Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Yiming, WU Youming, DAI Wei, et al. A few-shot SAR fine-grained aircraft detection and recognition method guided by strong scattering dynamic prototypes[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26060
Citation: ZHAO Yiming, WU Youming, DAI Wei, et al. A few-shot SAR fine-grained aircraft detection and recognition method guided by strong scattering dynamic prototypes[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26060

A Few-shot SAR fine-grained Aircraft Detection and Recognition Method Guided by Strong Scattering Dynamic Prototypes

DOI: 10.12000/JR26060 CSTR: 32380.14.JR26060
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62425115)
More Information
  • Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image interpretation has a wide range of applications, with SAR aircraft detection and recognition being a significant branch. However, collecting and annotating SAR aircraft samples is inherently difficult, leading to a scarcity of training data. Thus, developing few-shot methods for SAR aircraft detection and recognition is urgently needed. The complex SAR imaging environment results in unstable target feature representation, making it difficult for detection networks to adaptively manage disturbances from intricate SAR backgrounds. These factors limit the accuracy of aircraft detection and recognition under few-shot conditions. To address these challenges, this study proposes a few-shot SAR fine-grained aircraft detection and recognition method guided by strong scattering dynamic prototypes. This approach integrates strong scattering physical priors into a meta-metric learning framework. Detection and recognition performance are enhanced through two key aspects: target feature enhancement and task-adaptive network adjustment. A dynamic prototype generation module is introduced to extract strong scattering points from SAR images and create physical attention masks. High-level semantic features are anchored to the physical geometric structure of targets, enabling robust feature representation. These features are then adaptively fused with prototypes to produce dynamic prototypes. A dynamic prototype guidance module, which maps dynamic prototypes from semantic space to parameter space, is also proposed. This enables adaptive adjustments to network weight updates, feature inputs, and prediction outputs, thereby improving the model’s rapid adaptation capability for novel categories. The proposed method enhances the stability of SAR target feature representation and reduces background clutter interference. Experiments conducted on the CSAR-AC dataset demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms mainstream few-shot object detection algorithms under both 1- and 5-shot settings, significantly improving few-shot SAR aircraft detection and recognition performance in complex scenes.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BERARDINO P, FORNARO G, LANARI R, et al. A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2002, 40(11): 2375–2383. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2002.803792.
    [2]
    CHEN Sizhe, WANG Haipeng, XU Feng, et al. Target classification using the deep convolutional networks for SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(8): 4806–4817. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2551720.
    [3]
    FILIPPIDIS A, JAIN L C, and MARTIN N. Fusion of intelligent agents for the detection of aircraft in SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(4): 378–384. doi: 10.1109/34.845380.
    [4]
    GUO Qian, WANG Haipeng, and XU Feng. Scattering enhanced attention pyramid network for aircraft detection in SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 59(9): 7570–7587. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.3027762.
    [5]
    MENG Qingbiao, WU Youming, SUO Yuxi, et al. STC-Net: Scattering topology cue-based network for aircraft detection in SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 5201816. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3522186.
    [6]
    WANG Jielan, XIAO Hongguang, CHEN Lifu, et al. Integrating weighted feature fusion and the spatial attention module with convolutional neural networks for automatic aircraft detection from SAR images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(5): 910. doi: 10.3390/rs13050910.
    [7]
    ZHAO Danpei, CHEN Ziqiang, GAO Yue, et al. Classification matters more: Global instance contrast for fine-grained SAR aircraft detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5203815. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3250507.
    [8]
    HAN Jiaming, DING Jian, LI Jie, et al. Align deep features for oriented object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5602511. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3062048.
    [9]
    CHEN Dingyuan, ZHONG Yanfei, MA Ailong, et al. Explicable fine-grained aircraft recognition via deep part parsing prior framework for high-resolution remote sensing imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2024, 54(7): 3968–3979. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2023.3293033.
