Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
TAN Pengyuan, ZHU Jianjun, FU Haiqiang, et al. Inversion of forest height based on ALOS-2 PARSAR-2 multi-baseline polarimetric SAR interferometry data[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(3): 569–577. doi: 10.12000/JR20030
Citation: GUO Wenjie, WU Zhenhua, CAO Yice, et al. Multidomain characteristic-guided multimodal contrastive recognition method for active radar jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(5): 1004–1018. doi: 10.12000/JR24129

Multidomain Characteristic-guided Multimodal Contrastive Recognition Method for Active Radar Jamming

DOI: 10.12000/JR24129 CSTR: 32380.14.JR24129
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62201007, 62401007), The China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M681992), Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2308085QF199)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: WU Zhenhua, zhwu@ahu.edu.cn; CAO Yice, yccao@ahu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2024-06-21
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-08-12
  • Available Online: 2024-08-15
  • Publish Date: 2024-08-28
  • Achieving robust joint utilization of multidomain characteristics and deep-network features while maintaining a high jamming-recognition accuracy with limited samples is challenging. To address this issue, this paper proposes a multidomain characteristic-guided multimodal contrastive recognition method for active radar jamming. This method involves first thoroughly extracting the multidomain characteristics of active jamming and then designing an optimization unit to automatically select effective characteristics and generate a text modality imbued with implicit expert knowledge. The text modality and involved time-frequency transformation image are separately fed into text and image encoders to construct multimodal-feature pairs and map them to a high-dimensional space for modal alignment. The text features are used as anchors and a guide to time-frequency image features for aggregation around the anchors through contrastive learning, optimizing the image encoder’s representation capability, achieving tight intraclass and separated interclass distributions of active jamming. Experiments show that compared to existing methods, which involve directly combining multidomain characteristics and deep-network features, the proposed guided-joint method can achieve differential feature processing, thereby enhancing the discriminative and generalization capabilities of recognition features. Moreover, under extremely small-sample conditions (2~3 training samples for each type of jamming), the accuracy of our method is 9.84% higher than those of comparative methods, proving the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed method.

     

  • 森林高度是估算森林蓄积量及生物量的重要基础数据,对于研究森林资源状况以及分析全球生态环境、气候变化具有重要意义。极化合成孔径雷达干涉测量技术(Polarimetric SAR Interferometry, PolInSAR)采用微波监测模式,其回波信号不仅记录垂直结构及其属性信息,且可以区分同一分辨单元内不同散射体高度的能力,已被视为大范围、高分辨率、高精度反演森林高度的有效手段之一[1]

    为了实现利用PolInSAR观测量准确地提取森林高度,Thrauhft等人[2]建立了随机地体二层散射模型(Random Volume over Ground, RVoG),该模型将森林散射场景抽象为两层,即由随机均匀分布的散射体组成的植被层,以及微波信号不可穿透的地表层。随后,Papathanassiou等人[3,4]进一步分析PolInSAR复相干性与RVoG模型的关联,建立了利用PolInSAR反演森林高度的框架。实质上,该框架是基于体散射去相干的模型表达来反演森林高度等参数的,并且利用不同PolInSAR数据都获得了较高的反演精度[5-7]

    由于森林场景具有显著的时变性,具有长时间间隔的星载重轨干涉SAR(如ALOS-1至少为46天,ALOS-2为14天)散射场景内介电常数变化(如降雨)和风动都会产生严重的时间去相干。因此,除了体去相干的影响,时间去相干也是星载重轨极化干涉SAR数据中不可忽略的去相干因素,决定了森林参数反演的精度,甚至是反演成败的关键。为此,Yang等人[8]在随机移动散射模型(Random Motion over Ground, RMoG)[9]和体时去相干散射模型 (Volume Temporal Decorrelation, VTD)模型[10]基础上,提出一种时间去相干半经验森林高度反演方法。该方法结合少量机载LiDAR森林高度数据辅助时间去相干半经验模型解算,利用ALOS-1 PARSAR-1 HV极化相干幅度成功实现了大尺度森林高度反演。

    然而,该方法需假设HV极化不包含地表散射回波能量贡献,事实上,L波段SAR信号具有较强的穿透性,尤其当森林高度较低或密度较小时,HV极化方式会记录显著地表回波信号。此外,该方法只适用于单基线干涉数据,尚未考虑多基线条件下,如何充分利用观测几何的多样性提升反演结果的可靠性。因此本文的目的是针对上述反演方法的限制,利用ALOS-2 PARSAR-2多基线PolInSAR数据更为准确地提取森林高度。主要思路如下:首先利用相干最大分离算法(Maximum Coherence Difference, MCD)在极化空间内寻求具有最少地面散射能量贡献的极化方式,以获得更为纯净的森林冠层散射贡献。然后利用该极化方式的相干幅度,在少量森林高度地面调查数据辅助下基于时间去相干半经验模型进行森林高度反演。在此基础之上,结合多基线数据根据PolInSAR相干集在复数平面内的几何表达,甄选最优观测干涉数据的反演结果作为森林高度反演最终结果。

