Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Yejian, FENG Jiyuan, WEI Shaopeng, et al. FSUNet: a radar pulse stream sorting method based on structured state modeling[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26044
Citation: ZHOU Yejian, FENG Jiyuan, WEI Shaopeng, et al. FSUNet: a radar pulse stream sorting method based on structured state modeling[J]. Journal of Radars, in press. doi: 10.12000/JR26044

FSUNet: A Radar Pulse Stream Sorting Method Based on Structured State Modeling

DOI: 10.12000/JR26044 CSTR: 32380.14.JR26044
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62471438, 62301612), Young Talent of Liftingengineering for Science and Technology in Shandong (SDAST2025 QTA099), The Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2024MF096, ZR2023QF004), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (26CX07006A)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: WEI Shaopeng, spwei@upc.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2026-02-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-07-18
  • Available Online: 2026-07-22
  • Radar emitter signal deinterleaving separates pulse sequences from individual emitters within overlapping pulse streams. This is a critical step in radar signal intelligence processing, as its performance directly affects the accuracy of subsequent tasks such as waveform recognition, behavior analysis, and threat assessment. Current methods typically use pulse description words as the primary features, assigning pulse attribution based on parameter differences among emitters. However, in complex electromagnetic environments, the reliability of pulse description word estimation is highly susceptible to noise, measurement errors, and waveform overlap. These issues reduce the feature separability of pulses from different emitters, thereby limiting further improvements in deinterleaving performance. To address these challenges, this study proposes FSUNet, an end-to-end pulse stream deinterleaving network based on structured state modeling. FSUNet directly accepts the pulse stream within an observation window as input and jointly models intrapulse local morphological features and interpulse temporal dependencies within a unified framework. This enables an end-to-end mapping from raw signals to deinterleaving results. Specifically, FSUNet first utilizes a multiscale adaptive offset mechanism to extract pulse boundaries and local transient features. It then introduces a structured state space module to recursively model cross-pulse contextual dependencies, enhancing long-range temporal representation and improving the consistency of deinterleaving results. Finally, skip connections are combined with an attention-based fusion mechanism to adaptively integrate local details with global state information. Experimental results show that FSUNet achieves high deinterleaving accuracy and robustness across various scenarios while maintaining computational efficiency.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    隋金坪, 刘振, 刘丽, 等. 雷达辐射源信号分选研究进展[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(3): 418–433. doi: 10.12000/JR21147.

