Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Volume 8 Issue 5
Oct.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Measurement Method for Sea Clutter with Shore-based Radar
3. Experiment Radar, Sites, and Data Acquisition
4. Typical Data Presentation and Analysis
5. Conclusions
Appendix
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2019  >  8(5): 656-667
LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, WANG Guoqing, et al. Sea-detecting X-band radar and data acquisition program[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(5): 656–667. doi: 10.12000/JR19089
Citation: LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, WANG Guoqing, et al. Sea-detecting X-band radar and data acquisition program[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(5): 656–667. doi: 10.12000/JR19089
shu

Sea-detecting X-band Radar and Data Acquisition Program (in English)

DOI: 10.12000/JR19089

  • Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China

Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871392, 61531020, 61871391), The China Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2017M620862)
More Information
  • Author Bio:

    LIU Ningbo(1983–), PhD, is an associate professor at Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University, focusing on intelligent signal processing, radar target detection within sea clutter, radar experiment, and detection performance evaluation. His work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC) and the China Postdoctoral Foundation. He won first prize in the Provincial and Ministerial Science and Technology Progress Award. E-mail: lnb198300@163.com

    DONG Yunlong(1974–), PhD, is a professor at the Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University. His research interest is multi-sensor information integration. E-mail: china_dyl@sina.com

    WANG Guoqing(1980–), PhD, is a lecturer at the Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University, focusing on high-speed acquisition and real-time processing of radar data. E-mail: gqwang80@163.com

    DING Hao(1988–), PhD, is an associate professor at the Information Fusion Institute, Naval Aviation University. His research interests are recognition and suppression of sea clutter and target detection in sea clutter. E-mail: hao3431@tom.com

  • Corresponding author: LIU Ningbo, lnb198300@163.com; DONG Yunlong, china_dyl@sina.com
  • Received Date: 2019-09-29
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-10-13
    • Available Online: 2019-10-21
  • Publish Date: 2019-10-01
    Abstract
  • To meet the radar data requirements of target detection technology research and address the lack of publicly available sea-detecting radar data, a data-sharing program for sea-detecting radar is proposed herein. The aim of the proposed data-sharing program is to conduct sea detection experiments using an X-band solidstate phase-coherent radar and other multi-type radars to obtain the target and sea clutter data under different sea conditions, resolutions, and grazing angles. Moreover, the marine meteorological and hydrological data, target position, and track data are simultaneously obtained using the proposed data-sharing program to help achieve the standardized management of radar-measured data. The proposed data-sharing program aims to promote the open sharing of data sets, serve as the basis for research on sea clutter characteristics, and facilitate the research on sea clutter suppression and target detection technology.

     

    • FullText(HTML)

  • When detecting military and civil targets, such as ships, skimming aircraft, fairway buoys, fishing vessels, small-scale yachts, and floating ice in a complex marine environment, sea-detecting radars are inevitably influenced by surface scattering echo, i.e., sea clutter. Particularly under high-resolution radar and high sea conditions, spike phenomenon, which occurs frequently in sea clutter and has strong overall energy, is extremely similar to target echo in time domain. However, the radar shows a greater spectral width in frequency domain, which easily results in false alarm and seriously influences sea target detection. Thus, studying the characteristics of sea clutter based on actual application scenario and real data, developing sea clutter suppression and target detection, and improving sea-detecting radar capacity have become bottlenecks with strong exploration and difficulty and crucial issues in current research[1–3].

    The research methods for sea clutter characteristics can be classified into two types. One is research on the formation mechanism of sea clutter and scattering calculation based on geometrical model of sea surface and electromagnetic scattering theory. The other is acquiring real data on surface scattering echo and modifying existing theory or developing a new theory from an experimental perspective. The research method from an experimental view is widely used and closely resembles the real environment, thereby mutually supplementing and demonstrating the research method from the perspective of theoretical calculation. The characteristics of real experimental data are closely related to radar equipment. As a result, the research method based on real measurement of experiment can combine universal research results of theoretical calculation with specific application scenarios of special equipment to a certain extent. Besides, this research method implements optimization and improvement, advances the application of characteristic research results of sea clutter, and strongly supports research on target detection and clutter suppression such as MTI/MTD, transform domain disposal, tracking before detection, and constant false alarm rate[4,5]. Called “information fully recorded sea clutter measurement data,” real experimental data include not only sea clutter data and target echo data but also marine environment data (e.g., wave height, wave direction, wind speed, wind direction, temperature, and relative humidity), real-time location of target (e.g., size or RCS, longitude and latitude or range orientation, velocity, direction of real-time motion state, and motion track), radar operating parameters (e.g., radar location, height, frequency band, pulse repetition frequency, and distance/orientation resolution). Such information normalizes detailed records and correlates to radar data to repeat the experimental scenario corresponding to data and ensure high application values of such data.

    According to the literature, various sea clutter measurement experiments with radar have been made at China and abroad to support the development of sea-detecting radar equipment and improve the capacity of sea target detection[6]. Typical foreign experiments include four-frequency (P, L, C, X) sea clutter measurement with airborne radar made by the United States Navy Research Laboratory[7], “Peak Program” of the US Navy and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency[8], sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band IPIX radar conducted by McMaster University in Canada[9,10], sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band Fynmeet radar conducted by the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)[11,12], sea clutter measurement experiment with Ka-band radar on the South Coast of Spain[13], and L-band multichannel sea clutter experiment conducted by the Defense Science and Technology Organization[14-16]. In China, several radar-related scientific research institutions have also conducted sea clutter measurement experiments under different conditions[6,17–30], acquired massive data under various radar platforms, and developed many studies on characteristic analysis and modeling and multi-domain feature extraction[31–41]. However, because of military and technical confidentiality, most sea clutter datasets measured with radar have not been disclosed, and only the datasets acquired from the sea clutter measurement experiment with X-band IPIX radar conducted by McMaster University and with X-band Fynmeet radar of South Africa’s CSIR are available.

    The IPIX radar dataset is well known in the research field of sea target detection, being typical radar data under small grazing angles of shore-based platform. Under the leadership of Prof. Simon Haykin of McMaster University, a research team[9,10] conducted sea clutter measurement and small-sea floating target detection experiments in Dartmouth, south of Nova Scotia, and in Grimsby, Ontario in 1993 and 1998, respectively. The Fynmeet radar dataset was acquired by CSIR to support a small sea-target monitoring system. CSIR conducted sea clutter and echo data measurement experiments twice for target vessels over 19 days on the southwest coastline of South Africa in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Such a database is complete in a variety of parameters and records[11,12]. These two publicly available datasets focus on specific targets and sea areas for experiments, thereby having certain limitations. These datasets can be used to evaluate the performance of clutter suppression and target detection methods, but may be inaccurate in performance evaluation for the Chinese sea area and specific target detection. Furthermore, because of indefinite reasons, CSIR datasets can no longer be downloaded from the official website.

    Considering research demands for sea clutter characteristics and sea target detection technology, and learning from successful experiences in data acquisition and records of McMaster University for the IPIX radar datasets and of South Africa’s CSIR for the Fynmeet radar dataset, the research group working on sea target detection at Naval Aeronautical University have proposed a “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program.” This program aims to develop a sea-detection experiment with X-band full solid-phase coherent radar in stages and batches, acquire real radar data and experimental supplementary data under different conditions, as well as build and form datasets used to support recognition for sea clutter characteristics, sea clutter suppression, sea target detection, tracking, and classification. These datasets are disclosed and shared in batches to contribute toward advancing the quality sea-detecting radar equipment and improving detection performance.

    Using shore-based X-band full solid-phase coherent radar, this experiment acquires surface electromagnetic scattering echo and measure surface scattering coefficient[42–45], which are used to study rules of sea clutter change with resolution, incidence direction and scattering direction, and environmental characteristics of sea surface. This experiment also investigates statistical features and spectral characteristics of sea clutter. Note that the radar’s observation objects include not only sea surface (sea clutter) but also sea-surface targets such as channel buoys and ships. In other words, acquired real radar data include pure sea clutter data and sea clutter as well as target echo data.

    By measuring and recording echo power on the sea surface, we can build a corresponding relationship between the radar scattering coefficient of the measured sea surface and the voltage value of the radar video based on calibration. Such a relationship can be used in real measurements to determine the radar scattering coefficient of the measured sea surface from video voltage value. As a result, the data of this experiment can be compared with other experimental data. The external calibration method is mainly used in this experiment, i.e., to provide a calibration level with a calibration object under a given radar cross section. The calibration method is expressed as follows[42]:

    σ0=σA=PrPr0⋅(RrR0)4⋅σ0A=VrVr0⋅(RrR0)4⋅σ0A (1)

    where σ0 refers to the radar cross section of the measured sea surface (unit: dBm2/m2); σ refers to the radar cross section shown when the radar antenna beam irradiates the sea surface (unit: m2); A refers to the irradiation area on the sea surface made from the radar antenna beam (unit: m2); Pr refers to the echo power of measured sea surface (unit: W); Pr0 refers to echo power of calibration object (unit: W); Rr refers to the distance from the measured sea surface to antenna (unit: m); R0 refers to the distance between the calibration object and antenna (unit: m); σ0 is the radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); Vr refers to the echo voltage of measured sea surface (unit: V); and Vr0 refers to the echo voltage of the calibration object (unit: V).

    The calibration accuracy mainly depends on the radar cross section of the calibration object and relative size of the surface scattering cross section. The calibration error can be expressed as follows:

    σm−σ0σm=σbσ0±2√σbσ0 (2)

    where σm refers to the measured radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); σ0 refers to the real radar cross section of the calibration object (unit: m2); and σb refers to the radar cross section of the measured sea surface (unit: m2). When error is limited within ±20% (equivalent to ±1 dB), σb/σ0≤10−2 (equivalent to –20 dB) is controlled.

    In the calibration process, a rectangle panel, a corner reflector, a Luneburg lens reflector, and a metal ball are typically used as calibration objects. The scattering cross sections of these standard objects can be obtained through theoretical calculation (Ref. [42] provides details). This experiment proposes to use a metal ball as a calibration object (see Fig. 1). The calibration object is placed at sea surface and higher than sea level to a certain extent as a whole. Besides, the object is not submerged. The position of the calibration object is accurately calculated based on erection location of the radar and orientation of the wave beam. Stable calibration results can be obtained by averaging measurements acquired multiple times.

    Figure  1.  Stainless steel ball calibration body
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    In fact, for research demands of real sea clutter, such as characteristics of statistical distribution, correlation characteristics, Doppler spectrum characteristics, clutter suppression, and target detection, we pay close attention to the relative amplitude of radar echo. If differences exist in surface scattering coefficient and different bands and radars, then the radar will be calibrated.

    3.1 Experiment radar

    The X-band solid power amplifier surveillance/navigation radar used in this experiment is mainly applicable to scenarios such as shipping navigation and shore surveillance. Characterized by high-range resolution, high reliability, and small distance from dead zone of detection, the radar clearly distinguishes various targets under different ranges (see Fig. 2). Such a radar utilizes a solid power-amplifier combined impulse transmission mechanism (see Fig. 3) to improve range resolution, decline dead zones of range, and increase radiation power. The launch time is 40 ns to 100 µs. The target distance is calculated based on the difference of time between receiving signals and launching signals. Furthermore, the radar scans completely through 360° on a horizontal plane (see Tab. 1 for technical parameters of the radar).

    Table  1.  X-band experimental radar parameters
    Parameters Technical indexes
    Operating frequency X
    Scope of operating frequency 9.3-9.5 GHz
    Range 0.0625-96 nm
    Scanning bandwidth 25 MHz
    Range resolution 6 m
    Pulse repetition frequency 1.6 K, 3 K, 5 K & 10 K
    Emission peak power 50 W
    Revolving speed of antenna 2rpm, 12 rpm, 24 rpm, 48 rpm
    Length of antenna 1.8 m
    Operating mode of antenna Gazing & circular scanning
    Polarization mode of antenna HH
    Width of horizontal beam of antenna 1.2°
    Width of vertical beam of antenna 22°
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure  2.  X-band solid-state power amplifier surveillance/ navigation radar
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    Figure  3.  Three modes of combined pulse emission
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint
    1.  Summary table of sea-detecting radar data (the 1st phase)
    No. Grade of sea conditions Data size Working mode of radar antenna Transmission pulse mode Regional AIS data Meteorological and
    hydrological data     		Grazing angle (°)
    1 Grade 1 and below >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    2 Grade 2 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    3 Grade 3 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    4 Grade 4 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
    5 Grade 5 >5 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 No Yes 0.3–15
    Notes: ① Daily AIS data will be generated into a table format, which provides MMSI of ships, time, longitude and latitude, and others. ② Daily meteorological and hydrological data will be generated into an NC-format file, which indicates wind speed, wind direction, wave height, and cycle. ③ The number of pulses contained in a group of data under staring mode will not be less than 105, while a group of data under scanning mode contains a complete scanning cycle. ④ Under transmission pulse mode 2, radars of each corresponding repetition cycle will transmit a single-carrier frequency pulse and an LFM pulse.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    3.2 Experiment sites

    The “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program” proposes a series of sea-detecting experiments, including shore-based and airborne platform experiments, which are carried out within one to two years.

    The sea target detection site located in the coastal zone of Yantai, Shandong Province is selected as the shore-based experiment site. Three experiment sites with different altitudes are covered because of geographical conditions for observing the same sea area, various features, and mutual complementation.

    Experiment site 1: Located on Yangma Island in Yantai, the experiment site is approximately 50 m far from the seaside, at an altitude approximately 30 m, and approximately 180° sea-detecting range of radar. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles is approximately 0.3° to 15°. Various sea targets exist, which are mainly small and medium-sized ships (see Fig. 4 for details).

    Figure  4.  Aerial view of experiment site 1 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Experiment site 2: Located on the seaward side of a small mountain in Muping district, Yantai, the experiment side is approximately 500 m far from the seaside, has an altitude of 60–120 m, and has approximately 180° sea-detecting range of radar. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles shown in significant sea clutter data is approximately 0.3°–6°. Offshore small fishing boats are mainly sea targets and a few other sea targets exist at a remote distance. Thus, this site is feasible for conducting the target experiment (see Fig. 5 for details).

    Figure  5.  Aerial view of experiment site 2 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Experiment site 3: Located on Daiwang mountain in the Zhibu district of Yantai, this experiment site is approximately 2200 m far from the seaside and at an altitude approximately 400 m and sea-detecting range of radar larger than 180°. According to measurements, the scope of grazing angles shown in the significant sea clutter data is approximately 1.2° to 7°. Various sea targets are mainly large, small, and medium-sized ships, which show a wide horizon (see Fig. 6 for details).

    Figure  6.  Aerial view of experiment site 3 for sea detection
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The four-fin Bell 407GXi helicopter (see Fig. 7), which carries the experiment radar and is allowed to fly over the Yantai airspace, is mainly used in airborne platform experiment. For the sea target detection experiment, the helicopter is designed with a flight height from 500 m to 4000 m, loading capacity of up to 300 kg, single flight time of less than 2 h, maximum range of 675 km, and maximum cruising speed of 250 km/h.

    Figure  7.  Helicopter experimental platform
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Phase 1 experiment was conducted at seaside experiment site 1 from September to October 2019 to collect radar echo data, including sea clutter data and target echo data of ships, under different conditions. Phases 2 and 3 experiments will consider experiment sites 2 and 3 and an airborne experiment platform with high altitude. As the shore-based/shipborne radar used in the phase 1 experiment cannot be installed in an airborne platform, the airborne experiment has not been carried out in phase 1, but will be conducted later.

    3.3 Radar data acquisition

    Model HD-LD-CJ-10 portable radar acquisition equipment developed by the research group has been used for data acquisition (see Fig. 8). The equipment is constituted by a 2U portable reinforced IPC, acquisition board card, and upper computer software. Designed with 105 MSPS peak sampling capacity and 80 MB/S continuous storage capacity, and designed with 3-way TTL level signal, 2-receiving and 2-sending RS232 signals, and 4-receiving RS422 signal ports, the acquisition board will perform 3-way quantification and can be used to access data of auxiliary equipment. The upper computer software can realize user-defined port gate sampling, automatically separate binary data files based on the size of the preset file, and record automatic identification system (AIS), radar output point/flight path, and other data through serial and network interfaces.

    Figure  8.  HD-LD-CJ-10 portable acquisition equipment
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    When radar signals are collected, port gate sampling will be conducted based on triggering signals. The designation format for the data acquisition file is 20191008085830_staring/scanning (y/m/d/h/min/s/antenna working mode) and the working mode of the antenna includes staring (at a certain direction) and scanning (in a circular manner). Fig. 9 presents the basic format of collected data. Each data file is constituted by multiple pulse combined echo data ranked in order. Different working modes of radar correspond to different pulse combinations, and each pulse combination includes one to three transmission pulses. The echo data of each pulse combination is constituted by “data head plus echo data.” The data head includes zone bit, length of information head, data version, pulse repetition period, frequency and counting, sampling frequency, data source and triggering mode, orientation code, sign of data loss, start time and corresponding sampling depth of port gate, UTC time, radar position, true north angle of radar, working mode of radar and data check bit, and others. The length of echo data can be calculated based on the size of the port gate and sampling depth. Besides, the sampling number of each pulse echo in one pulse combination is defined (see Appendix for details of the real data).

    Figure  9.  Format of radar acquisition data
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Regarding the process of sea-detecting radar experiment and data acquisition, the radar is erected at a predetermined experiment side. Before each experiment, the preliminary level of sea state and staring angle at the antenna are determined based on the wind speed, wind direction, wave height, wave direction, weather forecast, and real-time information. The radar starts up and works under antenna parking mode and circular scanning mode, respectively. Furthermore, the data acquisition unit will be enabled to record data and synchronize data of AIS equipment. The data acquisition lasts over 2 min under parking mode and over 5 min under circular scanning mode. When the requirements are satisfied, the data acquisition is stopped, and the list of records for data acquisition and record information are prepared, as indicated in the experiment process. This process is repeated over five times to ensure the acquisition of 10 groups of real data from each experiment. These data are validated by being replayed and analyzed onsite by acquisition equipment.

    MAT data format in Matlab is used for data disclosed in the phase 1 experiment of the “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program.” The data head information and echo data can be loaded directly for future reference. In subsequent experiments, as the data type and size increase, international general data format (e.g., NetCDF, HDF5, and others) will be used to improve compatibility with various types of radar data. Furthermore, special radar data management and analysis software will be provided to ensure standard management for radar data.

    3.4 Auxiliary data of experiment

    One of the important elements of the sea clutter experiment with the radar is synchronous record of marine environmental data. On the one hand, generating the “information fully recorded sea clutter measurement data” will include basic information on the marine environment during the time that the radar data are replayed. On the other hand, this process will advance the refinement of technical research on characteristics of sea clutter, sea clutter suppression, and target detection. The range of spatial scale is relatively small because of the limited scope of the sea area for shore-based observation with the radar. Meanwhile, through marine meteorological station and satellite remote sensing, the marine environmental data (e.g., wave height and direction) will be predicted or modified in real time within a large spatial scale. For the definite sea area observed with the radar, corresponding marine environmental data will be provided generally through modeling and reanalysis. As a result, certain errors may occur. Of course, marine environmental data can also be measured through information buoy and such measurements will be more accurate. However, the buoy will only measure a certain point in the sea area observed with the radar, which cannot reflect the conditions of other zones of the entire sea area. Therefore, this experiment combines both of them (i.e. the reanalysis data and the measured data), while marine environmental data in the field of view of the radar will be provided mainly through reanalyzed marine environmental data. Furthermore, marine information buoys will be placed in certain points and time within the radar observation area to modify the marine environmental data. A combination of both will provide more accurate results to support the sea-detecting radar experiment.

    The marine environment information on wind and wave will be mainly recorded in the sea-detecting radar experiment. The wind elements mainly include wind scale, wind speed, and wind direction, while the wave elements mainly include wave height, wave direction, wave velocity, wave period, and temperature. In addition, the weather phenomena, temperature, and relative humidity during the experiment will also be recorded.

    With the background field of Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), the data source of wind elements utilizes the scale mode in weather research and forecasting, and 3DVAR (3D VARiational) data assimilation technology to assimilate various conventional and non-conventional meteorological observation data for land, ocean, and upper air as well as ensure dynamic integration between various observation and reanalysis data. On this basis, data on the historical optimal path of typhoons sourced from the National Meteorological Center and weak-constraint variational method have been used to adjust dynamically integrated reanalysis wind field and further improve data accuracy. The reanalysis dataset of the sea surface wind field can cover the northwest Pacific Ocean (10°S–50°N, 95°E–150°E). The data of the sea area observed with the radar will be randomly selected based on the experiment position and longitude and latitude in each experiment to support the experiment data analysis. For the data of wind elements, the spatial resolution is 0.1° (longitude and latitude), the time resolution is not less than 1 h, and the wind speed error at grid point of longitude and latitude is within ±1.5 m/s.

    With the driving field of CFSR, the data source of wave elements, based on the third-generation numerical mode SWAN of the offshore wave optimized by the National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center and the optimal interpolation assimilation technology, has assimilated effective wave height data of satellite altimeter along sea waves. The data source also used the nesting method to build a wave reanalysis system and form a high-resolution wave reanalysis dataset covering the northwest Pacific Ocean (0°–50°N, 100°E–160°E). Similar to the data acquisition method for wind elements, the data of the radar observed sea area will be randomly selected based on the longitude and latitude of the experiment site in each experiment to support the experiment data analysis. For the data of wave elements, the special resolution is 0.1° (longitude and latitude), time resolution is not less than 1 h, and wave height error at the grid point of longitude and latitude is within 0.3 m (see Fig. 10(a)—Fig. 10(d) for samples). In Fig. 10(a) and Fig. 10(c), “BUOY WS/BUOY SWH” refers to one-site experiment data of wind speed/effective wave height acquired through sea-surface buoy, and “MODEL WS/MODEL SWH” refers to the reanalysis data of wind speed/effective wave height acquired through data at the grid point of longitude and latitude and data modeling.

    Figure  10.  Meteorological and hydrological data of experimental sea area
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    Based on the above data acquisition, the buoy for marine meteorology and hydrological information will also be used to modify the reanalysis data of wind and wave at specific positions during the experiment. The real-time observation for onsite wave and tide can be realized at a fixed position through such a buoy because of its high accuracy in measurement and simple erection and maintenance (see Fig. 11). The measurement parameters include wave height, wave period, wave direction, wind speed, wind direction, air temperature, air pressure, and position coordinates of the buoy.

    Figure  11.  Marine meteorological and hydrological information buoy
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    In addition to obtaining the aforementioned marine environmental information, the sea-detecting radar experiment will also synchronize real motion tracks of the sea targets. For large and medium-sized ships, the position, motion state, and dimensional information of targets can be acquired through message data of AIS. For small-sized ships, coordination experiments (additionally installing AIS equipment or GPS/Beidou positioning system) will be conducted to acquire real motion tracks. Furthermore, non-coordinated targets (e.g., small-sized fishing ships and yachts) at sea surface will be roughly marked (for position and time) through observations of radar display terminal and manual records. These targets, however, cannot provide accurate position information as real values.

    To describe data validity, in this section, a group of typical sea-surface measurement data will be selected to provide time domain and frequency domain processing results. The data file name is 20191008085830_staring.mat and data acquisition was conducted from 8:58:30 a.m. on October 8, 2019. When the data acquisition began, the radar antenna stared at a certain direction of the sea surface. The pulse transmission mode is Mode 2 shown in Fig. 3, i.e., each trigger of radar successively transmits two different pulses. The first pulse is a single-carrier frequency signal with pulse width of 40 ns, while the second pulse is an LFM signal with bandwidth 25 MHz, pulse repetition frequency of 3 kHz, and sampling rate at a distance direction of 60 MHz. This group of data will be used to measure sea clutter. No coordinated target occurs at sea surface and the effective wave height of the sea surface is 1.8–2.0 m, which is Grade 4 sea condition according to the Table of Grade of Sea Conditions[1,46]. Fig. 12(a) and Fig. 12(b) show 2D plane graphs of the time domain for single-carrier frequency pulse echo and LFM pulse echo. This group of data contains a total of 4,096 pulses and the data duration is approximately 1.36 s. The echo sampling number at distance direction is 1,436 for the first pulse and 6,678 for the second pulse. Fig. 12(a) and Fig. 12(b) only shows the data of the area with strong clutter instead of the data in all distance units. Fig. 12(c) and Fig. 12(d) present oscillograms of the echo sequence of three distance units. We can observe that clutter energy gradually declines as the distance increases. Fig. 12(e) and Fig. 12(f) show a 2D planar graph of distance and frequency for the single-carrier frequency pulse echo and LFM pulse echo, respectively. Fig. 12(g) and Fig. 12(h) respectively show the Doppler spectra of multiple distance units. We can observe positive values at the center of the Doppler spectrum, indicating the movement of sea waves toward the gazing direction of the radar. According to a 2D diagram of distance frequency for the single-carrier frequency pulse echo, the amplitude of the Doppler spectrum for clutter at certain sampling points is weak, which is related to the fluctuation of sea waves and also the single-carrier frequency pulse echo without distance dimension matched filtering after digital demodulation. If distance dimension matched filtering is conducted, then the Doppler spectrum inevitably widens at the distance dimension to cover all distance units. As a result, results become similar to a 2D diagram of the distance frequency for the LFM pulse echo.

    Figure  12.  Results of typical measurements
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    According to an analysis of multiple groups of data, at the radar erection height of approximately 80 m and under levels 3–4 marine conditions, the range of the significant sea clutter is measured at not less than 3 km when the radar transmits a single-carrier frequency pulse and not less than 8 km when the radar transmits an LFM pulse. Such a range declines under low sea conditions but increase under high sea conditions.

    Real radar data are required to support the development of sea target detection technology with radar. Owing to military and technical confidentiality, most sea clutter datasets measured with radar have not been disclosed. The earlier disclosed sea-detecting radar data, however, is difficult to acquire. Thus, this paper has proposed a “sea-detecting radar data-sharing program” that aims to conduct sea-detection experiments with X-band solid full-coherent radar and other types of radars; acquire targets and sea clutter data under different grades of sea conditions, resolutions, and grazing angles; synchronously acquire real marine meteorological and hydrological data, target positions, and tracks; and achieve standard management for real radar data. As a result, dataset sharing will be advanced to provide data support for tackling critical problems in the research field of sea-detecting radars.

    The real sea-detecting X-band radar data will be disclosed and shared depending on the official website of the Journal of Radars. Experiment data will be uploaded to the “Data/Sea-Detecting Radar Data” page (see Appendix Fig. 1). Please visit http://radars.ie.ac.cn/web/data/getData?dataType=DatasetofRadarDetectingSea for details. Furthermore, data will be regularly updated after the sea-detection experiment.

    1.  Release address of sea-detecting radar data
    DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

    The phase 1 experiment primarily focuses on collecting sea clutter data and then detecting the data of sea-surface targets (non-coordinated targets). Owing to large data size, each data file is not described in this paper. An overview of each data type will be provided based on grade of sea conditions for future reference and selection by researchers.

    Each pulse echo in every group of data includes data head, which includes zone bit, length of information head, data version, pulse repetition period, frequency and counting, sampling frequency, data source and triggering mode, orientation code, sign of data loss, start time and corresponding sampling depth of port gate, UTC time, radar position, true north angle of radar, working mode of radar and data check bit, and others. When the data are loaded, each data point contained in the data head and corresponding meaning will be presented for future reference.

    • References(46)
  • [1]
    SKOLNIK M I. Radar Handbook[M]. 3rd ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., 2008.
    [2]
    WARD K, TOUGH R, and WATTS S. Sea Clutter: Scattering, the K Distribution and Radar Performance[M]. 2nd ed. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2013.
    [3]
    WARD K D and WATTS S. Use of sea clutter models in radar design and development[J]. IET Radar,Sonar&Navigation, 2010, 4(2): 146–157. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0132
    [4]
    丁昊, 董云龙, 刘宁波, 等. 海杂波特性认知研究进展与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(5): 499–516. doi: 10.12000/JR16069

    DING Hao, DONG Yunlong, LIU Ningbo, et al. Overview and prospects of research on sea clutter property cognition[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 499–516. doi: 10.12000/JR16069
    [5]
    何友, 黄勇, 关键, 等. 海杂波中的雷达目标检测技术综述[J]. 现代雷达, 2014, 36(12): 1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.12.001

    HE You, HUANG Yong, GUAN Jian, et al. An overview on radar target detection in sea clutter[J]. Modern Radar, 2014, 36(12): 1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.12.001
    [6]
    丁昊, 刘宁波, 董云龙, 等. 雷达海杂波测量试验回顾与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2019, 8(3): 281–302. doi: 10.12000/JR19006

    DING Hao, LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, et al. Overview and prospects of radar sea clutter measurement experiments[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 281–302. doi: 10.12000/JR19006
    [7]
    DALEY J C, RANSONE J T, BURKETT J A, et al. Sea clutter measurements on four frequencies[R]. Naval Research Laboratory Report 6806, 1968.
    [8]
    TITI G W and MARSHALL D F. The ARPA/Navy mountaintop program: Adaptive signal processing for airborne early warning radar[C]. 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, USA, 1996: 1165–1168. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1996.543572.
    [9]
    DROSOPOULOS A. Description of the OHGR database[R]. Technical Note 94-14, 1994.
    [10]
    GRECO M, STINCO P, GINI F, et al. Impact of sea clutter nonstationarity on disturbance covariance matrix estimation and CFAR detector performance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2010, 46(3): 1502–1513. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2010.5545205
    [11]
    HERSELMAN P L, BAKER C J, and DE WIND H J. An analysis of X-band calibrated sea clutter and small boat reflectivity at medium-to-low grazing angles[J]. International Journal of Navigation and Observation, 2008, 2008: 347518. doi: 10.1155/2008/347518
    [12]
    HERSELMAN P L and BAKER C J. Analysis of calibrated sea clutter and boat reflectivity data at C- and X-band in South African coastal waters[C]. 2007 IET International Conference on Radar Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 2007. doi: 10.1049/cp:20070616.
    [13]
    CARRETERO-MOYA J, GISMERO-MENOYO J, BLANCO-DEL-CAMPO Á, et al. Statistical analysis of a high-resolution sea-clutter database[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2010, 48(4): 2024–2037. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2033193
    [14]
    ANTIPOV I. Analysis of sea clutter data[R]. Technical Report DSTO-TR-0647, 1998.
    [15]
    DONG Yunhan and MERRETT D. Statistical measures of S-band sea clutter and targets[R]. Technical Report DSTO-TR-2221, 2008.
    [16]
    DONG Yunhan and MERRETT D. Analysis of L-band multi-channel sea clutter[R]. Technical Report DSTO-TR-2455, 2010.
    [17]
    赵海云, 张瑞永, 武楠, 等. 基于实测数据的海杂波特性分析[J]. 雷达科学与技术, 2009, 7(3): 214–218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2009.03.011

    ZHAO Haiyun, ZHANG Ruiyong, WU Nan, et al. Analysis of sea clutter characteristics based on measured data[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2009, 7(3): 214–218. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2009.03.011
    [18]
    刘志高, 徐向东, 刘斌. 某低空警戒雷达海杂波数据的统计特性分析[J]. 空军雷达学院学报, 2004, 18(4): 1–3, 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8691.2004.04.001

    LIU Zhigao, XU Xiangdong, and LIU Bin. Statistical analysis of sea clutter feature data from a low-altitude surveillance radar[J]. Journal of Air Force Radar Academy, 2004, 18(4): 1–3, 10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8691.2004.04.001
    [19]
    张忠, 袁业术, 孟宪德. 舰载超视距雷达背景杂波统计特性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(9): 19–22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2002.09.007

    ZHANG Zhong, YUAN Yeshu, and MENG Xiande. Background clutters statistical characteristics in shipborne radar[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24(9): 19–22. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2002.09.007
    [20]
    周超, 刘泉华. Ku波段实验雷达海杂波实测数据分析[J]. 信号处理, 2015, 31(12): 1573–1578. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2015.12.005

    ZHOU Chao and LIU Quanhua. Analysis of field sea clutter data of Ku band[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2015, 31(12): 1573–1578. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2015.12.005
    [21]
    杨俊岭, 李大治, 万建伟, 等. 海杂波尖峰特性研究及仿真分析[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2007, 19(8): 1836–1840. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2007.08.046

    YANG Junling, LI Dazhi, WAN Jianwei, et al. Sea spike characteristics studies and simulation analyses[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2007, 19(8): 1836–1840. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2007.08.046
    [22]
    XU Shuwen, SHUI Penglang, and YAN Xueying. Non-coherent detection of radar target in heavy-tailed sea clutter using bi-window non-linear shrinkage map[J]. IET Signal Processing, 2016, 10(9): 1031–1039. doi: 10.1049/iet-spr.2015.0564
    [23]
    康士峰, 葛德彪, 罗贤云, 等. 多波段多极化海杂波特性的实验研究[J]. 微波学报, 2000, 16(5): 463–468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6122.2000.z1.003

    KANG Shifeng, GE Debiao, LUO Xianyun, et al. Experimental study on multi-band and multi-polarization characteristics of sea clutter[J].Journal of Microwaves, 2000, 16(5): 463–468. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6122.2000.z1.003
    [24]
    张金鹏, 张玉石, 李清亮, 等. 基于不同散射机制特征的海杂波时变多普勒谱模型[J]. 物理学报, 2018, 67(3): 034101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171612

    ZHANG Jinpeng, ZHANG Yushi, LI Qingliang, et al. A time-varying Doppler spectrum model of radar sea clutter based on different scattering mechanisms[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 034101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171612
    [25]
    夏晓云, 黎鑫, 张玉石, 等. 基于相位的岸基雷达地海杂波分割方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40(3): 552–556. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.03.10

    XIA Xiaoyun, LI Xin, ZHANG Yushi, et al. Sea-land clutter segmentation method of shore-based radar based on phase information[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(3): 552–556. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2018.03.10
    [26]
    许心瑜, 张玉石, 黎鑫, 等. UHF波段海杂波时间相关性的海浪状态影响分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(6): 1203–1207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.06.03

    XU Xinyu, ZHANG Yushi, LI Xin, et al. Influence of sea condition on the temporal correlation properties of UHF band sea clutter[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(6): 1203–1207. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.06.03
    [27]
    张玉石, 许心瑜, 吴振森, 等. L波段小擦地角海杂波幅度均值与风速关系建模[J]. 电波科学学报, 2015, 30(2): 289–294. doi: 10.13443/j.cjors.2014042001

    ZHANG Yushi, XU Xinyu, WU Zhensen, et al. Modeling windspeed behavior of L-band sea clutter average reflectivity at low grazing angles[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2015, 30(2): 289–294. doi: 10.13443/j.cjors.2014042001
    [28]
    张玉石, 尹雅磊, 许心瑜, 等. 海杂波测量定标的姿态修正数据处理方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(3): 607–612. doi: 10.11999/JEIT140659

    ZHANG Yushi, YIN Yalei, XU Xinyu, et al. Data processing method of posture correction for calibration of sea clutter measurement[J]. Journal of Electronics&Information Technology, 2015, 37(3): 607–612. doi: 10.11999/JEIT140659
    [29]
    许心瑜, 张玉石, 黎鑫, 等. L波段小擦地角海杂波KK分布建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(7): 1304–1308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2014.07.13

    XU Xinyu, ZHANG Yushi, LI Xin, et al. KK distribution modeling with L band low grazing sea clutter[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(7): 1304–1308. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2014.07.13
    [30]
    张玉石, 许心瑜, 尹雅磊, 等. L波段小擦地角海杂波幅度统计特性研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36(5): 1044–1048. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01139

