Volume 2 Issue 2
Jun.  2013
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2013  >  2(2): 247-256
Zhao Yao-dong, Lü Xiao-de, Li Ji-chuan, Xiang Mao-sheng. Detection of Moving Targets Based on Doppler Spectrum Analysis Technique for Passive Coherent Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(2): 247-256. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20081
Citation: Zhao Yao-dong, Lü Xiao-de, Li Ji-chuan, Xiang Mao-sheng. Detection of Moving Targets Based on Doppler Spectrum Analysis Technique for Passive Coherent Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(2): 247-256. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20081
shu

Detection of Moving Targets Based on Doppler Spectrum Analysis Technique for Passive Coherent Radar

DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20081
  • 1.

    (National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Microwave Imaging, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)

  • 2.

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Received Date: 2012-11-16
  • Rev Recd Date: 2013-01-25
  • Publish Date: 2013-04-28
    Abstract
  • A novel method of moving targets detection taking Doppler spectrum analysis technique for Passive Coherent Radar (PCR) is provided. After dividing the receiving signals into segments as pulse series, it utilizes the technique of pulse compress and Doppler processing to detect and locate the targets. Based on the algorithm for Pulse-Doppler (PD) radar, the equipollence between continuous and pulsed wave in match filtering is proved and details of this method are introduced. To compare it with the traditional method of Cross-Ambiguity Function (CAF) calculation, the relationship and mathematical modes of them are analyzed, with some suggestions on parameters choosing. With little influence to the gain of targets, the method can greatly promote the processing efficiency. The validity of the proposed method is demonstrated by offline processing real collected data sets and simulation results.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(0)
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]SU Hanning, PAN Jiameng, BAO Qinglong, GUO Fucheng, HU Weidong. Anti-interrupted Sampling Repeater Jamming Method in the Waveform Domain before Matched Filtering[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(1): 240-252. doi: 10.12000/JR23149
    [2]ZHANG Shunsheng, LIU Meihui, WANG Wenqin. FDA-MIMO Radar Moving Target Detection Based on Doppler Spread Compensation[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(4): 666-675. doi: 10.12000/JR22042
    [3]DING Jinshan, ZHONG Chao, WEN Liwu, XU Zhong. Joint Detection of Moving Target in Video Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 313-323. doi: 10.12000/JR22036
    [4]QI Meng, HUANG Lijia, QIU Xiaolan, ZHANG Wenyi, HU Yuxin, CHU Qingwei. Method of Range Ambiguity Suppression Combining Sparse Reconstruction and Matched Filtering[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(1): 95-106. doi: 10.12000/JR21181
    [5]ZHOU Zibo, ZHANG Chaowei, XIA Saiqiang, XU Daoming, GAO Yan, ZENG Xiaoshuang. Feature Extraction of Rotor Blade Targets Based on Phase Compensation in a Passive Bistatic Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(6): 929-943. doi: 10.12000/JR21132
    [6]DING Jinshan. Focusing Algorithms and Moving Target Detection Based on Video SAR[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(2): 321-334. doi: 10.12000/JR20018
    [7]MOU Xiaoqian, CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, ZHOU Wei, LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong. Clutter Suppression and Marine Target Detection for Radar Images Based on INet[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 640-653. doi: 10.12000/JR20090
