Volume 6 Issue 3
Jun.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2017  >  6(3): 252-258
DING Zihang, XIE Junwei, and WANG Bo. Missing covariance matrix recovery with the FDA-MIMO radar using deep learning method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(5): 1112–1124. doi: 10.12000/JR23002
Citation: Wu Sunyong, Xue Qiutiao, Zhu Shengqi, Yan Qingzhu, Sun Xiyan. Track-Before-Detect Algorithm for Weak Extended Target Based on Particle Filter under Clutter Environment[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(3): 252-258. doi: 10.12000/JR16128
shu

Track-Before-Detect Algorithm for Weak Extended Target Based on Particle Filter under Clutter Environment

DOI: 10.12000/JR16128
  • ①.

    School of Computational Science and Mathematics, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China

  • ②.

    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application, Guilin 541004, China

  • ③.

    National Lab of Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China

Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61261033, 61561016, 61362005), The Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2014GXNSFAA118352, 2014GXNSFBA118280, 2016GXNSFAA380073), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Precision Navigation Technology and Application (DH201502), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Cryptography and Information Security (GCIS201611)
  • Received Date: 2016-11-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-01-26
    • Available Online: 2017-04-14
  • Publish Date: 2017-06-28
    Abstract
  • The Track-Before-Detect (TBD) algorithm based on the particle filter is proposed for weak extended target detection and tracking in low signal to clutter noise radio. The rod-shaped object is analyzed by dividing the cell on range and azimuth under the Weibull clutter. On the basis of a point target, the likelihood function and particle weights can be obtained by the target spread function. In the TBD algorithm, the binary target variable and the target shape parameters is added to the state vector and the scattering points in the sample collection is given based on the particle filter, which can detect and estimate the target state and the shape parameters under the clutter environment. Simulation results show that the stability of the algorithm is very good.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(19)
  • [1]
    Rollason M and Salmond D J. A particle filter for track-before-detect of a target with unknown amplitude[J]. IEEE Digest, 2001, 3(4): 36–41.
    [2]
    Rutten M G, Gordon N J, Maskell S, et al.. Recursive track-before-detect with target amplitude fluctuations[J]. IEE Proceedings-Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2005, 152(5): 345–352. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20045041
    [3]
    TSOU Haiping and Yan T&Y. The extended-image tracking technique based on the maximum likelihood estimation[R]. New York: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 1999.
    [4]
    Gilholm K and Salmond D. Spatial distribution model for tracking extended objects[J]. IEE Proceedings-Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2005, 152(5): 364–371. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20045114
    [5]
    Feldmann M, Franken D, Koch W, et al.. Tracking of extended objects and group targets using random matrices[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(4): 1409–1420. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2101064
    [6]
    Fan L, Zhang X, Shi J, et al.. Track-before-detect procedures for detection of extended object[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2011, 2011(1): 1–6. doi: 10.1186/1687-6180-2011-1
    [7]
    吴兆平, 朱凯然, 苏涛, 等. 采用改进粒子滤波的雷达扩展目标检测前跟踪[J]. 西安电子大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 38(2): 99–104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKD201102019.htm

    Wu Zhao-ping, Zhu Kai-ran, Su Tao, et al.. Extended radar target tracking before detection using the modified particle filter[J]. Journal of Xidian University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 38(2): 99–104. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDKD201102019.htm
    [8]
    于洪波, 王国红, 王娜. 基于粒子滤波的扩展目标检测前跟踪算法[J]. 电光与控制, 2010, 17(8): 41–44. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10336-1015564804.htm

    Yu Hong-bo, Wang Guo-hong, and Wang Na. A track-before-detect algorithm for tracking extended targets based on particle filter[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2010, 17(8): 41–44. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10336-1015564804.htm
    [9]
    于洪波, 曹倩, 杨志刚. 一种基于扩展模型的隐身目标检测前跟踪方法[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2014, 29(6): 569–574. doi: 10.7682/j.issn.1673-1522.2014.06.012

    Yu Hong-bo, Chao Qian, and Yang Zhi-gang. A method of stealthy target track-before-detect based on extended model[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2014, 29(6): 569–574. doi: 10.7682/j.issn.1673-1522.2014.06.012
    [10]
    雷刚, 邵可然, 李燕斌, 等. 威布尔杂波背景下的恒虚警检测[J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 36(3): 129–132. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZLG200803043.htm

    Lei Gang, Shao Ke-ran, Li Yan-bin, et al.. Constant false alarm rate detection against Weibull clutter background[J]. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technolngy (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 36(3): 129–132. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HZLG200803043.htm
    [11]
    陈建军, 黄孟俊, 邱伟, 等. 海杂波下的双门限恒虚警目标检测新方法[J]. 电子学报, 2011, 39(9): 2135–2141. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXU201109031.htm

    Chen Jian-jun, Huang Meng-jun, Qiu Wei, et al.. A novel method for CFAR detector with bi-thresholds in sea clutter[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2011, 39(9): 2135–2141. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXU201109031.htm
    [12]
    郑建军, 吕世芳. 相关Weibull分布雷达气象杂波模拟[J]. 微计算机信息, 2011, 27(9): 210–212. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJSJ201109083.htm

    Zheng Jian-jun and Lu Shi-fang. Modeling of correlated Weibull radar weather clutter[J]. Microcomputer Information, 2011, 27(9): 210–212. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WJSJ201109083.htm
    [13]
    武江涛. 雷达扩展目标跟踪算法研究[D]. 西安电子科技大学, 2014.

    Wu Jiang-tao. Research of radar extended target tracking[D]. Xidian University, 2014.
    [14]
    Wen C Y and Lee C H. Point spread functions and their applications to forensic image restoration[J]. Forensic Science Journal, 2002, 3(1): 1–16.
    [15]
    Boers Y and Driessen J N. A track before detect approach for extended objects[C]. 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2006.
    [16]
    Abraham D A, Gelb J M, and Oldag A W. Background and clutter mixture distributions for active sonar statistics[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2011, 36(2): 231–247. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2010.2102150
    [17]
    Gilholm K and Salmond D. Spatial distribution model for tracking extended model for tracking extended objects[J]. IEE Proceedings-Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2005, 152(5): 364–371. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20045114
    [18]
    Boers Y, Driessen H, and Torstensson J. A track before detect algorithm for tracking extended targets[J]. IEE Procee-dings- Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2006, 153(4): 345–351. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20050123
    [19]
    吴孙勇, 廖桂生, 杨志伟. 基于改进粒子滤波的微弱目标检测前跟踪算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(9): 1875–1879. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10614-1012472279.htm

