Submit Manuscript
Peer Review
Editor Work
- Home
- Articles & Issues
-
Data
- Dataset of Radar Detecting Sea
- SAR Dataset
- SARGroundObjectsTypes
- SARMV3D
- 3DRIED
- UWB-HA4D
- LLS-LFMCWR
- FAIR-CSAR
- MSAR
- SDD-SAR
- FUSAR
- SpaceborneSAR3Dimaging
- Sea-land Segmentation
- SAR Multi-domain Ship Detection Dataset
- SAR-Airport
- Hilly and mountainous farmland time-series SAR and ground quadrat dataset
- SAR images for interference detection and suppression
- HP-SAR Evaluation & Analytical Dataset
- GDHuiYan-ATRNet
- Multi-System Maritime Low Observable Target Dataset
- DatasetinthePaper
- DatasetintheCompetition
- Report
- Course
- About
- Publish
- Editorial Board
- Chinese
| Citation: | 
|
Fast Superpixel Segmentation Algorithm for PolSAR Images
DOI: 10.12000/JR17018 CSTR: 32380.14.JR17018
-
Abstract
As a pre-processing technique, superpixel segmentation algorithms should be of high computational efficiency, accurate boundary adherence and regular shape in homogeneous regions. A fast superpixel segmentation algorithm based on Iterative Edge Refinement (IER) has shown to be applicable on optical images. However, it is difficult to obtain the ideal results when IER is applied directly to PolSAR images due to the speckle noise and small or slim regions in PolSAR images. To address these problems, in this study, the unstable pixel set is initialized as all the pixels in the PolSAR image instead of the initial grid edge pixels. In the local relabeling of the unstable pixels, the fast revised Wishart distance is utilized instead of the Euclidean distance in CIELAB color space. Then, a post-processing procedure based on dissimilarity measure is empolyed to remove isolated small superpixels as well as to retain the strong point targets. Finally, extensive experiments based on a simulated image and a real-world PolSAR image from Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (AirSAR) are conducted, showing that the proposed algorithm, compared with three state-of-the-art methods, performs better in terms of several commonly used evaluation criteria with high computational efficiency, accurate boundary adherence, and homogeneous regularity. -
-
References
[1] Song H, Yang W, Xu X, et al.. Unsupervised PolSAR imagery classification based on Jensen-Bregman LogDet divergence[C]. European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, EUSAR, Berlin, 2014: 1–4.[2] 孙勋, 黄平平, 涂尚坦,等. 利用多特征融合和集成学习的极化SAR图像分类[J]. 雷达学报, 2016, 5(6): 692–700.Sun Xun, Huang Pingping, Tu Shangtan, et al. Polarimetric SAR image classification using multiple-feature fusion and ensemble learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 692–700.[3] Dabboor M, Collins M J, Karathanassi V, et al. An unsupervised classification approach for polarimetric SAR data based on the Chernoff distance for complex Wishart distribution[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(7): 4200–4213. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227755.[4] 滑文强, 王爽, 侯彪. 基于半监督学习的SVM-Wishart极化SAR图像分类方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(2): 93–98.Hua Wenqiang, Wang Shuang, and Hou Biao. Semi-supervised learning for classification of polarimetric SAR images based on SVM-Wishart[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(2): 93–98.[5] Xu Q, Chen Q H, Yang S, et al. Superpixel-based classification using K distribution and spatial context for polarimetric SAR images[J]. Rmote Sensing, 2016, 8(8): 619. DOI: 10.3390/rs8080619.[6] Wu Y H, Ji K F, Yu W X, et al. Region-based classification of polarimetric SAR images using Wishart MRF[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2008, 5(4): 668–672. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2008.2002263.[7] Ren X and Malik J. Learning a classification model for segmentation[C]. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Nice, France, 2003: 10–17.[8] Gong M G, Su L Z, Jia M, et al. Fuzzy clustering with a modified MRF energy function for change detection in synthetic aperture radar images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(1): 98–109. DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2249072.[9] Xie L, Zhang H, Wang C, et al.. Superpixel-based PolSAR images change detection[C]. 2015 IEEE 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Singapore, 2015.[10] Wang S, Lu H, Yang F, et al.. Superpixel tracking[C]. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain, 2011: 1323–1330.[11] Liu B, Hu H, Wang H Y, et al. Superpixel-based classification with an adaptive number of classes for polarimetric sar images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(2): 907–924. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2203358.[12] Xiang D L, Tang T, Zhao L J, et al. Superpixel generating algorithm based on pixel intensity and location similarity for SAR image classification[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(6): 1414–1418. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2259214.