Submit Manuscript
Peer Review
Editor Work
| Citation: | JIA Hecheng, PU Xinyang, WANG Yanni, et al. Multi-view sample augumentation for SAR based on differentiable SAR renderer[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(2): 457–470. doi: 10.12000/JR24011
|
Multi-view Sample Augumentation for SAR Based onDifferentiable SAR Renderer
doi: 10.12000/JR24011
More Information-
Abstract
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is extensively utilized in civilian and military domains due to its all-weather, all-time monitoring capabilities. In recent years, deep learning has been widely employed to automatically interpret SAR images. However, due to the constraints of satellite orbit and incident angle, SAR target samples face the issue of incomplete view coverage, which poses challenges for learning-based SAR target detection and recognition algorithms. This paper proposes a method for generating multi-view samples of SAR targets by integrating differentiable rendering, combining inverse Three-Dimensional (3D) reconstruction, and forward rendering techniques. By designing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), the proposed method inversely infers the 3D representation of targets from limited views of SAR target images and then utilizes a Differentiable SAR Renderer (DSR) to render new samples from more views, achieving sample interpolation in the view dimension. Moreover, the training process of the proposed method constructs the objective function using DSR, eliminating the need for 3D ground-truth supervision. According to experimental results on simulated data, this method can effectively increase the number of multi-view SAR target images and improve the recognition rate of typical SAR targets under few-shot conditions. -
-
References
[1] ZHANG Liangpei, ZHANG Lefei, and DU Bo. Deep learning for remote sensing data: A technical tutorial on the state of the art[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2016, 4(2): 22–40. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2016.2540798.[2] MA Lei, LIU Yu, ZHANG Xueliang, et al. Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2019, 152: 166–177. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015.[3] ZHU Xiaoxiang, TUIA D, MOU Lichao, et al. Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2017, 5(4): 8–36. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307.[4] SUN Xian, WANG Bing, WANG Zhirui, et al. Research progress on few-shot learning for remote sensing image interpretation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 2387–2402. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3052869.[5] HUANG Zhongling, PAN Zongxu, and LEI Bin. What, where, and how to transfer in SAR target recognition based on deep CNNs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(4): 2324–2336. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2947634.[6] SHORTEN C and KHOSHGOFTAAR T M. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning[J]. Journal of Big Data, 2019, 6(1): 60. doi: 10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0.[7] HENDRYCKS D, MU N, CUBUK E D, et al. AugMix: A simple data processing method to improve robustness and uncertainty[C]. 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2010.[8] ALFASSY A, KARLINSKY L, AIDES A, et al. LaSO: Label-set operations networks for multi-label few-shot learning[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 6541–6550. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00671.[9] SCHWARTZ E, KARLINSKY L, SHTOK J, et al. Δ-encoder: An effective sample synthesis method for few-shot object recognition[C]. 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montréal, Canada, 2018: 2850–2860.[10] ANTONIOU A, STORKEY A, and EDWARDS H. Data augmentation generative adversarial networks[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04340v3, 2018.[11] MALMGREN-HANSEN D, KUSK A, DALL J, et al. Improving SAR automatic target recognition models with transfer learning from simulated data[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(9): 1484–1488. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2717486.[12] GUO Jiayi, LEI Bin, DING Chibiao, et al. Synthetic aperture radar image synthesis by using generative adversarial nets[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(7): 1111–1115. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2699196.[13] SONG Qian, XU Feng, ZHU Xiaoxiang, et al. Learning to generate SAR images with adversarial autoencoder[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5210015. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3086817.[14] GUO Qian and XU Feng. Learning low-dimensional SAR target representations from few samples[C]. 2022 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium, Xuzhou, China, 2022: 1–2. doi: 10.1109/ACES-China56081.2022.10065101.[15] LIU Shichen, CHEN Weikai, LI Tianye, et al. Soft rasterizer: A differentiable renderer for image-based 3D reasoning[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Korea (South), 2019: 7708–7717. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00780.[16] WANG Nanyang, ZHANG Yinda, LI Zhuwen, et al. Pixel2Mesh: Generating 3D mesh models from single RGB images[C]. 15th European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Germany, 2018: 52–67. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01252-6_4.[17] WEN Chao, ZHANG Yinda, LI Zhuwen, et al. Pixel2Mesh++: Multi-view 3D mesh generation via deformation[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Korea (South), 2019: 1042–1051. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00113.[18] FU Shilei and XU Feng. Differentiable SAR renderer and image-based target reconstruction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2022, 31: 6679–6693. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3215069.[19] KATO H, USHIKU Y, and HARADA T. Neural 3D mesh renderer[C]. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA, 2018: 3907–3916. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00411.[20] XU Feng and JIN Yaqiu. Imaging simulation of polarimetric SAR for a comprehensive terrain scene using the mapping and projection algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(11): 3219–3234. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.879544.[21] FU Shilei, JIA Hecheng, PU Xinyang, et al. Extension of differentiable SAR renderer for ground target reconstruction from multiview images and shadows[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5217013. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3320515.[22] Moving and stationary target acquisition and recognition (MSTAR) public release data[EB/OL]. https://www.sdms.afrl.af.mil/index.php?collection=mstar.[23] SIMONYAN K and ZISSERMAN A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition[C]. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, USA, 2015.[24] HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.[25] SUN Ke, XIAO Bin, LIU Dong, et al. Deep high-resolution representation learning for human pose estimation[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 5693–5703. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00584.[26] LIU Ze, LIN Yutong, CAO Yue, et al. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada, 2021: 10012–10022. DOi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986. -
Proportional views
- Publishing Ethics
- Journal Insights
- Abstracting & Indexing
- Peer Review Policies
- Guide for Authors
- ISSN 2095-283X (Print)ISSN 2097-339X (Online)
- CN 10-1030/TN
- CODEN LXEUAO
About Journal
- Sponsor: China Radio Detection and Ranging Industry Association (CRIA)
- Phone: 010-58887062
- Email：radars@aircas.ac.cn
- Publisher: Leida Xuebao Bianjibu (Editorial office of the Journal of Radars)
Contacts Us
京ICP备20021838号-8
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd
Export File
Citation
Format
Content
DownLoad:
- Figure 1. Analysis of insufficient view coverage for SAR targets
- Figure 2. Overall framework of multi-view sample augumentation for SAR
- Figure 3. Preprocessing of target and shadow regions
- Figure 4. Structure of the target reconstruction network
- Figure 5. Illustration of illumination map and shadow map generation
- Figure 6. Visualization of target reconstruction results
- Figure 7. Visualization of SAR vehicle target generation results
- Figure 8. Gamma distribution fitting of pixel values in target and background regions
- Figure 9. Evaluation of target reconstruction results with different numbers of views
- Figure 10. Illustration of target and shadow area segmentation for T72 measured samples
- Figure 11. Visualization of target 3D models reconstructed based on measured data
- Figure 12. Target and shadow areas in generated images
- Figure 13. Illustration of morphological processing in shadow areas
- Figure 14. Experimental results under different shadow segmentation accuracies
- Figure 15. Visualization of intermediate 3D models for each category
- Figure 16. Visualization comparison of generated samples and ground truth for each category
- Figure 17. Confusion matrices of recognition results before and after augmentation