    综合顾及垂直方向上散射体分布产生的体去相干、散射场景内介电特性改变和植被风动引起的时间去相干同时占主导地位,星载重轨PolInSAR复相干系数一般形式表示为[8]

    γ(ω)=eiφ0γvdγv/m+γgdμ(ω)1+μ(ω) (1)

    式中,φ0为地表相位;γvdγgd分别表示植被体层和地面层介电特性改变引起的时间去相干复因子;μ(ω)为地体幅度比,与极化方式有关;γv/m为体散射去相干和时间去相干(植被风动引起)产生的耦合去相干

    γv/m=h0exp[12(4πλ)2σ2r(z)]f(z)exp(ikzz)dzh0f(z)dz (2)

    其中,h表示森林高度;f(z)为指数形式的垂直结构函数,描述垂直方向z上散射体的分布;σr(z)为散射体沿雷达视线方向的随机运动标准差,假定与森林高度呈线性关系

    σr(z)=σrhrz (3)

    式中,σr表示在参考高度hr(根据先验信息一般设为15 m[8,9])处的运动标准差。

    为了解决上述模型过参数化问题,Yang等人[8]对散射场景做如下假设:(1) 散射场景内时间去相干与消光系数在空间上具有一致性;(2) HV极化方式具有较小地面散射能量贡献,可假定其地体幅度比μmin=0,此时对于该极化方式可忽略地面层介电常数改变引起的时间去相干;(3) 假定干涉场景为零空间基线理想情况(忽略森林垂直结构引起的体散射去相干),即垂直有效波束kz=0,此时对于式(2)适用积分第一中值定理(即对于在给定区间[a,b]有连续函数f(x)和同号可积函数g(x),区间内存在一点ε满足baf(x)g(x)dx=f(ε)bag(x)dx。因此在上述假定条件下,式(1)可简化为时间去相干半经验模型[8,11]

    γ=Ssceneexp[12(4πσrαλhr)2h2]Sscenesinc(hCscene) (4)

    其中,α为中值ε关于森林高度的比例因子,即ε=αh(0α1); Sscene, Cscene分别与植被体层介电特性改变和风动引起的时间去相干有关

    Sscene=|γvd|; Cscene=λhr2π2σrα (5)

    已有方法主要选用对森林冠层较为敏感的HV极化方式进行模型求解,但是ALOS-2 PALSAR-2发射具有较强穿透能力的L波段电磁波,HV极化方式回波信号中同样会记录显著地表回波信号。鉴于此,本文利用ALOS-2 PALSAR-2全极化数据结合极化相干最优理论,尽可能抑制地表回波信号的干扰。具体方法如下:

    在主辅极化SAR影像散射机制相同的情况下,极化干涉SAR的复相干系数表示为[12]

    γ=ωHΩ12ωωHT11ωωHT22ω (6)

    式中,自相关矩阵T11T22都是标准Hermitian相干矩阵,分别描述主辅影像的极化特性,Ω12为互相关矩阵,不仅包含极化信息,还包含了主副影像不同极化通道间的干涉相位关系。ω为归一化复投影矢量,通过转换ω可以计算极化空间内任意极化基下对应散射机制的复相干系数,组成相干集。该复相干系数集合形成的区域边界范围可以看作将相干复平面旋转任意角度,得到的实部最大和最小相干系数[13]

    Re(γeiϕ)=ωHAωωHTωA=eiϕΩ12+eiϕΩH122,T=T11+T222} (7)

    式中,ϕ为旋转相位,在[0,π)范围内等间隔采样角度。式(7)求极值可以转化为求解特征值问题即Aω=λTω,进而得到最大和最小特征值分别对应的特征向量ω1ω2,那么相干区域的一对边界点可以表示为[14]

    γ1=ωH1Ω12ω1ωH1Tω1, γ2=ωH2Ω12ω2ωH2Tω2 (8)

    相比传统InSAR技术只能获取HH, HV或VV极化方式对应的复相干系数,相干集中包含了特定极化散射机理对应的复相干系数,为寻求极化空间内具有更为纯净森林冠层散射贡献的极化方式提供了可能。相干区域范围示意如图1所示,其中在相干区域成对边界点中距离最远的一对相干系数点γA, γB(也就是相干区域长轴两端点),可以表征植被层和地表层有效相位中心的最大分离[15]。根据式(9)进一步确定体散射占优极化方式复相干γ(μmin)与地表散射占优极化方式的复相干γ(μmax)

    图  1  不同干涉对相干区域在复平面上的示意图
    Figure  1.  Coherent regions on the complex plane for different interferometric pairs
    kz>0:ifarg(γAγB)>0thenγ(μmin)=γA,γ(μmax)=γBifarg(γAγB)<0thenγ(μmin)=γB,γ(μmax)=γAkz<0:ifarg(γAγB)<0thenγ(μmin)=γA,γ(μmax)=γBifarg(γAγB)>0thenγ(μmin)=γB,γ(μmax)=γA} (9)

    其中,μmin表示具有最小地体幅度比的极化方式,对应体散射占优极化方式复相干;μmax表示具有最大地体幅度比的极化方式,对应表面散射占优极化方式复相干;kz为垂直有效波束,取决于成像相对几何关系(垂直基线B,斜距R,入射角θ和雷达波长λ)[16]

    kz=4πBλRsinθ (10)

    即便简化了模型参数和采用多基线PolInSAR数据增加了观测量,利用传统多维非线性迭代求解时间去相干半经验模型仍存在秩亏问题。因此本文采用一种外部数据辅助反演法[8],即先利用小范围真实森林高度数据辅助解算出模型参数SsceneCscene,然后代入模型中即可得到整个散射场景范围的森林高度结果。模型参数求解具体思路如下:对于给定模型参数初始值,利用训练数据中的μmin极化方式相干幅度结合式(4)可以得到反演森林高度结果hinvert,它与对应真实森林高度数据hreal确定的散点图如图2所示。理想情况下,两者数据散点应沿虚线y=x分布,但实际上在初始模型参数误差存在情况下,两者散点点阵椭圆主轴与y=x并非一致,而是存在一定的偏差。因此通过利用训练数据对其调整来寻求散射场景最佳模型参数。

    图  2  反演森林高度与真实森林高度散点点阵椭圆示意图
    Figure  2.  Scatters ellipse between invert height and real height

    主成分分析思想[17]为实现上述思路提供了契机,即通过对训练数据中hrealhinvert这两个二维数据的协方差矩阵进行特征值分解,可以确定该二维数据降维后的主轴(也就是散点点阵椭圆的长轴)斜率k

    X=[Var(hreal)Cov(hreal,hinvert)Cov(hinvert,hreal)Var(hinvert)]=[P11P12P21P22][λ100λ2][P11P12P21P22]1k=P21P11} (11)

    其中λ1λ2为按降序排列的特征值,P为特征值对应的特征向量的元素。而点阵椭圆质心与虚线y=x的偏差 b可以表示为

    b=M(hreal)M(hinvert)[M(hreal)+M(hinvert)]/2 (12)

    式中,M 表示取平均运算。

    散点点阵椭圆主轴确定后,显然可以通过建立使逼近参数k, b分别趋近于1, 0的目标函数

    (k1)2+(b0)2=min (13)

    该目标函数可以利用高斯-牛顿迭代算法进行非线性最小二乘求解,如式(14)所示

    [SsceneCscene]=(JT0J0)1JT0[1k00b0]+[Sscene0Cscene0] (14)

    式中,表示最终迭代次数;通过给定模型参数初始值Sscene0, Cscene0,结合上述主成分思想可以得到初始点相应的k0, b0以及雅克比矩阵J0

    J0=[kSscenekCscenebSscenebCscene]|Sscene0Cscene0 (15)

    然后将得到修正后的模型参数作为新的初始点进行下一次迭代,经过多次迭代后即可获得最佳模型参数Sscene, Cscene,迭代终止条件为(ε为经验阈值,本文设为106)

    |[SsceneCscene][S(1)sceneC(1)scene]|<ε (16)

    在利用训练数据求得时间去相干半经验模型参数后,对每个像元求解一元非线性方程得到整个散射场景内的森林高度结果。

    时间去相干、体去相干以及其他噪声等因素会共同影响PolInSAR复相干性在复平面单位圆上的几何表达[18]。在多基线配置下,不同干涉对在同一分辨单元内往往呈现出不同的相干区域结构(如图1所示)。而相干特性P可以作为评价相干区域结构的指标[19]

    P=|γ(μmin)γ(μmax)||γ(μmin)+γ(μmax)| (17)

    式中,γ(μmin), γ(μmax)为2.2节所述相干区域长轴的两端点,分别对应体散射极化通道与地表散射极化通道的复相干系数。|γ(μmin)γ(μmax)|即为极化相干区域的长轴,反映了不同极化相干点在复数单位圆的分离程度;|γ(μmin)+γ(μmax)|为相干区域质心到坐标原点距离的2倍,反映了相干区域整体相干性的平均水平。因此,P 值越大说明该干涉对具有更好的相干性质量与极化分离度,反演的结果更为可靠。

    通过相干特性指标P 甄选出不同干涉对在同一分辨单元内反演出的最优森林高度值作为多基线PolInSAR森林高度融合结果,多基线PolInSAR融合反演框架可表示为

    maxP1(γ1(μmin),γ1(μmax))P2(γ2(μmin),γ2(μmax))PN(γN(μmin),γN(μmax)) (18)

    式中,N 为极化干涉SAR观测基线数。

    研究区域黄丰桥国有林场(27°05—27°24 N, 113°35—113°55 E)呈带状分布,横跨湖南省攸县东西两部(如图3所示)。该林场属亚热带季风湿润性气候区,年平均气温17.8 °C,年降水量1410.8 mm,大部分降雨发生于春、夏季。林场境内森林茂盛,拥有森林蓄积量90.12×104 m3,森林覆盖率达90%。林分类型以针叶林为主,包括杉木、油松、落叶松等。

    图  3  实验区:绿线范围为黄丰桥(HFQ)林场研究区域,蓝色虚线为ALOS-2 PALSAR-2影像范围,圆点为地面实测林分样地
    Figure  3.  The test site: the green line indicates the study area of HuangFengQiao (HFQ) forestry center, the blue dotted line indicates the ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 image range, and the dots are field measurement plots

    地面实测数据由中南林业科技大学于2016年6~7月采集得到,通过在林区范围内选取60个相互独立的林分样地以确保避免空间自相关,每个林分样地规格为30×30 m。树高则基于单木测高原理利用激光测高仪测得,林分高度范围为4.60~20.20 m,平均高度为13.24 m。本文通过随机采样,将60个林分样地数据随机分为45个训练数据(图3黄点所示)和15个验证数据(图3红点所示)两组。

    多基线星载重轨PolInSAR数据是利用日本宇航局(JAXA)提供的5景覆盖研究区域的ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 L波段全极化数据。该SAR影像范围如图3蓝色虚线所示,获取时间为2016年6月至8月,获取模式为StripMap2(SM2),影像主要参数信息如表1所示。将5景SAR影像组成3个时间基线为14天的干涉影像对(BL1, BL2, BL3),然后各自进行配准处理,并进行公共带通滤波以确保去除几何去相干。相干性以11×11窗口进行估计,并应用Boxcar滤波进行平滑处理以消除斑点效应。最后利用SRTM DEM对SAR影像进行地理编码,并将其重采样至与DEM空间分辨率一致(30×30 m)。图4为3个干涉对的HV极化和μmin极化的相干性统计图,由统计图可见不同干涉对的相干性均较低,说明研究区域受时间去相干影响较为严重。

    表  1  ALOS-2 PALSAR-2参数信息
    Table  1.  Parameter information of ALOS-2 PALSAR-2
    日期(2016年)垂直有效波数(rad/m)时间基线(天)距离向/方位向分辨率(m)中心入射角 (°)极化方式
    0616—0630 (BL1)0.013~0.015
    0630—0714 (BL2)0.010~0.011142.86/2.9738.99Full
    0811—0825 (BL3)0.009~0.010
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    图  4  相干性统计图
    Figure  4.  The histograms of coherence

    以选取的15个验证林分的实测森林高度(H-field)对反演结果(H-invert)进行分析评价,图5为3个干涉对利用HV极化反演得到的散点图结果,均方根误差RMSE分别为:4.20 m, 4.03 m和3.42 m。利用μmin极化方式反演的验证结果如图6所示,3个干涉对的反演精度分别提高了:20%, 17%和12%,除此之外,相关系数R2也分别有所提高。分析认为采用全极化数据结合PolInSAR相干优化算法扩展了极化空间,相比已有方法中选用的HV极化,μmin极化含有更少地表散射贡献,更贴近时间去相干半经验模型推导过程中基于“零”地体幅度比的关键假设。

    图  5  单基线InSAR反演高度与验证数据散点图
    Figure  5.  Scatterplot comparison between inversion height of single baseline InSAR and validation data
    图  6  单基线PolInSAR反演高度与验证数据散点图
    Figure  6.  Scatterplot comparison between inversion height of single baseline PolInSAR and validation data

    从上述单基线森林高度反演结果看,不同干涉对反演整体精度较为接近,但是对于同一林分在利用不同干涉对反演的结果却存在明显差异。因此,当多基线数据可用时,我们进一步在单基线PolInSAR森林高度反演结果的基础上挖掘PolInSAR数据本身特性并对其森林高度反演能力进行评判。与时间去相干相关的参数SsceneCscene共同反映了散射场景内的时间去相干影响水平,其中Sscene与植被体层介电特性变化相关,Cscene反映了植被体层随机运动引起时间去相关水平。表2即为单基线PolInSAR模型参数解算结果,对于不同干涉对,Sscene越小,表明该基线在散射场景内植被体层介电变化(降水等引起)越显著;Cscene越小,则表明植被体层随机运动(风动等引起)越强烈。从图4相干性统计图也可以看出,干涉对BL1相干性相对更低,受时间去相干的影响更为严重。因此,在不同时间去相干以及其他噪声影响下,每个干涉对在同一分辨单元内会具有不同的的相干特性,呈现出优劣不同的相干区域结构。

    表  2  单基线PolInSAR模型参数解算结果
    Table  2.  Model parameter results of single baseline PolInSAR inversion
    模型参数BL1BL2BL3
    Sscene0.690.780.78
    Cscene9.8810.0811.14
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格