    [8]CHEN Shichao, LUO Feng, HU Chong, NIE Xueya. Small Target Detection in Sea Clutter Background Based on Tsallis Entropy of Doppler Spectrum[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 344-354. doi: 10.12000/JR19012
    [9]Wang Benjing, Yi Jianxin, Wan Xianrong, Dan Yangpeng. Inter-frame Ambiguity Analysis and Suppression of LTE Signal for Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(4): 514-522. doi: 10.12000/JR18025
    [10]Chen Xiaolong, Chen Baoxin, Huang Yong, Xue Yonghua, Guan Jian. Frequency Diverse Array Radar Signal Processing via Space-Range-Doppler Focus (SRDF) Method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(2): 183-193. doi: 10.12000/JR18018
    [11]Xing Meng-dao, Sun Guang-cai, Li Xue-shi. Study on SAR/GMTI Processing for High-resolution Wide-swath SAR System[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(4): 375-385. doi: 10.12000/JR15096
    [12]Li Hai, Liu Xin-long, Zhou Meng, Liu Wei-jian. Detection of Maneuvering Target Based on Modified AMF[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(5): 552-559. doi: 10.12000/JR15105
    [13]Zhao Yong-ke, Lü Xiao-De. A Joint-optimized Real-time Target Detection Algorithm for Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(6): 666-674. doi: 10.12000/JR14005
    [14]Wu Yong, Wang Jun. Application of Mixed Kalman Filter to Passive Radar Target Tracking[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(6): 652-659. doi: 10.12000/JR14113
    [15]Wang Hua-bin, Xu Mu, Wang Cheng, Zhao Qing-quan. False Target Discrimination of Air Surveillance Radar Based on Track Velocity Modification and Frequency Spectrum Analysis[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(3): 382-388. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13045
    [16]Guan Xin, Zhong Li-hua, Hu Dong-hui, Ding Chi-biao. A Compensation Algorithm Based on RSPWVD-Hough Transform for Doppler Expansion in Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(4): 430-438. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13073
    [17]Zheng Shi-chao, Song Hong-jun, Liu Ya-bo, Yan He, Wu Kun. Error Analysis of Fast Moving Target Geo-location in Wide Area Surveillance Ground Moving Target Indication Mode[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(4): 445-453. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13076
    [18]RAO Yun-Hua, ZHU Feng-Yuan, ZHANG Xiu-Zhi, WAN Xian-Rong, GONG Zi-Ping. Ambiguity Function Analysis and Side Peaks Suppression of WiFi Signal for Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(3): 225-231. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20061
    [19]Liu Zhen, Wei Xi-zhang, Li Xiang. Novel Method of Unambiguous Moving Target Detection in Pulse-Doppler Radar with Random Pulse Repetition Interval[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(1): 28-35. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.10063
    [20]Zheng Ming-jie, Yan He, Zhang Bing-chen, Zhao Feng-jun, Yang Ru-liang. A Novel Method of Moving Target Detection and Parameters Estimation for Dual-channel WAS Radar Based on DBS Image[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(1): 36-42. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.20007
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. Zeqi Yang，Shuai Ma，Ning Liu，Kai Chang，Xiaode Lyu. A Novel Clutter Suppression Algorithm for Low-Slow-Small Targets Detecting Based on Sparse Adaptive Filtering. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2024(01): 54-64 .
    2. 张茂乙，程水英，郑辉. 无源雷达杂波抑制与相干检测的联合优化处理. 火力与指挥控制. 2023(11): 95-101 .
    3. 姚诗颖，易建新，万显荣，程丰. 基于多层感知器的外辐射源雷达多帧联合检测. 电波科学学报. 2021(02): 216-224 .