    [10]
    GUO Zhengxi, HOU Biao, GUO Xianpeng, et al. MSRIP-Net: Addressing interpretability and accuracy challenges in aircraft fine-grained recognition of remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5640217. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3458408.
    [11]
    LI Wei, CHEN Chen, ZHANG Mengmeng, et al. Data augmentation for hyperspectral image classification with deep CNN[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019, 16(4): 593–597. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2878773.
    [12]
    MALMGREN-HANSEN D, KUSK A, DALL J, et al. Improving SAR automatic target recognition models with transfer learning from simulated data[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2017, 14(9): 1484–1488. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2017.2717486.
    [13]
    TASAR O, HAPPY S L, TARABALKA Y, et al. ColorMapGAN: Unsupervised domain adaptation for semantic segmentation using color mapping generative adversarial networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(10): 7178–7193. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2980417.
    [14]
    SUN Xian, WANG Bing, WANG Zhirui, et al. Research progress on few-shot learning for remote sensing image interpretation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 2387–2402. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3052869.
    [15]
    ZHANG Tianyang, ZHANG Xiangrong, ZHU Peng, et al. Generalized few-shot object detection in remote sensing images[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2023, 195: 353–364. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.12.004.
    [16]
    WANG Yan, XU Chaofei, LIU Cuiwei, et al. Context information refinement for few-shot object detection in remote sensing images[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(14): 3255. doi: 10.3390/rs14143255.
    [17]
    KOCH G, ZEMEL R, and SALAKHUTDINOV R. Siamese neural networks for one-shot image recognition[C]. The 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, 2015: 125–132.
    [18]
    TANG Haojin, LI Yanshan, HAN Xiao, et al. A spatial-spectral prototypical network for hyperspectral remote sensing image[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(1): 167–171. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2916083.
    [19]
    HOSPEDALES T, ANTONIOU A, MICAELLI P, et al. Meta-learning in neural networks: A survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022, 44(9): 5149–5169. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3079209.
    [20]
    SNELL J, SWERSKY K, and ZEMEL R. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning[C]. The 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, USA, 2017: 4080–4090.
    [21]
    VINYALS O, BLUNDELL C, LILLICRAP T, et al.Matching networks for one shot learning[C]. The 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2016: 3637–3645.
    [22]
    GUO Manke, YOU Yanan, and LIU Fang. Discriminative prototype learning for few-shot object detection in remote-sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 5624313. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3326992.
    [23]
    HE Zhenwei, LIAO Xinye, and FENG Xin. Conditional prototype learning for few-shot object detection[C]. The 36th British Machine Vision Conference, Sheffield, UK, 2025: 1–14.
    [24]
    SUNG F, YANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li, et al. Learning to compare: Relation network for few-shot learning[C]. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA, 2018: 1199–1208. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00131.
    [25]
    ROSS T D, BRADLEY J J, HUDSON L J, et al. SAR ATR: So what’s the problem? An MSTAR perspective[C]. SPIE 3721, Algorithms for Synthetic Aperture Radar Imagery VI, Orlando, USA, 1999: 662–672. doi: 10.1117/12.357681.
    [26]
    KUANG Chunming, WANG Caijun, WEN Biyang, et al. An improved CA-CFAR method for ship target detection in strong clutter using UHF radar[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2020, 27: 1445–1449. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2020.3015682.
    [27]
    LIU Tao, YANG Ziyuan, MARINO A, et al. Robust CFAR detector based on truncated statistics for polarimetric synthetic aperture radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(9): 6731–6747. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2979252.
    [28]
    AN Wentao, XIE Chunhua, and YUAN Xinzhe. An improved iterative censoring scheme for CFAR ship detection with SAR imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(8): 4585–4595. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2282820.
    [29]
    YU Wenyi, WANG Yinghua, LIU Hongwei, et al. Superpixel-based CFAR target detection for high-resolution SAR images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, 13(5): 730–734. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2540809.