    3个干涉对在验证林分的相干特性P值、反演森林高度值以及多基线融合森林高度值如表3所示,从整体看,根据相干特性P值大小从3个单基线PolInSAR反演结果中甄选出的森林高度结果更接近于实测真实森林高度。整个实验区的多基线PolInSAR融合反演结果以及精度评定如图7所示,均方根误差RMSE为2.05 m,相比于已有的方法,本文提出的多基线PolInSAR融合反演策略精度至少提高了40%(与图5中BL3基线结果对比),同时,相关系数也提升至0.81。

    表  3  3个干涉对的相干特性P值以及森林高度值
    Table  3.  Coherence characteristic P-value and forest heights for three interferometric pairs
    林分样地编号BL1 P值 / 森林高度(m)BL2 P值 / 森林高度(m)BL3 P值 / 森林高度(m)多基线融合结果(m)实测森林高度(m)
    10.130 / 17.820.113 / 17.020.081 / 16.8917.8214.43
    20.116 / 14.380.104 / 15.300.091 / 16.5214.3814.20
    30.092 / 12.460.075 / 15.830.135 / 11.3411.349.80
    40.103 / 15.210.111 / 15.340.119 / 14.1914.1916.00
    50.106 / 6.860.106 / 7.240.131 / 8.318.3110.70
    60.110 / 12.980.083 / 14.670.118 / 11.8911.8913.50
    70.114 / 13.350.096 / 15.300.101 / 16.1013.3513.43
    80.079 / 14.290.106 / 16.150.117 / 16.2216.2216.95
    90.069 / 12.120.090 / 17.630.060 / 12.3017.6320.10
    100.104 / 12.330.089 / 13.670.102 / 11.7212.3315.60
    110.075 / 18.340.103 / 16.750.154 / 10.1610.1613.30
    120.113 / 9.080.134 / 9.460.106 / 12.699.4611.00
    130.086 / 13.760.096 / 9.070.109 / 16.0016.0016.40
    140.197 / 10.170.230 / 8.710.186 / 9.518.716.00
    150.103 / 14.590.064 / 19.170.128 / 15.4015.4014.70
    下载: 导出CSV 
    | 显示表格
    图  7  多基线PolInSAR融合反演
    Figure  7.  Multi baseline PolInSAR fusion inversion

    在多基线全极化数据可用条件下,弥补单基线InSAR观测信息不足以及几何结构单一的问题,对于反演结果整体精度提升具有重要作用。本文提出了一种星载重轨多基线PolInSAR反演森林高度的策略,对InSAR极化空间和观测几何空间进行扩展,主要结论如下:

    (1) 该方法利用MCD相干优化算法获得对体散射最为敏感的极化方式,并基于时间去相干半经验模型进行森林高度反演,使每条单基线反演精度在一定程度上都有所提高。

    (2) 利用由相干特性指标P确定的相干区域最优准则可以优选出同一分辨单元内最优的单基线森林高度反演结果。因此,相比仅利用单基线单一极化反演方法,多基线PolInSAR融合策略具有更好的稳定性,精度也更高。

  • [1]
    崔国龙, 余显祥, 魏文强, 等. 认知智能雷达抗干扰技术综述与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(6): 974–1002. doi: 10.12000/JR22191.

    CUI Guolong, YU Xianxiang, WEI Wenqiang, et al. An overview of antijamming methods and future works on cognitive intelligent radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(6): 974–1002. doi: 10.12000/JR22191.
    [2]
    解烽, 刘环宇, 胡锡坤, 等. 基于复数域深度强化学习的多干扰场景雷达抗干扰方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2023, 12(6): 1290–1304. doi: 10.12000/JR23139.

    XIE Feng, LIU Huanyu, HU Xikun, et al. A radar anti-jamming method under multi-jamming scenarios based on deep reinforcement learning in complex domains[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(6): 1290–1304. doi: 10.12000/JR23139.
    [3]
    周红平, 王子伟, 郭忠义. 雷达有源干扰识别算法综述[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2022, 37(1): 1–20. doi: 10.16337/j.1004-9037.2022.01.001.