    ZHANG Yushi, XU Xinyu, YIN Yalei, et al. Research on amplitude statistics of L-band low grazing angle sea clutter[J]. Journal of Electronics&Information Technology, 2014, 36(5): 1044–1048. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01139
    [31]
    DING Hao, GUAN Jian, LIU Ningbo, et al. New spatial correlation models for sea clutter[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(9): 1833–1837. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2430371
    [32]
    DING Hao, GUAN Jian, LIU Ningbo, et al. Modeling of heavy tailed sea clutter based on the generalized central limit theory[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, 13(11): 1591–1595. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2596322
    [33]
    GUAN J, LIU N B, HUANG Y, et al. Fractal characteristic in frequency domain for target detection within sea clutter[J]. IET Radar,Sonar&Navigation, 2012, 6(5): 293–306. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2011.0250
    [34]
    GUAN Jian, LIU Ningbo, HUANG Yong, et al. Fractal Poisson model for target detection within spiky sea clutter[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(2): 411–415. doi: 10.1109/lgrs.2012.2203578
    [35]
    CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, HE You, et al. Detection of low observable moving target in sea clutter via fractal characteristics in fractional Fourier transform domain[J]. IET Radar,Sonar&Navigation, 2013, 7(6): 635–651. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2012.0116
    [36]
    CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, BAO Zhonghua, et al. Detection and extraction of target with micromotion in spiky sea clutter via short-time fractional Fourier transform[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(2): 1002–1018. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2246574
    [37]
    CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, LIU Ningbo, et al. Maneuvering target detection via Radon-fractional Fourier transform-based long-time coherent integration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2014, 62(4): 939–953. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2297682
    [38]
    CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, HUANG Yong, et al. Radon-linear canonical ambiguity function-based detection and estimation method for marine target with micromotion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(4): 2225–2240. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2358456
    [39]
    CHEN Xiaolong, HUANG Yong, LIU Ningbo, et al. Radon-fractional ambiguity function-based detection method of low-observable maneuvering target[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2015, 51(2): 815–833. doi: 10.1109/taes.2014.130791
    [40]
    黄勇, 陈小龙, 关键. 实测海尖峰特性分析及抑制方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(3): 334–342. doi: 10.12000/JR14108

    HUANG Yong, CHEN Xiaolong, and GUAN Jian. Property analysis and suppression method of real measured sea spikes[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(3): 334–342. doi: 10.12000/JR14108
    [41]
    苏宁远, 陈小龙, 关键, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的海上微动目标检测与分类方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7(5): 565–574. doi: 10.12000/JR18077

    SU Ningyuan, CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, et al. Detection and classification of maritime target with micro-motion based on CNNs[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(5): 565–574. doi: 10.12000/JR18077
    [42]
    总装电子信息基础部. GJB 5026-2003固定站地、海杂波测试方法[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部, 2003.

    General Assembly Electronic Information Foundation Department. GJB 5026-2003 Measurement method of ground/sea clutter with stationary platform[S]. Beijing: General Armaments Department of PLA, 2003.
    [43]
    GJB 6638-2008雷达杂波统计方法[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部, 2008.

    GJB 6638-2008 Statistical methods of radar clutter[S]. Beijing: General Equipment Department of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 2008.
    [44]
    GJB 6850.138-2009水面舰船系泊和航行试验规程第138部分: 导航雷达试验[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部, 2009.

    GJB 6850.138-2009 Code for mooring and sea trial of surface naval ships - Part 138: Test for ships aerograph[S]. Beijing: General Equipment Department of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 2009.
    [45]
    GJB 5027-2003室外场雷达目标散射特性测试方法[S]. 北京: 中国人民解放军总装备部, 2003.

    GJB 5027-2003 The method of measurement for radar target scattering of outdoor range[S]. Beijing: General Equipment Department of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, 2003.
    [46]
    李清亮, 尹志盈, 朱秀芹, 等. 雷达地海杂波测量与建模[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2017: 56-105.

    LI Qingliang, YIN Zhiying, ZHU Xiuqin, et al. Measurement and Modeling of Radar Clutter from Land and Sea[M]. Beijing: National Defend Industry Press, 2017: 56–105.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Xiang, WANG Yumiao, CHEN Xingyu, ZANG Chuanfei, CUI Guolong. Deep Learning-based Marine Target Detection Method with Multiple Feature Fusion[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(3): 554-564. doi: 10.12000/JR23105
    [2]YANG Shixing, ZHANG Guoxin, LIANG Yunfei, YI Wei, KONG Lingjiang. Moving Targets Detection with Low-bit Quantization in Distributed Radar on Moving Platforms[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(3): 584-600. doi: 10.12000/JR23240
    [3]ZHANG Yushi, LI Xiaoyu, ZHANG Jinpeng, XIA Xiaoyun. Sea Clutter Spectral Parameters Prediction and Influence Factor Analysis Based on Deep Learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(1): 110-119. doi: 10.12000/JR22133
    [4]GUAN Jian, LIU Ningbo, WANG Guoqing, DING Hao, DONG Yunlong, HUANG Yong, TIAN Kaixiang, ZHANG Mengyu. Sea-detecting Radar Experiment and Target Feature Data Acquisition for Dual Polarization Multistate Scattering Dataset of Marine Targets（in English）[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(2): 456-469. doi: 10.12000/JR23029
    [5]DONG Yunlong, ZHANG Zhaoxiang, DING Hao, HUANG Yong, LIU Ningbo. Target Detection in Sea Clutter Using a Three-feature Prediction-based Method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(4): 762-775. doi: 10.12000/JR23037
    [6]LIU Chao, WANG Yueji. Review of Multi-Target Tracking Technology for Marine Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 100-115. doi: 10.12000/JR20081
    [7]LIU Ningbo, DING Hao, HUANG Yong, DONG Yunlong, WANG Guoqing, DONG Kai. Annual Progress of the Sea-detecting X-band Radar and Data Acquisition Program[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 173-182. doi: 10.12000/JR21011
    [8]GUAN Jian. Summary of Marine Radar Target Characteristics[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 674-683. doi: 10.12000/JR20114
    [9]GUO Zixun, SHUI Penglang, BAI Xiaohui, XU Shuwen, LI Dongchen. Sea-surface Small Target Detection Based on K-NN with Controlled False Alarm Rate in Sea Clutter[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 654-663. doi: 10.12000/JR20055
    [10]CHEN Shichao, GAO Heting, LUO Feng. Target Detection in Sea Clutter Based on Combined Characteristics of Polarization[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 664-673. doi: 10.12000/JR20072
    [11]XU Shuwen, BAI Xiaohui, GUO Zixun, SHUI Penglang. Status and Prospects of Feature-based Detection Methods for Floating Targets on the Sea Surface (in English)[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 684-714. doi: 10.12000/JR20084
    [12]CHEN Shichao, LUO Feng, HU Chong, NIE Xueya. Small Target Detection in Sea Clutter Background Based on Tsallis Entropy of Doppler Spectrum[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 344-354. doi: 10.12000/JR19012
    [13]ZUO Lei, CHAN Xiuxiu, LU Xiaofei, LI Ming. A Weak Target Detection Method in Sea Clutter Based on Joint Space-time-frequency Decomposition[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 335-343. doi: 10.12000/JR19035
    [14]DING Hao, LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian. Overview and Prospects of Radar Sea Clutter Measurement Experiments[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 281-302. doi: 10.12000/JR19006
    [15]Zeng Lina, Zhou Deyun, Li Xiaoyang, Zhang Kun. Novel SAR Target Detection Algorithm Using Free Training[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(2): 177-185. doi: 10.12000/JR16114
    [16]Wang Lulu, Wang Hongqiang, Wang Manxi, Li Xiang. An Overview of Radar Waveform Optimization for Target Detection[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 487-498. doi: 10.12000/JR16084
    [17]Ding Hao, Dong Yunlong, Liu Ningbo, Wang Guoqing, Guan Jian. Overview and Prospects of Research on Sea Clutter Property Cognition[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(5): 499-516. doi: 10.12000/JR16069
    [18]Zhao Yong-ke, Lü Xiao-De. A Joint-optimized Real-time Target Detection Algorithm for Passive Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(6): 666-674. doi: 10.12000/JR14005
    [19]Yan Liang, Sun Pei-lin, Yi Lei, Han Ning, Tang Jun. Modeling of Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter Based on Inverse Gaussian Distribution[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(4): 461-465. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13083
    [20]Chen Xiao-lng, Guan jian, He You. Applications and Prospect of Micro-motion Theory in the Detection of Sea Surface Target[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(1): 123-134. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20102
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(51)