    [30]
    POURMOTTAGHI A, TABAN M R, and GAZOR S. A CFAR detector in a nonhomogenous weibull clutter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2012, 48(2): 1747–1758. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2012.6178094.
    [31]
    LUO Ru, CHEN Lifu, XING Jin, et al. A fast aircraft detection method for SAR images based on efficient bidirectional path aggregated attention network[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(15): 2940. doi: 10.3390/rs13152940.
    [32]
    KANG Yuzhuo, WANG Zhirui, FU Jiamei, et al. SFR-Net: Scattering feature relation network for aircraft detection in complex SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5218317. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3130899.
    [33]
    CHEN Lifu, LUO Ru, XING Jin, et al. Geospatial transformer is what you need for aircraft detection in SAR imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5225715. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3162235.
    [34]
    SUO Yuxi, WU Youming, MIAO Tian, et al. Adaptive SAR image enhancement for aircraft detection via speckle suppression and channel combination[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5219415. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3438560.
    [35]
    罗汝, 赵凌君, 何奇山, 等. SAR图像飞机目标智能检测识别技术研究进展与展望[J]. 雷达学报(中英文), 2024, 13(2): 307–330. doi: 10.12000/JR23056.

    LUO Ru, ZHAO Lingjun, HE Qishan, et al. Intelligent technology for aircraft detection and recognition through SAR imagery: Advancements and prospects[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(2): 307–330. doi: 10.12000/JR23056.
    [36]
    ZHOU Jie, XIAO Chao, PENG Bo, et al. DiffDet4SAR: Diffusion-based aircraft target detection network for SAR images[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2024, 21: 4007905. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3386020.
    [37]
    曹婧宜, 张扬, 尤亚楠, 等. 基于图网络与不变性特征感知的SAR图像目标识别方法[J]. 雷达学报(中英文), 2025, 14(2): 366–388. doi: 10.12000/JR24125.

    CAO Jingyi, ZHANG Yang, YOU Yanan, et al. Target recognition method based on graph structure perception of invariant features for SAR images[J]. Journal of Radars, 2025, 14(2): 366–388. doi: 10.12000/JR24125.
    [38]
    WU Jiaxi, LIU Songtao, HUANG Di, et al. Multi-scale positive sample refinement for few-shot object detection[C]. The 16th European Conference on Computer Vision, Glasgow, UK, 2020: 456–472. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58517-4_27.
    [39]
    KAUL P, XIE Weidi, and ZISSERMAN A. Label, verify, correct: A simple few shot object detection method[C]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, USA, 2022: 14217–14227. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01384.
    [40]
    WANG Xin, HUANG T E, DARRELL T, et al. WANG Xin, HUANG T E, DARRELL T, et al. Frustratingly simple few-shot object detection[C]. The 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, 2020: 9919–9928.
    [41]
    SUN Bo, LI Banghuai, CAI Shengcai, et al. FSCE: Few-shot object detection via contrastive proposal encoding[C]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, USA, 2021: 7348–7358. doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00727.
    [42]
    QIAO Limeng, ZHAO Yuxuan, LI Zhiyuan, et al. DeFRCN: Decoupled faster R-CNN for few-shot object detection[C]. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada, 2021: 8661–8670. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00856.
    [43]
    ZHOU Jiawei, LI Wuzhou, CAO Yi, et al. Few-shot oriented object detection in remote sensing images via memorable contrastive learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 5630814. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3578632.
    [44]
    KARLINSKY L, SHTOK J, HARARY S, et al. RepMet: Representative-based metric learning for classification and few-shot object detection[C]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 5192–5201. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00534.
    [45]
    MEI Hefei, ZHAO Taijin, TANG Shiyuan, et al. GRSDet: Learning to generate local reverse samples for few-shot object detection[J]. Neurocomputing, 2025, 651: 130903. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130903.
