Submit Manuscript
Peer Review
Editor Work
- Home
-
Articles & Issues
-
Data
- Dataset of Radar Detecting Sea
- SAR Dataset
- SARGroundObjectsTypes
- SARMV3D
- 3DRIED
- UWB-HA4D
- LLS-LFMCWR
- FAIR-CSAR
- FUSAR
- MSAR
- SDD-SAR
- DatasetinthePaper
- SpaceborneSAR3Dimaging
- DatasetintheCompetition
- Sea-land Segmentation
- SAR-Airport
- Hilly and mountainous farmland time-series SAR and ground quadrat dataset
-
Report
-
Course
-
About
-
Publish
- Editorial Board
- Chinese
| Citation: | DING Zihang, XIE Junwei, and WANG Bo. Missing covariance matrix recovery with the FDA-MIMO radar using deep learning method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(5): 1112–1124. doi: 10.12000/JR23002
|
Missing Covariance Matrix Recovery with the FDA-MIMO Radar Using Deep Learning Method
DOI: 10.12000/JR23002
More Information-
Abstract
The realization of anti-jamming technologies via beamforming for applications in Frequency-Diverse Arrays and Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (FDA-MIMO) radar is a field that is undergoing intensive research. However, because of limitations in hardware systems, such as component aging and storage device capacity, the signal covariance matrix data computed by the receiver system may be missing. To mitigate the impact of the missing covariance matrix data on the performance of the beamforming algorithm, we have proposed a covariance matrix data recovery method for FDA-MIMO radar based on deep learning and constructed a two-stage framework based on missing covariance matrix recovery-adaptive beamforming. Furthermore, a learning framework based on this two-stage framework and the Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) is constructed, which is mainly composed of a discriminator (D) and a generator (G). G is primarily used to output complete matrix data, while D is used to judge whether this data is real or filled. The entire network closes the gap between the samples generated by G and the distribution of the real data via a confrontation between D and G, consequently leading to the missing data of the covariance matrix being recovered. In addition, considering that the covariance matrix data is complex, two independent networks are constructed to train the real and imaginary parts of the matrix data. Finally, the numerical experiment results reveal that the difference in the root square mean error levels between the real and recovery data is 0.01 in magnitude. -
References
[1] WANG Wenqin. Overview of frequency diverse array in radar and navigation applications[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2016, 10(6): 1001–1012. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0464[2] ANTONIK P, WICKS M C, GRIFFITHS H D, et al. Frequency diverse array radars[C]. The 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar, Verona, USA, 2006: 215–217.[3] WICKS M C and ANTONIK P. Frequency diverse array with independent modulation of frequency, amplitude, and phase[P]. US, 7319427, 2008.[4] WANG Wenqin and SHAO Huaizong. Range-angle localization of targets by a double-pulse frequency diverse array radar[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2014, 8(1): 106–114. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2013.2285528[5] BASIT A, KHAN W, KHAN S, et al. Development of frequency diverse array radar technology: A review[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2018, 12(2): 165–175. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2017.0207[6] SECMEN M, DEMIR S, HIZAL A, et al. Frequency diverse array antenna with periodic time modulated pattern in range and angle[C]. The 2007 IEEE Radar Conference, Waltham, USA, 2007: 427–430.[7] SAMMARTINO P F, BAKER C J, and GRIFFITHS H D. Frequency diverse MIMO techniques for Radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2013, 49(1): 201–222. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.6404099[8] XU Jingwei, LIAO Guisheng, ZHU Shengqi, et al. Joint range and angle estimation using MIMO radar with frequency diverse array[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2015, 63(13): 3396–3410. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2422680[9] LAN Lan, ROSAMILIA M, AUBRY A, et al. Single-snapshot angle and incremental range estimation for FDA-MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(6): 3705–3718. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3083591[10] LAN Lan, LIAO Guisheng, XU Jingwei, et al. Transceive beamforming with accurate nulling in FDA-MIMO radar for imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(6): 4145–4159. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2961324[11] XU Jingwei, LIAO Guisheng, ZHU Shengqi, et al. Deceptive jamming suppression with frequency diverse MIMO radar[J]. Signal Processing, 2015, 113: 9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.01.014[12] LAN Lan, LIAO Guisheng, XU Jingwei, et al. Range-angle-dependent beamforming for FDA-MIMO radar using oblique projection[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2022, 65(5): 152305. doi: 10.1007/s11432-020-3250-7[13] WEN Cai, PENG Jinye, ZHOU Yan, et al. Enhanced three-dimensional joint domain localized STAP for airborne FDA-MIMO radar under dense false-target jamming scenario[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18(10): 4154–4166. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2018.2820905[14] BASIT A, WANG Wenqin, NUSENU S Y, et al. Cognitive FDA-MIMO with channel uncertainty information for target tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2019, 5(4): 963–975. doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2019.2928799[15] HUANG Bang, WANG Wenqin, BASIT A, et al. Bayesian detection in Gaussian clutter for FDA-MIMO Radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71(3): 2655–2667. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2021.3139894[16] LAN Lan, MARINO A, AUBRY A, et al. GLRT-based adaptive target detection in FDA-MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(1): 597–613. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2020.3028485[17] WANG Keyi, LIAO Guisheng, XU Jingwei, et al. Clutter rank analysis in airborne FDA-MIMO radar with range ambiguity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2022, 58(2): 1416–1430. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3122822[18] WEN Cai, HUANG Yan, PENG Jinye, et al. Slow-time FDA-MIMO technique with application to STAP radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2022, 58(1): 74–95. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3098100[19] WEN Cai, TAO Mingliang, PENG Jinye, et al. Clutter suppression for airborne FDA-MIMO radar using multi-waveform adaptive processing and auxiliary channel STAP[J]. Signal Processing, 2019, 154: 280–293. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.09.016[20] WEN Cai, MA Changzheng, PENG Jinye, et al. Bistatic FDA-MIMO radar space-time adaptive processing[J]. Signal Processing, 2019, 163: 201–212. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.05.025[21] DING Zihang, XIE Junwei, WANG Bo, et al. Robust adaptive null broadening method based on FDA-MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 177976–177983. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025602[22] WANG Yuzhuo and ZHU Shengqi. Main-beam range deceptive jamming suppression with simulated annealing FDA-MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(16): 9056–9070. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2982194[23] JAMSHIDIAN M and BENTLER P M. ML estimation of mean and covariance structures with missing data using complete data routines[J]. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1999, 24(1): 21–24. doi: 10.3102/10769986024001021[24] WU C F J. On the convergence properties of the EM algorithm[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 1983, 11(1): 95–103. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176346060[25] AUBRY A, DE MAIO A, MARANO S, et al. Structured covariance matrix estimation with missing-(complex) data for radar applications via expectation-maximization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2021, 69: 5920–5934. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3111587[26] LOUNICI K. High-dimensional covariance matrix estimation with missing observations[J]. Bernoulli, 2014, 20(3): 1029–1058. doi: 10.3150/12-BEJ487[27] HIPPERT-FERRER A, EL KORSO M N, BRELOY Y A, et al. Robust low-rank covariance matrix estimation with a general pattern of missing values[J]. Signal Processing, 2022, 195: 108460. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2022.108460[28] XU Danlei, DU Lan, LIU Hongwei, et al. Compressive sensing of stepped-frequency radar based on transfer learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2015, 63(12): 3076–3087. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2421473[29] JI Yuanjie, WEN Cai, HUANG Yan, et al. Robust direction-of-arrival estimation approach using beamspace-based deep neural networks with array imperfections and element failure[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2022, 16(11): 1761–1778. doi: 10.1049/rsn2.12295[30] ZOOGHBY A H E, CHRISTODOULOU C G, and GEORGIOPOULOS M. Neural network-based adaptive beamforming for one- and two-dimensional antenna arrays[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1998, 46(12): 1891–1893. doi: 10.1109/8.743843[31] SALLAM T, ABDEL-RAHMAN A B, ALGHONIEMY M, et al. A neural-network-based beamformer for phased array weather radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(9): 5095–5104. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2554116[32] ZHAO Zhonghui, ZHAO Huiling, WANG Zhaoping, et al. Radial basis function neural network optimal modeling for phase-only array pattern nulling[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2021, 69(11): 7971–7975. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2021.3083787[33] SALLAM T and ATTIYA A M. Convolutional neural network for 2D adaptive beamforming of phased array antennas with robustness to array imperfections[J]. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies, 2021, 13(10): 1096–1102. doi: 10.1017/S1759078721001070[34] TAN Ming, WANG Chunyang, and LI Zhihui. Correction analysis of frequency diverse array radar about time[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2021, 69(2): 834–847. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3016508[35] CAPON J. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1969, 57(8): 1408–1418. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1969.7278[36] YOON J, JORDON J, and VAN DER SCHAAR M. GAIN: Missing data imputation using generative adversarial nets[C]. The 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018: 5675–5684.[37] STEKHOVEN D J and BÜHLMANN P. MissForest-non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28(1): 112–118. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597 Relative Articles
-
Proportional views
- Publishing Ethics
- Journal Insights
- Abstracting & Indexing
- Peer Review Policies
- Guide for Authors
- Conference
- ISSN 2095-283X (Print)ISSN 2097-339X (Online)
- CN 10-1030/TN
- CODEN LXEUAO
About Journal
- Sponsor: China Radio Detection and Ranging Industry Association (CRIA)
- Phone: 010-58887062
- Email：radars@aircas.ac.cn
- Publisher: Leida Xuebao Bianjibu (Editorial office of the Journal of Radars)
Contacts Us
京ICP备20021838号-8
Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd
Export File
Citation
Wu Sunyong, Xue Qiutiao, Zhu Shengqi, Yan Qingzhu, Sun Xiyan. Track-Before-Detect Algorithm for Weak Extended Target Based on Particle Filter under Clutter Environment[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(3): 252-258. doi: 10.12000/JR16128
Format
Content
DownLoad:
- Figure 1. The framework of dual channel GAN network
- Figure 2. The structure of D and G network
- Figure 3. The grayscale image of the real part of covariance matrix (single interference)
- Figure 4. The grayscale image of the imaginary part of covariance matrix (single interference)
-
Figure 5. RMSE performance versus training process (different
- Figure 6. RMSE performance versus training process (different k)
- Figure 7. FDA-MIMO radar beampattern based on different covariance matrices (single interference)
- Figure 8. The grayscale image of the real part of covariance matrix (multiple interferences)
- Figure 9. The grayscale image of the imaginary part of covariance matrix (multiple interferences)
- Figure 10. FDA-MIMO radar beampattern based on different covariance matrices (multiple interferences)