    ZHOU Hongping, WANG Ziwei, and GUO Zhongyi. Overview on recognition algorithms of radar active jamming[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 2022, 37(1): 1–20. doi: 10.16337/j.1004-9037.2022.01.001.
    [4]
    LV Qinzhe, FAN Hanxin, LIU Junliang, et al. Multilabel deep learning-based lightweight radar compound jamming recognition method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: 2521115. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3400337.
    [5]
    CAO Ru, CAO Jiuwen, MEI Jianping, et al. Radar emitter identification with bispectrum and hierarchical extreme learning machine[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, 78(20): 28953–28970. doi: 10.1007/s11042-018-6134-y.
    [6]
    QU Qizhe, WANG Yongliang, LIU Weijian, et al. IRNet: Interference recognition networks for automotive radars via autocorrelation features[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2022, 70(5): 2762–2774. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2022.3151635.
    [7]
    WU Zhenhua, QIAN Jun, ZHANG Man, et al. High-confidence sample augmentation based on label-guided denoising diffusion probabilistic model for active deception jamming recognition[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2023, 20: 3508305. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3316282.
    [8]
    ZOU Wenxu, XIE Kai, and LIN Jinjian. Light-weight deep learning method for active jamming recognition based on improved MobileViT[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2023, 17(8): 1299–1311. doi: 10.1049/rsn2.12420.
    [9]
    LV Qinzhe, QUAN Yinghui, FENG Wei, et al. Radar deception jamming recognition based on weighted ensemble CNN with transfer learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5107511. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3129645.
    [10]
    LUO Zhenyu, CAO Yunhe, YEO T S, et al. Few-shot radar jamming recognition network via time-frequency self-attention and global knowledge distillation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5105612. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3280322.
    [11]
    KONG Yukai, XIA Senlin, DONG Luxin, et al. Compound jamming recognition via contrastive learning for distributed MIMO radars[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 73(6): 7892–7907. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2024.3358996.
    [12]
    KONG Yukai, WANG Xiang, WU Changxin, et al. Active deception jamming recognition in the presence of extended target[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2022, 19: 4024905. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2022.3184997.
    [13]
    ZHOU Hongping, WANG Lei, and GUO Zhongyi. Recognition of radar compound jamming based on convolutional neural network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(6): 7380–7394. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3288080.
    [14]
    PENG Ruihui, WEI Wenbin, SUN Dianxing, et al. Dense false target jamming recognition based on fast-slow time domain joint frequency response features[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(6): 9142–9159. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3316125.
    [15]
    魏赓力, 李凉海, 闫海鹏, 等. 基于多模特征融合的雷达干扰信号识别[J]. 遥测遥控, 2023, 44(4): 80–87. doi: 10.12347/j.ycyk.20230328001.

    WEI Gengli, LI Lianghai, YAN Haipeng, et al. Radar jamming signal identification based on multimode feature fusion[J]. Journal of Telemetry, Tracking and Command, 2023, 44(4): 80–87. doi: 10.12347/j.ycyk.20230328001.
    [16]
    张顺生, 陈爽, 陈晓莹, 等. 面向小样本的多模态雷达有源欺骗干扰识别方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2023, 12(4): 882–891. doi: 10.12000/JR23104.

    ZHANG Shunsheng, CHEN Shuang, CHEN Xiaoying, et al. Active deception jamming recognition method in multimodal radar based on small samples[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(4): 882–891. doi: 10.12000/JR23104.
    [17]
    SHAO Guangqing, CHEN Yushi, and WEI Yinsheng. Deep fusion for radar jamming signal classification based on CNN[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 117236–117244. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004188.
    [18]
    ZHANG Yipeng, LU Dongdong, QIU Xiaolan, et al. Scattering-point topology for few-shot ship classification in SAR images[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2023, 16: 10326–10343. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3328066.
    [19]
    GENG Jie, ZHANG Yuhang, and JIANG Wen. Polarimetric SAR image classification based on hierarchical scattering-spatial interaction transformer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5205014. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3362360.
    [20]
    郭帅, 陈婷, 王鹏辉, 等. 基于角度引导Transformer融合网络的多站协同目标识别方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2023, 12(3): 516–528. doi: 10.12000/JR23014.

    GUO Shuai, CHEN Ting, WANG Penghui, et al. Multistation cooperative radar target recognition based on an angle-guided Transformer fusion network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(3): 516–528. doi: 10.12000/JR23014.
    [21]
    CHEN Xiaolong, SU Ningyuan, HUANG Yong, et al. False-alarm-controllable radar detection for marine target based on multi features fusion via CNNs[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21(7): 9099–9111. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3054744.
    [22]
    RADFORD A, KIM J W, HALLACY C, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision[C]. The 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021: 8748–8763.
    [23]
    李宏, 郑光勇, 郭雷, 等. 雷达相参压制干扰信号分析[J]. 电子信息对抗技术, 2013, 28(3): 36–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2013.03.009.