    Wu Sun-yong, Liao Gui-sheng, and Yang Zhi-wei. Improved track-before-detect algorithm for weak targets based on particle filter[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2006, 153(4): 345–351. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10614-1012472279.htm
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Zhirui, ZHAO Liangjin, WANG Yuelei, ZENG Xuan, KANG Jian, YANG Jian, SUN Xian. AIR-PolSAR-Seg-2.0: Polarimetric SAR Ground Terrain Classification Dataset for Large-scale Complex Scenes[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 353-365. doi: 10.12000/JR24237
    [2]YIN Junjun, LUO Jiahao, LI Xiang, DAI Xiaokang, YANG Jian. Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric SAR Gradient and Complex Wishart Classifier[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(2): 396-410. doi: 10.12000/JR23198
    [3]DING Jinshan, ZHONG Chao, WEN Liwu, XU Zhong. Joint Detection of Moving Target in Video Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 313-323. doi: 10.12000/JR22036
    [4]HUANG Zhongling, YAO Xiwen, HAN Junwei. Progress and Perspective on Physically Explainable Deep Learning for Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Interpretation（in English）[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(1): 107-125. doi: 10.12000/JR21165
    [5]YAN Hua, ZHANG Lei, LU Jinwen, XING Xiaoyu, LI Sheng, YIN Hongcheng. Frequency-dependent Factor Expression of the GTD Scattering Center Model for the Arbitrary Multiple Scattering Mechanism[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(3): 370-381. doi: 10.12000/JR21005
    [6]QUAN Sinong, FAN Hui, DAI Dahai, WANG Wei, XIAO Shunping, WANG Xuesong. Recognition of Ships and Chaff Clouds Based on Sophisticated Polarimetric Target Decomposition[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 61-73. doi: 10.12000/JR20123
    [7]CUI Xingchao, SU Yi, CHEN Siwei. Polarimetric SAR Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric Rotation Domain Features and Superpixel Technique[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 35-48. doi: 10.12000/JR20147
    [8]WEI Yangkai, ZENG Tao, CHEN Xinliang, DING Zegang, FAN Yujie, WEN Yuhan. Parametric SAR Imaging for Typical Lines and Surfaces[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(1): 143-153. doi: 10.12000/JR19077
    [9]WANG Xuesong, CHEN Siwei. Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Interpretation and Recognition: Advances and Perspectives[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(2): 259-276. doi: 10.12000/JR19109
    [10]HU Cheng, DENG Yunkai, TIAN Weiming, ZENG Tao. A Compensation Method of Nonlinear Atmospheric Phase Applied for GB-InSAR Images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(6): 831-840. doi: 10.12000/JR19073
    [11]Hu Dingsheng, Qiu Xiaolan, Lei Bin, Xu Feng. Analysis of Crosstalk Impact on the Cloude-decomposition-based Scattering Characteristic[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(2): 221-228. doi: 10.12000/JR16129
    [12]Tao Chensong, Chen Siwei, Li Yongzhen, Xiao Shunping. Polarimetric SAR Terrain Classification Using Polarimetric Features Derived from Rotation Domain[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 524-532. doi: 10.12000/JR16131
    [13]Wu Jiani, Chen Yongguang, Dai Dahai, Pang Bo, Wang Xuesong. Scattering Mechanism Identification Based on Polarimetric HRRP of Manmade Target[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 174-181. doi: 10.12000/JR16026
    [14]Sun Xun, Huang Pingping, Tu Shangtan, Yang Xiangli. Polarimetric SAR Image Classification Using Multiple-feature Fusion and Ensemble Learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 692-700. doi: 10.12000/JR15132
    [15]Huang Xiaojing, Yang Xiangli, Huang Pingping, Yang Wen. Prototype Theory Based Feature Representation for PolSAR Images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 208-216. doi: 10.12000/JR15071
    [16]Yang Ruliang, Dai Bowei, Li Haiying. Polarization Hierarchy and System Operating Architecture for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 132-142. doi: 10.12000/JR16013
    [17]Yan Jian, Li Yang, Yin Qiang, Hong Wen. Freeman-Durden Decomposition with Oriented Dihedral Scattering[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(5): 574-582. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2014.14057
    [18]Chong Jin-song, Zhou Xiao-zhong. Survey of Study on Internal Waves Detection in Synthetic Aperture Radar Image[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(4): 406-421. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13012
    [19]Wu Yi-rong. Concept on Multidimensional Space Joint-observation SAR[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(2): 135-142. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13047
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(23)

