Volume 5 Issue 2
Apr.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2016  >  5(2): 164-173
XIA Deping, ZHANG Liang, WU Tao, et al. A multiple interference suppression algorithm based on airborne bistatic polarization radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 399–407. doi: 10.12000/JR21212
Citation: Ren Bo, Shi Longfei, Wang Guoyu. Polarimetric Analysis of the Interference from Base Stations to UHF-band Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 164-173. doi: 10.12000/JR15134
shu

Polarimetric Analysis of the Interference from Base Stations to UHF-band Radar

DOI: 10.12000/JR15134
  • 1.

    (State Key Laboratory of Complex Electromagnetic Environment Effects on Electronics & Information System, Changsha 410073, China)

  • 2.

    (College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073, China)

Funds:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61490692, 61201336)

  • Received Date: 2015-12-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-01-22
  • Publish Date: 2016-04-28
    Abstract
  • Radar detection and tracking performance in the UHF-band can be influenced by the downlink signals of communication base stations. The polarimetric properties of interference from base stations are measured and analyzed as a basis for suppressing this type of interference by a polarization processing method. In this study, we establish signal models from the base station for dual-polarization UHF-band radar. We express the Probability Density Functions (PDF) of the estimated polarization ratio and degree of polarization in a closed form and use them to describe the statistical properties of the interference environment. We developed polarimetric radar reception experiments for the signals from both Single-Base Stations (SBS) and Multi-Base Stations (MBS). Experimental results proved that deterministic polarized descriptions are appropriate only for signals from SBS but not from MBS or from stations with a low DoP (Degree of Polarization). However, the proposed statistical method can be used to describe both SBS and MBS cases, which we demonstrated by comparing the theoretical models with real measurement data.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    高云, 畅洪涛, 聂宏斌, 等. 一起公众移动通信基站信号干扰民航二次雷达的案例分析[J]. 中国无线电, 2009(11): 67-71. Gao Yun, Chang Hong-tao, Nie Hong-bin, et al.. Analysis of a second civil aviation radar interfered by public mobile communication station signals[J]. China Radio, 2009(11): 67-71.
    [2]
    任博, 施龙飞, 王洪军, 等. 抑制雷达主波束内GSM干扰的极化滤波方法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36(2): 459-464. Ren Bo, Shi Long-fei, Wang Hong-jun, et al.. Investigation on of polarization filtering scheme to suppress GSM interference in radar main beam[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2014, 36(2): 459-464.
    [3]
    Ecker H A and Cofer J W. Statistical characteristics of the polarization power ratio for radar return with circular polarization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1969, 5(5): 762-769.
    [4]
    Eom H J and Boerner W M. Statistical properties of the phase difference between two orthogonally polarized SAR signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1991, 29(1): 182-184.
    [5]
    Barakat R. The statistical properties of partially polarized light[J]. Optica Acta, 1985, 32(3): 295-312.
    [6]
    Barakat R. Statistics of the Stokes parameters[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1987, 4(7): 1256-1263.
    [7]
    Touzi R and Lopes A. Statistics of the Stokes parameters and of the complex coherence parameters in one-look and multilook speckle fields[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, 34(2): 519-531.
    [8]
    任博, 罗笑冰, 邓方刚, 等. 应用极化聚类中心设计快速自适应极化滤波器[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2015, 37(4): 87-92. Ren Bo, Luo Xiao-bing, Deng Fang-gang, et al.. Design of fast adaptive polarization filters utilizing polarizing cluster center[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2015, 37(4): 87-92.
    [9]
    Galletti M and Zrnic D S. Degree of polarization at simultaneous transmit: theoretical aspects[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2012, 9(3): 383-387.
    [10]
    Galletti M, Zrnic D S, Melnikov V M, et al.. Degree of polarization at horizontal transmit theory and applications for weather radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(4): 1291-1301.
    [11]
    Galletti M, Huang D, and Kollias P. Zenith nadir pointing mm-wave radars linear or circular polarization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(1): 628-639.
    [12]
    Rio V S D, Mosquera J M P, Isasa M V, et al.. Statistics of the degree of polarization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2006, 54(7): 2173-2175.
    [13]
    Medkour T and Walden A T. Statistical properties of the estimated degree of polarization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(1): 408-414.
    [14]
    Shirvany R, Chabert M, and Tourneret J. Estimation of the degree of polarization for hybrid/compact and linear dual-pol SAR intensity images principles and applications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(1): 539-551.
    [15]
    Shirvany R, Chabert M, and Tourneret J. Ship and oil-spill detection using the degree of polarization in linear and hybrid/compact dual-pol SAR[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2012, 5(3): 885-892.
    [16]