    1. 刘丽华，陈志豪，杨皓宇，肖开明，吴继冰，陈海文，黄宏斌. 面向对海监视的舰船目标跟踪与航迹融合数据集. 中国科学数据(中英文网络版). 2024(01): 260-272 .
    2. 王伟，杜旭洋，杨志伟，吴凡. 基于无人艇的导航雷达目标检测跟踪算法. 系统工程与电子技术. 2024(05): 1561-1572 .
    3. 邹润明，程永强，杨政，吴昊，华小强. 基于流形滤波的海面微弱目标检测方法. 信号处理. 2024(05): 853-864 .
    4. 黄胜彬，潘大鹏，陈涛. 基于多维特征融合的海面目标检测. 舰船电子对抗. 2024(03): 84-91 .
    5. 韩喆璇，于恒力，王中训，刘宁波，孙艳丽. 基于相对多普勒峰高特征的OS-CFAR改进方法. 海军航空大学学报. 2024(04): 475-484 .
    6. 张振宇，杨金灿，卢丽，文统辉，王雅雷，文青波，熊翔. SiZrCN纳米复相陶瓷的成分结构调控与吸波性能. 中南大学学报(自然科学版). 2024(08): 2910-2924 .
    7. 陈胜垚，胡晨康，程智勇，席峰，刘中. 基于残差单元与注意力门的非对称编解码海杂波抑制网络. 电子学报. 2024(08): 2628-2640 .
    8. 关键，姜星宇，刘宁波，丁昊，黄勇. 海杂波背景下的双极化最大特征值目标检测. 系统工程与电子技术. 2024(11): 3715-3725 .
    9. ZANG Chuanfei，WANG Yumiao，WANG Xiang，XU Congan，CUI Guolong. Sea clutter suppression via cuttable encoder-decoderaugmentation network. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics. 2024(06): 1428-1440 .
    10. 陈佳音，郭山红，朱海锐，盛卫星，韩玉兵. 基于多特征融合的海面目标智能检测算法. 现代雷达. 2024(12): 24-30 .
    11. 张俊玲，董玫，陈伯孝. 基于可调Q因子小波变换的海杂波抑制算法. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(02): 343-351 .
    12. 郭立新，魏仪文. 复杂动态海面与目标电磁散射及回波仿真研究现状与展望. 雷达学报. 2023(01): 76-109 . 本站查看
    13. 汪金波，张顺生. 基于两步法的海上目标智能检测方法. 现代雷达. 2023(01): 35-40 .
    14. 黄瀚仪，胡仕友，郭胜龙，李珊君，舒勤. 基于稀疏分解的海面微动目标识别. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(04): 1016-1023 .
    15. 关键，刘宁波，王国庆，丁昊，董云龙，黄勇，田凯祥，张梦雨. 雷达对海探测试验与目标特性数据获取——海上目标双极化多海况散射特性数据集. 雷达学报. 2023(02): 456-469 . 本站查看
    16. 余苗，李刚. 对海监视雷达杂波的建模及仿真. 现代导航. 2023(02): 150-156 .
    17. 关键，伍僖杰，丁昊，刘宁波，黄勇，曹政，魏嘉彧. 基于三维凹包学习算法的海面小目标检测方法. 电子与信息学报. 2023(05): 1602-1610 .
    18. 邓稼麒，李正周，党楚佳，陈文豪，秦天奇. 基于海面场景感知的雷达目标检测方法. 中国电子科学研究院学报. 2023(02): 129-137 .
    19. 董云龙，张兆祥，刘宁波，黄勇，丁昊，张梦雨. 雷达回波三特征联合海况分类方法. 雷达科学与技术. 2023(02): 189-198 .
    20. 马全鑫，杜晓林，董军，李建波，田团伟. 基于几何方法的结构化协方差矩阵估计. 雷达科学与技术. 2023(02): 143-150 .
    21. 刘言，刘宁波，黄勇，王中训. 利用相位特征筛选参考单元的改进CFAR方法. 烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版). 2023(03): 371-378 .
    22. 田凯祥，于晓涵，王中训，刘宁波. 基于实测数据的海杂波与海面小目标特征分析. 海军航空大学学报. 2023(04): 313-322 .
    23. 丁昊，朱晨光，刘宁波，王国庆. 高海况条件下海面漂浮小目标特征提取与分析. 海军航空大学学报. 2023(04): 301-312 .
    24. 齐美彬，李亚斌，项厚宏，杨艳芳，张学森. 基于自注意力机制的雷达弱目标检测. 雷达科学与技术. 2023(04): 431-439+446 .
    25. 司凌宇，强文文，李港，刘美琴，徐帆江，孙富春. 基于对比学习的航海雷达目标检测方法. 电子学报. 2023(07): 1791-1802 .
    26. 李沙，陈元杰，蒋俊. 雷达自适应动目标显示滤波器性能对比. 舰船电子工程. 2023(06): 77-83 .
    27. 李宏武，王燊燊，徐秦，祁华峰. 海杂波对机载雷达探测影响研究. 现代电子技术. 2023(20): 101-106 .
    28. 杨政，程永强，吴昊，黎湘，王宏强. 基于正交投影的子带信息几何雷达弱小目标检测方法. 雷达学报. 2023(04): 776-792 . 本站查看
    29. 杨金龙，成勇，刘佳. 基于多核相关滤波X波段雷达多目标跟踪算法. 信息与控制. 2023(05): 561-573 .
    30. 杜延磊，杨晓峰，汪胜，殷君君，杨会章，杨健. 海面雷达散射及其杂波幅度统计特性的空间遍历性数值仿真研究. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(12): 3806-3818 .
    31. 马红光，郭金库，姜勤波，刘志强. 一种基于自适应滤波的海杂波背景下多目标检测方法. 现代信息科技. 2022(04): 72-76 .
    32. 田凯祥，刘宁波，王中训，刘言. 岸基对海雷达STC曲线设计与性能对比. 电子技术应用. 2022(08): 1-5+12 .
    33. 郁文贤. 自动目标识别的工程视角述评. 雷达学报. 2022(05): 737-752 . 本站查看
    34. 董云龙，刘洋，刘宁波，丁昊，关键. 基于雷达方程修正的目标探测距离评估方法. 信号处理. 2022(10): 2102-2113 .
    35. 刘宁波，丁昊，黄勇，董云龙，王国庆，董凯. X波段雷达对海探测试验与数据获取年度进展. 雷达学报. 2021(01): 173-182 . 本站查看
    36. 梁壮，温利武，丁金闪. 改进型SVD-FRFT海杂波抑制方法. 西安电子科技大学学报. 2021(02): 55-63 .
    37. 丁斌，夏雪，梁雪峰. 基于深度生成对抗网络的海杂波数据增强方法. 电子与信息学报. 2021(07): 1985-1991 .
    38. 刘宁波，姜星宇，丁昊，关键. 雷达大擦地角海杂波特性与目标检测研究综述. 电子与信息学报. 2021(10): 2771-2780 .
    39. 杜延磊，高帆，刘涛，杨健. 基于数值仿真的X波段极化SAR海杂波统计建模与特性分析. 系统工程与电子技术. 2021(10): 2742-2755 .
    40. 杨斌，黄默，王长元，张圆圆，段涛. X波段小擦地角海杂波WW分布建模. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2021(05): 916-921 .
    41. XU Cong，HE Zishu，LIU Haicheng，LI Yadan. Bayesian track-before-detect algorithm for nonstationary sea clutter. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics. 2021(06): 1338-1344 .
    42. 刘用功，尹勇. 目标船感知技术综述. 广州航海学院学报. 2021(04): 1-4+30 .
    43. 黄妙芬，杨光照，邢旭峰，黄山，杨锋，卓永强. 构建岸基雷达网辅助海上执法智能平台的关键技术分析. 海洋技术学报. 2020(02): 64-70 .
    44. 陈世超，高鹤婷，罗丰. 基于极化联合特征的海面目标检测方法. 雷达学报. 2020(04): 664-673 . 本站查看
    45. 牟效乾，陈小龙，关键，周伟，刘宁波，董云龙. 基于INet的雷达图像杂波抑制和目标检测方法. 雷达学报. 2020(04): 640-653 . 本站查看
    46. 关键. 雷达海上目标特性综述. 雷达学报. 2020(04): 674-683 . 本站查看
    47. 许述文，白晓惠，郭子薰，水鹏朗. 海杂波背景下雷达目标特征检测方法的现状与展望. 雷达学报. 2020(04): 684-714 . 本站查看
    48. 邢旭峰，谢仕义，黄妙芬，杨光照，黄山. 基于近海雷达与AIS探测目标融合算法研究. 海洋技术学报. 2020(03): 8-15 .
    49. 李先艳. 一种应用于海防监控领域中的雷达与光电协同工作方法研究. 光学与光电技术. 2020(05): 28-33 .
    50. 宋志勇，回丙伟，范红旗，周剑雄，朱永锋，达凯，张晓峰，苏宏艳，金威，张永杰，杨彩霞，蔺震，樊润东. 雷达回波序列中弱小飞机目标检测跟踪数据集. 中国科学数据(中英文网络版). 2020(03): 277-290 .
    51. 王超，孙芹东，张林，王文龙，张小川. 水下声学滑翔机海上目标探测试验与性能评估. 信号处理. 2020(12): 2043-2051 .