    LI Hong, ZHENG Guangyong, GUO Lei, et al. Jamming analysis of radar coherent suppressing[J]. Electronic Information Warfare Technology, 2013, 28(3): 36–40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2230.2013.03.009.
    [24]
    WEI Shaopeng, ZHANG Lei, LU Jingyue, et al. Modulated-ISRJ rejection using online dictionary learning for synthetic aperture radar imagery[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 35(2): 316–329. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000076.
    [25]
    TAN Mingxing and LE Q V. EfficientNetV2: Smaller models and faster training[C]. The 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021: 10096–10106.
    [26]
    GONG Heng, FENG Xiaocheng, QIN Bing, et al. Table-to-text generation with effective hierarchical encoder on three dimensions (row, column and time)[C]. The 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Hong Kong, China, 2019: 3143–3152. doi: 10.18653/v1/D19-1310.
    [27]
    LI Liang, MA Can, YUE Yinliang, et al. Improving encoder by auxiliary supervision tasks for table-to-text generation[C]. The 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2021: 5979–5989. doi: 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.466.
    [28]
    RADFORD A, WU J, CHILD R, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners[J]. OpenAI Blog, 2019, 1(8): 9.
    [29]
    KHOSLA P, TETERWAK P, WANG Chen, et al. Supervised contrastive learning[C]. The 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’20), Vancouver, Canada, 2020: 1567.
    [30]
    WANG Feng and LIU Huaping. Understanding the behaviour of contrastive loss[C]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, USA, 2021: 2495–2504. doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00252.
    [31]
    LIU Mingqian, LIU Zilong, LU Weidang, et al. Distributed few-shot learning for intelligent recognition of communication jamming[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2022, 16(3): 395–405. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2021.3137028.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHANG Peng, YAN Junkun, GAO Chang, LI Kang, LIU Hongwei. Integrated Transmission Resource Management Scheme for Multifunctional Radars in Dynamic Electromagnetic Environments[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 456-469. doi: 10.12000/JR24230
    [2]WANG Mingyang, LIU Xuxu, LI Yulin, LI Suqi, WANG Bailu. Dynamic Adversarial Risk Estimation Based on Labeled Multi-Bernoulli Tracker[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(1): 270-282. doi: 10.12000/JR23207
    [3]SHI Chenguang, TANG Zhicheng, ZHOU Jianjiang, YAN Junkun, WANG Ziwei. Joint Collaborative Radar Selection and Transmit Resource Allocation in Multiple Distributed Radar Networks with Imperfect Detection Performance[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(3): 565-583. doi: 10.12000/JR23081
    [4]CHEN Hui, DU Shuangyan, LIAN Feng, HAN Chongzhao. Track-MT3: A Novel Multitarget Tracking Algorithm Based on Transformer Network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(6): 1202-1219. doi: 10.12000/JR24164
    [5]SHI Chenguang, TANG Zhicheng, DING Lintao, ZHOU Jianjiang. Joint Optimization of Transmit Power and Dwell Time for Asynchronous Multi-target Tracking in Heterogeneous Multiple Radar Networks with Imperfect Detection[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(3): 563-575. doi: 10.12000/JR23044
    [6]ZENG Yajun, WANG Jun, WEI Shaoming, SUN Jinping, LEI Peng. Review of the Method for Distributed Multi-sensor Multi-target Tracking(in English)[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(1): 197-213. doi: 10.12000/JR22111
    [7]SONG Xiaocheng, LI Zhi, REN Haiwei, YI Wei. Threat-driven Resource Allocation Algorithm for Distributed Netted Phased Array Radars[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(3): 629-641. doi: 10.12000/JR22240
    [8]SHI Chenguang, DONG Jing, ZHOU Jianjiang. Joint Transmit Power and Dwell Time Allocation for Multitarget Tracking in Radar Networks under Spectral Coexistence[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(3): 590-601. doi: 10.12000/JR22146
    [9]WANG Zengfu, SHAO Yi, QI Dengliang, JIN Shuling. Consistency-based Air Target Height Estimation and Location in Distributed Space-based Radar Network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(6): 1249-1262. doi: 10.12000/JR23157
    [10]YI Wei, YUAN Ye, LIU Guanghong, GE Jianjun, KONG Lingjiang, YANG Jianyu. Recent Advances in Multi-radar Collaborative Surveillance: Cognitive Tracking and Resource Scheduling Algorithms[J]. Journal of Radars, 2023, 12(3): 471-499. doi: 10.12000/JR23036
    [11]DUAN Keqing, LI Yufan, YANG Xingjia, QIU Zizhou, WANG Yongliang. Reduced Degrees of Freedom in Space-Time Adaptive Processing for Space-based Early Warning Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(5): 871-883. doi: 10.12000/JR22075
    [12]XIAO Peng, YU Zhitong, CHEN Zhuoqi, CUI Xiangbin, ZHAO Bo, LANG Shinan, LI Meng, HU Luojia, HUANG Yan, LIU Min, WANG Cheng, CHEN Liang, LIU Lu, SUI Xiaohong, YUAN Chunzhu. Orbital Radar Sounding of Earth’s Ice Sheets: Opportunities and Challenges[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 479-498. doi: 10.12000/JR21196
    [13]LI Wenna, ZHANG Shunsheng, WANG Wenqin. Multitarget-tracking Method for Airborne Radar Based on a Transformer Network[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 469-478. doi: 10.12000/JR22009
    [14]DA Kai, YANG Ye, ZHU Yongfeng, FU Qiang. Multitarget Tracking Using Distributed Radar with Partially Overlapping Fields of Views[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 459-468. doi: 10.12000/JR21183
    [15]LIU Chao, WANG Yueji. Review of Multi-Target Tracking Technology for Marine Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 100-115. doi: 10.12000/JR20081
    [16]Lu Yanxi, He Zishu, Cheng Ziyang, Liu Shuangli. Joint Selection of Transmitters and Receivers in Distributed Multi-input Multi-output Radar Network for Multiple Targets Tracking[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(1): 73-80. doi: 10.12000/JR16106
    [17]Wei Qiang, Liu Zhong. A Radar Multi-target Tracking Algorithm Based on Gaussian Mixture PHD Filter under Doppler Blind Zone[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(1): 34-42. doi: 10.12000/JR16125
    [18]Wang Xiangli, Yi Wei, Kong Lingjiang. Joint Beam Selection and Dwell Time Allocation for Multi-target Tracking in Phased Array Radar System[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(6): 602-610. doi: 10.12000/JR17045
    [19]Yang Jun, Zhang Qun, Luo Ying, Deng Donghu. Method for Multiple Targets Tracking in Cognitive Radar Based on Compressed Sensing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(1): 90-98. doi: 10.12000/JR14107
    [20]Wu Wei, Yin Cheng-you. An Improved SMC-PHD Filter for Multiple Targets Tracking[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(4): 406-413. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20094
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 汪思源,曲毅,陈怡君. 基于U-Net的涡旋电磁波雷达成像方法. 空军工程大学学报. 2024(03): 77-85 .
    2. 潘浩然,马晖,胡敦法,刘宏伟. 基于涡旋电磁波新体制的雷达前视三维成像. 雷达学报. 2024(05): 1109-1122 . 本站查看
    3. 毛德庆,杨建宇,杨明杰,张永超,张寅,黄钰林. IAA-Net:一种实孔径扫描雷达迭代自适应角超分辨成像方法. 雷达学报. 2024(05): 1073-1091 . 本站查看
    4. 马晖,胡敦法,师竹雨,刘宏伟. 基于涡旋电磁波的雷达应用研究进展. 现代雷达. 2023(05): 27-41 .
    5. 袁航,罗迎,陈怡君,苏令华. 基于反正弦圆环天线阵列的二维成像. 北京航空航天大学学报. 2023(06): 1487-1494 .