    Gradshteyn I S and Ryzhik I M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 6 ed[M]. New York: Academic Press, 2000.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LAN Lan, ZHANG Xiang, XU Jingwei, LIAO Guisheng. Main-lobe Deceptive Jammers with Array Radars Using Space-time Multidimensional Coding[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 439-455. doi: 10.12000/JR24229
    [2]LAN Xiaoyu, HU Jiyan, LIANG Mingshen, MA Shuang. Sparse DOA Estimation Method Based on Riemann Averaging under Strong Intermittent Jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 280-292. doi: 10.12000/JR24175
    [3]SU Hanning, PAN Jiameng, BAO Qinglong, GUO Fucheng, HU Weidong. Anti-interrupted Sampling Repeater Jamming Method in the Waveform Domain before Matched Filtering[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(1): 240-252. doi: 10.12000/JR23149
    [4]LI Zhongyu, GUI Liang, HAI Yu, WU Junjie, WANG Dangwei, WANG Anle, YANG Jianyu. Ultrahigh-resolution ISAR Micro-Doppler Suppression Methodology Based on Variational Mode Decomposition and Mode Optimization[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(4): 852-865. doi: 10.12000/JR24043
    [5]ZHAO Kaifa, SONG Hu, LIU Rong, WANG Xinhai. Distributed Radar Main-lobe Interference Suppression Method Via Joint Optimization of Array Configuration and Subarray Element Number[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(6): 1355-1369. doi: 10.12000/JR24192
    [6]CHEN Zirui, JI Yifei, LIU Xiwang, ZHANG Yongsheng, DONG Zhen, CHEN Alei, LIU Weijian. Transient Interference Suppression Algorithm Based on Time Frequency Sparse Prior for Skywave OTHR[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(6): 1157-1169. doi: 10.12000/JR24188
    [7]CHEN Yan, WANG Zhanling, PANG Chen, LI Yongzhen, WANG Zhuang. Radar Active Deception Jamming Recognition Method Based on the Time-varying Polarization-conversion Metasurface[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(4): 929-940. doi: 10.12000/JR24028
    [8]WANG Rongqing, XIE Jingyang, TIAN Biao, XU Shiyou, CHEN Zengping. Integrated Jamming Perception and Parameter Estimation Method for Anti-interrupted Sampling Repeater Jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(6): 1337-1354. doi: 10.12000/JR24153
    [9]NIE Lin, WEI Shunjun, LI Jiahui, ZHANG Hao, SHI Jun, WANG Mou, CHEN Siyuan, ZHANG Xinyan. Active Blanket Jamming Suppression Method for Spaceborne SAR Images Based on Regional Feature Refinement Perceptual Learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(5): 985-1003. doi: 10.12000/JR24072
    [10]DU Siyu, LIU Zhixing, WU Yaojun, SHA Minghui, QUAN Yinghui. Dense-repeated Jamming Suppression Algorithm Based on the Support Vector Machine for Frequency Agility Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(1): 173-185. doi: 10.12000/JR22065
    [11]HAN Zhaoyun, CEN Xi, CUI Jiahe, LI Yachao, ZHANG Peng. Self-supervised Learning Method for SAR Interference Suppression Based on Abnormal Texture Perception[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(1): 154-172. doi: 10.12000/JR22168
    [12]GAI Jiyu, JIANG Wei, ZHANG Kaixiang, LIANG Zhennan, CHEN Xinliang, LIU Quanhua. A Method for Interrupted-Sampling Repeater Jamming Identification and Suppression Based on Differential Features[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(1): 186-196. doi: 10.12000/JR22058
    [13]XIA Deping, ZHANG Liang, WU Tao, MENG Xiangdong. A Multiple Interference Suppression Algorithm Based on Airborne Bistatic Polarization Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 399-407. doi: 10.12000/JR21212
    [14]ZOU Kun, LAI Lei, LUO Yanbo, LI Wei. Suppression of Non-Gaussian Clutter from Subspace Interference[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 715-722. doi: 10.12000/JR19050
    [15]LIU Pingyu, LYU Xiaode, LIU Zhongsheng, ZHANG Hanliang. Research on Co-channel Interference Suppression Method for Passive Radar Based on the Jiont Processing of Primary and Reference Channels[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(6): 974-986. doi: 10.12000/JR19047
    [16]HUANG Yan, ZHAO Bo, TAO Mingliang, CHEN Zhanye, HONG Wei. Review of Synthetic Aperture Radar Interference Suppression[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(1): 86-106. doi: 10.12000/JR19113
    [17]MENG Zhichao, LU Jingyue, ZHANG Lei. Forward-looking Multi-channel SAR Adaptive Identification to Suppress Deception Jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(1): 82-89. doi: 10.12000/JR18081
    [18]Zhou Chunhui, Li Fei, Li Ning, Zheng Huifang, Wang Xiangyu. Modified Eigensubspace-based Approach for Radio-frequency Interference Suppression of SAR Image[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(2): 235-243. doi: 10.12000/JR17025
    [19]Li Yongzhen, Hu Wanqiu, Sun Dou, Li Zhongwei. Scheme for Polarization Detection and Suppression of TRAD[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 666-672. doi: 10.12000/JR16115
    [20]Zhang Chi, Li Yue-li, Zhou Zhi-min. Wall Clutter Mitigation in Through-the-Wall Imaging Radar with Sparse Array Antenna Based on Independent Component Analysis[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(5): 524-532. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2014.14066
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王沙飞，朱梦韬，李云杰，杨健，李岩. 对先进多功能雷达系统行为的识别、推理与预测：综述与展望. 信号处理. 2024(01): 17-55 .
    2. 陈士超，魏靖彪，范俊，魏玺章，王泽朝，孙谦，刘明. 基于判别性无穷模糊受限玻尔兹曼机模型的HRRP序列识别. 兵工学报. 2024(S1): 43-50 .
    3. 赵娟娟. 基于统计模型的电子信息产业企业成长性分析. 中国电子商情. 2024(04): 64-66 .
    4. 苏海龙，水鹏朗. 采用双迭代寻优算法的舰船复HRRP估计. 西安电子科技大学学报. 2023(06): 105-119 .
    5. 赵春雷，姚嘉嵘，李京效，戚张行，魏汇赞. 地基雷达空中目标识别方法研究综述. 空天预警研究学报. 2023(05): 313-320+334 .