    Other cited types(50)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-042024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-030100200300400
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 52.6 %FULLTEXT: 52.6 %META: 39.9 %META: 39.9 %PDF: 7.4 %PDF: 7.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 5.4 %其他: 5.4 %其他: 1.6 %其他: 1.6 %Austin: 0.0 %Austin: 0.0 %Australia: 0.0 %Australia: 0.0 %Bacoor: 0.0 %Bacoor: 0.0 %Belarus: 0.0 %Belarus: 0.0 %Belgium: 0.0 %Belgium: 0.0 %Bulgaria: 0.0 %Bulgaria: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %Canton: 0.0 %Canton: 0.0 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %Curacao: 0.0 %Curacao: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Durham: 0.0 %Durham: 0.0 %European Union: 0.0 %European Union: 0.0 %Falls Church: 0.0 %Falls Church: 0.0 %France: 0.2 %France: 0.2 %Germany: 0.0 %Germany: 0.0 %Greece: 0.0 %Greece: 0.0 %Halfweg: 0.0 %Halfweg: 0.0 %Hanoi: 0.0 %Hanoi: 0.0 %Happy Valley: 0.0 %Happy Valley: 0.0 %Herndon: 0.0 %Herndon: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %Indonesia: 0.0 %Indonesia: 0.0 %Iran (ISLAMIC Republic Of): 0.0 %Iran (ISLAMIC Republic Of): 0.0 %Israel: 0.0 %Israel: 0.0 %Italy: 0.0 %Italy: 0.0 %Japan: 0.0 %Japan: 0.0 %Keelung: 0.0 %Keelung: 0.0 %Koesan: 0.1 %Koesan: 0.1 %Korea Republic of: 0.0 %Korea Republic of: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.0 %Malvern: 0.0 %Morocco: 0.0 %Morocco: 0.0 %Netherlands: 0.0 %Netherlands: 0.0 %Nigeria: 0.0 %Nigeria: 0.0 %Norman: 0.0 %Norman: 0.0 %North Point: 0.0 %North Point: 0.0 %Pakistan: 0.0 %Pakistan: 0.0 %Philadelphia: 0.0 %Philadelphia: 0.0 %Reserved: 0.0 %Reserved: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Russian Federation: 0.0 %Russian Federation: 0.0 %Saitama: 0.0 %Saitama: 0.0 %Sakakah: 0.0 %Sakakah: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Mateo: 0.0 %San Mateo: 0.0 %Sant'Anastasia: 0.0 %Sant'Anastasia: 0.0 %São José dos Campos: 0.0 %São José dos Campos: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seattle: 0.0 %Seongnam-si: 0.0 %Seongnam-si: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %South Africa: 0.0 %South Africa: 0.0 %St Andrews: 0.0 %St Andrews: 0.0 %Taichung: 0.0 %Taichung: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %Taiwan, China: 0.1 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Turkey: 0.0 %Turkey: 0.0 %Ukraine: 0.0 %Ukraine: 0.0 %United Kingdom: 0.0 %United Kingdom: 0.0 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %Vienna: 0.0 %Vienna: 0.0 %Viet Nam: 0.0 %Viet Nam: 0.0 %Vleuten: 0.0 %Vleuten: 0.0 %Yuseong-gu: 0.0 %Yuseong-gu: 0.0 %[]: 1.2 %[]: 1.2 %丁克尔舍尔本: 0.0 %丁克尔舍尔本: 0.0 %万象: 0.0 %万象: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %上海: 2.7 %上海: 2.7 %上海市徐汇: 0.0 %上海市徐汇: 0.0 %上饶: 0.0 %上饶: 0.0 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东京都: 0.0 %东京都: 0.0 %东莞: 0.1 %东莞: 0.1 %东营: 0.0 %东营: 0.0 %中卫: 0.0 %中卫: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临沂: 0.1 %临沂: 0.1 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乐山: 0.0 %乐山: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %云浮: 0.0 %云浮: 0.0 %亚特兰大: 0.0 %亚特兰大: 0.0 %京都府: 0.0 %京都府: 0.0 %亳州: 0.0 %亳州: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.0 %伊犁: 0.0 %伊犁: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %佳木斯: 0.0 %佳木斯: 0.0 %俄罗斯: 0.0 %俄罗斯: 0.0 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %元朗新墟: 0.0 %元朗新墟: 0.0 %克拉科夫: 0.0 %克拉科夫: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %内江: 0.0 %内江: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.0 %凤凰城: 0.0 %列克星敦: 0.0 %列克星敦: 0.0 %利雅德: 0.0 %利雅德: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加的夫: 0.0 %加的夫: 0.0 %勿加泗: 0.0 %勿加泗: 0.0 %包头: 0.1 %包头: 0.1 %北京: 12.1 %北京: 12.1 %北京市: 0.0 %北京市: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %南京: 5.1 %南京: 5.1 %南京市: 0.0 %南京市: 0.0 %南京市栖霞区: 0.0 %南京市栖霞区: 0.0 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南京市浦口区: 0.0 %南京市浦口区: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南平: 0.0 %南平: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南里奥格兰德州: 0.0 %南里奥格兰德州: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %卡拉奇: 0.0 %卡拉奇: 0.0 %卡纳塔克: 0.0 %卡纳塔克: 0.0 %印度尼西亚北苏门答腊: 0.0 %印度尼西亚北苏门答腊: 0.0 %印度班加罗尔: 0.0 %印度班加罗尔: 0.0 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台湾省: 0.0 %台湾省: 0.0 %合肥: 1.4 %合肥: 1.4 %合肥市: 0.0 %合肥市: 0.0 %吉林: 0.0 %吉林: 0.0 %吕梁: 0.0 %吕梁: 0.0 %周口: 0.0 %周口: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸宁: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 1.1 %哈尔滨: 1.1 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %喜马偕尔邦: 0.0 %喜马偕尔邦: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %圣何塞: 0.0 %圣何塞: 0.0 %圣卡塔琳娜: 0.0 %圣卡塔琳娜: 0.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣地亚哥: 0.0 %圣彼得堡: 0.0 %圣彼得堡: 0.0 %圣约翰斯: 0.0 %圣约翰斯: 0.0 %夏尔迦: 0.0 %夏尔迦: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %多伦多: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大庆: 0.0 %大庆: 0.0 %大连: 0.3 %大连: 0.3 %大阪: 0.0 %大阪: 0.0 %大阪府: 0.0 %大阪府: 0.0 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %威海: 0.4 %威海: 0.4 %娄底: 0.0 %娄底: 0.0 %娄底市娄星区: 0.0 %娄底市娄星区: 0.0 %孝感: 0.0 %孝感: 0.0 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %宁德: 0.0 %宁德: 0.0 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安娜堡: 0.0 %安娜堡: 0.0 %安庆: 0.0 %安庆: 0.0 %安康: 0.2 %安康: 0.2 %安阳: 0.0 %安阳: 0.0 %官坑: 0.0 %官坑: 0.0 %定西: 0.0 %定西: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜昌: 0.4 %宜昌: 0.4 %宜春: 0.0 %宜春: 0.0 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿州: 0.0 %宿州: 0.0 %宿迁: 0.0 %宿迁: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.0 %密蘇里城: 0.0 %岘港: 0.0 %岘港: 0.0 %崇左: 0.0 %崇左: 0.0 %巴中: 0.0 %巴中: 0.0 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %巴登-符腾堡州: 0.0 %巴登-符腾堡州: 0.0 %巴西: 0.0 %巴西: 0.0 %巴音郭楞: 0.0 %巴音郭楞: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.0 %布兰普顿: 0.0 %帕多瓦: 0.0 %帕多瓦: 0.0 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %平凉: 0.0 %平凉: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广元: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %广西壮族自治区: 0.0 %广西壮族自治区: 0.0 %广西桂林雁山区: 0.0 %广西桂林雁山区: 0.0 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家界: 0.1 %张家界: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德州: 0.0 %德州: 0.0 %德罕: 0.0 %德罕: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %德阳: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.1 %忻州: 0.0 %忻州: 0.0 %怀化: 0.0 %怀化: 0.0 %悉尼: 0.0 %悉尼: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %成都: 4.1 %成都: 4.1 %成都市武侯区: 0.1 %成都市武侯区: 0.1 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %抚州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %抚顺: 0.0 %抚顺: 0.0 %拉萨: 0.0 %拉萨: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %文昌: 0.0 %文昌: 0.0 %斯特灵: 0.0 %斯特灵: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.0 %新北: 0.0 %新北: 0.0 %新德里: 0.0 %新德里: 0.0 %新竹: 0.1 %新竹: 0.1 %无锡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.3 %日照: 0.1 %日照: 0.1 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昌吉: 0.0 %昌吉: 0.0 %昌都地区: 0.0 %昌都地区: 0.0 %昭通: 0.0 %昭通: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %普林斯顿: 0.0 %普林斯顿: 0.0 %景德镇: 0.0 %景德镇: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %曲靖: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %松原: 0.0 %松原: 0.0 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.0 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %桃园: 0.0 %桃园: 0.0 %梅利托波尔: 0.0 %梅利托波尔: 0.0 %棉兰: 0.0 %棉兰: 0.0 %楚雄: 0.0 %楚雄: 0.0 %榆林: 0.0 %榆林: 0.0 %武威: 0.0 %武威: 0.0 %武汉: 2.2 %武汉: 2.2 %汉中: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %汕头: 0.0 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳市浑南区: 0.0 %沈阳市浑南区: 0.0 %河内: 0.0 %河内: 0.0 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法国中央－卢瓦尔河谷: 0.0 %法国中央－卢瓦尔河谷: 0.0 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.0 %法尔肯施泰因: 0.0 %泰安: 0.0 %泰安: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %泰州: 0.0 %泰米尔纳德: 0.0 %泰米尔纳德: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.4 %洛阳: 0.4 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %浦项: 0.0 %浦项: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海东: 0.0 %海口: 0.3 %海口: 0.3 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %海得拉巴: 0.0 %淄博: 0.1 %淄博: 0.1 %淮南: 0.0 %淮南: 0.0 %淮安: 0.0 %淮安: 0.0 %深圳: 1.1 %深圳: 1.1 %清化: 0.0 %清化: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %温州: 0.0 %渭南: 0.4 %渭南: 0.4 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湛江: 0.1 %湛江: 0.1 %滁州: 0.0 %滁州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.1 %漯河: 0.1 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潜江: 0.0 %潜江: 0.0 %潮州: 0.0 %潮州: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %烟台: 1.6 %烟台: 1.6 %焦作: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %爪哇岛: 0.0 %爪哇岛: 0.0 %牛津: 0.0 %牛津: 0.0 %特伦托: 0.0 %特伦托: 0.0 %玉林: 0.0 %玉林: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %班加罗尔: 0.0 %班加罗尔: 0.0 %白沙: 0.0 %白沙: 0.0 %百色: 0.0 %百色: 0.0 %益山: 0.0 %益山: 0.0 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %红河: 0.0 %红河: 0.0 %红河哈尼族彝族自治州: 0.0 %红河哈尼族彝族自治州: 0.0 %纽约: 0.7 %纽约: 0.7 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.0 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.0 %罗拉赫: 0.0 %罗拉赫: 0.0 %罗马: 0.0 %罗马: 0.0 %美国: 0.0 %美国: 0.0 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.0 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %自贡: 0.0 %自贡: 0.0 %舟山: 0.2 %舟山: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.8 %芒廷维尤: 15.8 %芜湖: 0.0 %芜湖: 0.0 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %荆州: 0.0 %荆州: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %莆田: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %萍乡: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %葵涌: 0.0 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 10.3 %西宁: 10.3 %西安: 5.0 %西安: 5.0 %西安市长安区: 0.0 %西安市长安区: 0.0 %西安市雁塔区: 0.0 %西安市雁塔区: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %许昌: 0.0 %贵港: 0.0 %贵港: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %费利蒙: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.0 %贺州: 0.0 %贺州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %赫尔辛基: 0.0 %赫尔辛基: 0.0 %辽阳: 0.0 %辽阳: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %达州: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %迪凯特: 0.0 %迪凯特: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %通化: 0.0 %通化: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %遵义: 0.0 %邢台: 0.0 %邢台: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %邵阳: 0.0 %邵阳: 0.0 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %都柏林: 0.0 %都柏林: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %酒泉: 0.0 %酒泉: 0.0 %里斯本: 0.0 %里斯本: 0.0 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金奈: 0.0 %金奈: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %铜川: 0.0 %铜川: 0.0 %铜陵: 0.0 %铜陵: 0.0 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锡林郭勒: 0.0 %锡林郭勒: 0.0 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.0 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %锦州: 0.0 %镇江: 0.2 %镇江: 0.2 %长春: 0.1 %长春: 0.1 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.0 %阿什本: 0.1 %阿什本: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿尔及利亚: 0.0 %阿尔及利亚: 0.0 %阿尔科文达斯: 0.0 %阿尔科文达斯: 0.0 %阿德莱德: 0.0 %阿德莱德: 0.0 %阿拉善: 0.0 %阿拉善: 0.0 %随州: 0.0 %随州: 0.0 %雅加达: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.1 %青岛: 2.2 %青岛: 2.2 %韩国首尔: 0.0 %韩国首尔: 0.0 %首尔: 0.1 %首尔: 0.1 %首尔特别: 0.0 %首尔特别: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %马塞约: 0.0 %马塞约: 0.0 %马德里: 0.1 %马德里: 0.1 %马湾: 0.0 %马湾: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %驻马店: 0.0 %驻马店: 0.0 %鸡西: 0.0 %鸡西: 0.0 %鹤壁: 0.0 %鹤壁: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %黄石: 0.0 %黄石: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.6 %龙岩: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %其他其他AustinAustraliaBacoorBelarusBelgiumBulgariaCanadaCantonCentral DistrictChinaCuracaoDoylestownDurhamEuropean UnionFalls ChurchFranceGermanyGreeceHalfwegHanoiHappy ValleyHerndonIndiaIndonesiaIran (ISLAMIC Republic Of)IsraelItalyJapanKeelungKoesanKorea Republic ofMalvernMoroccoNetherlandsNigeriaNormanNorth PointPakistanPhiladelphiaReservedRochesterRussian FederationSaitamaSakakahSan LorenzoSan MateoSant'AnastasiaSão José dos CamposSeattleSeongnam-siSeychellesSingaporeSouth AfricaSt AndrewsTaichungTaiwan, ChinaTaoyuan DistrictTurkeyUkraineUnited KingdomUnited StatesViennaViet NamVleutenYuseong-gu[]丁克尔舍尔本万象三亚上海上海市徐汇上饶东京东京都东莞东营中卫中山临汾临沂丹东乌鲁木齐乐山九江云浮亚特兰大京都府亳州伊利诺伊州伊犁佛山佳木斯俄罗斯保定信阳元朗新墟克拉科夫六安兰州兰辛内江凤凰城列克星敦利雅德加利福尼亚加利福尼亚州加的夫勿加泗包头北京北京市十堰南京南京市南京市栖霞区南京市江宁区南京市浦口区南充南宁南平南昌南通南里奥格兰德州南阳卡拉奇卡纳塔克印度尼西亚北苏门答腊印度班加罗尔厦门台北台州台湾省合肥合肥市吉林吕梁周口呼和浩特咸宁咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布唐山喀什喜马偕尔邦嘉兴圣何塞圣卡塔琳娜圣地亚哥圣彼得堡圣约翰斯夏尔迦多伦多大同大庆大连大阪大阪府天津太原威海娄底娄底市娄星区孝感孟买宁德宁波安娜堡安庆安康安阳官坑定西宜宾宜昌宜春宝鸡宣城宿州宿迁密蘇里城岘港崇左巴中巴彦淖尔巴登-符腾堡州巴西巴音郭楞巴黎布兰普顿帕多瓦常州常德平凉广元广安广州广西壮族自治区广西桂林雁山区库比蒂诺廊坊延安开封张家口张家界徐州德州德罕德阳德黑兰忻州怀化悉尼惠州成都成都市武侯区扬州抚州抚顺拉萨揭阳文昌斯特灵新乡新加坡新北新德里新竹无锡日照昆明昌吉昌都地区昭通晋城普林斯顿景德镇曲靖朝阳本溪杭州松原枣庄柳州株洲格兰特县桂林桃园梅利托波尔棉兰楚雄榆林武威武汉汉中汕头沈阳沈阳市浑南区河内泉州法兰克福法国中央－卢瓦尔河谷法尔肯施泰因泰安泰州泰米尔纳德洛杉矶洛阳济南济宁浦项海东海口海得拉巴淄博淮南淮安深圳清化温州渭南湖州湘潭湛江滁州滨州漯河漳州潍坊潜江潮州濮阳烟台焦作爪哇岛牛津特伦托玉林玉溪珠海班加罗尔白沙百色益山盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛红河红河哈尼族彝族自治州纽约绍兴绵阳罗奥尔凯埃罗拉赫罗马美国美国伊利诺斯芝加哥聊城自贡舟山芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州茂名荆州荆门莆田莫斯科菏泽萍乡营口葫芦岛葵涌衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安西安市长安区西安市雁塔区许昌贵港贵阳费利蒙贺州赣州赤峰赫尔辛基辽阳达州运城连云港迪凯特迪拜通化遵义邢台邯郸邵阳郑州都柏林鄂州酒泉里斯本重庆金华金奈铁岭铜川铜陵银川锡林郭勒锡林郭勒盟锦州镇江长春长沙长治阜阳阳泉阿什本阿姆斯特丹阿尔及利亚阿尔科文达斯阿德莱德阿拉善随州雅加达青岛韩国首尔首尔首尔特别香港香港特别行政区马塞约马德里马湾马鞍山驻马店鸡西鹤壁鹰潭黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔龙岩1/3

