许成斌, 周伟, 丛瑜, 等. 基于峰值区域的高分辨率极化SAR舰船目标特征分析与鉴别[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(3): 367–373. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract213.shtml Xu Cheng-bin, Zhou Wei, Cong Yu, et al.. Ship analysis and detection in high-resolution Pol-SAR imagery based on peak zone[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(3): 367–373. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract213.shtml
[13]	王雪松. 雷达极化技术研究现状与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(2): 119–131. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract346.shtml Wang Xue-song. Status and prospects of radar polarimetry techniques[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 119–131. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract346.shtml
[14]	杨汝良, 戴博伟, 李海英. 极化合成孔径雷达极化层次和系统工作方式[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(2): 132–142. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract337.shtml Yang Ru-liang, Dai Bo-wei, and Li Hai-ying. Polarization hierarchy and system operating architecture for polarimetric synthetic aperture radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 132–142. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract337.shtml
[15]	代大海, 廖斌, 肖顺平, 等. 雷达极化信息获取与处理的研究进展[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(2): 143–155. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract316.shtml Dai Da-hai, Liao Bin, Xiao Shun-ping, et al.. Advancements on radar polarization information acquisition and processing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 143–155. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract316.shtml
[16]	赵春雷, 王亚梁, 阳云龙, 等. 雷达极化信息获取及极化信号处理技术研究综述[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(6): 620–638. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract389.shtml Zhao Chun-lei, Wang Ya-liang, Yang Yun-long, et al.. Review of radar polarization information acquisition and polarimetric signal processing techniques[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 620–638. http://radars.ie.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract389.shtml
[17]	Huynen J R. Phenomenological Theory of Radar Targets[D]. [Ph.D. dissertation], Delft University of Technology, 1970.
[18]	Cloude S R and Pottier E. An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1997, 35(1): 68–78. doi: 10.1109/36.551935
[19]	Touzi R. Target scattering decomposition in terms of roll-invariant target parameters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(1): 73–84. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.886176
[20]	Paladini R, Martorella M, and Berizzi F. Classification of man-made targets via invariant coherency-matrix eigenvector decomposition of polarimetric SAR/ISAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(8): 3022–3034. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2116121
[21]	Chen S W, Li Y Z, Wang X S, et al.. Modeling and interpretation of scattering mechanisms in polarimetric synthetic aperture radar: Advances and perspectives[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2014, 31(7): 79–89.
[22]	Xu F and Jin Y Q. Deorientation theory of polarimetric scattering targets and application to terrain surface classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(10): 2351–2364. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2005.855064
[23]	An W T, Cui Y, and Yang J. Three-component model-based decomposition for polarimetric SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(6): 2732–2739. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2041242
[24]	Yamaguchi Y, Sato A, Boerner W M, et al.. Four-component scattering power decomposition with rotation of coherency matrix[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(6): 2251–2258. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2099124
[25]	Van Zyl J J, Arii M, and Kim Y. Model-based decomposition of polarimetric SAR covariance matrices constrained for nonnegative eigenvalues[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(9): 3452–3459. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2128325
[26]	Arii M, Van Zyl J J, and Kim Y. Adaptive model-based decomposition of polarimetric SAR covariance matrices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(3): 1104–1113. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2076285
[27]	Neumann M, Ferro-Famil L, and Reigber A. Estimation of forest structure, ground, and canopy layer characteristics from multibaseline polarimetric interferometric SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(3): 1086–1104. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2031101
[28]	Chen S W, Wang X S, Xiao S P, et al.. General polarimetric model-based decomposition for coherency matrix[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(3): 1843–1855. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2255615
[29]	Ballester-Berman J D and Lopez-Sanchez J M. Applying the Freeman-Durden decomposition concept to polarimetric SAR interferometry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(1): 466–479. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2024304
[30]	Chen S W, Wang X S, Li Y Z, et al.. Adaptive model-based polarimetric decomposition using PolInSAR coherence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(3): 1705–1718. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2253780
[31]	Wang C L, Yu W D, Wang R, et al.. Comparison of nonnegative eigenvalue decompositions with and without reflection symmetry assumptions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(4): 2278–2287. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2259177
[32]	Li H Z, Wang C, Zhang H, et al.. A unified three-component scattering model for polarimetric coherent target decomposition[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 33(9): 2868–2891. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.622728
[33]	Zhu F Y, Zhang Y H, and Li D. An extension of a complete model-based decomposition of polarimetric SAR data[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, 13(2): 287–291. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2511076
[34]	Deng L and Yan Y N. Improving the Yamaguchi4 decomposition method using selective polarization orientation compensation[J]. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 42(2): 125–135. doi: 10.1080/07038992.2016.1160774
[35]	Zou B, Zhang Y, Cao N, et al.. A four-component decomposition model for PolSAR data using asymmetric scattering component[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2015, 8(3): 1051–1061. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2014.2380151
[36]	Wang Y H, Liu H W, and Jiu B. PolSAR coherency matrix decomposition based on constrained sparse representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(9): 5906–5922. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2293663
[37]	Cloude S R and Pottier E. A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, 34(3): 498–518.
[38]	张腊梅, 段宝龙, 邹斌. 极化SAR图像目标分解方法的研究进展[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(12): 3289–3297. http://youxian.cnki.com.cn/yxdetail.aspx?filename=LDAX20170807001&dbname=CAPJ2015 Zhang Lamei, Duan Baolong, and Zou Bin. Research development on target decomposition method of polarimetric SAR image[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(12): 3289–3297. http://youxian.cnki.com.cn/yxdetail.aspx?filename=LDAX20170807001&dbname=CAPJ2015
[39]	Chen S W, Ohki M, Shimada M, et al.. Deorientation effect investigation for model-based decomposition over oriented built-up areas[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(3): 273–277.
[40]	Chen S W, Wang X S, and Sato M. Uniform polarimetric matrix rotation theory and its applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(8): 4756–4770. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2284359
[41]	Chen S W, Li Y Z, and Wang X S. A visualization tool for polarimetric SAR data investigation[C]. The 11th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Hamburg, Germany, 2016: 579–582.
[42]	Chen S W and Wang X S. Polarimetric coherence pattern: A visualization tool for PolSAR data investigation[C]. The IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China, 2016: 7509–7512.
[43]	Xiao S P, Chen S W, Chang Y L, et al.. Polarimetric coherence optimization and its application for manmade target extraction in PolSAR data[J]. IEICE Transactions on Electronics, 2014, 97(6): 566–574.
[44]	Chen S W, Li Y Z, and Wang X S. Crop discrimination based on polarimetric correlation coefficients optimization for PolSAR data[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2015, 36(16): 4233–4249. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2015.1079345
[45]	Lee J S, Schuler D L, Ainsworth T L, et al.. On the estimation of radar polarization orientation shifts induced by terrain slopes[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(1): 30–41. doi: 10.1109/36.981347
[46]	Chen S W, Wang X S, and Sato M. PolInSAR complex coherence estimation based on covariance matrix similarity test[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(11): 4699–4710. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2192937
[47]	陶臣嵩, 陈思伟, 李永祯, 等. 结合旋转域极化特征的极化SAR地物分类[J]. 雷达学报, 录用待刊. doi: 10.12000/JR16131 Tao Chensong, Chen Siwei, Li Yongzhen, et al. Polarimetric SAR terrain classification using polarimetric feature derived from rotation domain[J]. Journal of Radars. doi: 10.12000/JR16131
[48]	Ainsworth T L, Schuler D L, and Lee J S. Polarimetric SAR characterization of man-made structures in urban areas using normalized circular-pol correlation coefficients[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112(6): 2876–2885. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.005
[49]	Yamaguchi Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamada H, et al.. Classification of terrain by implementing the correlation coefficient in the circular polarization basis using X-band POLSAR data[J]. IEICE Transactions on Communications, 2008, E91B(1): 297–301.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(18)

1.	吴林罡，胡生亮，罗亚松，吴兆东，林立. 浮空角反射体动态雷达目标特性研究. 空天技术. 2025(01): 82-92 . 百度学术
2.	李铭典，肖顺平，陈思伟. 极化雷达图像目标超分辨率重建研究进展. 电子与信息学报. 2024(05): 1806-1826 . 百度学术
3.	韩静雯，杨勇，连静，吴国庆，王雪松. 基于极化与距离像特征融合的雷达导引头角反射器鉴别方法. 系统工程与电子技术. 2024(11): 3658-3670 . 百度学术
4.	祝迪，王福来，庞晨，李永祯. 基于船用导航雷达的舰船与角反组合体极化调控鉴别方法. 雷达学报. 2024(06): 1252-1278 . 本站查看
5.	毕海霞，况祖正，李凡，高静怀，徐晨. 极化SAR图像分类深度学习算法综述. 科学通报. 2024(35): 5108-5128 . 百度学术
6.	崔兴超，李郝亮，付耀文，陈思伟，粟毅. 空间目标散射结构极化旋转域辨识. 电子与信息学报. 2023(06): 2105-2114 . 百度学术
7.	陈思伟，周鹏. SAR图像对抗攻击的进展与展望. 信息对抗技术. 2023(Z1): 171-188 . 百度学术
8.	李郝亮，陈思伟. 极化测量误差对人造目标散射解译性能的影响研究. 现代雷达. 2022(01): 1-8 . 百度学术
9.	李郝亮，陈思伟，王雪松. 海面角反射器的极化旋转域特性研究. 系统工程与电子技术. 2022(07): 2065-2073 . 百度学术
10.	吴国庆，陈思伟，李永祯，王雪松. 人造目标散射结构的零极化辨识与应用. 电波科学学报. 2022(05): 733-742+760 . 百度学术
11.	赵锋，徐志明，刘蕾，艾小锋. 弹道目标特征提取研究现状与展望. 信息对抗技术. 2022(03): 15-32 . 百度学术
12.	于腾，王锐，李沐阳，胡程. 宽带全极化垂直昆虫雷达设计及校准关键技术研究. 信号处理. 2021(02): 222-233 . 百度学术
13.	崔兴超，粟毅，陈思伟. 融合极化旋转域特征和超像素技术的极化SAR舰船检测. 雷达学报. 2021(01): 35-48 . 本站查看
14.	肖顺平，陈思伟. 雷达极化信息处理的启发式研讨教学研究. 电气电子教学学报. 2021(06): 71-75 . 百度学术
15.	杨成财，余慧庄，龙郝明. 基于SVM和能量最小化的PolSAR图像分类方法. 电子测量技术. 2020(03): 146-152 . 百度学术
16.	王雪松，陈思伟. 合成孔径雷达极化成像解译识别技术的进展与展望. 雷达学报. 2020(02): 259-276 . 本站查看
17.	王宇，禹卫东，刘秀清. 基于极化特征参数和极化干涉最优参数的改进四元素分解方法. 电子与信息学报. 2019(12): 2881-2888 . 百度学术
18.	孙翔，宋红军，王宇，李宁. 基于高分辨率全极化SAR图像的取向角校正方法. 雷达学报. 2018(04): 465-474 . 本站查看