    Other cited types(10)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.4 %FULLTEXT: 13.4 %META: 75.5 %META: 75.5 %PDF: 11.1 %PDF: 11.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.8 %其他: 17.8 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %Absecon: 0.3 %Absecon: 0.3 %China: 0.7 %China: 0.7 %India: 0.1 %India: 0.1 %Matawan: 0.0 %Matawan: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.0 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 1.1 %上海: 1.1 %上海市: 0.0 %上海市: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %东莞: 0.0 %中卫: 0.4 %中卫: 0.4 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %兰辛: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 20.3 %北京: 20.3 %北京市: 0.2 %北京市: 0.2 %北海: 0.1 %北海: 0.1 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南京市: 0.0 %南京市: 0.0 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吕梁: 0.0 %吕梁: 0.0 %吴忠: 0.0 %吴忠: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %和田: 0.0 %和田: 0.0 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %威海: 0.3 %威海: 0.3 %娄底: 0.0 %娄底: 0.0 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %岳阳: 0.0 %岳阳: 0.0 %崇左: 0.1 %崇左: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %常州: 0.0 %常德市: 0.0 %常德市: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山市叶县: 0.0 %平顶山市叶县: 0.0 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %广州市天河区: 0.1 %广州市天河区: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口市: 0.0 %张家口市: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %成都市新都区: 0.0 %成都市新都区: 0.0 %扬州: 0.1 %扬州: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %曼谷: 0.0 %曼谷: 0.0 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %株洲: 0.0 %株洲: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.1 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %榆林: 0.0 %榆林: 0.0 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %海西: 0.0 %海西: 0.0 %淮南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.1 %淮安: 0.0 %淮安: 0.0 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %渭南: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.3 %漯河: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %玉林: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %白银: 0.1 %白银: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %红河: 0.1 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.5 %芒廷维尤: 10.5 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衡水: 0.2 %衡水: 0.2 %衢州: 0.1 %衢州: 0.1 %西宁: 27.3 %西宁: 27.3 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵港: 0.1 %贵港: 0.1 %赤峰: 0.0 %赤峰: 0.0 %运城: 0.1 %运城: 0.1 %郑州: 1.4 %郑州: 1.4 %重庆: 0.0 %重庆: 0.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阜阳: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %黔南: 0.0 %黔南: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.4 %齐齐哈尔: 0.4 %其他其他AbseconChinaIndiaMatawanRochesterUnited States[]上海上海市东莞中卫丽水乌鲁木齐佛山信阳兰辛包头北京北京市北海南京南京市南宁南昌台北台州合肥吕梁吴忠呼和浩特和田唐山夏尔迦大连天津太原威海娄底安康宣城宿迁岳阳崇左巴中巴彦淖尔常州常德市平顶山平顶山市叶县广州广州市天河区廊坊张家口张家口市惠州成都成都市新都区扬州新乡无锡昆明曼谷杭州株洲格兰特县桂林榆林武汉沈阳洛阳济南海西淮南淮安深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭漯河潍坊玉林珠海白银石家庄福州秦皇岛红河纽约绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衡水衢州西宁西安贵港赤峰运城郑州重庆金华长沙阜阳阳泉青岛黔南齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(2504) PDF downloads(1110) Cited by(15)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return