    4. 占伟杰，万显荣，易建新，谢德强，程丰，饶云华. 外辐射源雷达目标扇叶微多普勒效应实验研究. 系统工程与电子技术. 2021(06): 1468-1476 .
    5. 马春雨，张丹，丁振东，宗楚菁. 基于双频连续波雷达技术的木材中白蚁无损检测. 计算技术与自动化. 2021(03): 33-37 .
    6. 郭忠义，汪彦哲，王运来，郭凯. 涡旋电磁波旋转多普勒效应研究进展. 雷达学报. 2021(05): 725-739 . 本站查看
    7. 朱天亮，王小鹏，王祺. 基于广义S变换奇异值分解的料位回波检测与校正（英文）. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation. 2021(04): 442-448 .
    8. 吕晓德，张汉良，杨璟茂，岳琦. 基于LTE信号的外辐射源雷达副峰特性及抑制方法研究. 电子与信息学报. 2018(10): 2498-2505 .
    9. 杨鹏程，吕晓德，刘宇，柴致海，张丹. 基于RDNLMS的机载外辐射源雷达杂波对消. 电子与信息学报. 2016(10): 2488-2494 .
    10. 刘宇，吕晓德，杨鹏程. 一种无源雷达频域扩展相消批处理杂波对消算法. 雷达学报. 2016(03): 293-301 . 本站查看
    11. 杨鹏程，吕晓德，李纪传，蒋柏峰. 基于压缩感知的外辐射源雷达目标检测. 雷达科学与技术. 2015(04): 384-389 .
    12. 杨宇翔，同武勤，熊瑾煜. 一种无源雷达高速机动目标检测新方法. 电子与信息学报. 2014(12): 3008-3013 .
    13. 李万春，黄成峰. 基于角度和多普勒频率的外辐射源定位系统的接收器最优航迹分析. 雷达学报. 2014(06): 660-665 . 本站查看
    14. 赵永科，吕晓德. 一种联合优化的无源雷达实时目标检测算法. 雷达学报. 2014(06): 666-674 . 本站查看
    15. 李纪传，吕晓德，向茂生，杨鹏程. 等效凹槽滤波器及其在无源相关定位雷达中的应用(英文). 雷达学报. 2014(06): 675-685 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.4 %FULLTEXT: 10.4 %META: 74.1 %META: 74.1 %PDF: 15.5 %PDF: 15.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 20.8 %其他: 20.8 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %Absecon: 0.1 %Absecon: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 0.9 %China: 0.9 %Kao-sung: 0.0 %Kao-sung: 0.0 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.1 %Philippines: 0.0 %Philippines: 0.0 %Reynoldsburg: 0.1 %Reynoldsburg: 0.1 %United States: 0.0 %United States: 0.0 %[]: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %三亚: 0.1 %三亚: 0.1 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东营: 0.0 %东营: 0.0 %中卫: 0.3 %中卫: 0.3 %临沧: 0.0 %临沧: 0.0 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 14.0 %北京: 14.0 %北京市: 0.3 %北京市: 0.3 %北榄坡府: 0.1 %北榄坡府: 0.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台湾省: 0.0 %台湾省: 0.0 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉林: 0.0 %吉林: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %圣彼得堡: 0.2 %墨尔本: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.2 %大连: 0.2 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.0 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州市: 0.1 %广州市: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延边: 0.0 %延边: 0.0 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口: 1.1 %张家口市: 0.0 %张家口市: 0.0 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %无锡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.0 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %普洱: 0.0 %普洱: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.1 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %柳州: 0.3 %柳州: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.2 %海口: 0.2 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %美国: 0.0 %美国: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 13.0 %芒廷维尤: 13.0 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 22.7 %西宁: 22.7 %西安: 1.4 %西安: 1.4 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %重庆: 0.1 %重庆: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %金昌: 0.1 %长沙: 1.3 %长沙: 1.3 %长治: 0.1 %长治: 0.1 %青岛: 1.5 %青岛: 1.5 %其他其他AbseconCentral DistrictChinaKao-sungKorea Republic ofPhilippinesReynoldsburgUnited States[]三亚上海东莞东营中卫临沧丽水佛山保定兰州兰辛加利福尼亚州包头北京北京市北榄坡府十堰南京南宁南昌南通南阳厦门台北台州台湾省合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布嘉兴圣彼得堡墨尔本大庆大连天津太原威海孟买安康宝鸡岳阳常德平顶山广州广州市廊坊延边张家口张家口市成都扬州无锡昆明普洱朝阳杭州枣庄柳州格兰特县武汉沈阳洛阳济南济源海口淄博深圳渭南湖州湘潭漯河潍坊烟台珠海石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约绍兴绵阳美国美国爱荷华得梅因芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城连云港郑州鄂州重庆金昌长沙长治青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(3093) PDF downloads(2338) Cited by(26)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return