[13] Xing Y X, Zhang Y, Li N, et al. Improved superpixel-based polarimetric synthetic aperture radar image classification integrating color features[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2016, 10(2): 026026. DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.10.026026.[14] Liu M Y, Tuzel O, Ramalingam S, et al.. Entropy rate superpixel segmentation[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Providence, 2011: 2097–2104.[15] Zhang Y H, Hartley R, Mashford J, et al.. Superpixels via pseudo-Boolean optimization[C]. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, 2011: 1387–1394.[16] Vedaldi A and Soatto S. Quick shift and kernel methods for mode seeking[C]. European Conference on Computer Vision, Berlin, 2008: 705–718.[17] Mester R, Conrad C, and Guevara A. Multichannel Segmentation Using Contour Relaxation: Fast Super-Pixels and Temporal Propagation[M]. Heyden A and Kahl F, eds. Image Analysis. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2011.[18] Den Bergh M V, Boix X, Roig G, et al. SEEDS: Superpixels extracted via energy-driven sampling[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2015, 111(3): 298–314. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-014-0744-2.[19] Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, et al.. SLIC superpixels[R]. EPFL, 2010.[20] Zou H, Qin X, Zhou S, et al. A likelihood-based SLIC superpixel algorithm for SAR images using generalized Gamma distribution[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(7): E1107. DOI: 10.3390/s16071107.[21] Feng J L, Cao Z J, and Pi Y M. Polarimetric contextual classification of PolSAR images using sparse representation and superpixels[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014, 6(8): 7158–7181. DOI: 10.3390/rs6087158.[22] Qin F C, Guo J M, and Lang F K. Superpixel segmentation for polarimetric SAR imagery using local iterative clustering[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2015, 12(1): 13–17. DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2014.2322960.[23] Zhu S, Cao D, Jiang S, et al. Fast superpixel segmentation by iterative edge refinement[J]. Electronics Letters, 2015, 51(3): 230–232. DOI: 10.1049/el.2014.3379.[24] Jiao L C and Liu F. Wishart deep stacking network for fast PolSAR image classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2016, 25(7): 3273–3286. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2016.2567069.[25] Kersten P R, Lee J S, and Ainsworth T L. Unsupervised classification of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar images using fuzzy clustering and EM clustering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2005, 43(3): 519–527. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842108.[26] Abramowitz M and Stegun I A. Handbook of Mathmatical Functions[M]. New York: Dover Pub. Inc., 1968.[27] Conradsen K, Nielsen A A, Schou J, et al. A test statistic in the complex Wishart distribution and its application to change detection in polarimetric SAR data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2003, 41(1): 4–19. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.808066.[28] Qin X X, Zou H X, Zhou S L, et al. Simulation of spatially correlated PolSAR images using inverse transform method[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2015, 9(1): 095082. DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.9.095082.[29] Arbelaez P, Maire M, Fowlkes C, et al. Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 33(5): 898–916. -
Proportional views
- Publishing Ethics
- Journal Insights
- Abstracting & Indexing
- Peer Review Policies
- Guide for Authors
- Conference
- ISSN 2095-283X (Print)ISSN 2097-339X (Online)
- CN 10-1030/TN
- CODEN LXEUAO
About Journal
- Sponsor: China Radio Detection and Ranging Industry Association (CRIA)
- Phone: 010-58887062
- Email：radars@aircas.ac.cn
- Publisher: Leida Xuebao Bianjibu (Editorial office of the Journal of Radars)
Contacts Us
京ICP备20021838号-14
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd
Export File
Citation
Format
Content
DownLoad:
- Figure 1. The sketch map of initialization of two methods. Ci indicates the ith cluster center, and S is the initial grid width. The pixels filled with black are the initial cluster centers. The initial unstable pixels of the IER algorithm are the yellow pixels, while the initial unstable pixels of the proposed method are the yellow, white, and black pixels.
- Figure 2. Pauli_RGB image of the simulated image
- Figure 5. Generated superpixels of the four competitive methods. The second row denotes the final superpixel maps of different methods. The red lines superimposed onto the Pauli-RGB images depict the superpixel boundaries. The third row gives the representation maps, where the color of each pixel is replaced by the average value of the superpixel to which this pixel belongs
- Figure 3. Comparison of two methods of initialization based on the simulated PolSAR images
- Figure 4. The results of four algorithms
- Figure 6. Three PolSAR image patches (first column) and corresponding superpixels provided by the standard SLIC (second column), IER (third column), SLIC-GC (fourth column), and the proposed method (fifth column)