    Other cited types(10)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04020406080
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 31.9 %FULLTEXT: 31.9 %META: 57.8 %META: 57.8 %PDF: 10.3 %PDF: 10.3 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(8)

    Article views(812) PDF downloads(411) Cited by(15)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    • 表  1  ALOS-2 PALSAR-2参数信息
      Table  1.  Parameter information of ALOS-2 PALSAR-2
      日期(2016年)垂直有效波数(rad/m)时间基线(天)距离向/方位向分辨率(m)中心入射角 (°)极化方式
      0616—0630 (BL1)0.013~0.015
      0630—0714 (BL2)0.010~0.011142.86/2.9738.99Full
      0811—0825 (BL3)0.009~0.010
      下载: 导出CSV 
      | 显示表格
    • 表  2  单基线PolInSAR模型参数解算结果
      Table  2.  Model parameter results of single baseline PolInSAR inversion
      模型参数BL1BL2BL3
      Sscene0.690.780.78
      Cscene9.8810.0811.14
      下载: 导出CSV 
      | 显示表格
    • 表  3  3个干涉对的相干特性P值以及森林高度值
      Table  3.  Coherence characteristic P-value and forest heights for three interferometric pairs
      林分样地编号BL1 P值 / 森林高度(m)BL2 P值 / 森林高度(m)BL3 P值 / 森林高度(m)多基线融合结果(m)实测森林高度(m)
      10.130 / 17.820.113 / 17.020.081 / 16.8917.8214.43
      20.116 / 14.380.104 / 15.300.091 / 16.5214.3814.20
      30.092 / 12.460.075 / 15.830.135 / 11.3411.349.80
      40.103 / 15.210.111 / 15.340.119 / 14.1914.1916.00
      50.106 / 6.860.106 / 7.240.131 / 8.318.3110.70
      60.110 / 12.980.083 / 14.670.118 / 11.8911.8913.50
      70.114 / 13.350.096 / 15.300.101 / 16.1013.3513.43
      80.079 / 14.290.106 / 16.150.117 / 16.2216.2216.95
      90.069 / 12.120.090 / 17.630.060 / 12.3017.6320.10
      100.104 / 12.330.089 / 13.670.102 / 11.7212.3315.60
      110.075 / 18.340.103 / 16.750.154 / 10.1610.1613.30
      120.113 / 9.080.134 / 9.460.106 / 12.699.4611.00
      130.086 / 13.760.096 / 9.070.109 / 16.0016.0016.40
      140.197 / 10.170.230 / 8.710.186 / 9.518.716.00
      150.103 / 14.590.064 / 19.170.128 / 15.4015.4014.70
      下载: 导出CSV 
      | 显示表格