    [46]
    FINN C, ABBEEL P, and LEVINE S. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks[C]. The 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, Sydney, Australia, 2017: 1126–1135.
    [47]
    ZHANG Gongjie, LUO Zhipeng, CUI Kaiwen, et al. Meta-DETR: Image-level few-shot detection with inter-class correlation exploitation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2023, 45(11): 12832–12843. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3195735.
    [48]
    吕艺璇, 王智睿, 王佩瑾, 等. 基于散射信息和元学习的SAR图像飞机目标识别[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(4): 652–665. doi: 10.12000/JR22044.

    LYU Yixuan, WANG Zhirui, WANG Peijin, et al. Scattering information and meta-learning based SAR images interpretation for aircraft target recognition[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(4): 652–665. doi: 10.12000/JR22044.
    [49]
    HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
    [50]
    BANSAL M, KUMAR M, KUMAR M, et al. An efficient technique for object recognition using Shi-Tomasi corner detection algorithm[J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25(6): 4423–4432. doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05453-y.
    [51]
    LAW H and DENG Jia. CornerNet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints[C]. The 15th European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Germany, 2018: 765–781. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_45.
    [52]
    PEREZ E, STRUB F, DE VRIES H, et al. FiLM: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer[C]. The 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, USA, 2018: 3942–3951. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11671.
    [53]
    HU E J, SHEN Yelong, WALLIS P, et al. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models[C]. The 10th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022: 1–13. (查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献出版地信息,请确认并补充).
    [54]
    XUAN Hao, YANG Bokai, and LI Xingyu. Exploring the impact of temperature scaling in softmax for classification and adversarial robustness[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20604, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.20604.
    [55]
    WU Youming, SUO Yuxi, MENG Qingbiao, et al. FAIR-CSAR: A benchmark dataset for fine-grained object detection and recognition based on single-look complex SAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 5201022. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3519891.
    [56]
    吴有明, 刁文辉, 索玉玺, 等. FAIR-CSAR复图像目标数据集V1.0(FAIR-CSAR-V1.0)[EB/OL]. https://radars.ac.cn/web/data/getData?dataType=FAIR_CSAR, 2025. (查阅网上资料,请确认作者是否正确).

    WU Youming, DIAO Wenhui, SUO Yuxi, et al. A Benchmark dataset for fine-grained object detection and recognition based on single-look complex SAR images (FAIR-CSAR-V1.0)[EB/OL]. https://radars.ac.cn/web/data/getData?dataType=FAIR_CSAR, 2025. (查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献英文翻译,请确认).
    [57]
    JOLLIFFE I T and CADIMA J. Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2016, 374(2065): 20150202. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0202.
    [58]
    VASWANI N and CHELLAPPA R. Principal components null space analysis for image and video classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(7): 1816–1830. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2006.873449.
    [59]
    ZHANG Suzhi, CHEN Xiaoni, LI Penghui, et al. Data dimensionality reduction method combining intra-class and inter-class distance[C]. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacturing, Dublin, Ireland, 2019: 17. doi: 10.1145/3358331.3358348.
    [60]
    CUMMING I G and WONG F H. Digital Processing of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data: Algorithms and Implementation[M]. Boston, USA: Artech House, 2005. (查阅网上资料,请补充引用页码).
    [61]
    YAN Xiaopeng, CHEN Ziliang, XU Anni, et al. YAN Xiaopeng, CHEN Ziliang, XU Anni, et al. Meta R-CNN: Towards general solver for instance-level low-shot learning[C]. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Korea (South), 2019: 9576–9585. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00967.
    [62]
    FAN Qi, ZHUO Wei, TANG C K, et al. Few-shot object detection with attention-RPN and multi-relation detector[C]. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA, 2020: 4012–4021. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00407.
    [63]
    HAN Jiaming, REN Yuqiang, DING Jian, et al. Few-shot object detection via variational feature aggregation[C]. The 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, USA, 2023: 755–763. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i1.25153.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(46) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint