Volume 6 Issue 2
May  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  Journal of Radars  > 2017  >  6(2): 221-228
Zhang Lei, Dong Chun-zhu, Hou Zhao-guo, Wang Chao, Yin Hong-cheng. Transmission Line Equivalent Plane Model and Phase Correction Algorithm for Multilayered Dielectric Slab Structure[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(3): 317-325. doi: 10.12000/JR15038
Citation: Hu Dingsheng, Qiu Xiaolan, Lei Bin, Xu Feng. Analysis of Crosstalk Impact on the Cloude-decomposition-based Scattering Characteristic[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(2): 221-228. doi: 10.12000/JR16129
shu

Analysis of Crosstalk Impact on the Cloude-decomposition-based Scattering Characteristic

DOI: 10.12000/JR16129
  • ①.

    Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China

  • ②.

    Key Laboratory of Technology in Geo-spatial Information Processing and Application System, Beijing 100190, China

  • ③.

    University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China

  • ④.

    National Disaster Reduction Center of China, MCA, Beijing 100124, China

  • ⑤.

    Satellite Disaster Reduction Application Center, MCA, Beijing 100124, China

Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61331017), The GF-3 High-Resolution Earth Observation System under Project (30-Y20A12-9004-15/16, 03-Y20A11-9001-15/16)
  • Received Date: 2016-11-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-02-27
    • Available Online: 2017-03-30
  • Publish Date: 2017-04-28
    Abstract
  • Crosstalk is not only one of the main error sources in the polarimetric SAR system, but is also an indicator for evaluating calibration performance. In this paper, to determine the impact of crosstalk on land cover classification, we first retrieve the mathematical relation expressions between crosstalk and the Cloude-decomposition-based scattering characteristic. Then, we verify our theoretical conclusions in a semi-physical simulation based on Radarsat-2 polarimetric data for different land covers. Finally, we perform H/a/Wishart classification on the experimental data. From the ratio curve of pixels labeled differently under changing crosstalk, we can determine the crosstalk requirement that will meet the needs of specific applications.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(24)
  • [1]
    Akbari V, Anfinsen S, Doulgeris A, et al. Polarimetric SAR change detection with the complex Hotelling-Lawley trace statistic[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(7): 3953–3966. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2532320
    [2]
    Doulgeris A. An automatic U-distribution and Markov Random Field segmentation algorithm for PolSAR images[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(4): 1819–1827. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2349575
    [3]
    Tao D, Doulgeris A, and BrekkeC. A segmentation-based CFAR detection algorithm using truncated statistics[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(3): 2887–2898. http://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/10602
    [4]
    Whitt M, Ulaby F, Polatin P, et al. A general polarimetric radar calibration technique[J].IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 1991, 39(1): 62–67. doi: 10.1109/8.64436
    [5]
    Freeman A. SAR calibration: An overview[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1992, 30(6): 1107–1121. doi: 10.1109/36.193786
    [6]
    Quegan S. A unified algorithm for phase and cross-talk calibration of polarimetric data-theory and observations[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1994, 32(1): 89–99. doi: 10.1109/36.285192
    [7]
    Sarabandi K, Pierce L, Dobson M, et al. Polarimetric calibration of SIR-C using point and distributed target[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1995, 33(4): 858–866. doi: 10.1109/36.406672
    [8]
    Freeman A. Calibration of linearly polarized polarimetric SAR data subject to Faraday rotation[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2004, 42(8): 1617–1624. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.830161
    [9]
    Sabry R, Vachon P, and Cole M. Prediction of polarimetric-SAR field-orientation rotation due to topographical slope variation for squint operations[J].IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2011, 8(3): 570–574. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2092410
    [10]
    Hu Dingsheng, Qiu Xiaolan, Hu Donghui, et al. Improved airborne PolSAR calibration algorithm based on time-variant attitude compensation[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2015, 36(12): 3184–3195. doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2015.1054042
    [11]
    Touzi R, Hawkins R, and Cote S. High-precision assessment and calibration of polarimetric RADARSAT-2 SAR using transponder measurements[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(1): 487–503. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2201946
    [12]
    Azcueta M, d’Alessandro M, Zajc T, et al. ALOS-2 preliminary calibration assessment[C]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Milan, Italy, 2015: 4117–4120.
    [13]
    Geudtner D, Torres R, Snoeij P, et al. Sentinel-1 mission capabilities and SAR system calibration[C]. IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon13), Ottawa, Canada, 2013: 1–4.
    [14]
    Lee J, Grunes M, Ainsworth T, et al. Unsupervised classification using polarimetric decomposition and the complex Wishart classifier[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1999, 37(5): 2249–2258. doi: 10.1109/36.789621
    [15]
    Benz U and Pottier E. Object based analysis of polarimetric SAR data in alpha-entropy-anisotropy decomposition using fuzzy classification by eCognition[C]. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Sydney, Austrilia, 2001, 3: 1427–1429.
    [16]
    Cao F, Hong W, Wu Y, et al. An unsupervised segmentation with an adaptive number of clusters using the Span/H/alpha/A space and the complex Wishart clustering for fully polarimetric SAR data analysis[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2007, 45(11): 3454–3467. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.907601
    [17]
    Yu P, Qin A, and Clausi D. Unsupervised polarimetric SAR image segmentation and classification using region growing with edge penalty[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2012, 50(4): 1302–1317. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2164085
    [18]
    Dabboor M, Collins M, Karathanassi V, et al. An unsupervised classification approach for polarimetric SAR data based on the Chernoff distance for complex Wishart distribution[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(7): 4200–4213. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227755
    [19]
    Correia A, Freitas C, and Mura J. Evaluation of the influence of the polarimetric calibration process on the H/A/alpha decomposition[C]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2010: 2039–2042.
    [20]
    Wang Y, Ainsworth T, and Lee J. Assessment of system polarization quality for polarimetric SAR imagery and target decomposition[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2011, 49(5): 1755–1771. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2010.2087342
    [21]
    Wang C, Yu W, Wang Y, et al. Polarimetric calibration requirements on several classification schemes for land application of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar[J].IET Radar, Sonar &Navigation, 2013, 7(2): 113–122.
    [22]
    Lee J and Potter E. Polarimetric Radar Imaging From Basic to Application[M]. New York: CSC Press, 2009: 53–84.
    [23]
    Cloude S and Pottier E. A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry[J].IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1996, 34(2): 498–518. doi: 10.1109/36.485127
    [24]
    数学手册编写组. 数学手册[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1979: 117–120.

    Mathematical Manual drafting group. Mathematical Manual[M]. Beijing: People’s Education Press, 1979: 117–120.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]WANG Zhirui, ZHAO Liangjin, WANG Yuelei, ZENG Xuan, KANG Jian, YANG Jian, SUN Xian. AIR-PolSAR-Seg-2.0: Polarimetric SAR Ground Terrain Classification Dataset for Large-scale Complex Scenes[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 353-365. doi: 10.12000/JR24237
    [2]YIN Junjun, LUO Jiahao, LI Xiang, DAI Xiaokang, YANG Jian. Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric SAR Gradient and Complex Wishart Classifier[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(2): 396-410. doi: 10.12000/JR23198
    [3]HU Zhanyi. A Note on Visual Semantics in SAR 3D Imaging[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(1): 20-26. doi: 10.12000/JR21149
    [4]DENG Likang, ZHANG Shuanghui, ZHANG Chi, LIU Yongxiang. A Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar Imaging Method Based on Multidimensional Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(3): 416-431. doi: 10.12000/JR20132
    [5]CUI Xingchao, SU Yi, CHEN Siwei. Polarimetric SAR Ship Detection Based on Polarimetric Rotation Domain Features and Superpixel Technique[J]. Journal of Radars, 2021, 10(1): 35-48. doi: 10.12000/JR20147
    [6]LI Yongzhen, HUANG Datong, XING Shiqi, WANG Xuesong. A Review of Synthetic Aperture Radar Jamming Technique[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(5): 753-764. doi: 10.12000/JR20087
    [7]ZENG Zheng, ZHANG Fubo, CHEN Longyong, BU Xiangxi, ZHOU Siyan. A Two-dimensional Mixed Baseline Method Based on MIMO-SAR for Countering Deceptive Jamming[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(1): 90-99. doi: 10.12000/JR18118
    [8]HU Cheng, DENG Yunkai, TIAN Weiming, ZENG Tao. A Compensation Method of Nonlinear Atmospheric Phase Applied for GB-InSAR Images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(6): 831-840. doi: 10.12000/JR19073
    [9]XING Mengdao, LIN Hao, CHEN Jianlai, SUN Guangcai, YAN Bangbang. A Review of Imaging Algorithms in Multi-platform-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(6): 732-757. doi: 10.12000/JR19102
    [10]Chen Siwei, Li Yongzhen, Wang Xuesong, Xiao Shunping. Polarimetric SAR Target Scattering Interpretation in Rotation Domain: Theory and Application[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 442-455. doi: 10.12000/JR17033
    [11]Tao Chensong, Chen Siwei, Li Yongzhen, Xiao Shunping. Polarimetric SAR Terrain Classification Using Polarimetric Features Derived from Rotation Domain[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 524-532. doi: 10.12000/JR16131
    [12]Zhong Neng, Yang Wen, Yang Xiangli, Guo Wei. Unsupervised Classification for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar Images Based on Wishart Mixture Models[J]. Journal of Radars, 2017, 6(5): 533-540. doi: 10.12000/JR16133
    [13]Xing Yanxiao, Zhang Yi, Li Ning, Wang Yu, Hu Guixiang. Polarimetric SAR Image Supervised Classification Method Integrating Eigenvalues[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 217-227. doi: 10.12000/JR16019
    [14]Huang Xiaojing, Yang Xiangli, Huang Pingping, Yang Wen. Prototype Theory Based Feature Representation for PolSAR Images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 208-216. doi: 10.12000/JR15071
    [15]Sun Xun, Huang Pingping, Tu Shangtan, Yang Xiangli. Polarimetric SAR Image Classification Using Multiple-feature Fusion and Ensemble Learning[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(6): 692-700. doi: 10.12000/JR15132
    [16]Yang Ruliang, Dai Bowei, Li Haiying. Polarization Hierarchy and System Operating Architecture for Polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2016, 5(2): 132-142. doi: 10.12000/JR16013
    [17]Zhan Xue-li, Wang Yan-fei, Wang Chao, Li He-ping. A Digital Dechirp Approach for Synthetic Aperture Radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(4): 474-480. doi: 10.12000/JR14117
    [18]Hua Wen-qiang, Wang Shuang, Hou Biao. Semi-supervised Learning for Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on SVM-Wishart[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(1): 93-98. doi: 10.12000/JR14138
    [19]Zhang Wen-bin, Deng Yun-kai, Wang Yu. A Fast Back Projection Algorithm for Spotlight Mode Bi-SAR Imaging[J]. Journal of Radars, 2013, 2(3): 357-366. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2013.13031
    [20]Llin Shi-bin, Li Yue-li, Yan Shao-shi, Zhou Zhi-min. Study of Effects of Flat Surface Assumption to Synthetic Aperture Radar Time-domain Algorithms Imaging Quality[J]. Journal of Radars, 2012, 1(3): 309-313. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1300.2012.20035
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 李郝亮，陈思伟. 极化测量误差对人造目标散射解译性能的影响研究. 现代雷达. 2022(01): 1-8 .
    2. 贺雨露，代大海，庞礴，邢世其. 基于粒子群优化的极化SAR定标算法. 雷达科学与技术. 2019(04): 401-408 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 22.8 %FULLTEXT: 22.8 %META: 63.7 %META: 63.7 %PDF: 13.4 %PDF: 13.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.7 %其他: 21.7 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Canada: 0.0 %Canada: 0.0 %China: 1.1 %China: 1.1 %India: 0.0 %India: 0.0 %Italy: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.0 %Osaka: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.0 %Taiwan, China: 0.0 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %上饶: 0.0 %上饶: 0.0 %中卫: 0.0 %中卫: 0.0 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %丹东: 0.0 %丹东: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %乌海: 0.0 %乌海: 0.0 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %乌鲁木齐: 0.1 %伊犁: 0.1 %伊犁: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.1 %兰辛: 0.1 %内蒙古自治区: 0.0 %内蒙古自治区: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 12.4 %北京: 12.4 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南宁: 0.1 %南宁: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %大连: 0.0 %天津: 0.2 %天津: 0.2 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %岳阳: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.1 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %巴彦淖尔: 0.0 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广安: 0.0 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %库比蒂诺: 0.1 %弗吉: 0.0 %弗吉: 0.0 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %徐州: 0.0 %徐州: 0.0 %恩施: 0.0 %恩施: 0.0 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 0.0 %扬州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %抚州: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昌吉: 0.0 %昌吉: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.0 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %淮南: 0.0 %淮南: 0.0 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.0 %濮阳: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄市: 0.1 %石家庄市: 0.1 %福州: 0.0 %福州: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %秦皇岛: 0.0 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.0 %绵阳: 0.0 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.2 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.2 %聊城: 0.1 %聊城: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 16.3 %芒廷维尤: 16.3 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %苏州: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %衢州: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %襄阳: 0.0 %西宁: 32.0 %西宁: 32.0 %西安: 0.8 %西安: 0.8 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %诺沃克: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %赣州: 0.1 %赣州: 0.1 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.0 %郑州: 0.3 %郑州: 0.3 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阿穆达巴: 0.2 %阿穆达巴: 0.2 %阿菲永卡拉希萨尔: 0.1 %阿菲永卡拉希萨尔: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %青岛: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.0 %鞍山: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.0 %鹰潭: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %其他其他CanadaChinaIndiaItalyOsakaTaiwan, ChinaUnited States[]上海上饶中卫临汾丹东丽水乌海乌鲁木齐伊犁佛山保定兰州兰辛内蒙古自治区加利福尼亚州包头北京十堰南京南宁南通台北台州合肥哥伦布嘉兴大连天津宝鸡宣城岳阳巴彦淖尔常州平顶山广安广州库比蒂诺弗吉张家口徐州恩施成都扬州抚州新乡无锡昆明昌吉朝阳杭州武汉沈阳洛阳济南淮南深圳温州湖州湛江漯河濮阳焦作珠海石家庄石家庄市福州秦皇岛纽约绵阳美国伊利诺斯芝加哥聊城芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衢州襄阳西宁西安西雅图诺沃克贵阳赣州运城邯郸郑州金华银川长沙长治阿穆达巴阿菲永卡拉希萨尔青岛鞍山香港特别行政区鹰潭齐齐哈尔龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views(2548) PDF downloads(996) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    京ICP备20021838号-8   Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return