Volume 10 Issue 1
Feb.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XUE Cewen, FENG Xuan, LI Xiaotian, et al. Multi-polarization data fusion analysis of full-polarimetric ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 74–85. doi: 10.12000/JR20104
Citation: XUE Cewen, FENG Xuan, LI Xiaotian, et al. Multi-polarization data fusion analysis of full-polarimetric ground penetrating radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 74–85. doi: 10.12000/JR20104

Multi-polarization Data Fusion Analysis of Full-Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar

doi: 10.12000/JR20104
Funds:  The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1503705), The Science and Technology on Near-Surface Detection Laboratory (6142414180911), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20130061110061), The Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (20180101091JC)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: FENG Xuan, fengxuan@jlu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2020-07-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2020-09-27
  • Available Online: 2020-10-12
  • Publish Date: 2021-02-25
  • Full-Polarimetric Ground Penetrating Radar (FP-GPR), compared to traditional single-polarimetric GPR, can obtain more comprehensive polarization data (such as VV, HH, and VH) for the same target. To ensure a more comprehensive targets’ image identification, data fusion technology is applied to FP-GPR so as to combine the polarization information of three different polarization modes. However, weighted average fusion is usually employed in FP-GPR data fusion, since it masks the advantages of full polarization and is unable to simultaneously adapt to different target scattering mechanisms. Based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Laplacian Pyramid (LP), and multi-scale Wavelet Transform (WT), this research proposes three FP-GPR data fusion methods. To check the reliability of several data fusion methods, we obtained FP-GPR data representing three different target scattering mechanisms in the laboratory and, then, compared the weighted average fusion method with the other three methods using instantaneous amplitude and gradient. The result shows that the three methods were better than the weighted average fusion and that they can be adapted to different target scattering mechanisms. However, PCA was used to fuse the unknown target scattering mechanisms. Finally, PCA fusion is applied to actual ice fracture data imaging, as it produces a better fusion effect than that of weighted average fusion.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KANG M S, KIM N, IM S B, et al. 3D GPR image-based UcNet for enhancing underground cavity detectability[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(21): 2545. doi: 10.3390/rs11212545
    [2]
    GABALLAH M, GRASMUECK M, and SATO M. Characterizing subsurface archaeological structures with full resolution 3D GPR at the early dynastic foundations of Saqqara Necropolis, Egypt[J]. Sensing and Imaging, 2018, 19(1): 23. doi: 10.1007/s11220-018-0209-8
    [3]
    SATO M and LU Q. Ground water migration monitoring by GPR[C]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toronto, Canada, 2002: 345–347. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1025035.
    [4]
    FENG Xuan and SATO M. Pre-stack migration applied to GPR for landmine detection[J]. Inverse Problems, 2004, 20(6): S99–S115. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/20/6/S07
    [5]
    CHENG Siyuan, LIU Sixin, GUO Jingxue, et al. Data processing and interpretation of antarctic ice-penetrating radar based on variational mode decomposition[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(10): 1253. doi: 10.3390/rs11101253
    [6]
    HU Bin, WANG Deli, ZHANG Ling, et al. Rock location and quantitative analysis of regolith at the Chang’e 3 landing site based on local similarity constraint[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(5): 530. doi: 10.3390/rs11050530
    [7]
    FENG Xuan, YU Yue, LIU Cai, et al. Subsurface polarimetric migration imaging for full polarimetric ground-penetrating radar[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2015, 202(2): 1324–1338. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggv208
    [8]
    FENG Xuan, YU Yue, LIU Cai, et al. Combination of H-alpha decomposition and migration for enhancing subsurface target classification of GPR[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(9): 4852–4861. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2411572
    [9]
    FENG Xuan, LIANG Wenjing, LIU Cai, et al. Application of freeman decomposition to full polarimetric GPR for improving subsurface target classification[J]. Signal Processing, 2017, 132: 284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.07.030
    [10]
    李玲玲. 像素级图像融合方法与应用[M]. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 2006.

    LI Lingling. Pixel-Level Image Fusion Method and Application[M]. Lanzhou: Gansu People’s Publishing House, 2006.
    [11]
    DAILY M I, FARR T, ELACHI C, et al. Geologic interpretation from composited radar and Landsat imagery[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 1979, 45(8): 1109–1116.
    [12]
    ABIDI M A and GONZALEZ R C. Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence[M]. Boston: Academic Press, 1992: 1–546.
    [13]
    HILL D, EDWARDS P, and HAWKES D. Fusing medical images[J]. Image Processing, 1994, 6(2): 22–24.
    [14]
    POHL C and VAN GENDEREN J L. Review article Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: Concepts, methods and applications[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1998, 19(5): 823–854. doi: 10.1080/014311698215748
    [15]
    DING Ji, LIU Qiang, BAI Mingxuan, et al. A multisensor data fusion method based on gaussian process model for precision measurement of complex surfaces[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(1): 278. doi: 10.3390/s20010278
    [16]
    WAN Tao, ZHU Chenchen, and QIN Zengchang. Multifocus image fusion based on robust principal component analysis[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2013, 34(9): 1001–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.03.003
    [17]
    JOSE C. A fast, on-line algorithm for PCA and its convergence characteristics[J]. IEEE, Transactions on Neural Network, 2000, 4(2): 299–307.
    [18]
    PEARSON K. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space[J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1901, 2(11): 559–572. doi: 10.1080/14786440109462720
    [19]
    SAFAYANI M, MANZURI SHALMANI M T, and KHADEMI M. Extended two-dimensional PCA for efficient face representation and recognition[C]. 2008 4th International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing, Cluj-Napoca, 2008: 295–298. doi: 10.1109/ICCP.2008.4648390.
    [20]
    HADRI A, CHOUGDALI K, and TOUAHNI R. Intrusion detection system using PCA and Fuzzy PCA techniques[C]. 2016 International Conference on Advanced Communication Systems and Information Security, Marrakesh, Morocco, 2016: 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ACOSIS.2016.7843930.
    [21]
    QIU Changzhen, REN Hao, ZOU Huanxin, et al. Performance comparison of target classification in SAR images based on PCA and 2D-PCA features[C]. 2009 2nd Asian-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Xi’an, China, 2009: 868–871. doi: 10.1109/APSAR.2009.5374193.
    [22]
    ADELSON E H, ADELSON C H, BERGEN J R, et al. Pyramid methods in image processing[J]. RCA Engineer, 1984, 29(6): 33–41.
    [23]
    BURT P and ADELSON E. The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 1983, 31(4): 532–540. doi: 10.1109/TCOM.1983.1095851
    [24]
    MAO Run, FU Xiansong, NIU Pingjuan, et al. Multi-directional laplacian pyramid image fusion algorithm[C]. 2018 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Control and Computer Engineering, Huhhot, China, 2018: 568–572. doi: 10.1109/ICMCCE.2018.00125.
    [25]
    LIANG Pei, XIE Zhiwei, and DAI Jiguang. Joint edge detector based on Laplacian pyramid[C]. 2010 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Yantai, China, 2010: 978–982. doi: 10.1109/CISP.2010.5646931.
    [26]
    MALLAT S G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1989, 11(7): 674–693. doi: 10.1109/34.192463
    [27]
    KUMAR K, MUSTAFA N, LI Jianping, et al. Image edge detection scheme using wavelet transform[C]. 2014 11th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Actiev Media Technology and Information Processing, Chengdu, China, 2014: 261–265. doi: 10.1109/ICCWAMTIP.2014.7073404.
    [28]
    LIU Qingliang, YANG Shuguo, LIU Jing, et al. A discrete wavelet transform and singular value decomposition-based digital video watermark method[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 85: 273–293. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.04.015
    [29]
    TAŞMAZ H. Dual tree complex wavelet transform based speech enhancement[C]. 2015 23nd Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, Malatya, Turkey, 2015: 823–826. doi: 10.1109/SIU.2015.7129955.
    [30]
    梁文婧, 冯晅, 刘财, 等. 多输入多输出极化步进频率探地雷达硬件系统开发[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2018, 48(2): 483–490. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170254

    LIANG Wenjing, FENG Xuan, LIU Cai, et al. Development of multiple-input and multiple-output polarimetric stepped-frequency ground penetrating radar system[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2018, 48(2): 483–490. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170254
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(2458) PDF downloads(238) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint