Volume 6 Issue 6
Dec.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2017  >  6(6): 709-718
LIU Zhen, SU Xiaolong, LIU Tianpeng, et al. Matrix differencing method for mixed far-field and near-field source localization[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(3): 432–442. doi: 10.12000/JR20145
Citation: Hon Kaikwong, Chan Pakwai. Aircraft Wake Vortex Observations in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(6): 709-718. doi: 10.12000/JR17072
shu

Aircraft Wake Vortex Observations in Hong Kong

DOI: 10.12000/JR17072 CSTR: 32380.14.JR17072

  • Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong, China

More Information
  • Author Bio:

    Mr. K. K. Hon is a scientific officer of the Hong Kong Observatory. He is involved in aviation weather services including detection of low-level windshear and turbulence using long- and short-range LIDAR, fine-resolution numerical weather prediction for the Hong Kong International Airport, and also aircraft wake vortex detection. E-mail: kkhon@hko.gov.hk

    Mr. P. W. Chan is a senior scientific officer of the Hong Kong Observatory. He has been working on aviation weather services for nearly 20 years. He has contributed to the developments of the various low level wind shear and turbulence alerting algorithms of the Hong Kong International Airport. Recently he has been involved in a wake vortex detection programme at the airport. He has published various papers on meteorological applications. E-mail: pwchan@hko.gov.hk

  • Corresponding author: HON Kaikwong   kkhon@hko.gov.hk
  • Received Date: 2017-08-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-09-01
  • Publish Date: 2017-12-28
    Abstract
  • The Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA) is among the busiest airports in the world, with total aircraft movement exceeding 400,000 in 2016. The Hong Kong Observatory (HKO), provider of aviation meteorological services to HKIA, has recently begun making the first sets of aircraft wake vortex observations at HKIA using short-range LIDARs. This paper briefly describes the preliminary observation results obtained from field measurements between 2014 and 2016, and discusses the way forward on the monitoring and prediction of wake vortex behaviour in Hong Kong.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(26)
  • [1]
    Hallock J N. Aircraft wake vortices: An assessment of the current situation[R]. U.S. Department of Transportation Report. DOT-FAA-RD-90-29. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991: 59.
    [2]
    Rubin W L. Radar-acoustic detection of aircraft wake vortices[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2000, 17(8): 1058–1065. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<1058:RADOAW>2.0.CO;2
    [3]
    Holzäpfel F, Gerz T, Köpp F, et al. Strategies for circulation evaluation of aircraft wake vortices measured by Lidar[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2003, 20(8): 1183–1195. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1183:SFCEOA>2.0.CO;2
    [4]
    Liu Zhong-xun, Jeannin N, Vincent F, et al. Modeling the radar signature of raindrops in aircraft wake vortices[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2013, 30(3): 470–484. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00220.1
    [5]
    Holzäpfel F and Robins R E. Probabilistic two-phase aircraft wake vortex model: Application and assessment[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(5): 1117–1126. DOI: 10.2514/1.2280
    [6]
    Holzäpfel F, Kladetzke J, Amelsberg S, et al. Aircraft wake vortex scenarios simulation package for takeoff and departure[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009, 46(2): 713–717. DOI: 10.2514/1.39346
    [7]
    ICAO. Procedures for air navigation services—air traffic management (Doc 4444)[Z]. 2016, 5: 1–36 (Technical document of the International Civil Aviation Organisation).
    [8]