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(26)  / Tables(4)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(10877) PDF downloads(1829) Cited by(101)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    • Table  1.  X-band experimental radar parameters
      Parameters Technical indexes
      Operating frequency X
      Scope of operating frequency 9.3-9.5 GHz
      Range 0.0625-96 nm
      Scanning bandwidth 25 MHz
      Range resolution 6 m
      Pulse repetition frequency 1.6 K, 3 K, 5 K & 10 K
      Emission peak power 50 W
      Revolving speed of antenna 2rpm, 12 rpm, 24 rpm, 48 rpm
      Length of antenna 1.8 m
      Operating mode of antenna Gazing & circular scanning
      Polarization mode of antenna HH
      Width of horizontal beam of antenna 1.2°
      Width of vertical beam of antenna 22°
       | Show Table
      DownLoad: CSV
    • 1.  Summary table of sea-detecting radar data (the 1st phase)
      No. Grade of sea conditions Data size Working mode of radar antenna Transmission pulse mode Regional AIS data Meteorological and
      hydrological data       		Grazing angle (°)
      1 Grade 1 and below >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      2 Grade 2 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      3 Grade 3 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      4 Grade 4 >10 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 Yes Yes 0.3–15
      5 Grade 5 >5 Groups Staring & scanning Mode 2 No Yes 0.3–15
      Notes: ① Daily AIS data will be generated into a table format, which provides MMSI of ships, time, longitude and latitude, and others. ② Daily meteorological and hydrological data will be generated into an NC-format file, which indicates wind speed, wind direction, wave height, and cycle. ③ The number of pulses contained in a group of data under staring mode will not be less than 105, while a group of data under scanning mode contains a complete scanning cycle. ④ Under transmission pulse mode 2, radars of each corresponding repetition cycle will transmit a single-carrier frequency pulse and an LFM pulse.
       | Show Table
      DownLoad: CSV