    1. 肖敏睿，王巍，尤明懿，陈新. 存在时频统误差条件下的联合时频差定位与观测站航迹优化方法. 信号处理. 2025(01): 150-160 .
    2. Xin Yang，Hongming Liu，Xiaoke Wang，Wen Yu，Jingqiu Liu，Sipei Zhang. A Fusion Localization Method Based on Target Measurement Error Feature Complementarity and Its Application. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2024(01): 75-88 .
    3. 任洋，姚金杰，赵昶淳，邹宇，薛晓东. 卫星导航多干扰源直接定位方法. 计算机测量与控制. 2024(04): 159-165+173 .
    4. 罗军，张顺生. 联合自适应LASSO与块稀疏贝叶斯直接定位方法. 雷达科学与技术. 2024(03): 265-274 .
    5. 万鹏武，李文杰，彭康. 混合信道下基于到达时间的快速直接定位算法. 西安邮电大学学报. 2024(02): 20-26 .
    6. Dandan Li，Deyi Wang，Hao Huan. LFM Radar Source Passive Localization Algorithm Based on Range Migration. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology. 2024(02): 130-140 .
    7. 李俊霞，王欣，黄高见，徐勇军，郝万明，朱政宇，李兴旺. 无源定位技术发展及其展望. 无线电工程. 2024(08): 1825-1846 .
    8. 陈梁栋，黄知涛，王翔，吴癸周. 基于角速度信息先验的固定无源单站直接定位方法. 电子学报. 2024(07): 2190-2200 .
    9. 任洋，姚金杰，赵昶淳. 一种自适应网格细化的卫星干扰源定位方法. 火力与指挥控制. 2024(08): 152-158+165 .
    10. 张炜，杨秋，李昊. 一种分布式一体化传感器异步纯方位跟踪管理方法. 指挥控制与仿真. 2024(06): 43-48 .
    11. 王雨琦，吴楠，张旭，刘丹，王海强，韩笑冬，仲小清，王宁远. 多星分布式无源相干定位方法. 中国空间科学技术. 2023(01): 63-68 .
    12. 陈志坤，翁一鸣，彭冬亮，吴美婵. 基于VEPPSO-EXTRA混合算法的分布式直接定位技术. 电子与信息学报. 2023(02): 664-671 .
    13. 罗迪，尹灿斌，李智. 双星对地面未知辐射源直接定位方法研究. 指挥控制与仿真. 2023(01): 136-143 .
    14. 刘云天，史鑫磊. 多基站非圆信号直接定位：降维PM与泰勒补偿. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2023(06): 725-733 .
    15. 夏楠，高丹阳，邢宝辉，王亚宁. 基于外辐射源的空中目标直接定位算法. 通信学报. 2023(06): 117-124 .
    16. 唐元春，陈端云，夏炳森. 基于传播算子的卫星导航系统干扰源直接定位方法. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2023(08): 985-991 .
    17. 张怡霄，王怀习，姚云龙，常超，康凯. 基于聚类与霍夫变换的同型雷达多目标定位算法. 电讯技术. 2023(12): 1885-1893 .
    18. 刘清，谢坚，王伶，王秋红，张兆林. 卫星导航欺骗式干扰源高精度直接定位方法. 电子学报. 2022(05): 1117-1122 .
    19. 韦卓. 基于单站干涉仪测向法的未知辐射源定位技术. 舰船电子工程. 2022(07): 159-161 .
    20. 王裕旗，孙光才，邢孟道，张子敬. 合成孔径无源定位性能分析与参数设计. 电子与信息学报. 2022(09): 3155-3162 .
    21. 刘振，苏晓龙，刘天鹏，彭勃，陈鑫，刘永祥. 基于矩阵差分的远场和近场混合源定位方法. 雷达学报. 2021(03): 432-442 . 本站查看
    22. 金峥嵘，王洁，陈丹彤，赵翼，朱秋明，段洪涛. 基于频谱测绘的辐射源定位. 通信技术. 2021(12): 2644-2649 .
    23. 张国鑫，易伟，孔令讲. 基于1比特量化的大规模MIMO雷达系统直接定位算法. 雷达学报. 2021(06): 970-981 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(22)

  • 加载中
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 27.1 %FULLTEXT: 27.1 %META: 62.6 %META: 62.6 %PDF: 10.3 %PDF: 10.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 6.5 %其他: 6.5 %其他: 1.7 %其他: 1.7 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Falls Church: 0.0 %Falls Church: 0.0 %Happy Valley: 0.1 %Happy Valley: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Tottori-shi: 0.2 %Tottori-shi: 0.2 %三亚: 0.0 %三亚: 0.0 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %东京: 0.3 %东京: 0.3 %东京都: 0.0 %东京都: 0.0 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %中卫: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %丹东: 0.2 %乌鲁木齐: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %九龙城: 0.0 %九龙城: 0.0 %云浮: 0.2 %云浮: 0.2 %京畿道: 0.1 %京畿道: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %六安: 0.0 %六安: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %内江: 0.1 %北京: 12.2 %北京: 12.2 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %华沙: 0.3 %华沙: 0.3 %南京: 3.4 %南京: 3.4 %南充: 0.0 %南充: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.3 %南昌: 0.3 %卡拉奇: 0.0 %卡拉奇: 0.0 %印多尔: 0.1 %印多尔: 0.1 %厦门: 0.0 %厦门: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %吉林: 0.0 %吉林: 0.0 %周口: 0.0 %周口: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %商洛: 0.0 %喀什: 0.6 %喀什: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %塔斯卡卢萨: 0.0 %塔斯卡卢萨: 0.0 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %威海: 0.0 %威海: 0.0 %娄底: 0.0 %娄底: 0.0 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安阳: 0.0 %安阳: 0.0 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %巴中: 0.0 %巴中: 0.0 %帕萨迪纳: 0.0 %帕萨迪纳: 0.0 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 1.8 %广州: 1.8 %库比蒂诺: 0.0 %库比蒂诺: 0.0 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %开封: 0.6 %开封: 0.6 %弗吉: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.1 %张家口: 3.0 %张家口: 3.0 %张家界: 0.2 %张家界: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %悉尼: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %惠州: 0.1 %成都: 2.3 %成都: 2.3 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %新德里: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.8 %昆明: 1.8 %晋城: 0.0 %晋城: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %来宾: 0.0 %来宾: 0.0 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %松原: 0.0 %松原: 0.0 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %汕头: 0.2 %汕头: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %河池: 0.0 %河池: 0.0 %泉州: 0.2 %泉州: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济南: 0.0 %济南: 0.0 %海东: 0.1 %海东: 0.1 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淮南: 0.0 %淮南: 0.0 %深圳: 1.3 %深圳: 1.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %焦作: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %珠海: 0.0 %白山: 0.0 %白山: 0.0 %眉山: 0.0 %眉山: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %纽约: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 24.1 %芒廷维尤: 24.1 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.2 %莫斯科: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %衡水: 0.3 %衡水: 0.3 %衡阳: 1.0 %衡阳: 1.0 %衢州: 1.5 %衢州: 1.5 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 8.9 %西宁: 8.9 %西安: 4.2 %西安: 4.2 %诺沃克: 0.3 %诺沃克: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %赣州: 0.0 %赣州: 0.0 %达州: 0.1 %达州: 0.1 %迈阿密: 0.0 %迈阿密: 0.0 %运城: 0.4 %运城: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %钱德勒: 0.0 %钱德勒: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %铁岭: 0.0 %银川: 0.0 %银川: 0.0 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 2.1 %长沙: 2.1 %阿什本: 0.0 %阿什本: 0.0 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔特别: 0.1 %首尔特别: 0.1 %香港: 0.3 %香港: 0.3 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %黄冈: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.6 %其他其他ChinaFalls ChurchHappy ValleyKao-sungTottori-shi三亚上海东京东京都东莞中卫丹东乌鲁木齐九江九龙城云浮京畿道佛山六安兰州兰辛内江北京十堰华沙南京南充南宁南昌卡拉奇印多尔厦门台北合肥吉林周口呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨哥伦布商洛喀什嘉兴塔斯卡卢萨大连天津太原威海娄底孟买安康安阳宣城巴中帕萨迪纳常州常德平顶山广州库比蒂诺延安开封弗吉张家口张家界徐州悉尼惠州成都扬州新德里无锡昆明晋城朝阳来宾杭州松原武汉汕头沈阳河池泉州洛阳济南海东海口淄博淮南深圳温州湖州漯河漳州潍坊烟台焦作珠海白山眉山石家庄福州秦皇岛纽约绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莫斯科菏泽葫芦岛衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安诺沃克贵阳赣州达州迈阿密运城邯郸郑州鄂州重庆钱德勒铁岭银川长春长沙阿什本青岛首尔首尔特别香港马鞍山黄冈齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(3084) PDF downloads(944) Cited by(45)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return