    EUROCONTROL. European wake vortex mitigation benefits study (EuroBen)[Z]. High Level Benefits Analysis & Systemic Analysis, 2005 (Technical report of EUROCONTROL).
    [9]
    Tittsworth J A, Lang S R, Johnson E J, et al.. Federal aviation administration wake turbulence program-recent highlights[C]. 57th Air Traffic Control Association (ATCA) Annual Conference & Exposition, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012.
    [10]
    Federal Aviation Administration. Wake turbulence recategorization[Z]. Order JO 7110.659C, 2016 (Administrative order form FAA of USA).
    [11]
    Treve V and Rooseleer F. RECAT-EU proposal, validation and consultation[R]. WakeNet-EU, EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Bretigny, France, 2014.
    [12]
    Morris C, Peters J and Choroba P. Validation of the time based separation concept at London Heathrow Airport[C]. Tenth USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2013.
    [13]
    French Civil Aviation Authority. Implementation of the RECAT-EU wake turbulence separation scheme at Paris Charles de Gaulle, Paris-le Bourget and Pontoise-Cormeilles-en-Vexin airports from March 22nd 2016[R]. AIC France A 03/16. 2016.
    [14]
    Federal Aviation Administration. Re-categorization (RECAT) of FAA wake turbulence separation categories at specific airports[R]. SAFO 12007. Washington, DC: SAFO, 2013.
    [15]
    Airport Authority Hong Kong. Hong Kong international airport fact sheet[EB/OL]. http://www.hongkongairport.com/eng/media/facts-figures/facts-sheets.html, 2016.
    [16]
    Airport Authority Hong Kong. Finalized civil international air traffic statistics at HKIA, Year 2016[EB/OL]. http://www.hongkongairport.com/eng/pdf/business/statistics/2016e.pdf, 2016.
    [17]
    Shun C M and Chan P W. Applications of an infrared Doppler Lidar in detection of wind shear[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2008, 25(5): 637–655. DOI: 10.1175/2007JTECHA1057.1
    [18]
    Hon K K, Chan P W, Chiu Y Y, et al.. Application of short-range LIDAR in early alerting for low-level windshear and turbulence at Hong Kong International Airport[J]. Advances in Meteorology, 2014, 2014: Article ID 162748.
    [19]
    Hon K K. First wake vortex measurements at the Hong Kong International Airport[EB/OL]. News bulletin for the aviation community, Hong Kong Observatory. http://www.hko.gov.hk/aviat/outreach/32nd/wakevortex.htm, 2015, January.
    [20]
    Smalikho I N, Banakh V A, Holzäpfel F, et al. Method of radial velocities for the estimation of aircraft wake vortex parameters from data measured by coherent Doppler Lidar[J]. Optics Express, 2015, 23(19): A1194–A1207. DOI: 10.1364/OE.23.0A1194
    [21]
    Loaec S, Thobois L, Cariou J P, et al.. Monitoring wake vortices with a scanning Doppler LIDAR[C]. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling, 2012.
    [22]
    Smalikho I, Köpp F, and Rahm S. Measurement of atmospheric turbulence by 2-μm Doppler Lidar[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2005, 22(11): 1733–1747. DOI: 10.1175/JTECH1815.1
    [23]
    Chan P W and Hon K K. Performance of super high resolution numerical weather prediction model in forecasting terrain-disrupted airflow at the Hong Kong International Airport: Case studies[J]. Meteorological Applications, 2016, 23(1): 101–114. DOI: 10.1002/met.2016.23.issue-1
    [24]
    Hon K K and Chan P W. Sub-kilometer simulation of terrain-disrupted airflow at the Hong Kong International Airport-aviation applications and inter-comparison with LIDAR observations[C]. 16th Conference on Mountain Meteorology, 2014.
    [25]
    Wassaf H S, Tabrizi A, Wang F Y, et al.. Atmospheric turbulence effects on near-ground wake vortex demise[C]. 13th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, 2008.
    [26]
    Chan P W. Generation of an eddy dissipation rate map at the Hong Kong International airport based on Doppler Lidar data[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2011, 28(1): 37–49. DOI: 10.1175/2010JTECHA1458.1
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(39)

    1. 董军，杜晓林，何肖阳，李建波，田团伟. 基于CNN-BiLSTM-AM的雷达波形设计. 现代雷达. 2025(03): 72-79 .
    2. 贲德. 机载有源相控阵火控雷达技术发展. 现代雷达. 2024(02): 1-15 .
    3. 王兴家，王彬，刘岳巍，晏学成，丁峰. 基于元知识转移的认知雷达波形设计. 雷达科学与技术. 2024(04): 443-453 .
    4. 沙印，陈虎威. 基于PLC的雷达自动控制系统设计与应用. 长春师范大学学报. 2024(10): 63-68 .
    5. 朱宏鹏，朱赛，安婷. 一种多材料综合的装备多波段兼容隐身方法. 现代电子技术. 2023(01): 1-5 .
    6. 岳帅英，彭芃，任渊. 舰载多功能相控阵雷达发展现状与趋势. 舰船科学技术. 2023(02): 141-147 .
    7. 张应奎，孙国皓，钟苏川，余显祥. 杂波先验数据缺失条件下基于级联优化处理的雷达波形设计方法. 雷达学报. 2023(01): 235-246 . 本站查看
    8. 陈涛，张颖，胡学晶，肖易寒. 基于DQN的探测干扰一体化波形优化设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(03): 638-646 .
    9. 冯翔，李风从，范羽，刘涛，崔文卿，赵宜楠. 基于粒子采样投影的雷达低旁瓣复合波形设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(04): 1008-1015 .
    10. 杨婧，余显祥，沙明辉，崔国龙，孔令讲. MIMO系统探通一体化信号矩阵设计方法. 雷达学报. 2023(02): 262-274 . 本站查看
    11. 王佳欢，范平志，时巧，周正春. 一种具有多普勒容忍性的通感一体化波形设计. 雷达学报. 2023(02): 275-286 . 本站查看
    12. 汪敏，冯一伦，蒋彦雯，范红旗. 雷达波形通用调制引擎设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(06): 1684-1692 .
    13. 李康，纠博，赵宇，刘宏伟. 雷达智能博弈抗干扰技术综述与展望. 现代雷达. 2023(05): 15-26 .
    14. 范文，李淳泽，赵勇，张航. 复杂环境下雷达抗干扰及多功能一体化波形设计方法研究. 无线电通信技术. 2023(05): 960-970 .
    15. 林瑜，卜祎，余显祥，崔国龙. 面向多主瓣干扰的波形与滤波器联合认知设计方法. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(11): 3437-3448 .
    16. 谢壮，朱家华，徐舟，范崇祎，金添，黄晓涛. 基于智能反射面辅助雷达的恒模多相波形-反射面联合优化算法. 电子与信息学报. 2023(11): 3848-3859 .
    17. 李志汇，唐波，周青松，师俊朋，张剑云. 新体制机载雷达波形优化设计研究综述. 系统工程与电子技术. 2023(12): 3852-3865 .
    18. 辛祺，辛增献，马亮，辛升，陈涛. 基于双层强化学习的干扰策略与干扰波形优化设计. 制导与引信. 2023(04): 35-41 .
    19. 陈唯实，黄毅峰，陈小龙，卢贤锋，张洁. 机场探鸟雷达技术发展与应用综述. 航空学报. 2022(01): 184-204 .
    20. 刘治东，张群，罗迎，李瑞. 基于孪生波形设计的频谱弥散干扰抑制方法. 航空学报. 2022(02): 352-361 .
    21. 余若峰，杨威，付耀文，张文鹏. 面向不同雷达任务的认知波形优化综述. 电子学报. 2022(03): 726-752 .
    22. 崔国龙，樊涛，孔昱凯，余显祥，沙明辉，孔令讲. 机载雷达脉间波形参数伪随机跳变技术. 雷达学报. 2022(02): 213-226 . 本站查看
    23. 余显祥，路晴辉，杨婧，沙明辉，崔国龙，孔令讲. 短基线收发分置频域协同波形设计方法. 雷达学报. 2022(02): 227-239 . 本站查看
    24. 田团伟，邓浩，鲁建华，杜晓林. 智能反射面辅助雷达通信双功能系统的多载波波形优化方法. 雷达学报. 2022(02): 240-254 . 本站查看
    25. 刘红亮，张思思，赵庆媛，岳凯. 一种跟踪信息辅助的认知目标检测方法. 太赫兹科学与电子信息学报. 2022(04): 340-345 .
    26. 陈辉，刘雅婷，张双庆，韩崇昭. 多扩展目标跟踪中基于加权最优子模式分配距离的传感器管理方法. 控制理论与应用. 2022(05): 887-896 .
    27. 吴文俊，唐波，汤俊，胡元奎. 杂波环境中雷达通信一体化系统波形设计算法研究. 雷达学报. 2022(04): 570-580 . 本站查看
    28. 姚誉，李泽清，范文，杜晓林，吴乐南. 基于ABSUM的MIMO雷达频谱兼容波形设计. 雷达学报. 2022(04): 543-556 . 本站查看
    29. 范文，蔚保国，陈镜，张航，李淳泽. 基于波形优化和天线位置选择的MIMO雷达波束扫描算法研究. 雷达学报. 2022(04): 530-542 . 本站查看
    30. 杨华明，卞美琴，刘亚帅. 船舶雷达系统智能化发展研究. 雷达与对抗. 2022(03): 1-5+65 .
    31. 董军，杜晓林，崔国龙，余显祥，田团伟. 基于加权准则的雷达博弈波形设计. 电子科技大学学报. 2022(06): 866-874 .
    32. 崔国龙，余显祥，魏文强，熊奎，孔昱凯，孔令讲. 认知智能雷达抗干扰技术综述与展望. 雷达学报. 2022(06): 974-1002 . 本站查看
    33. 曹亚丽，李梅梅，屈诗涵，宋昕. 联合准则下的认知雷达波形设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2022(11): 3364-3370 .
    34. 赵俊龙，李伟，王泓霖，黄腾，甘奕夫，王也. 基于长短时记忆网络的雷达波形设计. 系统工程与电子技术. 2021(02): 376-382 .
    35. 陈涛，张颖，黄湘松. 基于强化学习的自适应干扰波形设计. 空天防御. 2021(02): 59-66 .
    36. 周仕霖. 基于改进粒子群的重频组多目标优化算法. 探测与控制学报. 2021(03): 92-97 .
    37. 葛萌萌，余显祥，严正欣，方学立，崔国龙，孔令讲. 脉间波形幅相联合设计抗欺骗干扰方法. 电子科技大学学报. 2021(04): 481-487 .
    38. 周凯，李德鑫，粟毅，何峰，刘涛. 雷达脉冲压缩低旁瓣发射波形和非匹配滤波联合设计方法. 电子学报. 2021(09): 1701-1707 .
    39. 张吉建，谢文冲，沈伟，赵思明. 基于低PAR的机载雷达自适应发射抗噪声卷积干扰方法. 空军预警学院学报. 2020(05): 313-318 .

    Other cited types(68)

  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(3890) PDF downloads(660) Cited by(107)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return