    SUI Jinping, LIU Zhen, LIU Li, et al. Progress in radar emitter signal deinterleaving[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(3): 418–433. doi: 10.12000/JR21147.
    [2]
    WEI Shaopeng, HAN Haoyu, WEI Song, et al. ISRJ suppression using joint morphological component analysis and signal reconstruction based on jamming parameters estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2026, 62: 3773–3797. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2025.3648973.
    [3]
    CHENG Wenhai, ZHANG Qunying, DONG Jiaming, et al. An enhanced algorithm for deinterleaving mixed radar signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(6): 3927–3940. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3087832.
    [4]
    LLOYD S. Least squares quantization in PCM[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1982, 28(2): 129–137. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489.
    [5]
    ESTER M, KRIEGEL H P, SANDER J, et al. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise[C]. Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Portland, USA, 1996: 226–231.
    [6]
    BEZDEK J C. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms[M]. New York, USA: Springer, 1981: 1–272. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1.
    [7]
    RODRIGUEZ A and LAIO A. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6191): 1492–1496. doi: 10.1126/science.1242072.
    [8]
    WILKINSON D R and WATSON A W. Use of metric techniques in ESM data processing[J]. IEE Proceedings F (Communications, Radar and Signal Processing), 1985, 132(4): 229–232. doi: 10.1049/ip-f-1.1985.0055.
    [9]
    MARDIA H K. New techniques for the deinterleaving of repetitive sequences[J]. IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing), 1989, 136(4): 149–154. doi: 10.1049/ip-f-2.1989.0025.
    [10]
    MILOJEVIĆ D J and POPOVIĆ B M. Improved algorithm for the deinterleaving of radar pulses[J]. IEE Proceedings F (Radar and Signal Processing), 1992, 139(1): 98–104. doi: 10.1049/ip-f-2.1992.0012.
    [11]
    NELSON D. Special purpose correlation functions for improved signal detection and parameter estimation[C]. 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Minneapolis, USA, 1993: 73–76. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319597.
    [12]
    LI Ziying, FU Xiongjun, DONG Jian, et al. Radar signal sorting via graph convolutional network and semi-supervised learning[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2025, 32: 421–425. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2024.3519884.
    [13]
    LANG Ping, FU Xiongjun, DONG Jian, et al. A novel radar signals sorting method via residual graph convolutional network[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2023, 30: 753–757. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2023.3287404.
    [14]
    ZHOU Zixiang, FU Xiongjun, DONG Jian, et al. Radar signal sorting with multiple self-attention coupling mechanism based Transformer network[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2024, 31: 1765–1769. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2024.3421948.
    [15]
    CHEN Hongzhuo, QI Liangang, GUO Qiang, et al. A multi-view attention hypergraph neural network for radar emitter signal sorting[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2025, 32: 3754–3758. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2025.3602393.
    [16]
    WANG Chao, SUN Liting, LIU Zhangmeng, et al. A radar signal deinterleaving method based on semantic segmentation with neural network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2022, 70: 5806–5821. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2022.3229630.
    [17]
    LIU Zhangmeng. Pulse deinterleaving for multifunction radars with hierarchical deep neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2021, 57(6): 3585–3599. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3079571.
    [18]
    NUHOGLU M A, ALP Y K, ULUSOY M E C, et al. Image segmentation for radar signal deinterleaving using deep learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(1): 541–554. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3188225.
    [19]
    GUO Qiang, HUANG Shuai, QI Liangang, et al. A radar signal deinterleaving method based on complex network and Laplacian graph clustering[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2024, 31: 2580–2584. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2024.3461656.
    [20]
    HE Chao, ZHANG Lei, WEI Song, et al. Multifunction radar working mode recognition with unsupervised hierarchical modeling and functional semantics embedding based LSTM[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24(14): 22698–22710. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3406680.
    [21]
    HYVÄRINEN A and OJA E. Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications[J]. Neural Networks, 2000, 13(4/5): 411–430. doi: 10.1016/S0893-6080(00)00026-5.
    [22]
    LEE D D and SEUNG H S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization[J]. Nature, 1999, 401(6755): 788–791. doi: 10.1038/44565.
    [23]
    LUO Yi and MESGARANI N. TasNet: Time-domain audio separation network for real-time, single-channel speech separation[C]. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Calgary, Canada, 2018: 696–700. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8462116.
    [24]
    LUO Yi, CHEN Zhuo, and YOSHIOKA T. Dual-path RNN: Efficient long sequence modeling for time-domain single-channel speech separation[C]. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Barcelona, Spain, 2020: 46–50. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9054266.
    [25]
    HAO Fengyuan, LI Xiaodong, and ZHENG Chengshi. X-TF-GridNet: A time–frequency domain target speaker extraction network with adaptive speaker embedding fusion[J]. Information Fusion, 2024, 112: 102550. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102550.
    [26]
    ZHOU Yejian, ZHENG Ye, WEI Shaopeng, et al. CAU-Net: A convolutional attention U-network for radar signal deinterleaving[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2024, 28(7): 1569–1573. doi: 10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3404957.
    [27]
    SHIN U H, LEE S, KIM T, et al. Separate and reconstruct: Asymmetric encoder-decoder for speech separation[C]. 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 2024: 1655. doi: 10.52202/079017-1655.
    [28]
    LUO Zhenghao, YUAN Shuo, SHANG Wenxiu, et al. Automatic reconstruction of radar pulse repetition pattern based on model learning[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2024, 152: 104596. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2024.104596.
    [29]
    李廉林, 周小阳, 崔铁军. 结构化信号处理理论和方法的研究进展[J]. 雷达学报, 2015, 4(5): 491–502. doi: 10.12000/JR15111.

    LI Lianlin, ZHOU Xiaoyang, and CUI Tiejun. Perspectives on theories and methods of structural signal processing[J]. Journal of Radars, 2015, 4(5): 491–502. doi: 10.12000/JR15111.
    [30]
    BRAND D and ZAFIROPULO P. On communicating finite-state machines[J]. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 1983, 30(2): 323–342. doi: 10.1145/322374.322380.
    [31]
    王俊, 郑彤, 雷鹏, 等. 深度学习在雷达中的研究综述[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7(4): 395–411. doi: 10.12000/JR18040.

    WANG Jun, ZHENG Tong, LEI Peng, et al. Study on deep learning in radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7(4): 395–411. doi: 10.12000/JR18040.
    [32]
    KALMAN R E. Mathematical description of linear dynamical systems[J]. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series A Control, 1963, 1(2): 152–192. doi: 10.1137/0301010.
    [33]
    DAO T and GU A. Transformers are SSMs: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality[C]. 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, Vienna, Austria, 2024: 10041–10071.
    [34]
    CHI Kun, SHEN Jihong, LI Yan, et al. Multi-function radar signal sorting based on complex network[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2021, 28: 91–95. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2020.3044259.
    [35]
    RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, and BROX T. U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]. 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany, 2015: 234–241. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.
    [36]
    QIN Xuebin, ZHANG Zichen, HUANG Chenyang, et al. U2-Net: Going deeper with nested U-structure for salient object detection[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2020, 106: 107404. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107404.
    [37]
    DAI Jifeng, QI Haozhi, XIONG Yuwen, et al. Deformable convolutional networks[C]. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 2017: 764–773. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.89.
    [38]
    CHEN Hao, DOU Qi, YU Lequan, et al. VoxResNet: Deep voxelwise residual networks for brain segmentation from 3D MR images[J]. NeuroImage, 2018, 170: 446–455. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.041.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views(70) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint